Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 24th August 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Glorious diversity of our mongrel nation



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

HE WAS born 11 minutes into the New Year weighing 8lb 7oz, after a seven-hour labour at St John's Hospital in Livingston. Muhammad Akram was the first baby to be born in Scotland in 2008, to the delight of mum Sumraina, 28, and dad Anwar, 32.
The fact that their son was the first new Scot of the year filled the parents with pride. "It is a great honour," said Sumraina.

Elsewhere in Scotland the first baby born in Edinburgh was to a Chinese couple. Wei Ping Wang, 36, and her husband Zh
iyu, 39, named their first child Christina. Aberdeen's first arrival was a 6lb 5oz girl for Mahintha and Vettivelu Srimayooran. The baby has yet to be named – the couple want to follow Sri Lankan tradition and first consult her astrological chart.

I found it immensely heartening last week when these new arrivals were highlighted in the Daily Record, not with a tut or a scowl or a sigh, but with the headline: "They're all Jock Tamson's bairns." A leader column noted: "We should be honoured that these people have chosen to call Scotland their home."

My sons' friends illustrate how racially diverse Scotland has become in recent years. Elder son's best pal is half-Nigerian; younger son's best buddies are half-Romanian and half-Turkish. Their other friends have roots in Thailand, Ghana, France and Egypt. It's a pattern repeated across the country: half-this, half-that – and wholly Scots.

For me, there are two primary definitions of what makes a Scot, each carrying equal weight. The first, obviously, is someone born in Scotland, regardless of parentage. The second is someone who has chosen to make a life here. These, I stress, have equal weight and worth. Each, equally, is a citizen of Scotland. If you can trace your lineage back to King Kenneth MacAlpin in the ninth century, with absolutely no paddling outside the gene pool since, it makes you no more a Scot than little Muhammad Akram.

Some people don't see it this way. When my fellow columnist Hardeep Singh Kohli, a Glasgow-born Sikh, wrote recently of his pride in his Scottishness, some contributors to our website posted comments along the lines that "if a dog is born in a stable it doesn't make it a horse". The idea of Hardeep being Scottish is offensive to some people. How dare he love the place of his birth, the place where he grew up, the place where he bought his first garish fuchsia-coloured corduroy suit?

If this narrow view was only held by a small minority it might be less of a worry. But last month the latest Scottish Social Attitudes Survey revealed our growing intolerance as a nation. Half of those interviewed said Scotland would "lose its identity" if more Muslims came to live here, up from 38% in 2003. Almost 30% said it was sometimes all right to discriminate against incomers.

This shouldn't have come as a complete surprise. When Jack McConnell was First Minister and introduced his Fresh Talent scheme to encourage new immigrants to Scotland – a move essential to the country's future economic prosperity – he was astonished at the reaction. The First Ministerial postbag and e-mail in-box instantly filled up with bile, and Labour canvassers reported widespread opposition on the doorsteps. To his great credit, McConnell pressed ahead regardless.

The view of Scots as a race, often propagated by people of Scots ancestry abroad, must be resisted. I once went to a St Andrew's Day ball in Portland, Oregon, where I spoke to young SNP supporters who had embraced their Scottish lineage with passion. But they saw it as a means of asserting a distinctiveness that was racial, not cultural. For them, being Scottish was a retreat from America's racial melting pot. Thankfully the SNP here at home is far more enlightened.

Those who warn of Scottish identity being "diluted" by immigration are simply showing their ignorance. There is no single strand of Scottish DNA. The country's strength lies in the diversity of its component parts, and this has always been the case. Even from earliest times the Scottish nation has been a combination of ethnicities and cultures – Pictish, Norse, Gaelic and Anglo, each contributing to the whole. The more recent grafts of Irish, Asian, English and Polish incomers are simply the latest manifestation.

It is neither possible nor desirable to resist these changes. The trick is to ensure two things: first, that New Scots have confidence to celebrate their cultural antecedents as they see fit; second, that they feel similarly confident that they belong in the mainstream of Scottish life, fully part of the nation they now call home.

Similarly, anyone complaining of a Scottish culture "under threat" betrays both their misunderstanding of that culture and a misplaced lack of confidence in its vitality and strength. Our culture is strewn with immigrants and their offspring, from sculptor Sir Eduardo Paolozzi (the son of Italian immigrants) to poet Jackie Kay (daughter of a Scots mother and Nigerian father) to pop stars Franz Ferdinand (three of whose four members were born in England, including singer Alex Kapranos, who was last week pictured in newspapers wearing a rather nice vintage Scotland international football jersey).

I can't think of a better national new year resolution than zero tolerance of racial intolerance. In William McIlvanney's magnificent phrase, we're "a mongrel nation", and all the better for it.



The full article contains 911 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 January 2008 7:08 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Kenny Farquharson
 
1

famous 15,

Edinburgh 06/01/2008 00:56:12
Or culture is not under threat from the mongrel composition but from those who would deny Scotland the social cohesiveness of any self respecting nation of a self belief. Peoples of Scotland love your nation as every other self respecting nation does and join the adult world. You have nothing to lose but the clowns on your shoulders. (the unionists)
2

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 06/01/2008 01:09:09
The first child born in Scotland was a Scottish child of Asian ancestry. The first child born in Edinburgh was a Scottish child of Chinese ancestry. The first child born in Aberdeen was a Scottish child of Sri Lankan ancestry.

The common theme here is that they are all Scottish children regardles of their families ancestry. Your story while trying to appear aware of this fails when it calls the children Chinese, Asian or Sri Lankan. They are not Chinese. They are not Asian. They are not Sri Lankan. They are Scots.

Proud additions to our wonderful family and to our proud nation.
3

Spotter,

06/01/2008 01:11:09
kenny, alf young etc many of these commentaors are now like beached whales in Scotland .. the DNA of thinking has changed in Scotland but these guys are still writing the guff they wrote in the 1980s
4

nabodican,

Portree 06/01/2008 02:47:40
Born in Scotland - yes. Scottish - No otherwise Jock Tamson has a lot to answer for.
5

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 06/01/2008 06:53:38
Kenny and doonhamer,pretentious preachers?
6

govanite,

glasgow 06/01/2008 07:46:54
The more people that embrace Scotland and Scottish identity the better.
7

Covert Action,

06/01/2008 08:24:49
"If you can trace your lineage back to King Kenneth MacAlpin in the ninth century, with absolutely no paddling outside the gene pool since, it makes you no more a Scot than little Muhammad Akram."

Quite possibly the most insulting and moronic comment I have ever read in this newspaper. I read this happy-clappy drivel and it makes me want to throw up.
8

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/01/2008 10:36:02
Of course we're a mongrel nation. Anyone who disagrees -I'd like to know what factory you were built in.
The biggest threat to Scottish culture and identity isn't from outsiders but from those natives who'd demean and dismiss Scottish culture. For example we get the usual Lowland bigots moaning when the subject of Gaelic is brought. Obviously Scottish culture is of low importance to them.

Then the girning from the teaching fraternity at the likelihood of Scottish history becoming compulsory at schools. This partly explained by the fact they themselves were taught precious little on the subject. This state of affairs was going to continue under the previous Holyrood administration with "Henry Ford" Peacock downgarding the subject of history.
And of course there's the "nationalist shibboleth" squad of the Labour Party, who find the increase in "Scottishness" anathema to them.

9

Andrew Scalloway,

Stirling 06/01/2008 12:06:46
nabodican ethnic nationalist loony..go and stand in the corner.
10

Hugo of Garven,

06/01/2008 12:28:42
Of course we're a mongrel nation. I would be very surprised to find anyone who seriously argues otherwise.

In the last Ice Age there was no-one living in Scotland. As the ice receded people moved in.

Thus we should remember that we are ALL immigrants, even though some are more recent than others.
11

govanite,

glasgow 06/01/2008 13:46:15
#11
There is no difference if someone comes to Scotland from some part of the UK or from China say. They are all incomers and hopefully will integrate in Scottish society. Whatever identity they have, whether English, Welsh, Irish or Chinese the same principle applies.
12

govanite,

glasgow 06/01/2008 14:16:45
#13

Don't put words in my mouth.

I'm not suggesting anybody should be 'required' to undertake anything. It's up to them as to how they feel. A Welshman will feel Welsh as a Chinese will feel Chinese. Hopefully they will feel something for Scotland too. Scotland is after all a different place from all the territories you name, as you suggest: 'Let’s reverse the scenario. Imagine if you moved to somewhere in England and were told that you were now English'

13

EWB,

UK 06/01/2008 15:10:01
Since 1983, British citizenship according to the British Nationality Act has not been defined by place of birth.

You are British if you have one parent who is British by birth or if your parents have been living in the UK for five years and have a right of residence here.

In other words, the old principle of jus solis (the law of the land, i.e. according to your birthplace) has been replaced by jus sanguinis (the law of the blood, i.e. according to your parents or, in the past, your father). In the case of Irish citizenship, if one has an Irish grandparent, one qualifies for Irish citizenship.

This perhaps explains why Gary McAllister and Sandy Lyle can be considered Scots, or also the late Queen Mother. However, Air Chief Marshall Dowding (Battle of Britain) happened to be born in Scotland and probably would not have considered himself to be a Scot. And what of Manchester-born Lloyd George? Was he the Welsh Wizard?

Interesting, therefore, and perhaps this will chime with the writer of this article, that the SNP (when or if it realises its goal of an independent Scotland) will automatically grant Scottish citizenship to everyone born in Scotland (that includes Tony Blair!) or living there (e.g. the 500,000 English-born residents) on Independence Day.

By contrast, those with at least one Scottish-born parent who are born outwith Scotland can apply for citizenship but are not automatically Scots.

In the case of those who feel that their parents' citizenship is more of a determinant of their own nationality rather than their place of birth, then the SNP will have to allow dual nationality. Remember: some countries do not allow dual citizenship, e.g. Denmark, India, Trinidad.
14

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 06/01/2008 16:41:26
Once again we enter the debate about who is Scottish? The laws are invoked and debated ad naseum.

Scots are residents of Scotland, regardless of their DNA composition or family ancestry.

Scottish is a designation indicating a cultural connection to the country of Scotland. Historically, it has been taken as representative of those cultures resident in prior generations.

As Scotland, the country, evolves and attracts a more diverse population, the definition of Scottish will evolve.

However, the definition of Scots remains.
15

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 06/01/2008 16:47:31
If I moved to England with no intent to ever return to Scotland, I would indeed be making the decision to be seen as English, as defined as a resident of England.

I retain my Scottish heritage and may even retain and celebrate my family's historic cultural ancestry, but I would no longer be a Scot.

The test is whether I have any intent to return to Scotland. This is the test given to those who have emigrated to Australia, New Zealand, South Africa etc.

They retain their cultural heritage but are now Australians, etc.

AM2 may or may not have a different cultural or historic ancestry than I, but as we are both residents of Scotland, I would consider us Scots. He would argue that he is a Brit, but as that designation refers to a political entity not a country, he is mistaken.
16

EWB,

UK 06/01/2008 18:21:52
When the forms for the 1991 census were drawn up, APD #18, the one for England, which was completed before the Scottish one, simply had the label "British" on it for "Nationality". The Scottish census form, as you will know, allowed British people to sub-define themselves as Scottish, English, Welsh or Irish (but not Northern Irish).

Many people in England entered "English" under "Other" and refused to tick "British". This has been one of the consequences of devolution.

The 2011 census form for England will have the choice between British and the various UK territorial labels under Nationality.

What, according to what you have written above, will you tick if you have moved to England before 2011? Logically you would have to put Scottish under "Country of birth" and "English" under Nationality, wouldn't you?

As for a Scot going to live in Australia, if (s)he, after living there for four years, declined to take Australian citizenship, which the 2007 Australian Citizenship Act allows, then he would not be an Australian despite what you argue.

Equally, when a child born of foreign parents in the UK and eligible for two citizenships declares that he considers himself more attached to his parents' citizenship than to British citizenship, then would you consider that he should return to their country? Perhaps this is an extension of the Tebbitt test.

17

John Blackley,

Austin, TX 06/01/2008 18:29:47
No comment on the author's assertions except he seems to - like many others - confuse nationality with ethnicity.

While it is nice, warm and fuzzy to offer a good Scottish welcome to immigrants from other nations, please look to the large cities in England to get a preview of how Scottish cities might look in twenty years' time.
18

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 06/01/2008 18:58:48
Attitudes have certainly changed since the first Chinese baby born in Perth was called Robert Bruce Fong. That was the 60's.

19

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/01/2008 19:03:57
13 - well they aint Scottish !
20

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/01/2008 19:03:58
13 - well they aint Scottish !
21

govanite,

glasgow 06/01/2008 19:42:45
#15

I've no idea about your fictional new arrival from Carlisle. I guess they would see themself as English, an old and strong identity as anyone who has been there can testify. I myself am a Scot (another strong identity, just like the Irish or Welsh, French or German) and my day to day life experience tells me that most people in this country also see themselves as Scots. It's open to each of us to accept or reject that as an identity. Most people here accept it. Its existence can be denigrated or disavowed but never disputed.
22

Covert Action,

06/01/2008 19:51:36
Still, good to see that the Akram family entered into the celebration of Scotland's cultural nirvana by giving their new "laddie" a traditional Scottish name, er, Mohammed.
23

govanite,

glasgow 06/01/2008 21:38:33
#26

In answer to your question, as I said before, I've no idea what sort of integration they might wish to undergo, it's up to them. But you will understand I hope that there are different cultural reference points either side of the border.

Anyway, you seem to have several battles to fight, so goodnight.
24

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/01/2008 22:15:27
22 - the significance is that they're no' Scottish - doh !
25

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/01/2008 22:17:37
The retreat from the North British mentality goes on.
26

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/01/2008 22:19:22
B*gger it I'm off to watch Gladiator.
The Romans wot did they do for us Scots ?
Scorched earth and attempted genocide that's wot they did for us !
27

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 06/01/2008 22:20:26
25

Are you called Mungo, or Hamish, or Fergus or Donal?

Or do you have an ANGLACIZED or CHRISTIAN NAME brought to our shores by FOREIGNERS?
28

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 06/01/2008 22:22:49
28

My comments referred to those who emigrated to another country permanently. Please refrain from cutting and pasting my comments in part. Leave that effort for the articles and reports that you misquote and misrepresent.
29

Radge,

Aberdeen 07/01/2008 00:14:22
#18 Assuming you are Scottish you're lying and you know you are.

Don't insult our intelligence by trying to pretend you would think yourself English by changing your postcode.

What exactly does "no intent to ever return" mean?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.