Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 29th June 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Iran vows to continue expanding nuclear programme



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 April 2008
IRAN said yesterday that it would press ahead with plans to expand its nuclear programme, after diplomats in Vienna said Tehran was installing advanced centrifuges at its key uranium enrichment plant.
Government spokesman Gholam-Hossein Elham also rejected any idea of halting work which the United States believes is aimed at building nuclear bombs in return for trade, technology and other benefits.

Speaking a few days before the Islamic Repub
lic's annual National Nuclear Technology Day on April 8, Elham said he hoped for "good news" on that day but did not elaborate. The world's fourth-largest oil producer says it needs to produce nuclear fuel for a planned network of power plants to satisfy soaring electricity demand.

"The trend of advancing nuclear capacity until reaching the production of nuclear fuel and building nuclear power plants to produce 20,000 megawatts of electricity will continue," Elham said.

On Thursday, diplomats told Reuters that Iran has begun installing advanced uranium enrichment centrifuges in its Natanz enrichment complex, accelerating activity that could give it the means to make atom bombs in future if it chose to.

Iran has been hit with three sets of United Nations sanctions for hiding the programme until 2003, failing to prove to inspectors since then that it is wholly peaceful and refusing to suspend the disputed programme.

Enriched uranium can be used as fuel in nuclear power plants or, if refined much further, provide material for weapons. After a pause of several months, Iran has now assembled more than 300 centrifuges, the diplomats said.

The Washington Times reported last month that the five permanent members of the UN Security Council were preparing a package of incentives for Tehran if it stops its programme.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has rejected the reported package of incentives, Japan's Kyodo news agency quoted him as saying in an interview published on Friday. Elham said: "This (nuclear technology] is our obvious right and we do not exchange our rights for things like incentives."

Ahmadinejad has also said Iran would only discuss its nuclear programme with the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), rejecting a call by world powers to hold more talks with European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana.

"We do not accept replacing the IAEA... in the framework of negotiations," Elham said.

Iran's recommencement of its nuclear programme is the second such threat to global peace within a week. US and North Korean nuclear negotiators are already scheduled to meet next week to try to break a deadlock in disarmament talks over how the North will account for its nuclear past.

Assistant US Secretary of State Christopher Hill will hold talks with his North Korean counterpart, Kim Kye Gwan, on Tuesday in Singapore. Hill will then travel to Beijing to report on the talks. China, an ally of the communist North, has been the host of stalled six-nation disarmament talks.

North Korea missed a December 31 2007 deadline to produce a nuclear inventory and full disclosure of its proliferation activities. While other work to disable a nuclear reactor has continued, the delayed document has soured the atmosphere of talks meant to shutter North Korea's nuclear weapons programme and improve the nation's standing in the world.



The full article contains 542 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Ben More,

Edinburgh 06/04/2008 00:35:07
This is not good news.

Enough with the carrots (read, incentives) and sweet talk. Iran is due an ultimatum.
2

Carolyn 1,

06/04/2008 14:14:31
The Point of No Return
IMHO, I wasn't expecting it for another few months... but is it here sooner??

Israel intelligence stated that Iran would have the enrichment cycle completed by the end of March. Sharon ordered the military to be ready by the end of March for possible strikes on the secret uranium enrichment sites in Iran.

(There seems to be no if or but in reference to the 'secret' sites.)

- is Israel bluffing, or do they have the sites???

"Aharon Zeevi Farkash warned Israel's Knesset,
A quote: "if by the end of March the international community is unable to refer the Iranian issue to the United Nations security council, then we can say the international effort has run its course."

Iran has been getting ready for the Israeli strike it knows is coming- Iran controls Hezbollah, has a cache of long-range missiles with chemical warheads, it has the capacity to strike US Naval targets which, if it does, will start a war, ..

Israel, the IDF has only the ability for one stsrike, if it fails, everything is lost. Therefore, is the US cooperating, and Israel will take the blame???
Quote:
"this may be a large and sustained allied attack, with Israel taking the public blame or credit. US Navy and Special Forces may be involved. US cruise missiles may be hard to distinguish from Israeli ones, and stealth aircraft can perform night missions undetected."

IMHO, this is why the Americans are in Iraq.

Another point: if Israel proves the 'point of no return' they will have to strike before the US elections. The democrats, Obama especially, may not provide Israel the support it needs; he certainly doesn't not have the experience.

If you don't understand the- Point of No Return
By definition, that is the 'point' by which Iran has enriched uranium, and it then only has to push it through five more times for a warhead. It already has the missiles; when it can arm these missiles there will be no turning back time- the Arabs will have what they need t
3

Carolyn 1,

06/04/2008 14:16:14
Last sentence:
Iran will have what it needs to 'erase' Israel, and will therefore control the world, THEIR way. The Point of No Return.

4

Siroos,

UK 06/04/2008 18:18:29
The sooner the appeasers and the usual Peace protesters wake up the better, or else, every one must pay the price.
5

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 08/04/2008 00:48:59
#3

"Iran will have what it needs to 'erase' Israel, and will therefore control the world"

....Rubbish. If Iran does develop a nuclear bomb they will at least have a deterrent to Israel attacking them.

There's no better way of keeping the peace than Mutually Assured Destrucion.
6

57Nomad,

california 08/04/2008 19:33:39
#5

They will have a deterrent to being attacked by Israel? Why do they need a deterrent to being attacked by Israel?
What would Israel gain? Get real, sloopy. The Iranian nukes are for on reason and that is to destroy Israel. If Israel wanted to attack Iran they would have already done so.
7

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 10/04/2008 06:52:29
#6 57Nomad

You are so naive. Iran knows full well that if it were to attack Israel with nukes it would be wiped out.

"Why do they need a deterrent to being attacked by Israel?"

....That must be the most stupid question on this entire web site.

Mutually assured destruction, given the mindsets of both these entities, is the safest option.


8

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 10/04/2008 06:56:16
#6 57Nomad

"If Israel wanted to attack Iran they would have already done so".

....Israel is itching to attack Iran. The reason they haven't done so is because even a non-nuclear Iran could give Israel a pounding.


Mutually assured destruction, given the mindsets of both these entities, is the safest option.

9

57Nomad,

california 08/05/2008 20:44:29
#8 Lhtt

First of all, thank you for removing the gratuitous insult. All of us, myself included, have these impulses. The edited post is appreciated.

You state that even a non-nuclear Iran could beat up on Israel. What leads you to believe that? When I asked why Israel would want to attack Iran, I was not being facetious. Why would it be to Israels advantage? Mutually assured destruction is certainly not the answer to the tensions in the region. You are arguing for more, not less, nukes. This puts you at odds with the great majority of people.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.