Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Iran still a serious threat, warns Gates



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 December 2007
IRAN poses a threat to the United States and the Middle East despite a US intelligence assessment that Tehran halted its nuclear weapons programme in 2003, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates said yesterday.
In a speech to the Manama Dialogue security conference in Bahrain, the Pentagon chief argued Iran still had the capability to restart its weapons programme and continued to enrich uranium, an essential part of atomic weapons development.

He also
accused Iran of actively supporting insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as Islamist groups Hezbollah and Hamas, and said its missile programme poses a wider threat throughout the region.

"Everywhere you turn, it is the policy of Iran to foment instability and chaos, no matter the strategic value or cost in the blood of innocents - Christians, Jews and Muslims alike," Gates said.

"There can be little doubt that their destabilising foreign policies are a threat to the interests of the United States, to the interests of every country in the Middle East and to the interests of all countries within the range of the ballistic missiles Iran is developing."

Gates also argued that the recent US National Intelligence Estimate on Iran's nuclear programme did not rule out Tehran restarting its pursuit of atomic weapons. Iran says its nuclear programme has only peaceful civilian aims.

"The Estimate is explicit that Iran is keeping its options open and could restart its nuclear weapons programme at any time - I would add, if it has not done so already," the former CIA director told the conference.

"Although the Estimate does not say so, there are no impediments to Iran's restarting its nuclear weapons programme - none, that is, but the international community."

Gates urged Iran's neighbours to cooperate more closely in their defence activities to counter Tehran's policies and specifically consider a joint early warning system to detect missile launches. That, he said, could deter Iran from pursuing development of such weapons.

Iran cancelled its appearance at the conference.

Gates's comments follow a visit to US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, where commanders told him Iran continues to support insurgents.

Iran denies US charges that it has armed, trained and funded Shi'ite militias in Iraq, blaming the violence in Iraq on the US-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Gates's remarks also come as the US military assesses Iran's ability to disrupt oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a route for around 40% of all globally traded oil.



The full article contains 416 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 December 2007 12:26 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Iran
 
1

,

09/12/2007 01:39:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1214619, Article id was mapped to record!
2

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 09/12/2007 03:30:49

note to big Tex of Arkansas:

before we attacked Iraq in 2003 they were selling us oil quite freely. and the costs we've expended on this war make the oil fantastically expensive if you think that the war expenditures are for the oil.

there's been massive consolidation of ownership in the oil industry the last 30 years. There used to be many smaller independent oil companies capable of producing. Now there are not, and they all pretend that supply is very limited. When in reality it is not at all.

3

brian mcc,

the arctic 09/12/2007 04:57:21

I thought the topic was 'Iran still a threat, Gates.' Guess he didn't like the NIE. Israel still bangs the drum...another 300 housing units in East Jerusalem. And all this after Annapolis.

4

bill2,

09/12/2007 08:33:40

"IRAN poses a threat to the United States and the Middle East despite a US intelligence assessment that Tehran halted its nuclear weapons programme in 2003"

Let's rewrite that.

The United States still poses a threat to Iran and the Middle East despite a US intelligence assessment that Tehran halted its nuclear weapons programme in 2003.

5

bill2,

09/12/2007 08:46:42

2. Wally

Thank you for your shrewd observations.

The world price of oil has escalated massively during the Bush/Blair years, and the major beneficiaries are the new seven sisters.

1. Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia), formerly Aramco
2. JSC Gazprom (Russia)
3. CNPC (China)
4. NIOC (Iran)
5. PDVSA (Venezuela)
6. Petrobras (Brazil)
7. Petronas (Malaysia)

They will not rock the boat, or bite the hand that feeds them.

6

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 09/12/2007 19:52:24

following up on both the article & what big Tex said in #1:

The US would be a big threat to Iran if it were to decide to develop domestic energy sources and not import. That would ruin the world-wide market for oil that Iran so much enjoys. But the US is ruled by a clique that will not do that and its people are too fat stupid and lazy to do anything about it.

In Alaska there is a massive amount of oil in the ground unexploited. I read of one fellow who was employed up there and remembers when it was first discovered and the news that Alaska had as much oil as Saudi Arabia. Then the next day the same engineers who gave this news said they were under orders now not to speak of it. and much contrary info came out saying that there was only a small amount of oil in Alaska.

And so it goes, there are many similar examples around the world. From the oil industry itself there is info demonstrating that the oil industry is only pretending that there is an oil shortage and that in reality there is much of it, and it is kept quiet.

Industry reports have stated in the last few years that both Afghanistan & Somalia have lots of oil. But it is unexploited. and both countries have new governments installed by the empire.

the way things work only certain countries are allowed to produce oil so that the price will be kept high, and those certain countries allowed will make secret corrupt deals with the oil companies so that the profits are diverted to those companies and away from the peoples of those nations.

If you study the oil industry carefully, then this is what you'll find.

It is sad to see jingoistic and ignorant comments like in #1 because they are ridiculous comments on their face. he asserted that we fight these wars for oil, when in reality if you add onto the price of a barrel of oil the cost for fighting these wars, then oil would be priced at over $300/barrel now.

7

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 09/12/2007 20:04:44

the pro-war zealots speak of patriotism, but have no concern whatsoever for the welfare of our troops who fight these wars. here is a song by Billy Joel that is sympathetic to our troops and their plight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an7v6I2Bruo

all for a few dollars they become the dogs of war. they themselves know it is wrong, but this is how they support their families. The clique that rules America has arranged policies so that the domestic economy has gone very sour compared to what it was in the early 1970's from the point of view of ordinary people in our nation trying to earn a living.

as one poster on another thread on this Scotsman board said America has become a slave nation. In reality its people are enslaved as they're ruled by an evil clique hostile to the American nation. That is why I use the theme of Babylon in my location field. This theme Babylon is a biblical concept and is expressed in Psalm 137. Here's a bible verse.

"Psalm 137:4 How shall we sing the LORD'S song in a strange land?"

The meaning is that while our nation is occupied by these strange evil forces that rule us today we cannot produce the same fruit that we once did. When Jesus returns the situation will change. and if you'll read the rest of Psalm 137 you'll see that whatever destruction comes our way during this era as Babylon rules here we are content to stay & wait for.

we take seriously the warning in Proverbs that we should not fear the one who can merely kill us, but instead the one who can kill us and send us to hell.

8

Biker,

Ayr 09/12/2007 20:26:29

Thank you wally and bill2. Voices of reason.

9

Rosie O'Donnell,

NY 10/12/2007 00:24:25

8. Biker, Ayr

You should be a comedian!!!!!

10

Lynne,

USA 10/12/2007 16:23:36

The voices of reason they are not...the voices of hatred is what they are.

11

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 11/12/2007 00:36:38

# 10

From your comments I believe you have hate in your heart toward Iranians. That would make you no better than those you hate.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.