Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Polls 'need independent monitor'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 October 2007
ELECTIONS in Scotland should be overseen by an independent official as part of a bid to restore public confidence in the ballot box, former Scottish Secretary Douglas Alexander said today.
Writing in Scotland on Sunday, he said overall responsibility for administering elections should be taken away from politicians and given to a new Chief Returning Officer.

Alexander, who has been partly blamed for May's election chaos, said no po
litician should be in the same position as he was at the time of the poll, effectively ruling over the style and operation of the vote.

Last week, an official report into the May fiasco, written by independent expert Ron Gould, concluded that voters had been "treated as an afterthought" by politicians.

He singled out ministers for criticism, only to state later last week that he included all politicians in his comments.

In his article, Alexander, now International Development Secretary, said he accepts Gould's recommendation that a new Chief Returning Officer should be created in Scotland, with overall responsibility for administering the election.

He writes: "Not least so that no future Scottish secretary or other elected politician finds himself in the position I was in, I believe immediate and serious consideration should be given to creating a Chief Returning Officer to Scotland."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 October 2007 5:43 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Holyrood Elections
 
1

Sierra Foothills Scot,

28/10/2007 02:01:09

Not a bad idea -- provided the Chief Returning Officer is not appointed by Westminster.

2

An Beal Bacht,

Travelling in Nihlon 28/10/2007 04:33:47

Correct Sierra. Who will appoint the Chief Returning Officer? Whose man (or woman) will he be? Scotland's or Westminister's? Maybe Doogie thinks this would be a good job for Wendy.

I think I've heard enough from this wee man. Let the Scottish parliament decide; our elected leaders not a Broon place man.

3

Mercutio,

Falkirk 28/10/2007 06:02:14

Banana republic springs to mind.

4

Guga II,

Rockall 28/10/2007 07:52:22

The Scottish elections should be organised, supervised and run by the Scottish parliament, on behalf of the Scottish people. The colonial government in Westminster should not be involved, in any way.

5

A Better Way,

28/10/2007 10:55:35

You know Mercutio that is one of the most honest post I have seen by a Unionist, so well done son.

He is right we should never have that monkey skidding on his own banana skin again. He should be sacked by the Scottish People at the next Election along with Brown, Darling, Cairns and Des Browne. Once they are thrown out Scotland should barr them all from holding political office again. They are sleazy, corrupt, dangerous threats to democracy this country has seen since Blair and Thatcher.

6

Mallory,

28/10/2007 15:16:21

Agreed - and how about a literacy test for voters?

7

'Suck' - McCrunchie,

the eighth 28/10/2007 19:39:21

We need to be able to vote online.

Virtually every other service has an online option.

Its also unlikely with the ability to try it live, that it could be messed us as the embarrassing fiasco we just suffered that made us look like a banana republic.

Its worth mentioning that if an online voting option was given, all polling booths could be computer based, and would make it impossible to unintentionally spoil a paper. There would obviously even be a need to have a "spoiled paper/protest vote" option.

It would also mean the votes would not require to be physically moved to be counted. People could not destroy other's votes with golf clubs. Money would be saved on counters, delivery staff etc. There would be a more accurate result, with only postal votes requiring to be counted manually. Faster results. Fewer people driving to vote and driving to deliver and count votes.

It could also be verified later, with results being stored in media like a memory pen, to enable confirmation of the details sent encrypted over the internet or GPRS etc. Alternately, if the need was felt, they could produce hard copies to be checked as a recount.

We all know its going to happen in the future, and if Estonia can already manage it for the Riigikogu, can we not at least equal their insight?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.