Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Patients group attacks doctors' 4% pay claim

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 October 2008
DOCTORS' leaders have demanded a 4% pay rise that would see some senior medics earn almost £103,000 a year.


The British Medical Association has urged the Government to consider the deal, despite the economic crisis.

The BMA has asked for a 4% increase for GPs and consultants as well as a rise of almost 6% for junior doctors, to compensate them f
or losing their right to free hospital accommodation. The move, if accepted, would see GPs earn more than £93,000 a year and give junior doctors a starting salary of about £23,151.

But it has placed doctors on a collision course with the government as Prime Minister Gordon Brown has signalled that public sector pay rises will be restricted to about 2.25%.

It has also sparked anger from patients' groups after GPs were given a 20% pay increase three years ago and had their out-of-hours obligations scrapped. They have not received a pay rise since then.

The BMA has submitted the request to the Doctors and Dentists Review Body, which examines the case for doctors' pay and makes a recommendation to the Government. A committee representing NHS employers has requested that the pay rise for NHS staff is restricted to 2%.

Dr Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the BMA council, said a pay rise of "at least" 4% was "appropriate and affordable". He added: "Determining a fair pay award will be no easy task this year with the economy in an unstable and unpredictable state. We recognise this and have submitted a responsible request for pay increases.

"Last year's below inflationary rises have failed to keep pace with the increase in the cost of living. Moreover … the loss of free accommodation for junior doctors also amounted to a pay reduction."

Nurses were last year awarded just over 2% in a three-year deal. They, too, may return to the negotiating table because of the problems with the economy. Last night the Royal College of Nursing would not comment on the doctors' demands.

But Margaret Watt, of the Scotland Patients' Association, said: "Pensioners and low-paid people have the same problems with the credit crunch. Why should doctors be entitled to a pay rise when pensioners will have great difficulty heating their houses and feeding themselves?"





The full article contains 387 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 October 2008 6:50 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

The real dracula,

26/10/2008 01:24:36
Now hang on a moment patients groups 4% is not much above the rate of inflation , its hardly a big pay rise.

Neither is it Dr's fault that pensioners get a raw deal.

They have a great deal of responsibility esp in life or death emergencies . Why shouldnt their pay reflect this . Company directors , sportsmen and woman , actors get far more than this ,,,,,for what.

If you look in the BMJ the advertisements for consultants in whatever field salries in the main start at £70 0000 . You think that matches the responsibility they take on.
I would guess some plumbers and taxi drivers earn more.

Dr's earn way more than me but Im not jealous or vindictive. The rate of pay should reflect the responsibility.

Would you pay £70,000 to have your life saved ,,,, I would.
2

fife runner,

26/10/2008 07:26:44
issue here is me havig to wait nearly two weeks for GP appoinment due to the shorter hours they now work. Two 3 day weekends in the past 4 weeks at my surgery did not help either. If they offer more hours for the extra perhaps they deserve it but they now work less hours.
3

fife runner,

26/10/2008 07:27:47
even GPs could not beleive their luck when they got the new contracts 3 years ago.
4

fife runner,

26/10/2008 07:29:19
and my wait is not to see a named doctor or a certain time of day
5

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 26/10/2008 09:19:36
There will be precious little sympathy for an already pampered group of professionals getting 4% when the rest in the public sector are making do with 2.2% and in the private sector people are either losing jobs or voluntarily taking PAY CUTS.

This claim must be resisted. Since the 20% increase GPs work less and complain more when asked to do so to satisfy the reasonable needs of their patients. We are also saddled with the expense of NHS24 and its oft-reported problems.
6

Goody2Shoes,

EDINBURGH 03/11/2008 15:36:55
GP's being paid £93-103K per year and Health Care Assistants are paid Band 2, top salary £15500.Pay more to the bottom and less to the top and work shifts in the GP Practices so that there are more happy patients and staff. More competition between the Practices might mean better Practices and health care.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should the Western General ditch its fresh-cooked meals to make more room?
Yes, it’s cheaper to bring in food from elsewhere
No, patients need decent food to help them get better
Maybe, it depends what they make room for

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.