Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Autism link to firstborn of older parents

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 October 2008
FIRSTBORN children of older parents have three times as much chance of being diagnosed with autism than later born children of younger parents, new research has revealed.
A study of 240,000 teenagers carried out by researchers in the US has found a strong link between the likelihood of developing the condition and a higher age of parents.

Mothers aged 35 and over were cited as having a 30% higher risk of having an
autistic child than mothers in their twenties, while for fathers in their forties and over the risk was estimated to be even greater at around 40% higher when compared with fathers aged under 30.

The study also suggested that later born children were less likely to be afflicted with autistic disorders than firstborn offspring.

The research team behind the study has claimed their work provides "the most compelling evidence to date that autism risk increases with both maternal and paternal age, and decreases with birth order".

The study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, has been hailed as a possible explanation for the apparent increase in incidence of the condition in the western world, where social trends mean increasing numbers of couples put off having children until later in life, and tend to opt for smaller families – meaning a higher proportion of babies are firstborn or only children.

There is no clue to suggest why parental age should increase the risk of a child being autistic, but the authors suggest the sperm of older fathers could be more likely to pass on genetic mutations, while older mothers might be more susceptible to chromosome alterations. Another theory suggests that older parents may be more likely to spot developmental difficulties in their children, and therefore more likely to seek help and a formal diagnosis.

Firstborn children are also more prone to suffer from other childhood disorders, including type I diabetes. One theory to explain the phenomenon is the "hygiene hypothesis", which suggests that first-time parents are more protective and expose their children to fewer infections in early childhood, making them likely to develop autoimmune diseases.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 October 2008 10:55 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

John Stone,

London 26/10/2008 07:15:00
This is not an explanation for the increase in autism: it might help to explain a very small increase over many years, but not a large increase over a few. If anybody is trying to explain away the increase in autism on the back of this then you have to question their motives.

Did the entire population of the UK suddenly start having babies 10 years later in the late 1980s?
2

John Stone,

London 26/10/2008 08:19:33
'The average age of mothers at childbirth has increased by just over two years since 1971 when it was 26.6 years. In 2002 the average age for first births was 26.7 years, three years older than in 1971.'

Average age of mother: by birth order: Social Trends 34

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=7273
3

fife runner,

26/10/2008 10:13:33
on the whole women are having kids at an older age. This may a cause of more autism and not the MMR. Will they believe this research as much as they did the flawed work of Dr Wakefield? I think not.
4

fife runner,

26/10/2008 10:14:35
Japan stopped the MMR at the early 90's and still saw a rise in autism. Perhaps the cause is older mums.
5

John Stone,

London 26/10/2008 10:49:46
fife runner

Wakefield suggested caution about the simultaneous application of different vaccines (splitting them up). MMR uptake collapsed in Japan, and was replaced Measles+Rubella given together, while Japanese Encephalitis was also added to the schedule. The Japanese experience does not disprove a link between multiple vaccination and autism, or the Wakefield hypothesis.

I have just produced statistics showing that the average age of childbirth in the UK only went up by two years over a period of three decades. This would have a barely peceptable affect on the rate of autism on its own.
6

Autism Rights,

Ayrshire 26/10/2008 10:54:13
It is widely acknowledged that there is more than one cause of Autistic Spectrum Disorders. As a spectrum disorder, this is entirely credible.

What is not credible is to keep - very obviously - trying to find single causes that conspicuously avoid any link with any environmental cause, when the consistent scientific opinion emanating from independent and respectable scientists is that ASD is caused by the interaction of inherited and environmental factors.

The failure of the media to understand, let alone to express, the difference between genetics and epigenetics is resulting in articles which give credence to research that is self-evidently scientifically and intellectually fraudulent.

Note that no-one has made any link to a previous observation that the age of both parents may be a factor in the health of their children because their bodies will have built up a higher reserve of environmental toxins than younger parents.
7

Autism Rights,

Ayrshire 26/10/2008 10:58:03
Note that the recommendations of the World Health Organisation's report `Principles for Evaluating Health Risks in Children Associated with Exposure to Chemicals` identified areas for further research, notably to:-
` - identify subpopulations with the highest exposure levels
- develop validated, sensitive and cost effective biomarkers of exposure, susceptibility, and effects, particularly during early development stages.`

Given that there is a body of research revealing that children with ASD have significantly raised levels of heavy metals in their bodies and that their ability to excrete these metals are impaired, there is a clear basis for further research, with a view to prevention and treatment of this disability. That is certainly the view of the Learning and Developmental Disabilities Initiative (LDDI) Scientific Consensus Statement on environmental agents associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. This statement was compiled by a prestigious international group of children's health experts and reflects the views of scientists at conferences such as the International Conference on Fetal Programming and Developmental Toxicity, which was held in the Faroe Islands in May 2007.
8

Ian's Dad,

Richmond, VA 27/10/2008 01:27:33
As an older parent (I like to say wiser, or more mature parent), I think there may be some truth to this. I'm 47 and my wife is a few years younger. We have a 7 y.o., who has Asberger's Syndrome. We're confident that he will be a great rocket scientist or astronomer some day, but the behavioral issues are huge.

His younger brother, just a year and a half, is displaying early signs that his brother did. Testing is ongoing, but I'm confident he is in the same boat.

We've encountered a number of more mature adults/parents in the same spot. What can you do?

Did anyone see US comedian/actor Dennis Leary's comments about autism?

In his forthcoming book, "Why We Suck: A Feel Good Guide to Staying Fat, Loud, Lazy and Stupid," Leary, in a chapter titled "Autism Schmautism," wrote: "There is a huge boom in autism right now because inattentive mothers and competitive dads want an explanation for why their (expletive) kids can't compete academically, so they throw money into the happy laps of shrinks."

9

John Stone,

London 27/10/2008 07:47:53
Ian's Dad

Dennis Leary is, of course, right - he sucks.
10

John Stone,

London 27/10/2008 15:55:29
And Ian's Dad doesn't know how to spell Asperger syndrome, even though he says both his son's have it. Funny that.
11

John Stone,

London 30/10/2008 00:05:23
To anyone returning to this blog, an interesting point has been made in two letter to an autism website, SARNET:

http://www.sarnet.org/lib/SARtext.12-155.htm

Two correspondents point out the anomaly that if this is age related the risk should reduce after the first birth. They seem to pose the question whether fewer parents vaccinate subsequent children if the first gets autism leading to a reduction of incidence of autism later off-spring. Oh dear!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.