Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Farry's fall from grace

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 February 2009
THE MOMENT the SFA's own counsel, Paul Cullen, threw down his pen in frustration at Jim Farry's "very poor" performance under cross-examination, the writing was on the wall for the man who had ruled Scottish football with a rod of iron. But the embattled chief executive, a punctilious power-broker of fearsome repute, probably wouldn't have recognised it. In a supreme irony, it was the Great Administrator's misadministration that proved to be his downfall.
His misinterpretation of what was written in the game's statutes forced him to face Celtic's lawyers in an arbitration case and ultimately forced him out of office in what will be remembered as Scottish football's greatest courtroom drama.

Ten yea
rs ago this week the Royal Automobile Club in Glasgow provided the setting for the endgame in an extraordinary saga. Its starting point had come three years earlier when the SFA fatally delayed registering the new Celtic signing, Jorge Cadete. Farry's stubborn refusal to lodge the paperwork in time for the Portuguese striker to appear in the 1996 Scottish Cup semi-final, and Celtic owner Fergus McCann's equally stubborn refusal to let the matter rest, have given rise to various theories on the motives of two abrasive men. Previously unreleased legal papers shown to Scotland on Sunday do not lend any credence to the fanciful interpretations which have taken root in the decade since. Nothing supports the notion that Farry acted deliberately to hold up Cadete's registration out of "anti-Celtic" bias. Or that his adversary, McCann, was responsible for a "witch-hunt". Yet so sensitive does the episode remain that McCann declined to discuss it this week. Neither was Farry available for comment.

Farry left the arbitration hearing at the RAC on February 24, 1996 with no future in a game he had served across three decades because his own testimony destroyed his reputation. Even the SFA's own lawyers, Burness Solicitors, picked Farry apart.

The case revolved around the wording of an International Transfer Certificate for Cadete, who joined Celtic from Sporting CP (Lisbon). Celtic forwarded the ITC to the SFA on March 7, 1996 with all other relevant paperwork having arrived two weeks earlier. Initially, the club believed the player was a free agent. He wasn't, but that should have had no bearing on Farry registering Cadete. Celtic could not convince him of this because of a "conditionality clause" within the ITC. Under law, this was an irrelevance, which a fax from FIFA explained. Yet, it was not until Celtic lodged a third application to register Cadete at the end of March that Farry was eventually persuaded of that fact. Under the SFA's 14-day clearance rule, that was too late for the striker to play in the Scottish Cup semi-final against Rangers on April 6 – a match Celtic lost 2-1.

On March 29, Farry agreed to apply it retrospectively, only to change his mind the following day.

The Burness report exposed the extent of Farry's bungling. At the arbitration hearing he "substantially damaged his credibility and the integrity of the Association's case" by failing to produce correspondence from FIFA between 1994 and 1996 on the conditionality of ITCs. He "drew a warning" for "consistently" evading questions; was "unable to give a convincing explanation" why conditions in the second application "were unacceptable to him"; "indicated significant aspects...of registration fell to subordinates" "as he had been abroad"; "he gave evidence ... not regarded as credible ...."; "he gave contradictory evidence on the powers of the Executive Committee"; "was unable to explain why retrospectivity of the ITC was not applied in this case" and "deflected responsibility to Mr (Sandy] Bryson (head of registrations] .... (on] certain executive decisions".

Moreover, it had emerged that the day before his self-destructive evidence he had to be ordered to appear at the hearing by SFA vice-president John McBeth. Farry had intended to travel to Geneva for a conference.

The errors by Scotland's supposed supreme football law enforcer resulted in Burness advising the SFA to settle. They did so immediately for fear of the further damage that could follow from allowing the arbitration to proceed to a conclusion. In doing so, they paid Celtic's legal costs and gave them a £10,000 compensation payment – somewhat short of the £600,000 McCann demanded for the semi-final loss. Farry was suspended on full pay and removed from his post permanently two weeks later. He departed with a £200,000 pay-off that still rankles with McCann.

The downfall of the infuriatingly bumptious SFA secretary/chief executive of nine years is one that has to be understood in the context of the infamous workings of the Association. "Increasingly, he was running the Association as if it were his personal fiefdom," one former colleague reveals. "He had a way that made it very difficult for other voices to be heard and meant there was no way of suggesting to him he could have made a mistake. He prided himself on his knowledge of the rule book, and had an impressive grasp of it."

Clearly, he did not have as solid a grasp as he imagined. Hubris was a by-product. Every single piece of mail sent to the SFA would be delivered to his desk at 9am. He would read all correspondence then forward it to relevant departments. Replies to letters had to be written as if composed by him and at 4pm every day he would sign them off.

McCann was also a steely, single-minded operator but his martinet ways did not extend to this level of control in his day-to-day business. And neither did his determination to correct the wrong over Cadete's registration amount to a personal vendetta.

"At Celtic the Cadete case was not a 'get Farry' exercise," says a former club official. "Achieving justice on the matter certainly became a crusade for Fergus, but then he could go on a crusade over a bag of crisps. No one at Celtic, especially him, thought Jim was working to any agenda. We just thought he had made a huge mistake and wanted that recognised. Yes, there was an element of rubbing the SFA's noses in it, and therefore Jimmy's nose in it because he was the personification of the SFA. But plenty people at Celtic had a lot of time for him, could appreciate that he had strong points and worked hard. It was never the ultimate aim that he lose his job, and that was a surprise."

But his departure became inevitable, when the SFA announced on March 1 that the arbitration had been settled in Celtic's favour. McCann declared Farry's position untenable. The settlement including a letter of apology to the club that didn't best please Farry.

His fate was sealed when Burness delivered their report to the SFA on March 4. In damning fashion, it set out his "obstructive actions", the impact of which was, "to impede the preparation of the Association's case, to increase the expense of the process and to cause material frustration to Counsel who indicated his dismay at the counter-productive stance adopted in this complex case".

The following day, at a meeting of the SFA Emergency Committee, the office bearers unanimously agreed that "the Chief Executive be dismissed from his executive position and his office as Secretary of the Association on the grounds of gross misconduct". In Park Gardens, meanwhile, as they had since the end of the Cadete affair, employees continued to sport broad smiles, walk the corridors with a free air and even sign their own letters.

WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

JIM FARRY


From East Kilbride he came, to East Kilbride he has returned. Initially worked as a landscape gardner then went into football administration when he joined the Scottish Football League in the late 1970s, before moving to the SFA. Little was heard of him in the years immediately after his sacking for his "acts and omissions during the Cadete affair". In 2007, however, he was appointed business development manager for construction and refurbishment firm AKP Scotland Limited. Now 64.

FERGUS McCANN

The removal of Jim Farry, with whom he had several battles – most notably over the £53m spent on the redevelopment of 'white elephant' Hampden – was the last of many disputes he saw through successfully. His five-year plan complete, in April 1999 the Scots-Canadian sold his majority shareholding in Celtic for a £29m profit and returned across the Atlantic to set up a luxury bus service operating between Boston, where he is now based, and New York.

JORGE CADETE

The striker's season-and-a-bit at Celtic proved to be where he last enjoyed the scoring form that made him such sensation in his early 20s at Sporting. Following 33 goals in 43 games in the 1996/97 season, he claimed mental health problems prevented him returning the following season, and eventually he moved to Celta Vigo for £3.5m. Later played for Benfica, Bradford and Partick Thistle. In between times, he appeared in Portuguese Big Brother. Now makes the odd TV appearance.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 February 2009 7:30 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 09:12:06
Are we supposed to believe that this article is balanced and unbiased? Why pro Celtic puppets like Andrew Smith are allowed to blatantly push their own agenda in the Scottish media is maybe just another reason that sales of the Hootsmon have slumped to an all time low!
2

Pat the Hat,

Swanning in Singapore 22/02/2009 10:17:54
Ho!Ho!Ho! Fine Wine? Bitter vinegar, more like.

If Smith was really pushing Celtic's case, he would have pointed out that Cadete also missed five critical league games that, had all been won - three were drawn - would have stopped Rangers NIAR at seven.

Considering that Cadete scored in his first five games for Celtic, it is far from fanciful to suggest that Farry's 'obduracy' handed Rangers their discredited nine-in-a-row on a plate.
3

Shape to Shoot,

22/02/2009 10:24:29
1 ????

Whit ur you oan aboot ?

The most damning criticism in this article comes from verbatim quotations from the SFA's own lawyers.

In fact, standing the ferocity of the criticism, from their own lawyers, what I find perplexing is Andrew Smith's hypothesis that Farry did not act out of an anti-Celtic bias.

What else could have motivated him to willfully delay the registration ...and if it was all just an honest mistake, why didn't he cooperate with investigations ?
Evasion, concealment, misinformation...he knew what he'd done, he knew exactly what he'd done, and it was as a result of Celtic's perseverance that he was brought to a kind of justice.

I think Fergus Mcann was right to see him rooted out of scottish football. When someone so senior is caught
acting contrary to Celtic's interests, or any other club for that matter, they HAVE to go.
4

Bleeding Heart,

22/02/2009 10:26:27
#1 - Smith "pro-Celtic"? What in the article is "pro-Celtic"?

Farry got what he deserved. McCann perceived a wrongdoing and was determined to challenge Farry's arrogance.

As the article correctly points out, even the GFA's legal team had to agree that McCann was right.
5

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 10:55:03
4
Smith was at the Celtic view for 8 years ... what do you think makes him pro - Celtic? Due to hacks like Smith with an obvious pro - Celtic agenda, people with any sense are seeing through his propaganda crusade and have stopped buying the Hootsmaon! Funny again how this is the first OF thread that we are allowed to post on for months! Coincidence?
6

Bleeding Heart,

22/02/2009 11:18:19
#5 - Whether the guy was employed by the "Celtic View" or whether or not he may be a Celtic fan, are irrelevant facts here, surely?

The article quite simply sets out what happened following Cadete's registration fiasco.

It's quite clear that Farry was in the wrong. Even his employers concede this. I can't see that Smith's article does any more than set out what happened in this case.

Where in the article do you think there is evidence of pro-Celtic bias..?
7

Riot_Survivor,

22/02/2009 11:47:00
Was some player Jorge Cadette.

33 goals in 44 games. Indeed, towards the end of his short Celtic career he'd effectively chcked it.

At his peak he was a goal a game guy in our league. Pace, power, control, good in the air.

Ruined 2 SFA careers, the one stated above and Richard Goughs by scoring a hat-trick for Portugal in a 5-0 rout. He absolutely detroyed Gough that night

Clearly it was when Farry seen the destruction of Gough in that game, he panicked when there was a decision to make in his transfer to Celtic.

Any wonder a ReaRangers supporter tried to hi-jack it?
8

big bucks,

East Kilbride 22/02/2009 12:13:09
5/fine wine/ninny
You make a point about Andrew Smith being pro Celtic because he worked for the Celtic view,but you fail to mention the fact that the same could be said about Jim Farry the fact he was a Rangers fan and went to hunter high school,the same school Ally Mcoist went to,very few Celtic fans came from there.
If Smith was a pro celtic puppet then surely he would have mentioned these facts.
As for no old firm threads being open i take it you have not read the article about boyd today,but don't let these small details get in the way of your hatred for all things Celtic.sad little fella
9

Shape to Shoot,

22/02/2009 13:22:29
5

It doesn't really make a difference what team Smith supports...he is quoting from documents which recently came into the possession of the scotsman.

The fact that your team's 9iar is tainted is, I think, the root of your frustration.

So what if Andrew Smith supports Celtic ...don't shoot the messenger.
10

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 13:55:05
Mon the M'well ... lets sicken poor Andrew and his lackies even more!
11

Daillyman,

22/02/2009 13:55:10
Patrick,

Farry was a clown and in losing his job, got what was deserved, because he screwed up how does that taint 9iar. The reporter did a story, that seems to be factual for a change, dont care what team he supports, but why twist the story to 9iar.
12

Backofthenet,

22/02/2009 14:12:29
The article is clear:

'Nothing supports the notion that Farry acted deliberately to hold up Cadete's registration out of "anti-Celtic" bias.'

This was the familiar SFA combination of incompetence and arrogance.
13

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 14:33:05
Celtic are again struggling against M'well but are trying every trick in the book and are getting the usual help from Brines & Co. Scott Brown really is a donkey!
14

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 14:37:58
VOH has already dived and had a free kick refused without a booking and now he gets one for free from all the hoops fans favourite Brines! How long can Brown run around like a headless chicken spitting venom without getting booked?
15

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 14:39:53
Again Brown clatters into someone and escapes with a warning! Meanwhile the Celtic faithful or those with enough giro left continue singing God bless the Pope!
16

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 14:44:05
0 -0 at half time with the M'well fans chanting "CHEAT CHEAT" around the stadium. Celtic again are the beneficiaries of at least 6 refereeing decisions.
17

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 14:53:23
I wonder if Mr Dick (the SPL delegate) is at Fir Park today and if he will report the offensive singing by the away support?
18

Bleeding Heart,

22/02/2009 14:54:09
#16 - Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm getting the strong impression that you don't like Celtic FC?

Or am I misjudging you..?
19

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 14:56:45
Is it really any wonder that Scotland is not producing much talent these days with the likes of Scott Brown clumping his way through the youth development!
20

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 14:59:27
18
I tend to dislike cheats and in most games Celtic are involved in they are guilty of cheating! I am telling it like it is though with nothing made up or exaggerated!
21

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:03:51
18
I tend to dislike fans of clubs that sing songs in support of banned terror groups that m! Celtic fans do this at every away game! It is safe to say that they have very little redeeming qualities!
22

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:08:49
Brown eventually gets booked for yet another bad challenge and looks at the ref in disbelief!
23

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:10:36
Despite Celtic getting away with fouls all over the park, M'well are still pressing for the opener!
24

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:13:36
McDonald scores after a slip by the defender and the keeper should really have done better! M'well are still looking good for an equaliser!
25

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:16:55
McGeady replaces VOH and how the latter has gone another game without at least a yellow , only the bhoys in black will know!
26

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:18:49
The Celtic fans get a decision that goes against them and the fans actually sing " Who's the mason in the black" and follow it up with a chorus of the Soldier song!
27

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:25:08
Hughes gets booked for a nothing challenge on Nakamura. M'well look deflated after losing that goal against the run of play!
28

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:31:34
Ironic cheers from the M'well fans as they are awarded a free kick! This game is not over yet!
29

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:34:58
M,well have scored and the scorer is Quinn!
30

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:37:49
M,well are now pressing for a winner!
31

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:39:26
Good old Mr Brines gives Celtic another wee helping hand with a free kick and goal scoring chance!
32

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 15:46:30
It is all over and Rangers remain at the top of the table as this Celtic side stumble to yet another draw and only 3 wins in the last 10 games!
33

Shape to Shoot,

22/02/2009 17:32:49
We should've had this one just about wrapped up by HT.
Two gilt edged chances - one falling to McDonald very early on, the other to Venegoor around the 30 odd minute mark - and a hatful of half-chances saw the champions going into the break having failed to break the deadlock.

It was pretty awful that on both occassions, they each failed to hit the target.

Having got our noses in front, Celtic pressed for a second, but struggled to create any clear cut chances, and then with 9 minutes to go and their first shot on target, the homeside drew level.

The game could have gone either way after that equaliser, but the closest anyone came to a winner was Samaras when his header from 10 yards went inches over the bar.

A disappointing result, but an improvement in last week's drudgery. The park was in a dreadful state and quite honestly the sfa should be telling motherwell that they'll have to play their home games elsewhere because it is not fit for purpose...AFTER the next visit from the rearrangerz I hasten to add.

It was an interesting formation that Strachan fielded, and it delivered on chances in the first half...poor finishing made the difference today, very poor finishing.
34

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 19:48:25
It feels good being back at the top where the Rangers belong! It should be an easy canter towards another treble!
35

Roscoe P Coltrane,

22/02/2009 19:55:54
Fine Whine - both sides of the OF cheat and have refs/linesmen in their pockets. The whole system is biased in their favour (the OF, that is) and has been for at least 20-odd years.

All that you've said above may well be correct, but your beloved Gers do exactly the same in games against (ahem) 'lesser' opponents. You'd do well to remember that.
36

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 20:39:59
35
Rangers get nothing these days! Twenty years agao maybe but not now! It's a bit like everything else in the 21st Century with the minority ruling the majority! Welcome to the real world! If Rangers get everything then why the disallowed Beasley goal at Pittodrie or the penalty refused last week when McManus crunched Miller in the box or even Broadfoot's disallowed goal for the invisible foul on Boruc! Try and remember that ... and take a look at the help Celtic have hadin every game this season!
37

Fine Wine,

22/02/2009 20:48:08
35
I nearly forgot, how much help did Rangers get from the SFA and the SPL last season during a magnificent run in Europe and all four domestic comps? I think that will be another big fat zero!
38

Bleeding Heart,

22/02/2009 22:27:52
#36 - "Rangers get nothing these days!" LOL!

Do you recall the Andy Davis incident? Or perhaps the game v. Dundee United last season?

I'm not suggesting that some decisions don't go against Rangers, but to suggest they "get nothing" is fantasy stuff.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.