Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Musselburgh must be permitted to add vital chapter to its history as a matter of course

TURFTALK

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
19 November 2006
OVER the next two to four weeks, a hearing will take place in Musselburgh which could well decide the direction of Scottish racing. A public inquiry into Musselburgh racecourse's plans for an all-weather racetrack plus improvements to the historic golf links within the course will hear arguments for and against the developments.
Philip Hutchinson, the reporter, is a highly-experienced official who has handled several contentious inquiries, and it

is to be hoped that he can give ministers at the Scottish Executive a recommendation as soon as possible. An election is loomi
ng in May, and if the decision is not made before then, it will be put back many months, and the racecourse will lose its chance of gaining some extra all-weather fixtures, which will become available next year.

I have made my feelings known: I believe that the all-weather track is vital for the future of the sport in Scotland, and the plans, which have the approval of the local planning department and East Lothian Council as a whole, should be allowed to proceed forthwith.

The serious objectors consist mainly of NIMBY types whose main fear, if they are being honest, is that the value of their homes will be reduced because the plans involve erecting retractable floodlights on pylons to allow more meetings to be held on winter afternoons and during evenings throughout the year. Objectors can dress up their arguments as they like - concerns about bird sanctuaries and so on - but they are worried that properties will lose value, despite the absence of evidence that this will happen.

If they would admit the true basis for their opposition, the antis would gain more respect, from me at least. It's an honest argument, for in days of soaraway house prices, people have a right to object to developments that they believe will materially affect property values. Indeed, I believe that compensation should be paid where loss is proved.

But to claim that there is a massive groundswell in the Honest Toun to "save the Links" for reasons of history, wildlife and scenic value is so much tosh. More than 22,000 people live in Musselburgh, and I doubt if 20% of them could state why the golf course, for example, is deemed historic. It hosted six early Opens before 1890, the standard golf hole worldwide derives its diameter of 4.25 inches from Musselburgh, and the oldest recorded women's golf competition was held there in 1811.

The anti-campaigners also include people who have been scared into objecting because of misleading reports that the golf course will be altered beyond recognition. Yet curiously, the golf club whose members play on the course is not listed among objectors, and senior members are looking forward to improvements, such as a new six-hole course and practice area.

It is the golf course itself which provides evidence on why the racecourse developments should go ahead. Musselburgh Links was once a home of golf, a significant place where pioneers such as Willie Park senior and junior plied their trade. Though the original seven holes were extended by two in the 19th century, the course declined in the next century after tenant clubs, such as Royal Musselburgh and the Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers moved elsewhere.

Musselburgh racecourse also went into decline, until the past 15 or so years saw a remarkable alliance develop between de-facto owners East Lothian Council and enthusiastic professional managers, such as Mark Kershaw and incumbent Bill Farnsworth, which has transformed the venue.

The racecourse is thriving, but it could be even better. An all-weather track, which would be the first in Scotland, would deliver a huge boost to Scottish racing and to East Lothian's economy, as many more racing opportunities would be created for Scottish-based trainers and owners, and pubs and hotels would benefit from increased visitor numbers.

If the developments do not go ahead, it is easy to conclude that the racecourse will stagnate, as the golf course did. A chance to make history would also be lost: Musselburgh could become the first major racecourse in the world to offer turf racing on the Flat and over jumps and all-weather Flat racing.

It boils down to going forward and making history or staying still and being trapped by history. I know which course I prefer.



The full article contains 770 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 November 2006 9:46 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh planning issues
 
1

Robin McGregor,

Musselburgh Old Course Golf Club 20/11/2006 23:08:44

As Secretary of the Golf Club you speak of I can only agree with most of your comments. The golf course has negotiated not only with Musselburgh Racecourse but the local council to produce a golf coures to be proud of. It will also as part of phase 2 be extended to 18 holes. A further phase willl see the introduction of modern catering facilities for golfers and give a solid base to move forward into the new century. History is important but the golf course serves the game and not the other way round. Musselburgh's history adds to the prestige of our game by what happened over 100 years ago. I believe it is time more history was made on the links by moving ahead and driving the golf course forward together with Musselburgh racecourse to produce two facilities of excellance. Together both can be a massive positive force for East Lothian and Scotland.

2

Aly,

Musselburgh 21/11/2006 13:16:47

As a resident living near the racecourse I feel justified in questioning some of your logic. Using the fact East Lothian Council have approved the plans is a non-starter, after all as you mention later on in your piece, they are de-facto owners of the racecourse. Secondly, your branding of us as NIMBY's is insulting, we chose to live near the racecourse in the first place and I for one do not think it will reduce house prices if done right. However the lack of consultation on the position, type and hours of use of the lights added to a lack of information on exactly how many races and how big these meetings will be is what annoys me. The plans seem to have progressed to a high level without any real effort to take on board our concerns about light pollution, car parking, litter, noise etc. Compare these floodlights put up in an area of countryside to the Kurry Bar owner in Edinburgh asked to take down his small blue neon sign in a built up street with many other lit signs. Done wrong they could be a huge blight on the landscape.
All I ask is residents views are taken on board. If they are then we can have a 21st century racecourse patronised by local residents as well as many new race fans from far and wide.This would also breathe much needed life into the golf course which, by right of its history, should be being promoted as a jewel not just in East Lothian's crown but the whole of Scotland if not the UK.

3

Robin,

21/11/2006 14:07:53

"I believe that the all weather track is vital to the development of the sport (racing I believe is meant here) in Scotland".
Scotsman comment.

What a load of drivel.
The only beneficiaries are likely to be the bookies and the racecourse mamagement.
East Lothian Council are in favour- - why?
Could it be that the ELC provost is chairman of the racecourse committee.
In addition, do we raelly believe that an all weather track will 'improve' the quality of racing at Musselburgh.
Absolutely no way.
As an avid racegoer and punter I can say from experience that other all weather tarcks as Southwell, Lingfield , Wolverhampton and now more recently Kempton actually devalue the standard of racing.
A lot of the all weather meetings are for 'banded' races, i.e for horses of a standard of, for example rating 30 and below.
Sure all horses are entitled to 'earn thier corn' but such animals are only marginally above the level of the old St Cuthberts milk cart beasts.
For God's sake see the light, of course the ELC wants it, - money, money, money.
Also I understand that only one council in Scotland owns a corporate hospitality box at any racecourse.
Guess.
East Lothian Council at, would you believe, Musselburgh
I rest my case.

4

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 22/11/2006 15:12:59

#1 comments above show what is wrong with the small minded approach taken by the council. Changing the golf course further is defiling the heritage of golf. The putting in of the racecourse straight several years ago took away the charactor of the Mrs Formans hole and the one proceding it, stated like this for simplicity as the hole numbers have changed on occasion, for ease of sensible starting hole dependent on where 'starters box' was.

There are no shortage of 18 hole courses looking for members and knowing the area well, building additional holes, on flat, reclaimed and ex football pitch land, with no established trees to speak of would be dull in the extreme. The Royal and Monktonhall should cater for that type of play because no other course in the world can offer what the old course has.

More effective marketing, more focus on establishing itself with East Lothian clubs to offer a hickory based round for visiting golfers to other courses would work well for both parties.

Bribing the members appears to have worked, why else would the council be offering a 6 hole area etc. The article says a small % of 22,000 residents etc, BUT that again demonstrates the small mindedness, the world of golf knows of Musselburgh and Ben Crenshaw at the last change to the course registered his disgust. Many more will now if we further treat this under marketed piece of golfing history, with contempt. Shame on the ELC.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are Edinburgh’s planning regulations too strict on the city’s business community?
Yes - everything should be done to help businesses in a recession
Yes - they pale into insignificance when compared to the tram works
No - the city’s heritage and appearance can’t be compromised

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.