Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Assets sale plan to cut council tax by £200 per household

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 December 2006
SCOTLAND'S councils have been told they should get rid of nearly £350m in surplus assets to cut council tax by almost £200 per household.
Tom McCabe, the Scottish finance minister, has warned that there needs to be a more "professional" approach to the management of assets.

Officials estimate there could be as much as £346m worth of surplus land, property and other assets such as v
ehicles - a sum which could potentially equal about 17% of the £2bn raised across Scotland in council tax each year. A 17% cut in the average Band D Scottish council tax, which stands at £1,130, would cut the charge to £938. But local authorities have questioned the Executive's conclusions, and say they already sell off surplus possessions to help balance their books.

McCabe's remarks came ahead of this week's announcement on how much cash ministers will give local councils in order to finance key services. The money, known as the Revenue Support Grant, will be in the region of £7.7bn.

McCabe said that the council tax in its current form had "lost credibility" and said it was in need of reform, but was unwilling to be drawn on what kind of reform he envisaged.

Legal restrictions on how cash raised from selling off capital assets can be spent mean the money could only be used to help finance other capital projects such as new roads or new schools and could not directly be used to dramatically slash council tax bills.

The cash could help reduce council tax if it were used to pay off borrowing on new spending projects, such as PFI schools, which right now eat up cash in council budgets.

According to officials, the £346m already known to be surplus is just part of the £21bn of local councils' assets held across Scotland.

While the vast majority of these cannot be disposed of without impacting on services, the Executive believes that the £10.2bn of land and buildings held by councils holds potential for further savings over and above the £346m figure.



The full article contains 373 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 December 2006 12:10 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Council tax
 
1

Peter Cherbi,

Edinburgh 10/12/2006 04:15:31

Aye .. I can see a lot of Council friends & supporters getting ready to buy said assets on the cheap .. prepare for yet another scandal folks ...

2

Guga,

Rockall 10/12/2006 05:18:49

#1 They do that already.

3

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 10/12/2006 10:13:20

If £346m means they could cut council tax across Scotland by £200, then if they scrap the £1.5bn+ Edinburgh toy town tram and EARL projects they could cut council tax by around £900 for every household in Scotland.

Sounds much more sensible to me.

4

Wisnaeme,

Sent to Coventry, 10/12/2006 12:13:31

Once apon a time in pre Bliar/Maggie era before the time when" greed is good for you and "free enterprise works". Every little farm toon,village,town and city had something called civic pride. That civil pride by its very nature was substained by some thing called a community.A board of directors was voted in from within that community to ensure that the community was adequately supplied by its own public services.Amongst it's remit was to build and maintain the local communities local schools,playing fields,cottage hospitals,transport,power and fuel supplies,water ect ect.Folk weren't so apathetic then, weren't hell bent on the greed is good for you that they would destroy and fritter away the communities assets.the community had a certain control over these assets to ensure that they were used to benefit them.
Now wasn't that a nice story.
In this modern age we're told every thing has it's price,politicians included; and the community post offices,the local hospitals, doctor's surgeries,schools, colleges,playing fields,social housing, and utilities are sold off to who ever.In return we receive something called free private enterprise works.The people responsible for this are the very ones elected by us into a position of public service.One thing should be made clear,these private enterprises are not free,indeed they come with a rather expensive price tag if you include profits,shareholders and countless middle persons.So now we are being told by the peoples party,the one that once believed in such things as community had value, that councils now have to flog off community owned real estate obtained over the many years by purchase, by kindness from rich benefactors, lands and buildings belonging to us,the community in the name of profit and greed. That is theft,theft from the community and theft from you and I.Further more it denies our children and our children's children not only the use of those community assets but the ownership of

5

NimbysUnited,

The Kingdom of Fife 10/12/2006 21:42:08

Why do we not just get rid of the 32 councils?

By reducing the Local Authorities and aligning the areas with the NHS we could save over a £1 Billion staight away.

After this is complete we could then start by dismantling the largest Local Authority in Britian. Holyrood.

6

JayJay,

Glasgow 10/12/2006 22:25:36

And so it begins.
Every year, round panto time (with no sense of irony) we find Cosla and the Executive locked in a Darth Vadar versus Luke Skywalker duel to the death. Sadly there is no suspense surrounding the outcome. McCabe will talk tough, Cosla will plead poverty. Council tax payers will once again be required to bend over and clench their teeth as yet another above inflation hike in Council Tax heads their way. And for what? I love when they talk about services being compromised. What services are they then?
Of course McCabe has an absolute ace up his sleeve which is the much heralded "reform" of Council Tax. When I see the word "reform" as ascribed to any tax, I automatically bend over and brace myself, because it simply won't be good news.
There is high farce going on in West Dumbartonshire. You might have read about it. Don't think that a culture of cronyism and waste is restricted to Clydebank and the like. Oh no. What we see in the Councils is waste and over-manning on a scale few would believe - all with the most absurdly generous pension entitlement outside of a fatcat's boardroom, and all paid by us. I read somewhere that a goodly chunk of our council Tax (17% springs to mind) is required for the Cooncil Superannuation Fund, which of course must be maintained at its current level. As an ex-customer of Equitable Life, this makes my blood boil.
I know of someone who, at 47, is able to retire on full pension from the police. You just ask yourself how much that single pension costs, and wonder no more at what they are talking about when they mention "service".
The single greatest issue we have in Scotland is what to do about a huge, expensive public sector. I am sure anyone with half a brain knows its expensive and inefficient. Problem is, politically, to say so and do something about it, seems to be beyond our powderpuff pretend politicians in Holyrood. Mind you, they are riding

7

GP,

11/12/2006 00:06:30

4# exactly totally agree.

There are huge scandals going on yet not investigated. Playing fileds sold off etc. to who?

8

Oliver,

11/12/2006 12:54:09

Sorry for going off the thread but I have just seen something that may help Farepak customers who paid by credit card. For further info see:

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article...

and the 2nd half of

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1955820,00.html?g...

Hope it helps someone


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.