Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Spelman urged to pay back 'nanny' money



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 June 2008
CONSERVATIVE chairman Caroline Spelman was last night facing calls to pay back money from the public purse she gave to a nanny she says was acting as her constituency secretary.
Spelman insists she did nothing wrong and is seeking a meeting with parliamentary standards commissioner John Lyon tomorrow to allow him to look into the case. She was defended by shadow chancellor George Osborne as "someone of enormous integrity a
nd honesty".

But Bassetlaw MP John Mann accused the Conservatives of a "cover-up" and said that Spelman should today make public documentation to prove that Tina Haines was employed to carry out administrative and secretarial duties.

He said any MP's secretary would leave a "paper trail" of computer files and initials on documents handled, and Spelman's home telephone number would be listed in local authority directories if she was using it as her constituency office, as she says.

Spelman yesterday confirmed that she paid Haines from her parliamentary staffing allowance for a period of months after she was first elected to the Commons in 1997. She said the nanny answered phone calls and opened and sorted letters during school hours, and then provided childcare later in the day.

She ended the arrangement after then chief whip James Arbuthnot told her it could give rise to "misinterpretations". But she insists she did not breach the rules, which say the allowance must be used to pay staff who assist with MPs' parliamentary work and not their private lives.

"At the time, I thought it was entirely within the rules – and that is still my belief," she said.

Mann said: "The use of the money was clearly inappropriate. It may well have been inadvertent, but she should put her hands up and pay the money back, and that would be the end of the matter as far as I'm concerned.

"I think the cover-up is much worse – and a much bigger problem for the Conservatives – than the original offence.

"She now needs to provide all the letters marked with the secretary's initials. If she was to be contacted via her constituency secretary, then it must be listed in the local authority guide, so let her produce that."

The question mark over Spelman's expenses comes in the wake of the resignation of the Tory leader in the European Parliament, Giles Chichester, who transferred more than £400,000 of staff expenses into a private family company.

The fact that Spelman's own expenses are now being subjected to public scrutiny is particularly embarrassing for Conservative leader David Cameron, because it was the party chairman herself who issued a deadline to Chichester to justify his actions.

Osborne said: "Spelman is someone of enormous integrity and honesty, so I think her statement speaks for itself and her character speaks for itself."



The full article contains 471 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 June 2008 10:17 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Conservative Party
 
1

Angus Ogg,

07/06/2008 22:26:58

If this was Joe Punter, the polis would have been called. So why is a lawmaker getting off without an alleged lawbreaking investigation.

It's true: One law for them and another law for the rest of us.
2

subrosa,

08/06/2008 00:20:04
Wonder when some good journalist will start digging into nulabour's EU members.
3

bring them on,

08/06/2008 04:29:25
Give the money back!!

Cheat...
4

donald,

glasgow 08/06/2008 04:56:16
Everybody should have a well paid nanny.
5

bring them on,

08/06/2008 05:18:05
#4

There might be joke in there....
6

JT,

08/06/2008 06:57:48
Was the nanny's contract inclusive of the secreatrial duties, or carried out under the disguise as "any other duties"?? Even so this seems still more anti sleaze politicians getting caught with their hand in the biscuit barrel.
7

Alberto.,

08/06/2008 07:38:41
It seems no doubt that down in the Westminster Village there appears to be a well organised system of fraudulent use of taxpayers funds, expressly for Politicians - all ranks, all occasions, entirely for personal financial gain!

The 'Golden Rule' for becoming a team member looks like, 'Take it that anything goes' - and it only becomes a problem if you get caught.

However, there will probably be no serious action taken against you, for, as you can see, we are on your side, and obviously, everybody that matters is in our pocket to do as they are told - and they do!

The worst that may happen is you 'may' be requested 'officially' to make payback - but this aspect will not be pushed, or enforced upon you!

That's not the way we do things!

Like Mr Tony Blair, who started the amazing situation, with many of his own band of rogues, we also shall declare 'your integrity will stand safe' - no matter what!

It's the way of life down here - everyone, more or less is totally safe, for as you can see, they are still amongst us - regardless!

After all, it's only the electorate kicking up a fuss, but currently, with most authority all nicely 'tied up' there ain't much they can do about it for now!

We are sailing in fairly calm waters for now - so 'Carry on' - make hay while you can, and lots of it - the Sun may not shine so brightly on us in the future!

We shall not be beaten by simple and continual whingeing from whoever - especially a non-entity like the electorate, it will require much more than that!
8

It's me!,

08/06/2008 08:12:30
Let's hear from Tina Haines........under oath.
9

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 08/06/2008 08:40:22
I was reading the other day about the spouse of a local councillor in Inverclyde who was being prosecuted because he took 23,000 pounds of council benefits he was not entitled to.

Why isn't Giles Chichester being prosecuted for his 400,000 thousand pound fraud?

Are benefit fraudsters given the opportunity to pay the money back to avoid prosecution like Ms. Spellman to avoid prosecution?

Until such time as the Politicians are held accountable for their actions just like any member of the public we will continue to have a nation run by thieves.

10

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 08/06/2008 09:29:23
No doubt many other M.E.P.'s from other U.K. parties have also been gilding the lily when it comes to the very generous E.U. parliamentary expenses but you can always rely on Conservative members to revert to type and carpetbag their way to a fortune!

After all, the Conservative Party encourages self-reliance and opportunism, and these Conservative Members have certainly helped themselves....BIG TIME!
11

Mike555,

08/06/2008 09:50:06
It seems that all politicians are sleazy p!gs devoted to robbing the public purse when it suits them.

Wish we had a sleazebuster with the power to stamp this out once and for all and send these p!gs to prison.
12

Bridged and tunnelled,

08/06/2008 10:22:20
Angus Ogg - do you think the polis are called every time there is a dispute about someones expenses? Get real!

I'm all for applying strict controls on politicians, but in this case, it happened 10 years ago, when the MP was new to the House.

Rather than real scandal, it smacks of the Labour Party grasping at any straw they can.

And BTW, I'm not a Tory, nor have ever voted for the party, and I think David Cameron is a twerp. I just the case against Carline Spelman is paper thin.
13

roughrider,

Glasgow 08/06/2008 10:22:56
Greedy pig is to polite for these thieving scumbags.
Sack the 8itch then charge her with fraud.
14

ddmc,

08/06/2008 10:28:59
another paper has interviewed the nanny, who claims she occasionally answered the phone & took mail to the post office, if true then i think the cheating politician is sunk
15

Hickory,

US 08/06/2008 14:43:28
Aye, we need to pay for the nanny. After all, she needs a laptop too! The flyin' monks answer to no one. What's the difference between Davie boy and wee Wendy? The answer is one wears a dress and the other wears pants. Me thinks it could even be the other way around.
16

Scott Webb.......,

08/06/2008 15:43:56
Comment@5 Something that rhymes with Nanny.....mmmmm...tough one that :)

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.