Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Expert's fear over cervical cancer vaccine

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 November 2008
MASS vaccination of Scottish schoolgirls against cervical cancer should have been delayed because not enough is known about possible side effects, a leading researcher claimed last night.
Dr Diane Harper, one of the world's leading experts in the field, said safety trials of the Cervarix vaccine should have been conducted for at least four more years before the decision was taken to give the jabs to thousands of girls in schools.

Harper concedes that Cervarix is effective against the HPV virus that causes many cases of cervical cancer and admits there is no evidence so far of any serious side effects. Manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline says rigorous tests have been conducted over six years.

But Harper believes the safety tests for side effects should have been conducted for at least a decade and doses given to millions of individuals around the world before any mass vaccination began. She described the cervical cancer vaccination scheme in Scotland as an "experiment".

Last night, UK regulators and leading medics insisted Cervarix was safe and that it could save hundreds of lives by preventing many cases of cervical cancer.

Two months ago the Scottish Government launched its £64m Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination programme in schools, aimed at vaccinating around 30,000 girls aged 12-13 every year. Around the country thousands of girls are currently being vaccinated every week.

The vaccine was approved by the European Medicines Agency in September 2007.

Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at Dartmouth Medical Centre in the US, was herself paid by Glaxo to help conduct safety trials. She told Scotland on Sunday: "We can't tell you it's 100% safe because we don't know that. I think we would have been better waiting.

"In five years it will be pretty clear how safe it is because 70% of adverse events occur within five years and almost all of them, 97%, within 10 years. That way you have a good sense of comfort and you can reassure your population."

Harper said she would encourage women to use the vaccine, but on a voluntary basis. Under the Scottish programme, girls are receiving the vaccine unless they decide not to. She said: "I think there's a lot of room for discussion about making it voluntary so that girls are not put under pressure to get it."

A total of 344 cases of suspected adverse reactions among girls receiving Cervarix have so far been reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The most common include pain and rashes, dizziness, headaches and vomiting.

Cervarix is currently undergoing evaluation by the US Food and Drug Administration and is expected to be approved next year. A spokeswoman for GlaxoSmithKline said: "Cervarix had to undergo rigorous testing with large numbers of people in numerous clinical studies. In clinical studies, Cervarix was found to be generally well tolerated."

A Department of Health spokesman said: "Both HPV vaccines have gone through very thorough testing as part of the licensing process. In properly conducted long-term safety studies, where HPV vaccines have been compared with a placebo, there were no differences in reported serious adverse events between the two groups.

"In the absence of any scientific evidence that points to safety concerns, it would be irresponsible to raise inappropriate fears over HPV vaccine safety."

Dr Stuart Scott, deputy chairman of the British Medical Association's Scottish GP Committee, said: "This cancer kills a number of women every year and, although there are no large population studies, it has been used for a number of years."

'Seize the opportunity to get protected'

HAZEL NUNN, health information manager for Cancer Research UK, writes: The introduction of the cervical cancer vaccine for teenage girls in Scotland began this September. It's an exciting step in the fight against a disease which still affects nearly 300 Scots women each year.

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women under 35. But from now, all girls aged 12 and 13 will be offered the vaccine. Over the next few years this will be extended to include women and girls up to the age of 18. And research suggests that the vaccine will prevent 70% of cervical cancers.

Earlier research has shown that cervical cancer is linked to some strains of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). The vaccine has been developed to give protection against two of these strains of HPV. It's exciting that research into the basic causes of cervical cancer has led to a new way of preventing the disease, and that it's now freely available to girls in Scotland.

It's vital to remember that the vaccine will not completely wipe out cervical cancer because it does not protect against every type of HPV. Now and for the foreseeable future, it is vital that women go for cervical screening (the smear test) when they're invited. In Scotland, cervical screening is available every three years for women aged 20 to 60.

"Screening can prevent cervical cancer by detecting unusual changes in the cervix before cancer develops, and it saves around 5,000 lives in the UK each year. Our message is to take up the opportunity to get vaccinated."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 November 2008 10:34 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Cervical cancer
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/11/2008 00:32:19




"She described the cervical cancer vaccination scheme in Scotland as an "experiment".


ALL I CAN SAY IS!!!!,.......'TOLD YOU ALL THIS'!!

BUT!!,..'OH-NO',..Charles Linskaill speaks Garbage!


Maybe you will all listen to me now! and stop believing all you Hear, from our Health Ministers!

HAVE YOU NO BRAINS OF YOUR OWN!!!

It is like saying,..
"D'oh!, I have been told, pigs can fly, I believe them"

I TOLD YOU ALL THIS 'JAB' IS BEING PORTRAYED AS A LIE, IN THE FIRST INSTANCE, AND AS USUAL!!, WOMEN ARE BEING TREATED, AS MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS.....'FULL-STOP'!!



2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/11/2008 00:42:16






"She described the cervical cancer vaccination scheme in Scotland as an "experiment".


ALL I CAN SAY IS!!!!,.......'TOLD YOU ALL THIS'!!

BUT!!,..'OH-NO',..Charles Linskaill speaks Garbage!


Maybe you will all listen to me now! and stop believing all you Hear, from our Health Ministers!

HAVE YOU NO BRAINS OF YOUR OWN!???

It is like saying,..
"D'oh!, I have been told, pigs can fly, I believe them"

I TOLD YOU ALL THIS 'JAB' IS BEING PORTRAYED AS A LIE, IN THE FIRST INSTANCE, AND AS USUAL!!, WOMEN ARE BEING TREATED, AS USUAL, AS MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS,.....

........'FULL-STOP'!!





3

somerferg,

perth 02/11/2008 02:07:29

This is the ONE subject I have actually agreed with you Charlie - so there thats a bit of a miracle. And back to the subject - if this vaccine is so safe give it to every BOY under the age of 16. After all thats where the papilloma virus originates!
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/11/2008 02:58:50


somerferg ~3,

Gosh!, That's a First!, we usually don't see 'eye-to-eye' on very many Topics, but this, "subject matter" is one that really, 'Boils my Blood', when the Female Sex, are expected to-be, Experimented on, for all sexual behavior, what you say IS True!,....

"Give this Jab, to the Boys"

BUT!,,'OH-NO'!! US MEN!, WOULD NEVER ALLOW IT!


Sexual Equality, 'HUH'?

On a Lighter note, because our TV is on in the background, on the Xfactor, her that Presents the Xfactor, background reports, has just announced on live TV, that she is 'Pregnant'!

She got all-emotional when, 'Stating This'!

Looking lovely as usual, and a 'Twinkle' in her eyes,

Celeb News!
5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/11/2008 03:17:59


Holly Willoughby, as in my comment, "Her" in the Xfactor.
6

possum,

The sunny part of the world 02/11/2008 06:33:29
Why does the reporter not get their facts right - it isn't just the Scots that are being mass vaccinated, Australia too has been doing so for the last year and a half. If you ask me it is a pile of scaremongering anyway...bit like saying that the MMR vaccine to babies causes Autism neither will be proven or disproven. If it saves just one extra life - my daughter could be in that number - who knows, then to me it is worth its weight in gold
7

fife runner,

02/11/2008 08:04:15
does not protect against other std's.
8

possum,

still in the sunny place 02/11/2008 08:55:53
I didn't mention STD's did anyone else? From memory neither did the article though that is one large glass of wine later so am not planning on re reading it.
9

greenhill,

02/11/2008 10:10:17
" RE: fife runner,02/11/2008 08:04:15 :
does not protect against other std's."

Did anyone claim that it would ? What an idiotic point.

10

Micjonger,

Cambridgeshire 02/11/2008 12:16:46
Charles Linskaill(4);Somerberg(3):
This vaccine is not a viricidal agent - it is a VACCINE.
Suggest you look it up in the OED (there being no Scottish alternative).
11

I GAVE BLAIR THE FINGER LAST WEEK,

BY OBAN 02/11/2008 12:33:41
NOT ENOUGH ANSWERS, TOO MUCH PROPAGANDA. LETS HAVE A REAL DEBATE WHY PARENTS SHOULD ALLOW UNKNOWN INGREDIENTS PUMPED INTO THEIR LITTLE GIRLS WITHOUT PROPER TRIALS OF THE CERVARIX VACCINE ON THE SAME AGE GROUP.
VACCINES HAVE COINCIDED IN AN AGE WITH MORE CANCER, MORE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, MORE DIABETES, MORE AUTISM, MORE LEARNING DIFFICULTIES, MORE ASTHMA, MORE ALLERGIES, MORE ECZEMA, MORE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUCED
DEATH, MORE PROFIT FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, MORE CORRUPTION!
ESPECIALLY WITH HPV VACCINES MORE PARALYSIS, MORE MISCARRIAGES. IN FUTURE YEARS SERIOUS CONCEPTION PROBLEMS.

InfoisPower

Another thing. Just like all the already mandated vaccines you can bet there will be no long term studies of efficacy or side effects of this one either. We and our babies will be used for scientific experimentation with only salutory oversight to protect the manufacturer's and government posteriors and not ours.

12

,

02/11/2008 13:20:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

junecleaver131,

Ontario, Canada 02/11/2008 13:32:09
As your poster from Australia says, our daughters here in Ontario, Canada have been the subject of this mass experiment for a year or so now. The part that infuriates me is the way it is being portrayed in the media and television ads here as a "cervical cancer vaccine", it is NOT a cervical cancer vaccine. It is merely a vaccine which may or may not prevent a small percentage of the HPV strains that may or may not be linked to cervical cancer. In this country, they are using 13 year old girls and telling their parents that if they don't grab this initial offering, it will cost them $500.00 to do it later. This in my view is such a transparent scare tactic, if it is as vital as they make it sound, it would be free all the time like our other vaccines, measles, mumps, chickenpox etc. Not until it has been tested for at least one full generation of our girls and how it affects them and their offspring (or the ability to even reproduce)will I be offering up my daughters for their "study. It's very telling when a renowned Gynecologist/writer over here, who herself was on the development team, does not endorse the vaccine.
14

discman,

edinburgh 02/11/2008 13:42:44
Efficacy not known,model to evaluate the cost effectiveness skewed,cervical cancer not in the top ten of cancers for women,cohort tested on under 15,1500 to 1800 it goes on.

American cancer society 2007:


"fortunately,most cervical precancers develop slowly,so nearly all cases can be prevented if a women is screened regularly."

£64million intially over 3 years is not going to save hundreds of lives,investing more money inscreening and targeting specfic areas and groups much more effective
from a health and cost perspective.

GSK:for evey £1 spent on research £2 is spent on advetising and media its not rocket science!
This market is worth billions and sadly the countries
that could benefit from this vaccine are those countries that dont have screening programmes,Scotland is not one of them!
15

Geraldine Firequeen,

Pits of nelson 02/11/2008 14:07:45
Why the fuss? It's ALL experiments, everything the medical profession do. Refuse to have anything to do with them, stick to traditional - Chinese and Herbal - medicine. We need the Elders to inform the young, who have not seen it before, and grow up thinking medical science is good for them - it isn't. Just keep away from doctors, and if you get some horrible illness, my opinion is, it's better to die of the disease than the cure, which is the choice you have. I know which I prefer.
16

Fifi la Bonbon,

02/11/2008 14:50:03
Ancient tribal folkways, mystic knowledge of the elders, better off dead - right, Geraldine Firequeen?
17

mishanti,

Sandston,VA, USA 02/11/2008 14:54:19
As a nurse I prefer that girls wait a while before having this vaccine. We do not know what if any danger there is in having this vaccine and I am fearful that this may make girls think they are immune for many other sexually transmitted diseases and other viruses. And one more thing, the US FDA is notorious for approving medications etc that aren't safe since they all get so much from the pharmacutical companies and there isn't the federal funding adequate for this agency to do its job properly to safeguard our public.
18

Aasa,

Ontario 02/11/2008 18:13:29
Gardasil and Cervarix have not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity and genotoxicity. They both have aluminum-containing adjuvants. Aluminum hydroxide is a neurotoxin which damages motor neurons.
19

Fifi la Bonbon,

02/11/2008 19:17:03
Adjuvants, eh? Sounds scary.

One other thing - all these products have involved the use of copious amounts of the notorious dihydrogen monoxide. Check out www.dhmo.org for full details, but basically, some of the known perils of Dihydrogen Monoxide are:
- Death due to accidental inhalation of DHMO, even in small quantities.
- Prolonged exposure to solid DHMO causes severe tissue damage.
- DHMO is a major component of acid rain.
- Gaseous DHMO can cause severe burns.
- Contributes to soil erosion.
- Leads to corrosion and oxidation of many metals.
- Contamination of electrical systems often causes short-circuits.
- Exposure decreases effectiveness of car brakes.
- Found in biopsies of pre-cancerous tumours and lesions.
- Given to vicious dogs involved in deadly attacks.
- Associated with killer cyclones including Hurricane Katrina.

Are we geting the whole truth from scientists and the military about dangerous and reckless experiments with DHMO? This is our daughters' safety we are talking about!!!
20

votethirdpartycandidate,

East Haddam, USA 02/11/2008 19:47:25
None of the patent holders, their relatives or their groupies had the lyme disease vaccine. It ruined many lives and it turns out one in three will be adversely affected. The patent holders knew this and did nothing to test for potential problems. When it was taken off the market the reason given was the vaccine wasn't selling well. The lyme disease tests patent holders know the tests are semiworthless but, as long as they get their money, who cares.

DO NOT TRUST THAT EVERYONE HAS YOUR BEST INTEREST AT HEART BECAUSE MOST JUST WANT YOUR MONEY. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY... NOT YOUR OR YOUR DAUGHTERS' HEALTH.
21

Fifi la Bonbon,

02/11/2008 20:31:12
Why is it all foreigners having a go at this?
22

Aasa,

Ontario 02/11/2008 21:30:33
"Why is it all foreigners having a go at this?"
It is because our daughters have already been offered or given Gardasil, and the VAERS database in the States already shows over 8000 adverse events following vaccination with Gardasil. Only a small percentage of actual adverse reactions (oops, "events") ever get reported to the VAERS, so there are likely many more out there that are not counted. Also, here in Canada, our government is using about $900 million of our tax dollars to pay for this dubious vaccine/experiment, that some of us want no part of!
http://dailystrength.org/c/Chronic_Fatigue_Syndrome/forum/2223691-gardasil-investigate-safety-issues
23

drahcir,

pittsburgh, pennsylvania, usa 02/11/2008 22:46:50
keep that vaccine away from the kids. teach the kids good Biblical morals to keep their dresses up and cherish virginity !!!!!!!!! this whole world's society is whacked out !!!!!!!!! big pharma won't like my recomendations, neither vile liberals !!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6ZIHbFQAzU

goldieshouse.piczo.com
24

Fifi la Bonbon,

02/11/2008 23:52:20
I should have said "Why is it all foreigners having a go at this here, on a Scots website?"

Have you no websites of your own, insteads of telling us in your arrogant North American way how to live our lives? And the fact that your great great aunt Germolina supposedly came from Auchenshuggle doesn't make it any better.

All this foreign talk of "big pharma" and "vile liberals" cuts no ice in our glorious socialist people's kingdom. Go and annoy your own neighbours with your mad paranoid ideas. They will probably have guns and will shoot you.
25

Geraldine Firequeen,

Pits of Nelson 03/11/2008 00:31:19
Fifi la Bonbon - aren't you French? These women are trying to help - they are passing on information - isn't this what it's all about - the internet? and stuff? Do you have to be Scottish to be on here? I'm not!
26

RanWiz,

USA 03/11/2008 00:32:17
Its the money for Big Pharma,
It would be wiser to circumcise the boys to help prevent cervical cancer, than an unproven vaccine. The virus hangs out under the foreskin. Do some research of your own, not pharma's claims
27

DOONUNNER,

Perth 03/11/2008 01:02:37
What a load of TOSH!!

My daughters here in Oz have both been vaccinated and of all the girls done in Oz there have been no reports so far. Get with the programme - loads of girls have been vaccinated woth it so far and there have been no reports so far.

By the way this was developed by a scottish doctor working in Oz. How about celebrating scots ingenuity once again.
28

DOONUNNER,

Perth 03/11/2008 01:09:43
This isn't about avoiding STD's or promiscuity, it is not like giving teenage girls the pill. This affects many women who have lived wholesome lives who fall prey to a cancer causing disease later on in life. The vaccine needs to be given as teenagers in order for them to be protected. Note it is not available to over 20's as it doesn't work if taken after the teens.

Enough of you Bayou anti-propaganda.
29

Edward S,

http://drop.io/Summerbird 03/11/2008 04:40:37
Listen to the Alex Jones radio interview with an expert on the Gardasil vaccine, along with a woman whose teen daughter was horribly injured by that vaccine. It is a free MP3 download at http://drop.io/Summerbird The title of the file is, "vaccines" and it is currently the 32 audio file from the top of the page. There is also another file titled, "vaccine whistle blower." That is also good but it is not specifically about Gardasil.
30

Helen Ahandcart,

Edinburgh 03/11/2008 12:13:18
why not give it to boys?? have you ever met a boy with a cervix?

Charles L at #1, I find your notion that women are being treated as some kind of wholesale experiement patriarchal and insulting. Should I say thanks for standing up for us, since you clearly think we're too feeble minded to have intelligent, reasoned views for ourselves, and instead just allow ourselves to be used by the (presumably male?) medical and scientific establishment? Also you clearly know next to nothing about the subject.

#22 - re VAERS ; here are the facts:

The US National Vaccine Information Centre (NVIC), which describes itself as a vaccine safety and informed consent advocacy organisation, issued a report in August 2007 which quoted a figure of 2227 Gardasil® related adverse events reported to VAERS. It also presented evidence of a statistically significant increased risk when Gardasil® is co-administered with other vaccines, specifically Menactra®. The organisation called for the CDC to issue an advisory alert and a recommendation that Gardasil® should not be administered simultaneously with Menactra®.

Causation, it should be noted, cannot be established with this kind of data, which merely quantifies events occurring in temporal sequence. Without more rigorous examination of other factors such as biological plausibility, strength of association, reproducibility, or even a comparison against a baseline of ‘normal’ or ‘expected’ incidence, its value is limited. In June 2007, GACVS reviewed the safety of HPV vaccines and concluded that the evidence, based on local and systemic events after vaccination, was ‘reassuring’ and that no concerns were identified. It did, however, note the need for long-term surveillance to identify possible rare and unexpected adverse effects, particularly as accurate information on the rated of a variety of diseases is ‘generally lacking’ in this age group.

The CDC response to the NVIC’s report was published in August 2007, which concluded that
31

,

04/11/2008 22:31:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

Ferg frae N.Z.,

Capital City Wellington 07/11/2008 20:37:39
Hi just to let you know its too late for our young Girls here in NZ they have already completed the injection of all that age group and will continue as they reach the 12- 13 y.o. age group!
We all had injections for measles, TB,rubella,polio you name it we had when I was a boy in Scotland 50something years ago. I never had any side effects nor did I hear of any THOUGH THERE PROBABLY WAS but for the general population it saved many lives I am sure. Have a great Saturday when it arrives for you. The temp here is about 8C degs so we are not a tripical Pacific island you may think we are!
Kind regards

John
33

Hera,

Chesterfield 15/11/2008 16:06:01
When I complained to the ASA about the NHS HPV vaccine advert : no evidence of safety/efficiency and no evidence that the HPV causes cancer, the ASA replied that they believed that the NHS would be able to provide evidence if they were asked !!! The ASA didn't ask.

Pat Rattigan N.D.
34

Shuggie,

Vancouver 23/02/2009 16:56:36
#24 Fifi; speaking as one of the foreigners you have been having a go at, I have nothing against vaccines. During the polio epidemic of 1957 I was a houseman, and had one of the first doses of Salk vaccine in Scotland. Dr Salk refused to patent this, saying that you can't patent good health. Would that the makers of the current generation of anti-viral vaccines were as scrupulous.
My grand-daughter will not be having this jab until more is known.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.