Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Salmond urged not to throw caution to the wind on energy

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 August 2008
ALEX Salmond's renewables policy will come under attack from business groups this week ahead of a Parliamentary inquiry into Scotland's future energy provision.
Business groups warn that Salmond's target of generating 50% of Scotland's electricity from renewable sources by 2020 does not "stand up to scrutiny" and the Government should look at all energy sources, including nuclear and coal, with the aim of ma
king Scotland self-sufficient in future.

As the global energy market becomes increasingly competitive amid growing demand and rising prices, business groups say the Government needs to make securing Scotland's future provision a priority if it wants to maintain private sector interest in the country.

Graham Bell, spokesman for the Scottish and Edinburgh Chambers of Commerce, said: "Business and industry don't like uncertainty. They don't like not knowing what's going to happen tomorrow. Demand is starting to exceed supply and it's a serious issue. How we get ourselves there (to the point of self-sufficiency] – that should be a key part of the plan."

Scotland is presently an exporter of electricity but will be forced to import it in future as two major power stations have been marked for closure within the next 10 years.

Bell warned that although the Government's renewables plan is laudable, it does not appear to take account of the unreliability of some alternative forms of energy generation.

"We have a feeling that the minister has taken the capacity measurements of wind installation, for example, as given for what they actually deliver and they don't. They're not 100% efficient, few things are.

"We need an energy plan that stands up to scrutiny which means we make the most use of the existing sources we have.

"Nuclear has to be considered as part of the mix. We also need to invest in our coal reserves which are still considerable."

Salmond, who has been hailed as a renewables "saint", would like to see all of Scotland's nuclear power stations closed by 2020.

In their submissions ahead of the economy, energy and tourism inquiry into Scotland's energy future – the deadline for which is on Friday – business groups are also expected to push for more thought to be given to how energy-savings programmes affect Scotland's small and medium-sized businesses, which commonly find it more difficult to meet targets.

"There needs to be a much more clear and accessible programme around the whole issue of saving energy. It needs to be much better adapted for SMEs," Bell added.

The economy, energy and tourism committee, convened by Tavish Scott, intends to assess "what type of future we want in Scotland in terms of the production, distribution and more efficient use of energy, and how and when it can be delivered to meet the Scottish Government's objectives of increasing renewable energy generation and reducing emissions".

Oral hearings are scheduled to start next month.



The full article contains 486 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 August 2008 6:29 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Greenheatman,

TAIN 10/08/2008 01:12:47
Energy is not Electricity. What we are talking about here is the generation of ELECTRICITY. Why do the chattering classes call electricity energy?

We do not have to invest in nuclear or coal to provide heat to raise steam.

We need to invest in renewable energy to provide heat for existing thermal plants. Replacing existing thermal plants with alternative green heat sources will reduce our carbon footprint towards zero over time.

Generating worthless intermittent electricity and dumping it onto the grid where it is NEVER consumed makes a lot of money for the operators of wind farms but costs the planet dear.



2

The Strategist,

10/08/2008 09:24:22
Did Salmond say he was anti-coal? I don't remember that.
3

gus1940,

Edinburgh 10/08/2008 09:34:41
Periodic supply surpluses could be used in pump/storage systems or to generate hydrogen.
4

Charles MN,

10/08/2008 11:10:48
#3
Currently renewable energy costs twice conventional energy ( 10.6p/kWh vs 5.31). If you add to that the costs involved in pump storage, including the losses in transmission and storage, the cost will increase even more.

At the moment the increased costs of renewable energy to the consumer are small because it only supplies a small amount of our power ( ~5%). If it was to increase to 50% there would be significant increases to the current electricity prices.
5

Andra, Dundee,

10/08/2008 14:26:59
#4 Charles MN,
Your point regarding the cost to consumers is very valid. Take the argument further, and you see that consumers UK wide are paying a "renewable" premium on their electricity bills so that expensive wind power can be generated in Scotland. If Scotland were independent, English consumers would now longer wish to subsidize Scottish wind power so the bills for Scottish consumers would double over night!
Salmond's electricity policy is political opportunism that does not stand up to logical analysis and is highly dependent on reliable English generation, and expensive transmission.
6

Geomac 1,

Scotland 10/08/2008 16:58:25
It's about time that business and industry started to make noises about the totally inadequate posturing of Salmond and his SNP buddies re electricity generation - a statement that we will produce 50% from renewables by 2020 is woeful - from where exactly???

#1 Greenheatman
You have a very strange understanding of electricity generation and distribution.
For a start re your final para, you simply CANNOT dump electricity into the grid where it cannot be used - at all times the grid (supply/demand) is in balance - what is delivered is used - there is NO storage!
You also need to remember that only some 25% of Scottish CO2 comes from electricity generation! the rest is from transport and industry etc.
Finally, could you be more specific as to what renewables you see generating our electricity in future - you seem to have ruled out wind - that leaves hydro (largely reaching limit), wave (not yet proven commercially) and wave/tidal (again not proven commercially on any scale)

#3 gus - the process you are suggesting with hydrogen as an intermediary (storage) is vastly expensive and results in negative energy
7

Andra, Dundee,

11/08/2008 07:28:29
#6 Geomac 1
What is negative energy? Does all electricity generation not leave you with less energy than you started with?
If only we could turn remote wind power into Hydrogen - even with low efficiency - then there would be a number of advantages:
(a) we could make use of the wind whenever it blows - not just when electricity demand is high
(b) hydrogen can be transported without inefficient and unsightly long range pylons
(c) we could store hydrogen
(d) Hydrogen can be used to run cars

These advantages are so great that low efficiency would be an acceptable use of low value remote wind power. Much better than the current politically motivated expensive, inefficient, gas-backed-up use of wind to generate subsidised power for the grid.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.