Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


RBS payout up as bank averts crisis

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 February 2008
ROYAL Bank of Scotland is poised this week to increase its dividend and reveal that its newly acquired assets in emerging markets are trading above expectations, when it unveils a record profit above £10bn.
It is also expected to reveal a further loss on bad credit lines, but its full-year results statement is likely to confound those who remain sceptical about the strength of its balance sheet.

The Edinburgh-based bank is not thought to have any plans to raise capital by selling off major assets in the immediate future, beyond selling train-leasing company Angel Trains, though speculation lingers over the long-term status of some of its businesses, such as Direct Line and Churchill insurance.

RBS is more likely to follow Barclays and Lloyds TSB in raising its dividend, and chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin will draw attention to the businesses it has acquired from Dutch bank ABN Amro, which it bought last year in a three-way deal with Banco Santander and Fortis.

A source said: "RBS will not disappoint. It will increase the dividend and reveal the strength of the bank's position in emerging markets."

It is thought the ABN Amro businesses will enable RBS to significantly expand its transactional banking services, where business is conducted on a deal-by-deal basis. Stripping out ABN, expectations are for RBS to post underlying profits before tax of £10.3bn, up from £9.4bn last time. There was relief among investors at the end of last year when it confirmed lower than feared writedowns for both RBS and ABN of £1.5bn, of which £250m could be offset elsewhere.

Keith Bowman, analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "The market consensus is a 9% increase in dividend. RBS in the past year or two has been good at raising the dividend. Given that Barclays raised its dividend last week, there will be pressure on RBS to do the same.

"ABN will probably be the top of the list of priorities for the time being. I doubt they are going to say anything specific this time (on asset sell-offs].

"Rumours of a pending rights issue have been rife in recent weeks. However, such concerns also have to be weighed against the bank's recent investment record, with successes coming from the likes of Southern Water and the Bank of China. Much may also depend on just how vigorously management scoured the books at ABN before completing its acquisition."

Mike Trippet, analyst at Oriel Securities, said: "I've heard they are looking hard at all assets. I don't think Angel Trains would realise a huge amount of cash for them."

HBOS, parent of Bank of Scotland, will unveil year-end figures on Wednesday, with the spotlight once again on impairment provisions. Bad news from Bradford & Bingley has heaped pressure on HBOS's shares amid concerns over writedowns and arrears.

HBOS said in December that bad-debt charges were lower in the second half of the year, but according to Dresdner Kleinwort, the group could see some of the sector's highest bad-debt provisions, forecasting £2.24bn for 2007 – not far below the £2.8bn posted last week by its larger rival, Barclays.

Analysts are expecting underlying pre-tax profits of £5.76bn, up marginally on 2006's £5.54bn. HBOS has already revealed a £180m blow from the credit crunch, but the market will be watching for news of further losses or exposure. One source said HBOS would report a restoration of its 15-20% market share of mortgages, but a greater focus in future on profitable business rather than market share.

The full article contains 605 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 February 2008 4:44 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

The Strategist,

24/02/2008 00:22:28
Nothing of great interest here for Scotland's economy.
2

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 24/02/2008 05:58:20
Good job boys, any chance of you guys running an Independent Scottish Economy?
3

The Strategist,

24/02/2008 10:00:05
#2 That would involved a degree of patriotism.
4

Dr Mike,

Edinburgh 24/02/2008 13:37:44
Ask Fred Goodwin why his bank is turning 6000 ATMs, many situated at Tesco superstores, over to an advertising company who will subject users to ads while they withdraw their cash.

That is the biggest story in banking today: banks and their software provider forcing the general public to suffer ads while waiting for their own cash and taking in advertising fees by the back door.

Banks already take our money in so many ways viz mortgages, loans and insurance, now they want to play a role in the influence of advertising as to how we spend our disposable cash. Banks are not entitled to advertise dissimilar products without the consumer having an opportunity to object.

Also, RBS funds small and medium businesses in so many ways, it is completely hypocritical for it to now form alliances with big advertisers on their own ATMs at the doors to supermarkets and shopping centres. Banks should be expounding the virtues of financial prudence, savings and investment, not suggesting that I should somehow use my cash and burn it on a Lottery Ticket!!!!

Third party advertising on ATMs is a matter for serious concern. Banks have grown too powerful and outward looking and it's time to say No to yet more exploitation of the consumer. The top brass are not in control of their underlings, and that is because they themselves no longer care about the basic principles of banking and propriety. They are only interested in occupying a world stage and building ever greater profits. I promise you Fred, unless you take urgent action to stop the madness of entering into third party advertising, it could well be your nemesis.

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/NoATMadvertising/
5

The Strategist,

24/02/2008 16:55:54
#4 Dr Mike

"Also, RBS funds small and medium businesses in so many ways"

Eh? You'd have more chance of winning with that lottery ticket than getting RBS to fund your small business.... They'll certainly lend you money or provide an overdraft but they won't put up real venture type funding unless its for something they want themselves such as buying a stake in a Chinese bank, a building company or some property.
6

Tris,

24/02/2008 23:31:57

Will this mean longer queues at the autoteller?
7

Dr Mike,

Edinburgh 25/02/2008 15:54:53
I don't know. The adverts are generally the same length as the wait for the cash, and this is one of the hackneyed excuses that the advertisers churn out for it not being a bad thing.

HOWEVER, that is not the point. Think how vulnerable you are at the ATM...you are waiting for both your card and your cash, so what choice do you have but to "view the advert". You can't walk away. OK you could close your eyes and count to 10, but the ads are shown when you are almost competely captive. Also, according to quite well established research, when you withdraw cash, a person is in a certain mental state which makes them more suggestible - something to do with having actual currency in your hand makes you more willing to spend it with less reason (unless your rational mind says, can I really afford this?). Advertisers know therefore that they can have a high degree of success at that moment, hence why this is happening.

Again, according to received wisdom, a certain percentage of the cash that you take out is "up for grabs" say around 20-30% meaning that people are willing to go and spend that money on a whim. So if you see an ad for a product that is available right there and then , say in the shop where the ATM is located, then bingo, your suckered. Even if you don't buy it, your mental recall of the ad is very high and you may find that you are much more likely to buy that product another time.

It's psychological warfare, and it works. That's why it's bad. It's certainly nothing to do with how long the ad is.
8

Dr Mike,

Edinburgh 25/02/2008 17:06:34
Actually, a bank that makes £10,000,000,000 in one year in profit has no moral right to even think of entering into being a promoter, by whatever intermediary it can employ, of ANY product or service of any kind, including its own I might add, using its ATM network.

It's utter madness to court controversy and become embroiled in the rights and wrongs of becoming an ally of Tesco through ATM ads just to support one almost insignificant supplier's vision of their own fortune, earned from the apparent exploitation of every potential ATM user in the UK from now until Kingdom come!!!!!

The prudent knighted Chief Executive would make one telephone call and take a lead to begin the end of the matter of entering the world of third party advertising at ATMs, for the sake of the integrity of the entire Banking Industry. That would indeed be a noble act.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.