Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Staffing crisis 'will hit green energy targets'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 September 2008
SCOTLAND's renewables sector is facing a severe staffing crisis which will throw Government targets on green energy into disarray, industry experts are warning.
Renewable energy companies have raised the alarm over a chronic shortage of engineers and other staff with enough training to man Scotland's growing army of wind farms, hydroelectric power stations and biomass plants.

Industry experts say up to 4
0% of jobs at some renewables firms are currently unfilled and Scotland will not meet its target of generating half its electricity from renewable sources by 2020 if the Government does not urgently address the problem.

With the industry expected to mushroom over the next 12 years, a report from the British Wind Energy Association next month is expected to warn of a grave threat to the future of the industry.

Sector specialists are calling on the Government to invest in more specialised training programmes or risk missing its 2020 ambition.

Henning von Barsewisch, managing director of RePower UK, an Edinburgh-based firm which manufactures wind turbines, said recruitment is currently acting as a bottleneck in the industry, and in some cases it has taken up to year to recruit people even for sales roles.

He warned the problem is only likely to get worse in the run-up to 2020 as the renewables workforce balloons. "We won't be able to achieve the targets because we can't find the people," he said.

David Cameron, chief technical officer at the Scottish Renewables Forum, the trade body for the renewables industry north of the border, said a recent survey of members had highlighted recruitment as one of the biggest barriers to the sector's development, along with Scotland's grid and planning constraints.

He pointed out that many training schemes will be too late for the 2020 target. Careers Scotland's 'The Path is Green' course raises awareness of green energy jobs among schools but it can take 12 years before the students are ready to enter the workplace, he argued.

"It's a shame we didn't start this 10 years ago," he added.

The warning over recruitment follows a sharp wake-up call from Robert Armour, of British Energy, who said the Government will need to built a new generation of conventional power stations before 2025 if it wants to avoid importing electricity.

At a conference on Scotland's energy future last Tuesday, fears were also raised over the "woeful" state of the Scottish grid system, which industry experts say will need to be "turned on its head" if electricity generated at remote wind and tidal facilities is to be transported to the rest of the country.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 September 2008 1:16 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Alternative energy sources
 
1

The Strategist,

14/09/2008 09:15:27
RE Power is a German company with a branch office in Edinburgh. It does NOT manufacture in the UK or Scotland.
2

Greenheatman,

TAIN 14/09/2008 11:20:53
I just happen to be one of these engineers that they seek, but I would never work for them because I do not suffer fools gladly.

The strategy of generating dribs and drabs of electricity randomly is seriously flawed and will NEVER reduce our carbon footprint in 20, 50, or 100 years. The key to reducing our carbon footprint is to provide an alternative heat source, from wind, waves and tides to existing coal fired power stations like Cockenzie.

Cockenzie, for example, needs to burn one tonne of coal to get around 2MWh of electricity. Generating 6MWh of thermal power from renewables will give you 2MWh of green electricity without polluting the atmosphere with 1,900kg of CO2 equivalent.

Yes, it really is that simple and self-evident so why are we still generating intermittent electricity in real time, usually when nobody wants it?
3

Mcsnagpile,

14/09/2008 12:35:34

In the 1970’s many industries came under pressure as the North Sea and Oil industry in general soaked up engineers of various levels of skill. The industrial base is no longer in existence. Training engineers does not solve a market demand, as industrial experience is a more important factor. I would question if there are sufficient experienced trainers to man the courses. To build one major power plant of any kind, using only Scottish labour, is unlikely to be possible. British experienced engineers are mainly ageing and scattered around the world, many never to be seen on these shores again.
If UK wanted to immediately build a number of Nuclear Plants it would need substantial, expensive, European engineering expertise, if available (French & German).
Scotland has a number of prehistoric plants as its power backbone and is something that must be resolved urgently.
4

Abel Magwitch,

14/09/2008 13:10:28
As number 4 states, the problem is the quality rather than the quantity of engineers. Our elected leaders, who mainly have a background in law and the arts, have difficulty in understanding this concept. They may have heard the old story that if a sufficiently large number of monkeys are seated at computer keyboards, they will produce the works of Shakespeare.

I vividly remember from 50 years ago the establishment thinking that the UK would be doomed if it did not train more engineers. The main competition in those days was considered to be the USSR which trained far more engineers than we did,in proportion to population. As an engineer myself I also remember the shabby underfunded university departments and the low starting salaries for graduates. The only good thing about the old days was that there were many industrial companies that were willing and able to allow student visits and summer projects at their plants.

5

Incandescent,

15/09/2008 00:08:47
All valid points. However, the cause of increased energy demand is obvious: population growth. The Labour government has conspiculously avoided this simple fact and, indeed, used "population shrinkage" as an excuse to massively increase the immigration of potential voters (of every race so, please, no knee-jerk "racist comments"). At this point in evolution, affluent human beings should be looking merely to replace themselves with two genetically merged children. Why do three (or more) children families continue to happen when every scientific fact points to it being not such a bright idea?
6

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 15/09/2008 06:49:42
And just exactly how many jobs are there at a windfarm when it is up and running? - A big fat zero.
They use Danish and German turbines, are delivered by German and Danish ships, driven to the site on Danish and German trucks with Danish and German drivers and erected by Danish and German construction crews.
Then they are monitored remotely in Denmark and Germany.
So what exactly is in it for the Scottish people from the renewable ie wind, industry?
Answer : Higher electricity bills and a destroyed landscape.
7

Why can't I use my usual name?,

15/09/2008 08:56:09
Perhaps you're not a racist, 7, but you are ill-informed. Scotland's population is barely growing and is lower than it was a couple of decades ago. Smaller households have a far bigger influence on energy demand, as does growing affluence.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.