Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Transplants overhaul will save 120 lives

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 January 2008
MORE than 100 lives a year will be saved in Scotland as a result of plans to boost by 50% the number of transplant operations.
Ministers will back moves this week to entirely overhaul the transplant system, with more bereaved families being urged to offer up their loved ones' organs to save the life of another. An extra 120 heart, kidney, liver and lung transplants could tak
e place in Scotland every year under the new measures, helping the 600 Scots currently on the waiting list.

But plans to introduce a new law of presumed consent – where everyone would be deemed to have granted consent for the removal of their organs after death, unless they had specified otherwise – will not be announced, though are still being considered.

The long-awaited shake-up will be unveiled this week by Scottish Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon and UK Health Secretary Alan Johnston.

Britain has one of the highest family refusal rates in the EU, with 42% of relatives blocking organ removal, compared with 17% in Spain, 29% in Italy and 30% in France. Combined with the low numbers of those who have taken a donor card, it has ensured that the waiting list for transplants across the UK is at a record high.

Under the new plans, more special "transplant coordinators" will be recruited to the NHS who will attempt to encourage more families to back transplants. In addition, a new 24-hour organ retrieval unit will be set up to ensure speedy delivery to where organs are needed.

The new measures are expected to reduce the family refusal rate by at least 10%. It is thought that it will take five years before they can then be fully implemented across the NHS.

The problems surrounding Scotland's organ transplant worsened last month after the country's only heart transplant unit at Glasgow Royal Infirmary halted all operations after a rise in the number of deaths following surgery.

Labour MSP Lord Foulkes, who has put forward a private members' bill at both the Scottish Parliament and the House of Lords to introduce a new law on presumed consent, said he welcomed the changes. He also praised the fact that SNP and Labour had worked together to introduce the reforms uniformly across the UK.

He said: "In this case it is encouraging to see the co-operation between all parts of the United Kingdom and it shows that progress can be made by that co-operation.

My own aim is to try and speed this process up and get as many of these changes, in particular presumed consent, as quickly as possible."

The moves have also raised hopes that the number of living kidney donors might increase.

Andy Williamson, of the Kidney Patients' Association, said: "These are necessary changes which I hope will make a big difference.

We need to improve public awareness about how safe it is to be a living donor now. I was given a kidney by a friend and I have become aware of how little people know so I hope there will be a big focus on that."

Meanwhile, Sturgeon urged people to get a donor card. She said: "The shortage of donor organs for transplantation is an increasing problem and we are determined to address this. I want everyone to seriously consider signing up to the register."

On the plans this week, she added: "Although the report does not deal with the issue of presumed consent, I want to repeat that I am sympathetic towards the idea of introducing a system of presumed consent and I welcome the fact that the task force is considering this approach."

Health chiefs in Scotland point out that as well as saving lives there are significant economic benefits to increasing the number of transplants.

For example, while a kidney transplant costs £45,900, it costs £25,300 a year to maintain kidney dialysis for a patient waiting for a transplant.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 January 2008 9:36 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Transport policy
 
1

Ross Fyffe,

Scotand 13/01/2008 02:27:27
I am and will always be an organ donor, even if my organs go into lowlife like George Best, or into others who refused sign up to be an organ donor.

If I am in as much mess to go donating something for another would be a great way to go.

2

nabodican,

Portree 13/01/2008 08:21:43
Donation - yes
Presumed consent - no
3

,

13/01/2008 10:23:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 13/01/2008 10:23:03
Presumed consent is not the way to go.
5

Haleakelaman,

St.Andrews 13/01/2008 13:06:52
Yes, this would be a compassionate donation. I only hope that a surplus of organs is not abused by the UK goverment. It wasn't too far in the past when a tory government minister, Virginai Bottomley was selling British donated blood to Germany. I only hope that the UK goverment isn't considering making any financial gain out of cadavers organs.
6

ochone,

Sauchie, clack's 13/01/2008 14:01:19
Don't fall for it, it's just another fiendish SNP plot, I am surprised that an old fox like Lord George is being duped like this.

The SNP are just hoping that transplants from Nat's will influence any unionist's that they are put into to change their ways, yes that must be it.

I am so glad that AM2 opened my eyes to the ways of the SNP, just like their fiendish plot to subvert English produce as he outlines on another post or I would actually have thought this wa sa good idea
7

Aqwes,

Edinburgh 13/01/2008 16:19:05
To those who chorus "if you don't like it, opt out", I would put it to you that you're missing the point. It's not the donating of organs that is being objected to, but rather the assumption of organs by the state, without consent or compensation. By opting out, you are only legitimising their claim of ownership over your organs. By opting out, you give up the chance to refute that claim.
8

Rita,

Warren 13/01/2008 16:56:31
whwn were Burke & Hare voted into office???
9

Pilrig.,

Livingston 13/01/2008 18:25:49
1 - who you calling the George Best a lowlife ?
George was a decent bloke with a God-give talent, unfortunately he couldn't handle the bevvy, like a lot of people. That doesn't mean he or they are necessarily lowlifes.
"ye that are withoot sin, cast the first stone."
10

yockel,

Green Hills 13/01/2008 19:06:03
And how exactly are they going to know if you opted out? They won't but the medics will be protected by the presumption.
Another justification for ID cards or perhaps a tattoo on your forearm if you prefer.
We are all going to die anyway, get used to it. Tranplant ops are a complete waste of time in the medium term.
My corpse does not belong to the state.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should wardens be given the power to fine drivers who double park?
Yes, there has to be some kind of deterrent.
Yes, but only if they are causing a serious obstruction.
No, it would be just another money-making exercise.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.