Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scots will still see the light on roads

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 February 2007
SCOTLAND'S transport agency has no plans to follow its counterpart south of the Border and switch off streetlights to save energy.
The Highways Agency, which runs main roads and motorways in England and Wales, has said trials of unlit roads will begin this year.

The scheme will involve lights being dimmed or going off automatically at midnight when there are fewer vehicles o
n the roads. The plan has been criticised by road safety groups.

A spokeswoman for Transport Scotland, which looks after trunk roads and motorways - as well as railways - north of the Border, said: "We have no plans for any scheme to switch off the lights at night."

UK transport minister Stephen Ladyman said in a Commons written answer last week that the Highways Agency was looking to switch off road lighting from midnight and added that his department was also urging local councils to dim or turn off other lights on local roads to save money.

He added: "Any financial or environmental saving would have to be balanced against potential adverse effects, for example on accidents or crime." Around 30% of major roads and motorways are lit and powerful lights are installed at junctions and roundabouts to reduce accidents."

A spokesman for the Highways Agency added: "Our first step could be to look at whether lights could be dimmed at suitable locations when traffic levels are low. We will not begin trials without pre-assessments."

Paul Smith, of the Safe Speed group - which lobbies against speed cameras and which believes too little is being done on other road safety measures - said: "Lights allow drivers to see pedestrians who are on the road in the wrong place. This is penny-pinching at the expense of safety."

Dianne Ferreira, from the Brake pressure group, added: "We cannot put costs in front of lives."

Julie Bentley, from personal safety charity the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, said: "With less street lighting, our awareness of our surrounding area is diminished and the risk to our personal safety is increased."

However, environmental groups have cautiously welcomed the move, claiming large numbers of powerful street lights waste energy and create "light pollution" at night, meaning would-be stargazers cannot see the night sky properly.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 February 2007 7:05 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Transport policy
 
1

Hadrian,

18/02/2007 01:50:41

Perhaps the whole street lighting system needs investigation for a more efficient light emmitter, we are supposed to do this for our houses. But dimming or turning street lights off surely defeats the purpose.
Crims and muggers will love it , but. :-).

2

Alasdair McWhirter,

taking time off from cleaning my bicycle 18/02/2007 09:14:42

I can think of several major junctions around the east side of the country that are not lit, yet down south you find mile after mile of open, illuminated motorway. (I must point out I did not discover these whilst on my bicycle lest anyone point out bicycles and motorways are not conducive to longevity)

3

lisa,

perth 18/02/2007 11:17:46

My council leaves them on day and night. When a bulb goes they turn them off, replace the bulb, and turn them on again. Then they lecture us for not being green.

How do you deal with people who are too stupid to realise how stupid they are?

4

BrightSpark,

Scottish Borders 18/02/2007 14:22:58

This is not news- dimming technology for street lighting has been available for a long time now - just because the HA decides to do something does not mean that Scotland should follow suit.
Don't assume for one minute that Lighting Engineers are not aware of their environmental responsibilities. Lighting is usually installed for a good reason i.e. road or personal safety, assist in combatting crime and the fear of crime etc. and so to consider dimming where lighting has already been installed, would have to mean that there was a reduced need for it or circumstances had changed since the lighting had been installed. To do so otherwise would be foolish and leave the SE or local authorities open to prosecution.
Re: Hadrian #1: there is considerable work being carried out by all the major manufacturers into more efficient forms of lighting - it's just that most authorities cannot afford the cost of installing such fittings! Like most things "environmental" they come at a cost.

5

Henry Gray,

Scottish Borders 18/02/2007 15:13:52

OK BrightSpark but why is Scottish Borders Council removing 90 or 135 watt lamps and replacing them with larger numbers of 250 watt lamps ?
250 - 135 = 115 watts of ADDITIONAL energy consumption.
If you wish to REDUCE consumption why don't they use fluorescent ?

6

Miss Jean Brodie,

18/02/2007 22:25:21

Sooner the world turns dark at night the better - the world will again return to the creme de la creme!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should wardens be given the power to fine drivers who double park?
Yes, there has to be some kind of deterrent.
Yes, but only if they are causing a serious obstruction.
No, it would be just another money-making exercise.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.