Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Thwarted male smokers identified as the archetypal air rage passengers

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
08 October 2006
THE typical plane passenger who carries out air rage is a male in his 30s who is angry at not being allowed to smoke, according to a new study.
The study also found that many of the incidents involve passengers travelling alone, with only a minority involving rowdy groups on board aircraft.

Research by Britain's air watchdog, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), analysed over 3,600 air ra
ge incidents since 2001 to find the typical profile of an air rage incident.

The main findings included:

• More than three-quarters (78%) of incidents involved male passengers.

• The largest single age group involved in offences were travellers in their 30s - accounting for 35% of incidents.

• About a third of examples involved people travelling on their own.

• Four out of 10 incidents involved passengers being banned from smoking.

• More than four in five smoking-related incidents involved smoking in the aircraft's toilet, often including an attempt to sabotage the smoke-detector there.

• Two-fifths of air rage incidents were connected to alcohol abuse, with a third of such events resulting from passengers bringing their own drink on the plane.

• Only 1% of occurrences happened in business or first class seating.

A British Airways source said: "The study turns the conventional image of air rage somewhat on its head. The idea that they are all groups of drunks is quite wrong; smoking is actually just as significant as a cause of air rage incidents."

The doctors, who were attending an International Civil Aviation Organisation conference on the health risks of international travel, heard that increasing numbers of passengers felt anxious about flying since the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and were drinking more on board as a result.

Excessive alcohol consumption has also been linked by many scientists to an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis, or DVT, triggered by potentially fatal blood clots caused by long periods of immobility. In some cases, DVT can be fatal.

In 2001, British Airways warned passengers that they faced being banned from flights for air rage. Passengers who are rude or aggressive to airport staff will be banned from boarding British Airways flights under new measures.

The airline's conditions of carriage were rewritten to warn customers that they would not be allowed to board their flights if they used "threatening, abusive or insulting words to ground staff or the crew".

In August, two Scottish tourists were held in a Greek prison after being arrested for an alleged drunken incident on a flight from Glasgow to Zakynthos. Graham McDonnell and Pieter Mienen, both from Renfrewshire, were arrested on charges of "endangering civil aviation".

Greek police said the men became rowdy and lashed out after being refused drink by flight attendants.

Last January, a British airliner flying from Cancun in Mexico to Manchester had to make a forced landing in Florida when a passenger allegedly became violent and abusive.

The Thomsonfly plane was diverted to Sanford Airport in Orlando following the disturbance on board.

In 2004, a drunk and abusive passenger received a nasty shock when he found his flight included members of the British police rugby league team on their way to New Zealand.

Cabin crew on the Singapore Airlines plane to New Zealand turned to the police contingent to deal with the man.

The drunk passenger was met by local police when the flight landed, but no charges were levelled against him.

In the same year, a Swansea businessman - Michael Jones - lit a cigarette and swore at flight crew. He also scuffled with fellow passengers aboard a 747 from Bangkok in Thailand and had to be handcuffed and strapped into his seat. Jones was jailed for six weeks.

In 2003, footballer turned actor Vinnie Jones was sentenced to community service and ordered to pay £1,100 for air rage offences.

The former Wimbledon midfielder became angry when fellow passenger Stephen Driscoll told him he was being "annoying" - sparking a tirade of "frightening" threats from the star.

Jones was given 80 hours' community service after admitting assault and using threatening words or behaviour towards members of an air crew.

In 2002, a number of leading doctors called for a ban on alcohol on board aircraft in order to stem air rage.

A spokesman for the British Air Transport Association said: "Air rage is an issue which the whole industry takes seriously, but it is important to get these incidents in context.

"They only affect a tiny minority of the flights in and out of the UK every year."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 October 2006 8:13 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Tobacco , Smoking issues
 
1

Donnie,

08/10/2006 07:49:25

Thank goodness for SMINTAIR the first airline specifically for people who smoke. I wish them every success. I look forward to travelling with them when they have expanded their routes to include the UK which hopefully will not be to long in the distant future.

http://smintair.com/THOUGHTS/thoughts.html

2

Belinda-2,

08/10/2006 11:50:55

How interesting – hope the airline authorities will act on this information and re-introduce smoking at least in some sections of the aircraft – then they can bring back full ventilation too and make flying safer for everyone.

3

Colin,

Banff 08/10/2006 12:44:23

Why doesnt this "study" surprise me? It is issued in a timely fashion isnt it? Just when it is de rigeur to vilify smokers. It just adds to the "weight of evidence" against smokers. That "weight of evidence" is conveniently ignored when it concerns the epidemiological studies on passive smoking that so far (and there are some 150 in existence) tell us that the risk of harm is statistically insignificant.

This has gone beyond selective reporting. This, in my opinion, is a fully fledged fatwah.

The logical answer was, is, and always shall be- ventilation.

And it also works on aircraft.

4

Jeremy,

08/10/2006 16:15:04

I think they should just give out dummy tits to these guys, and teach their mammies to knit.

5

Chuckles,

08/10/2006 17:56:35

Donnie 1 thank goodness indeed!!

2Belinda you have real sense- well done!!!! ventilation will bring clean air- its like tyhe smoke is a marker!! Pity the stupid retarded health fascists cant see this!! Theyre too taken by their narrow minds!! Yes that includes Johnny4!!

Im sick and tired of hearing indutries that or this!!!!!! just cut it out and get more sense in!!!!

Colin3 thats right just explain to them!!

6

mandyv,

Cambs England 08/10/2006 20:30:52

Cannot believe it took soooo long for that one to be worked out - how much did that study cost I wonder.
I get that now before I even get on the plane. The airport stresses me out just as much now.

Wonder when they try to stop smoking in cars ( believe me that is where this is going too) will road rage kick in and how long they will take too realise that one as well.

Anyone who thinks this is getting out of hand you have a voice at Freedom2choose, please use it.
Lets see how much the stress levels go up and the time off from work people will be taking.
I have never skivved in the 34 years I have been working, but things are going to change and believe me I will change with them.
I know people who do not know what a days work is and the goverment look after them for many years. I think my time has come too.
I am sick to death reading the blantant lies nad have virtually stopped watching TV - does not bother me in the slightest really. What bothers me is being forced to pay for the BBC license and their very biased opinions.
Rage in the Air-Rage at work- rage on the roads- wow we have so much too look forward too.
Yes Bill, I believe people were less sick coming back from their holidays or buissness trips when smoking was allowed. Something must be differant with the ventilation on planes now. Well done Simitar glad you are not sheep and do not believe everything the Antis spout out.

7

Iain Inverness,

Inverness 08/10/2006 20:54:15

Mandy, good post!!
When they stopped allowing smoking on planes they cut back on the air filtration to save fuel.

Result? All those viruses, bacteria and toxic moulds now have a field day and people get sick much more often after air travel. Indeed, where I work I have noticed that everyone who has come back from a foreign holiday always go off sick on their scheduled return to work with, most often chest infections.

People really ought to understand that because there is no visible smoke in places where smoking is banned it does not mean the air is "clean" or "clear" at all.

8

Ursula,

Edinburgh 08/10/2006 22:02:09

smoking, drinking causing air rage, what next PMT

9

John V,

Chester 09/10/2006 20:31:39

"Holy" crusaders don't want truth they prefer dogma. A good definition of a dogmatist that I read up many years ago is that a he/she is someone who never examines the basis from which they are operating.

One can see it all here with the "antismokerists" - the Nazis, the Inquisition and many others. Antismokerism is, as someone recently said, what happens when what was initially a sub cult gets its hands on the levers of power.

However, I can quite believe that some air rage is caused by people being unable to smoke - and why not? Unreasonable conditions create unreasonable responses. Or if you like the concept of karma - every action produces an equal reaction.

10

Douglas,

Bathgate 09/10/2006 22:12:53

Yes, but Vinnie Jones a star?

11

Colin,

Banff 09/10/2006 23:45:58

Yes, Douglas.

Its about as believable as the SHS hoax.

12

Adamski,

Edinburgh 11/10/2006 11:21:30

Really, it's just the standard reaction of the drug addict who can't get their "fix".
Can they not go without for a couple of hours, show some willpower eh?.
Regardless of whether you believe in the effects of passive smoking one thing is for sure, having someonelses fag reek wafting over you is disgusting and it stinks.

13

Chuckles,

11/10/2006 11:57:14

well let the airlines decide of course if they want to allow smoking!!

14

David from New Mills,

New Mills 11/10/2006 12:32:26

A yob is a yob is a yob. Why feel the need to make excuses?

15

Chuckles,

13/10/2006 12:16:08

precisely i know what a yob is they are different things to smokers!!

16

David from New Mills,

New Mills 13/10/2006 12:45:30

#15,Charlie.
Agreed that they are not necessarily synonymous. Nor are they necessarily mutually exclusive. My criticism was of yobs, drunken, smoking or otherwise.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.