Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scottish Water faces new row as businesses overcharged £70m a year

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 February 2008
BUSINESSES are being overcharged by almost £70m a year on their water bills, according to a Government report which is expected to prompt more calls for a shake-up at Scottish Water.
The findings, which are part of a widespread review of water charges in Scotland, show that in the next five years, business customers will be billed an extra £210m.

The consultation says there is "robust evidence" that Scottish Water has been cha
rging businesses to subsidise household bills by up to £69m a year and that the practice must stop.

Scottish Water's average household charges are at present lower than the average in England and Wales, and in 2010 are expected to be among the lowest in the UK.

The news comes just days after MSPs demanded Scottish Water be fined over the "profligate" waste of one billion litres of treated water a day. The state-owned organisation has spent more than £2bn of taxpayers' cash replacing leaking pipes, but every 24 hours, water treated at a cost of £190,000 continues to leak into the ground.

Last night one business group accused Scottish Water of effectively putting companies north of the border at a cost disadvantage to their English neighbours.

Niall Stuart, spokesman for the Scottish Council for Development and Industry, slammed the findings and called for changes to be implemented immediately to restore "competitiveness".

He said: "The over-payment runs into hundreds of millions of pounds, which is extremely unfair given that water charges are supposed to reflect cost.

"Effectively, business customers have been subsidising water services to households. Not only is this unfair, given that bills are supposed to reflect cost, it is also damaging economically. Higher overheads undoubtedly impact on business competitiveness, and it is vital that charges are adjusted so that prices are based upon up-to-date information on costs.

"Scottish businesses have been contributing 20% more to the country's water infrastructure costs than they should, putting them at a cost disadvantage compared to businesses south of the border."

The news comes just two months before the industry is part-privatised north of the border. From April 1, all businesses in Scotland will be able to buy their water competitively from a number of licensed suppliers and are no longer obliged to use Scottish Water. The new model is a world first and could form the template for a competitive water industry in other countries.

Scottish business customers can now choose between three suppliers – Satec, Aquavitae and Business Stream – with more expected to come on board over the next few months.

Scottish Water is being forced to phase out the cross subsidy by 2010 so there is parity between household and business bills. A spokesman for Business Stream said: "The commissioner and the Scottish Government are responsible for setting wholesale prices which we have to use as the platform when we set retail prices.

"This consultation process is ongoing and it's important to stress that Business Stream will be making its representations, looking to get a fair deal for commercial water customers in Scotland."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 February 2008 2:25 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish Water
 
1

Sprauncy,

Aberdeenshire - the place to be. 17/02/2008 11:07:52
I know nothing of the water industry, but as a consumer, I am concerned that with Scottish Water, apparently performing poorly in a Government Sheltered environment, is going to be exposed to competition before the problem of waste has been eliminated.

Perhaps one of your more knowledgeable readers can explain how privatisation will solve the waste problems and hold costs down for both the householder and Business.

If one reads all the press comment on the water industry south of the boarder, it does not bowed well for Scotland.
2

Mcsnagpile,

17/02/2008 11:33:25
The Scottish have already made clear that privatisation of this natural resource was unacceptable. None the less water will eventually wear away a stone and the direction relentlessly goes towards privatisation. There is nothing wrong with privatisation providing it remains under Scottish control. Unfortunately what it means is the international sharks move in, asset strip, break up the organisation and move control well out of reach of the people that use the resource. Of the three companies mentioned in the editorial the only one Scottish is ‘Business Solutions’ which is in effect Scottish Water. Perhaps we should sack senior Scottish Water executives and bring in Scottish Nationalists. We need people who represent the interests and wishes of the Scottish people.
It would also in the Scottish people’s interest for preference to contracts from Scottish Water to be kept within the Scottish sector. This is presently not the case, in fact the opposite is true. Incidently I am not in the water industry.
3

Sprauncy,

Aberdeenshire - the place to be. 17/02/2008 12:16:57
What is driving this move to privatise Scottish Water? Is it a one-off financial gain? Where do the proceeds go? Who is the driving force behind the proposal?

My ignorance knows no bounds?
4

beech hedge,

blairgowrie 17/02/2008 14:15:32
WE are a bowling club and we are ripped off by scottish water every month to the tune of £90 whih is £1080 per year that we cannot afford. This lot must go.
5

Beachcomber,

Edinburgh 21/02/2008 16:37:04

Let's not make the same mistake !

http://www.democracyctr.org/bolivia/investigations/water/the_water_war.htm

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.