Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Business wants poll on Union, says Tory

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 June 2007
DEMANDS for a referendum on Scottish independence have received support from the country's business community, according to another Conservative figure who is backing the radical plan.
John McGlynn, founder and chairman of Airlink group, and a leading Tory fundraiser, said he too supported the idea of a referendum in order to clear the air over Scotland's constitutional future.

His comments come a week after the vice-chairman o
f the Scots Tories, Richard Cook, first backed the plan, insisting that Unionists should take the fight to the SNP over the matter.

Business figures are understood to have held meetings to discuss the referendum question in the last week, following Cook's announcement.

Cook claimed that investment decisions in Scotland were being jeopardised because of the uncertainty surrounding the issue.

McGlynn said he had no evidence that doubts over Scotland's future were turning businesses off, but said that there was growing backing for a referendum.

"There are business people who are totally against independence and there are those who are totally in favour of it, but the common theme that I come across is that they believe the people of Scotland should have a say in their destiny," he said.

He went on: "Whether or not you agree with independence, the bottom line is that the people of Scotland should have their say. My hope is that this becomes Conservative Party policy.

"The Tories could say: 'We believe in the Union and what we also believe in is the right of people in Scotland to have their say.'

"That would be a clear message that we trust the people of Scotland."

McGlynn is a well-known figure in Scots Tory circles, helping to arrange annual fundraising events. However, Scots Tory leader Annabel Goldie has said she is opposed to any referendum.

Yesterday, the SNP backed a plan to find 100,000 signatures for a public petition on a referendum.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

frank mcbride,

lusitania 24/06/2007 00:29:58

Welcome aboard Mr. McGlynn.

But, don't expect the referendum too soon. We have still to convince the non-democrats that democracy is the way forward.

2

mesmiths,

fife 24/06/2007 00:33:57

Lets get it on.

3

Guga II,

Rockall 24/06/2007 06:05:13

#1 Frank. The non-democrats, i.e. the Whigs, the Tories and the Numpties can't do anything until they receive their instructions from London.

4

AM4,

Larne 24/06/2007 06:59:21

Why are the Unionistas so scared?

Joe Schmoe,Livingston; Pirate Pete,Paisley; Duncan;Edinburgh; AM2; Master of the Duckpond; Weedmouth etc.

5

williamx,

Delta, Canada 24/06/2007 07:01:30

Simple. Have a referendum. The people will either vote yes or no. End of story. Right now it looks like the people would vote no as they have no way of measuring the competence of the current administration. After 4 or 5 years of successful leadership,then they might vote yes. Currently it is in the interests of the non SNP parties to ensure the vote takes place sooner rather than later and no doubt Westminster has already ordered the "Scottish" branch parties to strive for this. Salmond should hold back until he is sure of sucess.

6

Richardinho,

24/06/2007 07:23:15

The sooner the better for a referendum as far as i'm concerned, but I find this 'Lets have a referendum asap because we can win a 'no' vote and never have to think about independence again' attitude deeply unpleasant, not to mention misguided.

If they were really interested in stability, surely the idea of giving the SNP a few years in power to see how it goes-then having a referendum-makes more sense from a business perspective, since then, if there is a 'yes' vote, the transition to independence will be much smoother?

7

northerner,

England 24/06/2007 08:39:40

He should bring his petition into England. He'd soon surpass the 100,000 signatures he needs.

Whilst we're about it; we in England should be givern a referendum as well, just in case Scotland turn independence down. We don't want to take any chances, do we?

8

Mallory,

24/06/2007 08:43:24

Good idea - and lets do the Edinburgh TRAM poll at the same time.

9

megz,

Glasgow 24/06/2007 10:43:29

there is no need to do a tram poll as 2/3 of edinburgh voted for labour and libdems in the election so they must want the trams. Any extra added onto the projects should come from the people of edinburgh and the CEC.

10

Car Driver,

24/06/2007 10:54:30

#9 like glasgae never has it begging bowl out looking for executive cash

11

jkr,

Lochwinnoch Greater Glasgow 24/06/2007 10:56:05

We should definitely have a referendum and clear up the matter or it will drag on and on and on.

12

Scottish Toryboy,

24/06/2007 11:40:59

Yeah let's get it on and when only 35% support yes we can get on with things in Scotland as opposed to this constitutional wrangling

13

Callum,

Edinburgh 24/06/2007 12:08:15

Yes We must have a vote on this all partys must support a referendum bill. People should tell their local MSPs that we should have a vote on this. This is Scotland future.

14

Brisbane Scot,

24/06/2007 14:33:25

The pro unionist parties should bring the referendum to the Scottish Executive if they want to have some credability in Scotland. Lets not forget that everyone of them will continue to live here and will hope to run various purely Scottish Political Parties. Once they get it past parliament Big Alex can pick his date, and make sure the SNP and the Scottish People are ready.

15

IainGlasgow,

24/06/2007 17:58:34

#9

If people in Edinburgh want the trams it should be Edinburgh Council and not the whole of Scotland that pays for it

16

subrosa,

24/06/2007 19:06:25

I thought Alex Salmond said he would have a referendum in 2010 as part of the SNP manifesto. Am I incorrect? Of course there should be one but all the unionists want it asap for obvious reasons. Good for Alex to ensure he gets a good chance to make a definite change. You'll just have to wait you Westminster led parties :)

17

subrosa,

24/06/2007 19:10:06

Auch Alex give the Edinburger their trams! Shut them up please! I'm sick of hearing all the noise coming from our London of the North. Hopefully they'll be happy with their 'pretty' city then because, from experience, I can see far more congestion once they have them, as the roads are nowhere near wide enough for a full tram system. I do wish the supporters of these trams would stop quoting various European cities with them...just no comparison with our narrow streets here. But regardless jist gie them their trams!

18

Royster,

24/06/2007 23:15:11

#5. End of story, I don't think so. It would mean Quebec style neverendums and more instability.

19

Richardinho,

25/06/2007 00:20:55

Pretty rich talking about endless referendums when in 300 years of the union we've yet to have ONE!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should there be an independence referendum?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.