Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Too much hot air: hypocrisy of our 'green' political leaders

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 March 2007
THEY have spent the last month urging the electors to turn green and help save the planet from global warming.
In the competition for the environmental vote, Scottish and Westminster politicians of all parties have been encouraging people to save energy in their homes and businesses to cut down on harmful greenhouse gases.

But now Scotland on Sunday can r
eveal that the political parties in Scotland are failing to practise what they preach, while official buildings such as the new Holyrood parliament and Bute House, the First Minister's official residence, are also leaking heat.

A thermal imaging survey commissioned by Scotland on Sunday shows that party offices used by the Conservatives and the SNP have energy efficiency problems revealed by telltale red "hotspots".

It also shows that the managers of the £414m Scottish parliament building have still not managed to eradicate the heat loss problems in the building's upper floors first spotted two years ago. Even the headquarters of the Green Party is not perfect with heat leaking from some windows.

Red and white areas show the highest temperatures, where most of the heat is escaping. Blue, green and purple indicate temperatures in the middle of the scale, with black at the coolest end of the range.

Ideally, a well-insulated building should reveal consistent temperatures across its surface given an identical construction and material type.

Earlier this month, Labour Chancellor Gordon Brown called on households to do more to cut greenhouse gases by making homes better insulated and more fuel-efficient. Brown said stand-by switches on electrical goods had to go, as did old-fashioned lightbulbs, which are less efficient than modern equivalents.

In September last year, Tory leader David Cameron announced a scheme aimed at encouraging more consumers to install micro-renewables.

And the SNP, who want to turn Scotland into the renewable energy powerhouse of Europe, includes a key section on energy efficiency in policy documents.

According to the IRT survey, Bute House, the official home of First Minister Jack McConnell in Charlotte Square, reveals several areas of temperature "inconsistency," showing heat loss in red and yellow. This was mainly found at wall junctions and by windows.

The Scottish Parliament shows increased temperatures in red and white spots at the top of the building. Experts say that water is seeping through the outside wall into the building, ruining the insulation.

The headquarters of the SNP in McDonald Road, Edinburgh, reveal inconsistent temperatures across its surface, with increased temperatures visible below several of the lower storey windows,

The headquarters of the Scottish Tories, in Princes Street, reveal heat escaping at wall junctions. Experts suggest this is due to missing or poor insulation.

Environmental groups and energy experts said politicians should "practise what they preach. It seems a bit unfair to preach to the public about energy efficiency when their own buildings are not in order," said Alan Little, of energy efficiency specialists IRT Surveys.

Duncan McLaren, chief executive of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: "Politicians who make claims about the environment should put their own houses in order. More than 20% of energy is lost in this way and that is a substantial chunk."

A source close to the First Minister said: "Bute House is a listed building and managed by the National Trust for Scotland. It is difficult to make changes to it and it should not be a surprise to anyone that it is not as well insulated as modern buildings."

A spokesman for the Scottish Greens, which has its office in Lyne Street, Edinburgh, said: "We have done what we can with the limitations of that building. But there is always room for improvement.

"All the other political parties talk green in the lead up to an election - but it turns out to be nothing more than hot air. This seems to be what we are seeing now."

An SNP spokesman said: "The SNP is committed to building a greener Scotland. That's why at our conference this weekend we have announced more measures to help the environment such as the introduction of a carbon offset scheme."

A spokeswoman for the Scottish Parliament insisted the managers of the Holyrood building were committed to the highest environmental standards. "Just last month the Scottish Parliament received an ISO14001, a prestigious certificate of its environmental management system," she added.

Top scientists attack 'Hollywoodisation' of global warming


TWO leading British scientists have hit out at the "Hollywoodisation" of fears over climate change.

Professors Paul Hardaker and Chris Collier of the Royal Meteorological Society have criticised peers who they accuse of "overplaying" the global warming message.

The pair placed the highly respected American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) at the centre of their criticism.

They say some researchers make claims about possible future impacts that cannot be justified by the science. They think the "Hollywoodisation" of weather and climate only works to create confusion in the public mind.

The 2004 smash-hit film The Day After Tomorrow blurred the lines between science and entertainment, with its depiction of catastrophic consequences after global warming caused large areas of the Arctic ice shelf to break off and melt.

Hardaker and Collier argue for a more sober explanation of the uncertainties about possible future changes in the Earth's climate.

They criticised a strongly worded statement released by the AAAS at its last annual meeting in San Francisco in February, which said: "As expected, intensification of droughts, heat waves, floods, wildfires and severe storms is occurring, with a mounting toll on vulnerable ecosystems and societies.

"These events are early-warning signs of even more devastating damage to come, some of which will be irreversible."

According to Hardaker and Collier, this may well be true, but convincing evidence has not yet emerged.

Collier told the BBC: "It's certainly a very strong statement. I suspect it refers to evidence that hurricanes have increased as a result of global warming; but to make the blanket assumption that all extreme events are increasing is a bit too early yet.

"I've no doubt that global warming is occurring, but we don't want to undermine that case by crying wolf."

Hardaker, the society's chief executive, agreed: "There's no evidence to show we're all due for very short-term devastating impacts as a result of global warming; so I think these statements can be dangerous where you mix in the science with unscientific assumptions."

The AAAS said it would not be commenting directly on the professors' remarks. A spokesperson told the BBC: "We feel that the recent consensus statement of the AAAS Board of Directors speaks for itself and stands on its own."

Hardaker and Collier have contributed to a pamphlet, Making Sense of the Weather and Climate.

CHRISTOPHER CLAIRE



Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

18/03/2007 00:26:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

One-man-bucket's older twin,

18/03/2007 00:33:01

Government and industry waste exponentially more than taxpayers do. But it's easier to get more cash to pay for it by punishing taxpayers.

3

Guga,

Rockall 18/03/2007 02:34:03

#2 Which is why Broon is jumping on the global warming bandwaggon. He'll tax us all into the poorhouse, and use any excuse to do so.

4

fred bloggs,

18/03/2007 08:35:23

It's not just Bute House; the whole of the New Town leaks heat because double-glazing is not allowed.

5

Cadgers,

Perth 18/03/2007 09:24:10

"AAAS"......only yanks could dream up an acronym like that!

6

bus user,

edinburgh 18/03/2007 09:39:13

It is good to be around at the strat of a new religion and observe the zealotry that brought down the Romans and gave us Christian orthodoxy. Don't dare question your carbon footprint, folks.

7

Toast,

18/03/2007 10:42:00

If New Labour had the guts to take on the construction industry and bring in tough new control on new build we might see a difference,but obviously donations are more important than conservation.

8

walter,

18/03/2007 11:26:30

I wonder if the government on Mars are as keen to scare its people into paying more taxes to stop the global warming that is happening there or on any other of the celestial bodies.
No they don't and the people on these bodies don't complain either and why is the reason for that? well it's simple really the people on Jupiter, Saturn, Pluto, Mars, Triton, and other celestial bodies cannot complain about global warming because... (well because these people don't exist)

9

musicismylife,

18/03/2007 11:37:05

#8. The hydrogen-based Jovian lifeforms are very unhappy with your last six words, Walter. And the Ringlord of the Saturn Hive is most put out.

Expect a visitation ...... and anal probe. Not that it's necessary, but the aliens have a wierd sense of humour and just like to see humans squirming!

10

Neil,

9% Growth Party 18/03/2007 12:56:17

Releasing CO2 seems to be the private sin that politicians all pretend not to do nowdays, in very much the way Victorians treated sex. We are developing a very silly political culture. No wonder people do not vote when this is what "serious" politics is about.

11

seanie,

18/03/2007 12:58:11

Every six months or so IRT Surveys takes some thermal images of a public building and gets some free publicity on the back of it. It gets tedious after a while.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4289017.stm

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=336712006

12

I'm no really here,

18/03/2007 13:12:35

Gordon Brown wants the Green Taxes, because he already has plans that these taxes are not exclusively for the use of Green Policies. So, Green Tax us to support policies that he will never fund. Not so much a stealth tax as a 10lb hammer to your skull.

13

One-man-bucket's older twin,

18/03/2007 19:38:33

Why doesn't he just set a MAXIMUM national wage, so that nobody but politicians and council workers can ever rise above the lowest common denominator?

14

I'm no really here,

18/03/2007 20:47:33

Just reading an SA article about how soft drink supplies are running short because of a shortage of CO2. They require 71 Tonnes per day.

How much CO2 is released just from the Beer and Soft drinks when you open the cans and bottles. It probably makes out "Carbon-Offset" figures look trivial in comparison.

15

AlexanderD,

Ottawa 19/03/2007 01:29:56

If The Scotsman wishes to cover the 'green' or 'Kyoto' story it could boost its own reputation enormously by researching, writing and publishing a complete -- that's complete -- bio. of famous Canadian, Mr. UN himself, Mr. Kyoto himself, Mr. UN-PyongChampagne envoy himself, Mr. manipulator-controller of at least one Liberal Party PM of Canada, Mr. receiver of at least one million$ from convicted Iraq-oil-for-food fraudstar (sic) Tongsun Park, Mr. the-list-goes-on-and-on ... Maurice Strong, now living luxuriously not in Canada, not in Manhattan close by his beloved and very rewarding UN document-shredding HQ, but in Beijing (no doubt with a private title at the mandarin mafia's department of economic warfare that might be something like Kim Philby's with the KGB).

16

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 19/03/2007 10:50:13

#17 Dragonhead claimed, "Two volcanic eruptions in the not too distant past produced a huge amount of 'Greenhouse' gases and pollution many times more than all the fossil fuels, jet fuel etc produced by ALL other means in the whole world."

That is not true. The recent C4 Climate Swindle programme made the same claim. That wasn't true either (like much else in that programme).

All volcanoes around the world together release on average about 130 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year (US Geological Survey). Human burning of fossil fuels presently release about 26,000 million tons of CO2 per year. Thus volcanoes produce less than 1% of the CO2 released by burning fossil fuels.

CO2 in the atmosphere has been monitored continuously since 1958 (Keeling curve). The curve even picks up slight seasonal changes in CO2 levels, so we know that it is sensitive to any sudden inputs of CO2. Other than the seasonal "wriggle" it is a SMOOTH upwards curve, showing CO2 to be increasing in the atmosphere at a smooth steady rate. If Pinatubo or Mount St Helens, or any other volcano were producing a sudden input of CO2 into the atmosphere the curve would show a sudden lurch upwards: that is not present. The main climatic effect of volcanoes is to produce cooling for a few years after a major eruption because of the sulphur dioxide and dust ejected into the atmosphere that reflects sunlight back into space. This effect doesn't last long because the SO2 and dust are rapidly rained out, whereas the extra CO2 we are dumping in the atmosphere will last for over a century.

This information is readily available: look up the Climatic Research Unit, under volcanoes, or CO2 in the Atmosphere in Wikipedia, for example.
That TV programmes like the one you have just seen and the C4 Swindle programme continue to churn out untruths that are easily rebutted shows that they are not interested in the truth.

Yes, mercury in fluorescent l

17

Frodo the Scot,

middle earth 19/03/2007 12:57:13

In the U.S. hollywood to be exact there
are hundreds of these actor types who think because they have a lot of money "they automatically have a brain" Sad part is these limpets are too STUPID to come in from the rain and most of them are as popular as a LOUD fart in church.

18

petrol head,

Edinburgh 19/03/2007 14:02:13

These infrared tests are meaningless unless properly conducted---and even then give only an approximation. Tests of this kind were once the domain of double-glazing salesmen and home insulating companies. Now they are being used as a serious political tool that offers incontravertable proof of heat leakage. Why?

#20: is a loud fart in church really that un-popular? I must give it a go some time! >:->

19

MarioG,

Toledo, Ohio 19/03/2007 19:55:02

The great global warming hoax is now unravelling at warp speed, as more and more people realize that they've been had:
>
Previous major media propagandists for blaming humans for global warming like the NY Times and the BBC are leading the charge to now warn their readers of the swindle:
>
The following URLs tell the sordid tale, fueled by greedy scientists in their incessant search for research grants, and opportunistic left wing politicians seeking to bring the western industrialized economies down to the lowest common denominator. Why else would they exempt 80% of the world's countries, including India and China, from the bogus Kyoto Protocols?
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?ex=...
>
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzA5YjM2MzY0ZGI1OWIy...=


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.