Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Energy-hungry nations call for rise in oil output

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 June 2008
LEADING energy-consuming nations yesterday urged oil producers to boost their output to counter soaring prices threatening the world economy, while they pledged to develop clean energy technologies and improve efficiency.
The five nations – the United States, China, Japan, India and South Korea – differed, however, on how urgently oil subsidies should be phased out, with Washington backing bold movement while India and China warned of political and economic instabilit
y.

Cabinet ministers from the five countries, which account for more than half the world's consumption of energy, agreed that the sharp surge in oil prices was a menace to the world economy, and more petroleum should be produced to meet rising demand.

"Current oil prices are at abnormal levels," said Japanese trade minister Akira Amari, who hosted the meeting in the northern city of Aomori. "There is an overwhelming lack of investment and production levels have hardly increased over several years."

Oil prices made their biggest single-day surge on Friday, soaring $11 to $138.54 on the New York Mercantile Exchange, an 8% increase. That followed a $5.50 increase the day before, taking oil futures more than 13% higher in just two days.

World oil production has stalled at about 85 million barrels a day since 2005, while global economic growth – boosted by spectacular surges in China and India – has pushed demand to unprecedented levels.

Analysts have also cited the decline of the US dollar, fears about the long-term supply of oil and aggressive speculation as factors in rising prices.

The five consumer countries, meeting before an energy conference of the Group of Eight industrialised nations and Russia today, argued that the unprecedented prices were against the interests of both producers and consumers, and imposed a "heavy burden" on developing countries.

The ministers also vowed to diversify their sources of energy, invest in alternative and renewable fuels, ramp up cooperation in strategic oil stocks in case of a supply shortage, and improve the quality of data on production and inventories available to markets.

The group diverged somewhat over oil subsidies. The International Energy Agency has estimated that oil subsidies in China, India and the Middle East totalled about $55bn in 2007.

The US, which has its own energy subsidies, urged countries such as China to lower their oil supports, which enable domestic consumers to enjoy cheaper gasoline. Subsidies shield consumers from higher prices, meaning consumption does not decline despite rising expenses.

But China and India, while signing on to a statement recognising the need to eventually phase out such subsidies, argued that removing such supports quickly could trigger political and economic instability.

"We are taking very precise and delicate measures so we will not destabilise the government," said Zhang Guibao, China's delegate. "If we face such problems in a country such as China, with a large population… there would be adverse impacts felt throughout the world."

India is already facing such effects. The government on Wednesday hiked gasoline and diesel prices, triggering protests by angry consumers who blocked rail tracks and roads and shut down businesses.

British business secretary John Hutton said yesterday that it was important to work constructively with the governments of China, India and South Korea.

Hutton said: "We must strongly resist the temptation to demonise the new Asia economies. Those who think the answer to dealing with the challenges of climate change is to tell the people of China or India to sacrifice the sort of living standards that we have enjoyed for so long are deeply misguided. It is the right of every person and every nation to strive for a better way of life."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 June 2008 7:47 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Nikostratos,

08/06/2008 00:27:07
Speculators, Speculators, speculators.......bubble 'POP'

2

truthsleuth,

08/06/2008 00:39:37
#1 Nikostratos,
dream on Speculators have played a part but they rarely get this wrong.

As one of the proud owners of the North Sea Oil you should be egging OPEC and the speculators to reduce production so that oil prices GO UP.

Oh I forgot its your car habit you want to satisfy not your nationalism.
3

American,

08/06/2008 02:36:32
#2-truthsleuth-its not our car habit that people want to satisfy. It's the habit of using our car to go to work to feed our families and put a roof over our heads. Most do not have the luxury of working from home, or the luxury of working only a few miles from home.
4

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 08/06/2008 08:09:49
There are 6 Billion people on the Planet.

1 Billion live in the Developed World and consume 80% of the Worlds Hydrocarbons.

4 Billion live in the Developing world where their Use of Hydrocarbons is increasing.

1 Billion live in the least developed Countries and have none if any impact on Hydorcarbon Resources.

Many of those in the Developing World aspire to the lifestyle enjoyed in the Developed World.

Over the next 50 Years 1 Billion of them will attain it along with the same pattern of Hydrocarbon Use.

Since all the inexpensively accessed Hydrocarbons have been tapped Oil Prices will continue to rise until the price forces a radical rethink of how we use energy.

Will that be at $200?.

Will that be at $300?.

At what ever price it happens you can be sure that the people who will pay the highest price will be the 1 Billion in the least developed countries as they starve because they can no longer afford to eat.

5

SouthernSkye,

08/06/2008 08:45:48
2 truthsleuth
A dram over 1000l heating oil was 660GBP last week.
5 years ago it was around 200GBP.
4 tanks a year is required to heat my home.
I suppose sell up (to whom?) and a small flat in Glasgow is my future eh?
6

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 08/06/2008 09:16:13
#5

A better option might be to look at what you can do to increase the efficiency of your current home.

Double Glazing, Insulation and Draft Barriers are probably the most cost effective ways to reduce your heating costs.

You could also turn down the thermostat on your Central Heating and use alternatives to heat rooms you use frequently with electric fires or a wood burning stove.
7

Scott_B,

08/06/2008 10:04:33
If this is all about speculation, where are the stockpiles? There are NONE - this oil is being extracted and consumed, because the demand is there.

After water, the most precious resource we currently have, we can't extract enough, and the reaction of our national governments is "more, faster". Because clearly with something so precious, the best thing to do is get it out the ground and burn it as quickly as we can.

All the while making the problem worse for the next generation.

And we vote for these fools.
8

Hamilton,

08/06/2008 10:24:04
Interesting that the UK government is now accusing the US administration of having "a deeply misguided" energy policy.
9

Derick fae Yell,

The solar water heated hoose 08/06/2008 11:02:24
Get the tushkar out! Peat spade to the uninitiated.
10

Uilleam Mor,

Luss 08/06/2008 11:36:04
One would think that the developed world knew that oil prices would rise as demand went up.

Imean it's not rocket science that the oil will run out.

However, the near doubling of the oil price in the last 12 months is clearly something that has been manipulated since demand has not changed all that radically over that period.

So what is this all about,

1) is it to force the West to start building new nuclear ( put the lights out or the price up and the punters will be clambouring for it)

2) Or is it to disadvantage the developing countries ( maybe they are growing too fast for the West's liking)

3) Is it to stoke inflation to wipe out the astronomic debt levels.

4) Is it to allow countries with oil to secure more benefit.

5) Is it to force new technology development.

Well there will be a reason, and it will be worked out, but it's just that we don't know.
11

Scott_B,

08/06/2008 14:23:39
The demand has not changed all that much, but it has changed. India is 8% higher year on year, China likewise. Not much, but since supply has been stuck at around 85 million barrels per day for some years now, its enough to push the price up.

The other thing that has happened over that time is that currencies have weakened. Of course all currencies weaken, but some do so much faster relative to others. In this case the dollar is being sacrificed by the US to bail out the banks. Since oil is priced in dollars, it looks like the price is going up. In part it is, but a very large part is that the value of the dollar is going down, and fast.

Below is a trend of oil price versus key dollar decisions.

http://bp3.blogger.com/_nSTO-vZpSgc/SEtjveddYpI/AAAAAAAACts/zMYCqQh3hv4/s1600-h/bernanke-paulson.png
12

Hickory,

US 09/06/2008 00:41:22
It's nea the pumpers. It's the speculators, the ones with big money. The biggies in the States like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet. Lay the blame on them, they have it and are holdin' more oil than China uses.
13

donald,

glasgow 09/06/2008 08:40:06
Scotland has no say in the matter. England will look after us.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.