Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Speaker candidates' receipts revealed

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 June 2009
THE ten candidates for the job of Speaker, one of whom will be elected tomorrow, have had further embarrassing details of their expenses revealed.
The full details of the group's claims were not fully published last week, when the House of Commons released heavily redacted details of MPs' expenses.

But full details of the claims appear in today's papers. According to reports, Margaret Becket
t, now the bookmakers' favourite, claimed for almost £11,000 in gardening expenses. Last month Beckett said a £600 claim for hanging baskets and planters in 2005 was a mistake, but it is reported today that she made three similar claims in 2001 and 2003.

John Bercow, the Conservative MP, twice charged taxpayers for the cost of hiring an accountant to complete his tax return, it is claimed.

Sir Alan Beith, the Lib Dem candidate, used office expenses to pay for his secretary to spend a month in his constituency during the 2005 election campaign.

Meanwhile, Parmjit Dhanda, the Labour MP, over-claimed on his second home allowance on at least two occasions, charging the public purse more for mortgage interest than he was charged by his lender, according to reports.

MPs choose Michael Martin's successor in a complex series of votes tomorrow. All the candidates pledged last week to turn over a new leaf in the Commons, and said they would unveil reforms to win back public trust.

Yesterday, it emerged MPs had inflated council tax bills on their expenses, receiving thousands of pounds more than they paid to local authorities.

As many as 50 MPs claimed sums higher than their council tax payments and then pocketed the difference. Up to 18 MPs have repaid the sums after the uncensored versions of their expenses were leaked to the press.

The over-claiming was made possible because, until recently, MPs did not need to provide receipts for payments of less than £250.

An investigation has found many MPs simply filled in a round figure every month – of about £150 or £200 for council tax. In other cases, MPs made 12 monthly claims even though their annual bills were split into ten instalments.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 June 2009 12:36 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Politicians' expenses
 
1

Evia,

21/06/2009 01:21:15
These claims were not made accidentally...they were made to receive more money than the MPs were entitled to and that is fraud. An ordinary member of the publice would be charged with fraud so why shouldn't they be. There is no point in just making an example of one or two because fraud is fraud, no matter whether it is for £50 or £5,000.

The Parliament should be dissolved and a General Election called because a clean sweep is needed and clear rules for claiming laid down and adhered to. Where second homes are concerned, MPs living in or near London should not qualify for second homes allowance and Mps living ouside London should not be allowed to make the family home their second home. The best solution of all would be to have a block of apartments with basic accommodation for those MPs from outside London. After all, when other people work away from home, they don't get put up in luxury accommodation. MPs are not special people, regardless of whether they think they are, and they know what the job entails, just the same as other people know when they take on a job.

www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-queen-to-dissolve-parliament-and-call-a-general-election.html.

www.gopetition.com/petitions/bring-the-mp-fraudsters-to-justice-over-expenses.html

petitions.number10.gov.uk/please-go/

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.