Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Labour losing the election spending race

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 December 2006
LABOUR faces being massively outspent by the SNP during next year's Scottish parliament election because of the party's cash crisis.
Scotland on Sunday can reveal that Scottish Labour's election spending has been cut back to barely £600,000, compared with £730,000 in 2003, and £1m in 1999.

The squeeze will see key staff not being replaced, less cash for mailshots in swing seat
s and the posting of cut-price election broadcasts on the internet.

And unless Labour north of the Border can attract a last-minute, major donor other cutbacks being considered are on billboard advertising and the "phone banks" used to target floating voters.

The situation is all the more grim for Labour because it faces a newly resurgent SNP which is ahead in the opinion polls and claims to have already raised £600,000 of its £1m target.

The Scottish Tories refused to say how much they had so far raised but claimed they were on target for a spend similar to 2003, about £720,000. The Lib-Dems said they were confident of raising £500,000. Even the Green Party believes it will double its spending, to £100,000, for the May campaign.

Labour last week admitted "acute cash flow problems" as Electoral Commission figures revealed it owes £23.4m, with the majority - £17m - to be paid back before the end of next year. The issue is particularly sensitive for Labour as the police investigation over "cash for honours" gets closer to Downing Street.

Scottish Labour campaign managers were warned of the grim financial situation at a closed session at last weekend's party conference in Oban. Chairwoman Hazel Blears warned of "challenges" in funding the Holyrood campaign using cash from the party's central coffers.

A Scottish Labour insider admitted: "There is going to be less cash this time around. There will be no last-minute helicopter tour for Jack, and we will be cutting back on the billboards and the telephone calling banks."

Another source said: "You are talking about a cut of about at least 20%, although we are still talking about estimates at this stage. Even with extra cash from the unions it won't be easy. The unions themselves don't have that much money right now."

It is understood the budget for election broadcasts is being examined. A Labour source said the possibility of putting cut-price election slots on the internet - including the web video site, Youtube - was being considered.

Although Labour has not used helicopters for Scottish elections, they were used by Labour during last year's general election and they have been used by all the other main parties north of the Border.

If a lack of money means a no-fly zone being imposed, politicians increasingly opt for people carriers to get themselves and their teams around the country.

The traditional "battlebus" is increasingly being shunned as anachronistic by the parties. Insiders say its main use in modern campaigning involves the most ineffectual or downright embarrassing politicians being consigned to battlebuses so that they can do the "minimum damage" while still being under the illusion that they are involved in the campaign. Labour strategists make a point of insisting that their deputy leader, John Prescott, should be in the battlebus.

An SNP spokesman said: "We have been careful with the money and we now expect to be in a good position to make our case known to the people of Scotland."

A Liberal Democrat spokesman said his party was "well on course" to raise its target £500,000, and the money would be used to win votes in seats which were not traditionally seen as Lib-Dem.

A Scottish Tory spokesman said party managers did not anticipate any funding problems.

Both the Nationalists and Lib Dems' spokesmen said it was too early to say whether they would be using helicopters during the campaign, although both parties have used them in the past.

While eschewing aircraft in favour of bicycles and walking is more the Greens' style, even they believe they are on course to increase their spending in this election and have set a target of £100,000.

A spokesman said: "We're careful with our resources, just as we believe in being careful with the Earth's resources. We aim to double our campaign budget this time. We don't have the backing of big business, just the goodwill of ordinary donors."

A Labour spokesman said: "We are confident we can raise the necessary funds . . . and fight a campaign which will put the people of Scotland first. "



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Bill, Dunblane,

03/12/2006 01:59:51

Won't make a lot of difference as long as the B(E)BC and the 'Scottish' press continue to support the unionist argument and give 'free' time to the Labour and Tory parties. Why should an election in Scotland have equal, or more than equal time given to the Tories and Lib Dems - very much minority parties, much on a par with the Greens?

2

TerryinSpringburn,

glasgow 03/12/2006 03:37:11

Scottish Labour spending only £600,000 on their campaign for next year's Euro-Region Parliament? It doesn't sound a lot compared to the £3.6 million Tony Blair paid for his house.

3

Guga,

Rockall 03/12/2006 04:03:21

They'll be wishing they could still flog off a pile of peerages and knighthoods, but, as #1 pointed out, they have plenty of free publicity from the press in particular, including all the unionists at the Scotsman.

4

Wisnaeme,

Sent to Coventry, 03/12/2006 04:10:12

Hmm.
A labour spokesman said,"we are confident we can raise the necessary funds." Aye,no doubt they are confidend but where will this largess come from? Have no doubt about it they will indeed have the necessary and not all of it will have been obtained from Scottish labour party fiscal inspiration as their interpretation of how to run a fiscally viable organisation seems somewhat suspect.
The phrase,"bought and sold for English gold" is about to have a rerun with a variation on the theme.Whats the equivalent of English merchants, nobles and the unionist politically powerful these days,by the way?

Congratulations "Hotsmon" on such acute political perception, I don't think. I'm inclined to take this oh so factual reportage with a bucketfull of salt. Aye, they're at it again. The unionists are well praticed in the black art of disinformation. I am not deceived by this black propaganda, a cart full of speculation and manure to be sure. Such a rubbish of words is fit only for the gulliable and insane to ingest.
Labour unionists will have the necessary funds.Even if some of the dubious methods of where and from whom those funds were obtained could possibly be construed as highly questionable.Aye weel, they've rather a dubious recent history of that sort of thing,ye ken.

5

Paul Voltaire,

www.paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 03/12/2006 05:25:16

Who is seriously gonna watch Labour Part Political Broadcasts on YouTube?
Pathetic!
As for a 'battlebus' I am sure it would attract ony eggs and the occasional half brick.

6

donald,

weegieland 03/12/2006 06:43:28

So, no one notices how HM Labour Party uses local Government funds to finance their election expenses; Cooncil premises, furniture, office equipment, Cooncil workers, Cooncil publications which are no more than numpty election leaflets, etc, etc? Not to mention the loyalist meejah.

7

TerryinSpringburn,

glasgow 03/12/2006 07:42:50

Toxic Jack should arrange for a free DVD of the film "Passport to Pimlico" to be given out with a Sunday newspaper.

8

Calum Crubag,

Alba, gu brath. 03/12/2006 08:34:44

British Labour can't get themselves in order without borrowing heavily from rich supporters. How then can they expect us to believe that a united Britain in their hands or the Tories, who are just as bad, is a viable option?

Small is beautiful and easier to manage. Indpendence in the modern and forward-looking option. The Union with all it's outdated processess, pomp and aggresive ethos has had its day.

Saor Alba.

9

Cadgers,

Perth 03/12/2006 09:38:26

No word of them dipping into their own pockets then......shows how sure they all are of the results!

10

Budgie,

Scotland 03/12/2006 10:33:21

Aye. All political parties are suffering from a shortage in funds and recognise that something will have to be done about this threat to their jobs.
I see in today's press that MP's are seeking a 66% - yes 66% - increase in their salaries. In the light of the Political Parties funding shortfall, I wonder if this sought after increase could be an agreed ploy by all parties to satisfy their funding needs by getting the taxpayer's to pay through this 66% wage increase. It would be quite easy for this to happen if all MP's were required to "contribute" a high % of any wage increase to their party coffers.
I suppose this cold be viewed as an effective way to reduce their dependence on wealthy benefactors - whose largesse may be motivated by the prospect of elevation to a higher position within society. It could also (possibly), reduce sleeze.

11

Rubbersnap,

03/12/2006 11:00:42

#7 ... News of the World/Daily Express already gave out "Passport to Pimlico" earlier this year amongst its dozen Classics of British Cinema.

Good idea otherwise!

12

,

03/12/2006 11:17:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 206694, Article id was mapped to record!
13

Mallory,

03/12/2006 11:37:21

Why don't they apply for another loan from Unity Trust Bank?

14

BillyB,

03/12/2006 12:25:49

Maybe John Reid can arrange a loan from his Serbian friends - if they are not all in jail by then.

15

Eve,

Scotland 03/12/2006 12:29:00

#12 Steve: Aye, There's a thought.
I came across a leaft that had that number on a few months ago. (My dad still uses the wee yellow box's from 1999, to save money for the SNP)

Supose it would work out cheaper than voteing for a fovourate in BB, I'm celbraty and XFactor.
(As you only need to texts once rather than loads to keep the indavals in)

Much more fun to anoy the "Scottish" Labour party than Simon Cowell that's what I think any way.

16

John B Dick,

Rothesay 04/12/2006 22:24:23

Labour used a helicopter in the election for the last few days of the first Scottish Parliament election to keep Donald Dewar out of the way in the air or meeting party workers so that they could deploy Liddell (and others who had more of a taste for it) on Nat-bashing duties.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.