Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Blair clashes with police over cash for honours questions

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 August 2006
TONY Blair is embroiled in a bitter dispute with the Metropolitan Police over arrangements for quizzing him about a long-running investigation into the cash for honours scandal.
Downing Street is resisting police requests for the Prime Minister to make a high-profile trip to New Scotland Yard for an official interview over claims that honours were offered in return for multi-million-pound loans to the Labour party.

The i
nterrogation is expected to take place within the next month, a senior government aide revealed last night.

The Blair camp is believed to have asked for officers to make a more discreet visit to Downing Street for the face-to-face session.

But a police source claimed the softly-softly approach would be "totally out of line" with the conduct of the inquiry so far.

While Blair does not believe he will be placed under arrest, police are insistent they are given the chance to quiz him.

However, Labour Treasurer Lord Levy was arrested when he arrived at his local police station last month for a pre-arranged appointment with detectives.

"There is a real concern that they want to avoid a public spectacle where Blair will be taken from Downing Street and whisked down to the police HQ," a government source said last night.

"They don't see why the Met can't just slip into Downing Street on a given day, to prevent it being a media circus, but they seem to be sticking to their guns, and saying they can't guarantee it."

The nagging worry over the continuing police inquiry is one of a raft of concerns facing Blair as he returns to his desk following his three-week summer holiday this weekend.

Amid lingering complaints about his approach to the crises in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon, and Labour's slump in the polls, pressure is also growing on the Prime Minister to set his departure date, amid concerns among ministers that the government is "drifting".

Europe minister Geoff Hoon stoked the discontent yesterday when he conceded voters were starting to see Tory leader David Cameron as a serious alternative to Blair.

But the Prime Minister now intends to seize back the agenda by driving forward a series of new initiatives at home and abroad, designed to cement him into Number 10 - and freeze Gordon Brown out.

Blair's aides last night confirmed that they had been ordered to prepare more than a dozen new pieces of legislation for the Queen's Speech this autumn, which will set out the blueprint for Blair's legislative programme for the coming year.

The package, including three crime bills, House of Lords reform, and reform of the CSA will form the domestic element of his two-pronged battle plan.

Aides insisted he was "hell-bent" on travelling to the Middle East in a bid to restart the peace process, chiefly through reviving the moribund "road map to peace".

But the plans effectively kill off any suggestion that Blair will "go quietly" and make way for Brown within the next few months, despite mounting calls for him to quit - many from within his own party.

Despite hopes that he might offer a hint as to the timetable for his departure, the PM is expected to return to the "I go on and on" theme during his keynote speech to the Labour party conference late next month.

Blair's counter-offensive will begin this week with a lecture on social exclusion, followed by a speech to the think tank Progress, and an appearance before the Trades Union Congress next month.

A Downing Street insider said the issue of social exclusion would be the main theme of the speeches, and of Blair's next phase of government.

He added: "He has obviously signalled he's going to give the Middle East peace process a push, but he has a very clear domestic focus as well.

"The work we have done in getting people back to work and out of poverty over the past few years has shown that there is a hard core of hard-to-reach families across the country that we must find ways of helping."

Blairite loyalist Tessa Jowell yesterday underlined Blair's intention to stay in office, insisting he was determined to tackle the problems of terrorism and migration. She said: "Whether it's under Tony Blair or under a new leader, the policies will remain the same, the threats will remain the same and the challenges will remain the same."

Scotland on Sunday understands the draft Queen's Speech outlined to colleagues by Leader of the House Jack Straw contains 13 bills, including measures on criminal justice, criminal trials and organised crime, further education, consumer protection and the switchover to digital broadcasting.

But further anti-terror measures are also under construction and ministers are preparing to push through proposals to allow evidence gathered through secret phone-taps to be used in court for the first time.

The move has been opposed by the government for several years, in the face of support from prosecutors and even civil rights groups.

But Home Secretary John Reid is preparing to do a U-turn, in a bid to make it easier to prosecute alleged terror plotters.

It has now emerged that the main objection of the security services has been the demands the change would make on their resources, rather than any concerns about disclosing their confidential tactics.

Reid will sanction the change in line with the expected findings of a review of "possible legal models for evidential use of intercept", which is due to report to him in November.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Corbett Hunckers,

Fife 27/08/2006 00:28:57

Storm in teacup - once Oor Tony pinpoints the principal Met Officials, an offer of suitable awards should sort the problem.

2

Clansman,

Scotland 27/08/2006 03:03:37

It only proves it's wrotten to the core.

3

Thomas the Tank,

EmbraToon 27/08/2006 08:10:08

The prospect of PhoneyTony being dragged whimpering out of the front door of No 10 in handcuffs, Cherie in her curlers peeping tearfully round the curtains, Big Broon heard chortling next door, full glare of the Meeja Circus, is an absolutely wonderful image.
But I agree with AJ #1 - it's just no gonnae happen. Sir Ian Blair is a total wobblebottom - his own professional life relies on politcal patronage - and he'll cave in to 'the establishment'. This story is nothing but political spin, to make both the Blairs look good when they reach a 'mature and sensible' compromise. And Sir Ian will eventually become Lord Scotlandyard (cann'ae have 'Lord Blair' 'cos that'll be reserved for Tony). Wad it no' mak' ye Boak!

4

Toast,

borders 27/08/2006 09:22:09

Tony "double standards"Blair forgets who he is again,he expects special treatment,free holidays,free travel,the right to choose his successor,the right to buy property he cannot pay for,what a out of touch parasite he is,using his position to further his own agenda

5

Peter,

Edinburgh 27/08/2006 09:37:02

"Downing Street (ie Toney Bliar) is resisting police requests for the Prime Minister to make a high-profile trip to New Scotland Yard for an official interview over claims that honours were offered in return for multi-million-pound loans to the Labour party."

I imagine if I resisted police requests to attend a police interview, they'd be round to arrest me faster than if I reported I had been burgled.

Sadly, though they should, I doubt the Met police will apply the same procedures to Bliar.

6

Sixupman,

Bridgwater 27/08/2006 10:25:29

There was a recent case in England where a woman had an unsubstantiated alleagtion of assault made against her. She was unable to agree a time for interview with the police: they locked her up for five hours and threatened to take her children into 'care'. The accusation had been false and no charges followed.

7

AlexanderD,

Canada 27/08/2006 10:48:19

How about using the facilities of the Tower of London? Or the Hijundas' planned palace at Carleton Terrace on the Mall? Or at the top of the London Eye, with the door open (see The Third Man)? Or in front of one of Lakshmi Mittal's steel furnaces? Or in a recording studio, going full blast with one of Lord Levi's (in)famous 'pop' groups? Or in a wee IRA cottage, deep in the Irish bogs?

8

Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes,

Peepuls Rabublick A Skoa'lin 27/08/2006 12:09:50

Had anyone else tried to orchestrate police interviews, and for such a protracted period, they would have long since been arrested.

OK Danno, 'cuff him!

9

td,

Highlands 27/08/2006 12:15:43

With all the extra powers entrusted to the Police by this government...the right to arrest good and honest people for all sorts of new and frequently petty offences, too many conceived and invented by this Politically correct, Safety and security paranoid, Field sports hating, class concious government under Tony Blair.... I hardly think that this Prime Minister deserves the right to evade Police interview. Clearly under his stewardship money has changed hands in return for the promise of honours. If it were not so how could otherwise sane men have expected the labour party to make the prospect of them loaning a staggering £20 million of unaffordable debt , seem attractive.

Didn't the person who originally said : " you can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but fooling all of the people all of the time is impossible." get this right. ??
You'd better believe it ...Mr Blair. By creating a quazi Police state you have shown that you agree that No one is above the Law.

10

Quinlan,

Tokyo/Japan 27/08/2006 12:38:06

When the good gentlemen in blue do get to speak to Mr. Blair, perhaps they can ask him about the use of depleted uranium munitions in Iraq.

Ordnance with a half-life of 250,000 thousand years, tons of it, is polluting the lands of Iraq causing cancer and horrible birth deformities.

Instead of investigating honours for cash, investigate crimes against humanity.

<a href="http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/britain__u_s__using..., US using radioactive dirty bombs</a>

11

Guga,

Stornoway 27/08/2006 12:54:05

Tom (10) what you've got to allow for is that most politicians believe in the missing part of that quote, namely: "You can fool most of the people most of the time."

In any event, why haven't they arrested Bliar as a war criminal?

12

Andy Gilmour,

Dunfermline 27/08/2006 16:18:47

So, he's currently refusing to attend a police interview with regards to a serious criminal offence, he has close personal links to fraudsters, and his son has previous form as a teenage delinquent, but he still feels perfectly qualified to lecture everyone on morality & personal ethics.

"Things, can only get bet-ter..."

13

Steve Roberts,

London 27/08/2006 17:28:20

Perhaps Mr Blair should be detained for 28 days without charge while the police look for evidence?

14

Corbett Hunckers,

Fife 27/08/2006 19:47:16

The experience of a night in the cells might stand Blair in good stead. If he ever gets done for crimes against humanity( as he should), he may well recieve a lengthy stretch - we can only hope!!

15

Freedom,

Aberdeen 27/08/2006 19:56:30

Well Tony you reap what you sow!

Go direct to jail do not collect 200 honours.

16

yahya,

Abu Dhabi 29/08/2006 17:21:59

Democracy or no democracy, Corruption always come with absolute power. Tony has a disregard to the opinion of those who voted him in. His policy proved to only benefit him personally and to benfit the rich and the powerful. What happened to the old Good Labour Party?

17

thomas,

midlothian 02/09/2006 12:05:57

nice to see a top of the line lawyer evade the long arm of the law for this length of time.
is there a new definition of the words criminal intent?
it will be very interesting in the next few weeks
with george bush being assassinated on film and tony blair being taken in for questioning can life get any sweeter?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.