Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


David Cameron: I would govern Scots with respect

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 February 2009
LABOUR and Lib Dem wrangling over Holyrood's budget wasn't very edifying, but I believe there are lessons that can be learnt from the experience about how parties manage devolution, both now and in the future.

For Annabel Goldie and the Scottish Conservatives the priority was to secure £234m of concessions from the SNP to help Scotland tackle Labour's recession. This shows that when the interests of the Scottish people are at stake, Conservatives will wo
rk hard to ensure that Scottish people get the best deal.

As a result of their shrewd and tough negotiations, town centres the length and breadth of the country will benefit from £60m worth of regeneration. 150,000 small businesses will have their local taxes cut or abolished. The elderly will get the care money they deserve. There will be more police on the streets, and bus fares will be lower. This is a massive achievement from our 16 MSPs, and a great example of how constructive dialogue can achieve results.

In these difficult economic times the people of Scotland are looking for stability and certainty. That's why we supported the bank recapitalisation last autumn. Supporting the UK Government when it did the right thing then hasn't stopped us from holding it to account since. In the same way, our support for this budget will in no way diminish our vigorous opposition to the SNP.

If elected, I will do everything in my power to ensure that the SNP will not be able to split up the UK. I want to be a Prime Minister of the whole UK. That's not because I'm some kind of megalomaniac, it's because we have so much in common and we have done so much together. We turned a small European island into one of the most powerful countries known to the world. In the 18th century, the Union helped create the sense of possibility that inspired the titans of the Enlightenment. In the 19th century, what was Europe's first common market brought unparalleled prosperity to both our countries.

And in the 20th century, we not only remained stable in the face of the totalitarianisms that were the scourge of mainland Europe, but we confronted them side by side. If you ask me, that's a winning partnership worth fighting for – and the Conservative Party is the only party fighting for it.

That's why we are now the only major party to field candidates in all four parts of the UK. Across the water in Ulster we are building a new force in Northern Irish politics, by combining with the Ulster Unionists to create a modern, moderate centre-right force. Scotland too needs a force that promotes conservative values – the family, enterprise, and a strong country – and that stands up for the UK at the same time.

Surely Scotland deserves better than to have to choose between one centre-left party – Labour – that has failed the country for 11 years, and another centre-left party – the SNP – that wants to break it up. Almost every country in the democratic world has a strong party of the centre-right that stands for important values. The nation of David Hume and Adam Smith should be no different.

How would this commitment to Scotland and the Union manifest itself in government? Let me explain three ways. First, devolution. We will back the constitutional settlement. There is room for improvement and we will look at the Calman Commission carefully. But devolution is about attitudes, not just institutions. This budget debate has highlighted issues about the true nature of political devolution in Scotland. Whilst Iain Gray and Scottish Labour simply take their orders from Gordon Brown, Annabel Goldie is her own woman. We have a close working relationship but it is about co-operation, not control.

This brings me to my second point – our working relationship is a model for how it should be done in Government. If the First Minister had something close to a workable relationship with the Prime Minister throughout this economic crisis, we would have had fewer arguments and more action. Amazingly, Alex Salmond admitted this week that he hadn't met with Gordon Brown in almost a year despite the recession. How is that standing up for Scotland?

This important relationship simply hasn't been respected by this Government. If we win the next election at Westminster, we would govern with a maturity and a respect for the Scottish people. I would be a Prime Minister who would work constructively with any administration at Holyrood for the good of Scotland, and I would be in regular contact with the First Minister no matter what party he or she came from.

Third, if we are going to make devolution work effectively we need more co-operation at all levels, not just the very highest. That means the Secretary of State for Scotland having monthly meetings with the First Minister. That means Cabinet Ministers in Westminster talking to their counterparts in Holyrood. That also means officials in Whitehall talking to officials in St Andrew's House. And instead of completely refusing to appear before Scottish Parliament Committees as Labour's ministers do, our ministers would be open to reasonable requests.

We've already demonstrated our co-operative spirit. Think of David Mundell's letter to the SNP offering talks about the funding of the Forth Road Bridge. Members of our shadow cabinet have also had meetings with members of the SNP cabinet, such as George Osborne's meeting with John Swinney last year. I want to see more of that.

This commitment to true partnership between our nations sets the Conservatives apart from the other parties in Scotland as much as our commitment to modern, centre-right ideas. We are the only party that can bring about the change Scotland needs.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 08/02/2009 01:01:54
I have enough respect for David Cameron to believe that he has a better grasp of the real situation than this propaganda exercise would indicate. Of course there will have to be close cooperation between Edinburgh and London, under devolution and independence alike. Of course he is right about the present state of relations - but that is due largely to Gordon Brown's poisonous hatred of the SNP, and Alex Salmond in particular.

The SNP did not invent the present wave of national feeling in Scotland; it is just one of its innumerable symptoms. It is, if one likes, the main political arm of the much larger national movement. That movement has been building up in waves over a period of many generations, each wave reaching a higher point than the one before, and this rising tide is not going to be turned back by anyone.

All that Mr. Cameron can do is fight a rearguard action for as long as possible. That is his job, and I have no doubt he will do it to the best of his ability. In the long run I don't think he or anyone else is going to succeed, and to judge from some of his previous statements I have a feeling that he knows this.

2

Observer,,

Glasgow 08/02/2009 02:15:55
There isn't any inherent need for the Tories to keep Scotland. Without us, the Tories may well become the natural party of Government in what remains of the UK. That is majorly bad for the North of England, Wales, and socialists everywhere. But it ain't our fault.

When viewing what the Tories say we have to ask ourselves - do we hate them so much that we will vote Labour, like sheep, to try and get rid of them (which we don't have the numbers to do) or will we be self-centred and vote for ourselves ?

To avoid being self-centred in the context we are in now would be incredibly stupid. I will never ever ever welcome a Tory Govt - but if it's gonna happen then let's use it to crystalise views.
3

 sm753,

08/02/2009 05:06:18
An excellent article by Prime Minister-to-be Cameron and two excellent examples of delusion by the posters above.

Today's Scotland, like today's UK, does not "hate" today's Tories any more.

And how will the Nats be able to call them "anti-Scottish" when they've relied on their backing for two budgets?

4

donald,

glasgow 08/02/2009 06:32:27
At least he is more honest than the other British Brown and Gray Tory Party.
5

Grant,

Edinburgh, Scotland 08/02/2009 09:38:02
David Cameron only cares about Scotland to help prop up England and the UK on the international stage.

No Scotland mean no nuclear weapons for the rest of the UK, absolutely. Witness the concerned overtones of the Chief of the Defence Staff a few months ago initimating such a scenario.

If Scotland was to leave the UK, it would humiliate England and nobody in the rest of the world would take whatever remained of the UK seriously any more. The effect would be disproportionate. Why would they take seriously a country with post-colonial delusions of grandeur that can't even keep itself together? And what would that mean for Mr Cameron? The words of Nye Bevan sum it up well: "Please don't send me naked into the conference chamber".

As Barack Obama quite rightly pointed out when referring to Mr Cameron - "Man, that guy's a lightweight!!" Indeed he is. And we can all see through his shallow, narrow motives.
6

gus1940,

Edinburgh 08/02/2009 10:08:19
#5

Was it not Gaitskill?
7

Grant,

Edinburgh 08/02/2009 10:51:27
#6 gus1940

Definitely Bevan.
8

Colin Wilson,

08/02/2009 11:01:11
Re #3 : Is "Prime Minister-to-be Cameron" going to dismantle the English class system (imposed on Scotland after 1707) where people are selected for important positions based on their social pedigree rather then on their individual merits?

Scotland (where everyone is lumped togather as "lower class") will not thrive until this system is dismantled or until Scotland withdraws from the UK.
9

Bolivarian Scot,

BorisTown 08/02/2009 12:01:00
What is most perhaps most noticeable about this article is the low response rate amongst readers, compared to other Scotland on Sunday threads in recent weeks. Only nine comments so far, including this one, and two of those were a digression on the subject of Nye Bevan (who once described Tories as "lower than vermin").

David Cameron may be the PM-in-waiting but he isn't exactly setting the heather alight. The phrase "rampant apathy" springs to mind.
10

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 08/02/2009 14:06:44
#3 "Today's Scotland, like today's UK, does not "hate" today's Tories any more."

16 MSPs out of 125, and one Scottish Westminster MP out of 59, would seem to suggest otherwise.
11

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 08/02/2009 14:52:18
The Leader of HM Opposition at Westminster arrogantly appears to have decided that his party will win the next UK General Election?

As any actuary, bookmaker, or undertaker will tell you there are few certainties in this life? Indeed, outsiders and underdogs regularly upset the odds.
We read about it day in, day out!

It is a long time to the next UK and Scottish Parliament Elections, and a lightweight politician like the current Tory Leader might not even be around by that time?

The mass of the Scottish Electorate have a long and painful collective memory of the indigenous Tories disastrous time at the old Scottish Office, and
if I were the Tory Leader, I wouldn't rush out and place a penny bet on him winning, whatever the pollsters, pundits, and sephologists claim is a foregone conclusion?
12

Retiarius,

Batavadorum 08/02/2009 16:36:16
"This budget debate has highlighted issues about the true nature of political devolution in Scotland. Whilst Iain Gray and Scottish Labour simply take their orders from Gordon Brown, Annabel Goldie is her own woman. We have a close working relationship but it is about co-operation, not control."
As somebody who will never vote Conservative I nevertheless find this observation to be completely accurate. Well said, Dave.
13

Eric D,

08/02/2009 16:47:27
Mr Cameron I will vote for your party for the first time next year because your policies on tackling the dependency culture, driving up school standards, and repairing our broken society. The last 12 years have shown this ex SNP voter that the centre-left parties have nothing to offer but more social welfare/dependency and the same old failed dogma's.
14

puskas,

East kilbride 15/02/2009 09:01:33
No13 Eric..

Please tell me who are the centre left political parties..
15

FTH22inarow,

03/05/2009 08:57:37
You will govern Scots with NO MANDATE what so ever what is democratic about that.13 Be careful what you wish for
16

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 04/10/2009 23:27:27
The Tories are as popular as the plague in Scotland and therefore shouldn't be governing us at all! Don't worry Dave you won't have to worry about pleasing us for long...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.