Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Residential streets face 20mph limits

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 April 2009
SCOTTISH drivers face compulsory 20mph speed limits on residential streets, it emerged last night.
The Department for Transport is this week expected to start consulting on new speed limit guidelines across England and Wales and Scotland is expected to follow suit.

The move is designed to slash road fatalities even further, building on the lowest figures for road deaths since records began more than 80 years ago.

Four English councils have already decided to impose a blanket 20mph speed limit on all their residential roads and near schools.

Scottish councils too have been embracing powers to cut limits on such roads, although none has yet imposed a new blanket limit.

The Department for Transport will expect all councils in England and Wales to follow its guidelines, although ultimately it is up to local authorities to decide what limits to set on what roads.

The Scottish Government, which is responsible for advising councils north of the border, is expected to produce a major new road safety strategy later in the spring.

Scotland on Sunday understands that the Scottish Government will almost certainly follow guidelines set by the DfT, simply adapting them for local circumstances.

Stewart Stevenson, the Scottish transport minister, is said to be a strong supporter of better road safety and has gathered together the nation's top experts to find ways to cut casualties.

SNP insiders last night suggested a new road safety strategy put together by those experts would be likely to consider moves such as new blanket 20mph zones.

A total of 281 people died on Scottish roads in 2007, including nine children. The Scottish Government has a target of cutting the number of people killed or seriously injured on the roads by 40% between 1994-1998 and 2011.

It has already topped that target substantially, with the figure down 45%. It also aimed to halve the number of children who died in accidents in the same period. The figure is down 67% already.

In England and Wales, road deaths are also at an all-time low. The total UK death toll in 2007 was 2,940 people, a drop of 7% from 2006. The number of children killed in the UK fell to a record low of 121.

Ministers, however, are determined to drive them down even further and make sure councils play their part in slowing traffic on residential roads.

Department for Transport insiders yesterday said: "We are trying to get the balance right between motorists and everyone else and this is a way of reminding local authorities that they have got these powers and they should use them.

"It is proven that the 20mph limit does lower the number of accidents and we do not think that anyone should be up in arms about this as it is a sensible idea."

The DfT will set out its guidelines in a consultation document to be published on Tuesday. Jim Fitzpatrick, the Transport Minister, will say it is important that highway authorities look at bringing in 20mph limits on residential roads, including all those near schools. Road safety researchers have long known that people hit at 20mph have a much better chance of survival than those struck at 30mph. Only one in 40 dies at 20mph, compared with one in five at 30mph.

Sources yesterday said that ministers would seek to avoid using cameras to enforce the wider use of 20mph limits, saying they would only annoy drivers rather than encourage them to slow down.

Claire Armstrong, who runs the anti-camera group Safespeed, said the move to Twenty's Plenty was "extremely disturbing". She said: "If you make drivers go at a speed where they are not comfortable, they will be distracted and inattentive and that is what causes accidents. This Government seems obsessed with speed as a prime factor for causing accidents."

Geoff Hoon, the Transport Secretary, has signalled he opposes the blanket use of speed cameras. The new guidelines are likely to suggest they are focused "in a blanket way". Instead, camera operators will be expected to put new devices in accident blackspots.

The UK Government is desperate not to be seen as anti-motorist, with several of its members looking enthusiastically at ways of helping the automotive industry out of one of the worst crises it has faced.

Some campaigners have called for more cameras – and more focus on the dangers of driving at high speeds outside of towns.

Safety experts in recent years have warned that the worst fatalities in Scotland have been out of towns.

All road traffic regulations, including the Highway Code and vehicle and driving licensing, are reserved to Westminster but most practical measures of road planning, however, are devolved.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Road accidents are at their lowest level in Scotland for more than 50 years. However, we must not be complacent.

"Local authorities already have the power to introduce 20mph speed limits on any road for which they are the roads authority.

"In addition the Scottish Government has taken action by bringing together an expert group of some of the leading thinkers in road safety from across the country to devise a new 10-year road safety framework for Scotland."



Twenty's plenty to kill a pedestrian

According to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, excess speed contributes to 28% of collisions in which someone is killed, 18% of crashes resulting in a serious injury and 12% of all injury collisions.

This means that around 1,000 people are killed each year on Britain's roads because drivers and riders travel too fast, and more than 6,000 are seriously injured.

Approximately two-thirds of all crashes in which people are killed or injured happen on roads with a speed limit of 30mph or less. At 35mph, a driver is twice as likely to kill someone as they are at 30mph.

A spokesman said: "When a car is travelling at a high speed, a driver will have less time to identify hazards and react to what is happening around them. It takes vehicles further to stop from higher speeds, and if there is a crash the injuries will be more severe."

The official statistics are stark:

• Hit by a car at 20mph, one out of 40 pedestrians will be killed, 97% will survive.

• At 30mph, two out of 10 pedestrians will be killed, 80% will survive.

• At 35mph, five out of 10 pedestrians will be killed, 50% will survive.

• At 40mph, nine out of 10 pedestrians will be killed, 10% will survive.

• At 20mph in dry conditions, the breaking distance is 20ft, or 6m. At 30mph it is 45ft, or 14m. At 40mph it is 80ft, or 24m. At 50mph it is 125ft, or 38m. At 60mph it is 180ft, or 55m. At 70mph is 245ft, or 75m.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 April 2009 10:40 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Motoring issues
 
1

Dougie - Edinburgh,

19/04/2009 00:38:25
Realistically this is going to kill more motorists through old age than it will save lives of pedestrians through collisions. There are some residential roads where 20mph is justified because the roads are very narrow but as usual, the government would rather use a blanket rule regardless of the specific details about where it will be applied rather than guidelines which can be applied where appropriate.
2

truthsleuth,

A caring motorist 19/04/2009 01:38:03
Wait for the screams from the petrolheads an boy racers. No matter how many times they are faced with the facts that speed kills you will hear their whines of not true. They even whine about 20mph in residential streets - just how self centred can they get.
I do not hear many pedestrians complaining about 20mph limits nor do I hear of many motorists being killed by 20mph pedestrians.

Lets have the 20mph speed limits before we get electric cars that will stalk pedestrians before they can hear them.
3

Deag,

Edinburgh 19/04/2009 02:37:00
How do you get them to obey them, my street (20mph limit) has speed tables (rather than humps) and drivers regularly drive at 30 or faster. Also signs are placed too high for car drivers to normally read them without straining their heads or there is only one sign.
4

an interested party,

19/04/2009 06:10:05
2 things

1. an unenforced / unenforceable law is a guideline not a law

2. those that ignore a 30 mph limit wont suddenly change heart and obey a 20 limit

therefore this law will only be observed by drivers who are unlikely to be the problem anyway. reducing the problem not a jot, sounds like action but isn't

one of the most observed speed related problem i see is people that drive at 45 in a national limit (60) and 40 in a built up area(30) whilst on a trunk road
5

Peripatetic Pensioner,

US heading north 19/04/2009 06:13:37
20mph is common in urban areas and when school children are arriving of leaving schools amber lights in the zones flash and not only are speed limits reduced but if drivers are caught fines are doubled. The same applies to roadwork zones, speed in them when people are working and your fine is doubled. Strangely enough, in this land where the car is king, people, except for some profesional drivers like truckers or taxis, tend to obey and outside of freeways with no work restrictions driving is relativley stress free.
6

Son of Gramsci,

Edina 19/04/2009 08:28:32
#4

Worse than that - an unenforced law brings all law into disrepute.

I'd rather the 30mph limit was enforced in my street from time to time, and yes with cameras if at all possible.

People only object to cameras because they want to break the law. As in other areas of life, people who advocate breaking the law should be treated with contempt.

7

Son of Gramsci,

Embra 19/04/2009 08:31:35
The quote below is clearly complete twaddle. What is Ms Armstrong's point - that people should drive through town at 60/ 70/ 80, because at least then they'd be interested in the challenge of trying to stay alive? This is real life, not a video game.

Claire Armstrong, who runs the anti-camera group Safespeed, said the move to Twenty's Plenty was "extremely disturbing". She said: "If you make drivers go at a speed where they are not comfortable, they will be distracted and inattentive."
8

Mallory,

Edinburgh 19/04/2009 09:03:48
Wil they be reducing the Tram speed in Edinburgh in residential areas like Leith Walk and Haymarket?
9

Unimpressed one,

19/04/2009 09:05:38
We've had '20s plenty' signs in our area for 10 years. Still see motorists doing 30-40mph on a regular basis. Introduction of speed bumps is a better bet.
10

an interested party,

19/04/2009 10:00:41
twenty's plenty is an advisor not a limit
needs a red ring round it not a green one

its in the highway code
11

The Ayrshire Bard,

19/04/2009 11:18:16
No matter what the signs say the loonies will continue to ignore all speed limits. I've noticed that the 50 mph signs at roadworks are totally ignored by female drivers and the general driving standards drop after 7pm when the young tearaways take to the roads.
If you watch the cop programmes where they are constantly chasing these guys you will be horrified at the feeble penalties they are given by the courts, so the careful drivers will be the only ones to pay any attention to the new limits.
12

Charles MN,

19/04/2009 11:23:47
“The Scottish Government has a target of cutting the number of people killed or seriously injured on the roads by 40% between 1994-1998 and 2011.
It has already topped that target substantially, with the figure down 45%. “

Doctors were so sick of hearing this as it did not match their experience in hospitals that they compiled this report:

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7558/73

Their conclusion was:
“The findings from hospital admission statistics cast doubt on whether there were reductions in serious road injuries from 1996 to 2004 and on whether the government's targets either overall or for children will be met by 2010 “

In other words they accused the police and the DoT of lying.

“The official statistics are stark:

• Hit by a car at 20mph, one out of 40 pedestrians will be killed, 97% will survive. 

• At 30mph, two out of 10 pedestrians will be killed, 80% will survive. 

• At 35mph, five out of 10 pedestrians will be killed, 50% will survive.

• At 40mph, nine out of 10 pedestrians will be killed, 10% will survive. “

Government accident statistics show that in 2007 on all roads there were 646 pedestrian deaths and 30191 injured or killed. So 1 in 50 pedestrians are killed in accidents on our roads. This suggests that the average pedestrian accident on all roads happens at less than 20MPH if you believe the above “official statistics”.

http://www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/162469/221412/221549/227755/rcgb2007.pdf


“At 20mph in dry conditions, the breaking distance is 20ft, or 6m. At 30mph it is 45ft, or 14m. At 40mph it is 80ft, or 24m. At 50mph it is 125ft, or 38m. At 60mph it is 180ft, or 55m. At 70mph is 245ft, or 75m. “

These figures may have been accurate 50 years ago in the days of crossply tyres and drum brakes but any modern car will do much better. Autocars figures for a Fiat 500: 30-0 8.5 meters, 70-0 46.6 meters. It's a pity the highway code hasn't been updated to reflect reality

13

BorderLineScottish,

19/04/2009 12:37:44
Numptys on the roads!

I lived in a small town when in Scotland and the standard of driving was the worst I'd ever seen, despite previously living and driving in large cities and towns.

Boy racers driving in convoys, elderly drivers pulling out after parking on double yellows, courtesy of a disabled badge.

Vehicles badly parked on double yellows or six foot away from the kerbside, causing the high street to be grid-locked.

Speeding motorbikes and large trucks that barely had enough room to maneuver.

Blatant speeding through residential areas, even past schools and a complete lack of road sense when entering the town from one of the national speed limited roads.

In England, there are so many speed cameras and calming initiatives in towns and residential areas, it's nigh on impossible to speed.

Prickheads will NOT adhere to the limits and thick skulled imbeciles will never learn how to drive, park or maneuver correctly.
14

FTH22inarow,

19/04/2009 13:10:48
why not have someone walking in front of every car with a red flag, shouting unclean
15

Douglas,

Bathgate 19/04/2009 15:24:06
#14 FTH22inarow: That's okay till uncle Ian is driving past and gets distracted by a flag waving operative he thinks is calling out to him resulting in an avoidalbe accident.
Please think your suggestions through. :o)
16

Papa? Nicole! Papa?,

19/04/2009 16:09:58
For those of you clamouring for speed bumps, they recently installed some in my quiet residential street - the traffic noise has increased, and people just speed between the bumps. Be careful what you wish for - these speed bumps are almost always not the answer!
17

Weel Kent Jambo,

19/04/2009 18:03:12
So really what we are saying is that x hundred pedestrians died after wandering out into a road without looking properly? When is the Government going to introduce pedestrian cameras at accident blackspots? When will it make walking under the influence of drink or drugs an indictable offence?

OK I'm joking but there is a serious point to this - in any collision between person and car it will be the person who comes off worst but how many of these 'accidents' are actually caused by the pedestrians? When was the last time we heard of a pedestrian being charged for causing one - or is jaywalking an old-fashioned notion?
18

Moder8,

EDINBURGH 19/04/2009 20:47:36
Here's an idea to think about. Try to get pedestrians to look right, left then right again, ascertain traffic flow then on the basis of what they see make a judgement on the safety of crossing the road.
This could be passed on to children by parents. Pavements and crossings could be made available in cities keeping pedestrians separated from motorists and cyclists. I'm sure somebody will be able to elaborate on this idea and come up with a solution to the problem of "carnage on our roads"
19

Yonthing!,

20/04/2009 14:54:15
Remove as many hazards from the roads as possible - remove parked cars. Remove speed bumps. Move and reduce signs, fences, hedges, poles, bollards and all other street furniture that obscures and distracts drivers.

Most accidents occur at or near some form of additional hazards such as parked cars. Build off-street car parks and make owners store their vehicles off the street. Clear open roads without hazards statistically have fewer accidents. With better visibility, drivers have more time to be prepared to react to a changing situation.
20

just wondering,

21/04/2009 12:12:59
17 & 18. I saw this item being discussed on TV last week, and in the furore of the "anti speeding" brigade, only one person actually mentioned what you have ie put some emphasis onto the pedestrian.

When we were young, you had the traffic police coming round the schools for demo's, and Green Cross Code and others. Do kids get this stuff at school these days, or are they so sure in their "I can do anything" mentality, that they don't feel the need to watch out for cars before crossing roads.

At the same time, I appreciate that some car drivers should have psychological profiling carried out before being allowed into their cars. :)

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do Portobello traders deserve compensation for roadworks disruption?
Yes, it’s the same as troubles caused by trams
Yes, the council must support small businesses
No, everybody is struggling at the moment

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.