Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Motherwell 1-1 St Mirren: Adverse conditions the winner as Well pitch in to grind out replay in Paisley

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 February 2009
Motherwell 1
(Hughes 65)

St Mirren1
(Dorman 11)
IT WAS a case of honours even after a forgettable 90 minutes between two sides who struggled to cope with adverse conditions.

Motherwell came from behind to earn a replay at St Mirren Park in nine days' time and it would have been unjust if they hadn't been allowed a second chance to reach the quarter-finals of the Homecoming Scottish Cup.

They don't award points for artistic impression in the cup which, given the disgraceful state of the Fir Park playing surface, is just as well.

A cursory glance at St Mirren's starting line-up, which featured the strike pairing of Billy Mehmet and Jim Hamilton, suggested that manager Gus MacPherson had also sussed that attempting to play silky football on this pitch would be a waste of time.

He was right, too, although the home side squandered two glorious opportunities before Saints moved in front.

David Clarkson was the first sinner, firing straight at Mark Howard after being sent clear from Keith Lasley's pass.

At least that effort was on target: when Marc Fitzpatrick was given a free header six yards out from Steven Hammell's free-kick, he sent his effort over the bar.

Saints could not have complained about being behind at that stage but they surprised their hosts, and possibly themselves, by taking the lead immediately after that second escape.

Mehmet justified his inclusion by picking out a trademark run behind the opposing back four from Andy Dorman.

The midfielder took the ball round Graeme Smith and, although Hammell did superbly well to block his initial shot the rebound fell kindly for him and this time he produced a clinical finish.

Falling behind provoked a flurry of activity from Motherwell but it proved to be a lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Mehmet was foolishly booked for throwing the ball away after conceding a free-kick and Hamilton collected a yellow card for dissent.

Motherwell, by contrast, couldn't get arrested and it was no great surprise when Cillian Sheridan, signed on loan from Celtic, replaced Lasley at the interval.

He provided Clarkson with the support he had previously been lacking and Hughes, who had been deployed in a no-man's land between playing up front and on the left wing, was switched to a more central role. Motherwell thrived consequently.

Even so, Saints had a clear-cut chance to secure their place in the quarter-finals when Hamilton's knock-on provided Mehmet with a shooting opportunity but he pulled his shot well wide.

Relief turned to disbelief for the home crowd when they found themselves level just five minutes later.

Clarkson did the spade work on the right flank, cutting the ball back for Sheridan. Howard left his line to block the Irishman's fierce drive but the rebound fell to Hughes and he lashed it into the roof of the net from 15 yards.

Motherwell dominated from then on but lacked the cutting edge which would have converted their build-up play into something more palpable. Even so, the visitors could have won it in the dying seconds when Stephen McGinn's free-kick was allowed to travel all the way to the far post where the unmarked Scott Cuthbert was lurking with intent.

Unfortunately for the defender, he lacks a predatory instinct and his volleyed attempt at goal was weak and easily gathered by a relieved Smith.

It would have been harsh on Motherwell, whose second-half performance alone was worthy of a replay. McGhee's team are now unbeaten in eight matches and, on this showing, should start as favourites for a place in the last eight when they reconvene at St Mirren Park.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 February 2009 8:19 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Motherwell FC , St Mirren FC
 
1

,

08/02/2009 00:10:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

,

08/02/2009 00:41:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

08/02/2009 01:41:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

08/02/2009 02:46:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

,

08/02/2009 08:07:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 11:17:02
#2 - ReaRangers are 2 points behind Celtic currently.

If the league stopped today who would be champions?

Which ReaRangers team has lost 3 of the last 4 games against Celtic?

Which team would suffer the biggest damage should they lose next week.

Who are staring down the barrell of 4 in a row?

7

sonnybud,

A|yrshire 08/02/2009 11:26:50
Hey numpties 1-6. What has this game to do with the Bigot Brothers? Away and rabbit on your own match report - eejits.

Back on topic - poor game. Correct result. Lets hope the replay is better.
8

Ajax MacKindling,

08/02/2009 11:48:41
Still wondering why Mr English has tried to stir up some kind of Clarkson-esque backlash with his odd rant, and why a "quality" newspaper would publish it.

Any thoughts?
9

Ajax MacKindling,

08/02/2009 11:53:17
7
If this site had allowed comments on Tom English's article I would be posting there.
Oddly after inviting "backlash" the article is closed for comment.
10

,

08/02/2009 11:56:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Ajax MacKindling,

08/02/2009 12:01:49
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/sport/Tom-English-39No-reasonable-fan.4958528.jp
12

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 12:18:56
Looks like Tom English column is a retort to the Blue Mail Campaigns of the "We Deserve Better" folks.

Those sad people who trawl through the media to back up their vatican conspiracy theories and "Timmy under the bed" psychosis, for anything which backs up their delusional beliefs.

It then results in "Blue Mail Campaigns" ((C) Feurher Feurher) and various other hysterical outlets for these clowns to embarrass themselves.

See the "Campaign For Parity Of Esteem For Bluenoses" for further evidence and hilarity.
13

,

08/02/2009 12:31:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

08/02/2009 12:31:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 12:34:55
Just watching on ESPN, Britain's 20 greatest ever managers.

Unbelievable, Joe Kinnear finished above Sir Matt Busby.

The top 10 for me is;

1. Busby
2. Stein
3. Shankly
4. Clough
5. Ferguson
6. Paisley
7. Wenger
8. Dalglish
9. Kendal
10.Revie









16

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 12:35:48
14

Yes for some reason the Hearts thread is not accepting my login. Strange.
17

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 12:48:53
#15 - would be inclined to find a place for Bobby Robson....probably a Revie or Kendals expense.
18

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 12:51:46
17

Robson is a good shout. Also Bill Nicholson who managed the great Spurs team of ther 60s and built the club.

19

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 12:56:12
Unbelievably in Britain's top 20 football managers Jock Stein doesn't even get into the top 20. According to the ESPN viewers Stein is not even thought of above the likes of Keegan, Wilkinson, Atkinson and Kinnear.

Well what a joke that programme was. It only tells us one thing; those who must be watching ESPN are football's ignorant armchair fans.

20

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 13:00:04
According to ESPN Arsene Wenger is the greatest manager to ever manage in British Football.

Wenger has never won a European trophy nor dominated his era yet he's been voted greatest ever. Total joke.

I bet all those who contributed to this mickey mouse programme are embarrassed they ever took part.

21

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 13:04:23
#20 - seen that programme before. Its an English made one for American Soccer Ball fans.

Hardly worth the effort..
22

,

08/02/2009 13:05:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 13:11:09
21

It should have been renamed - England's Top 20 Managers
24

Shape to Shoot,

08/02/2009 13:15:17
9

I think it's Tom English trying to stir up trouble.
It is a bit rediculous that the scotsman bans people from these threads at the drop of a hat for saying things not half as provocative as those which appear in his article today.

I think it was unreasonable not to open a thread...but then had that been done it would have descended into a Celtic/Rearrangerz slagging match resulting in the thread being pulled.

I mean what IS the point ? We know that there are some very weird rearrangerz fanz out there cultivating the most outlandish beliefs about their club being the target of a conspiracy. They are however a very small minority ...I seem to recall their last protest demo outside the BBC offices in Glasgow attracted about 30 , and that was including the devil-dugz.
25

,

08/02/2009 13:19:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Shape to Shoot,

08/02/2009 13:22:38
BTW

There is a Polish newspaper running a story that some Polish dude has been approached by Celtic to take over from Strachan in the summer. Can't remember his name but from the accompanying photo he looks to be in his 60s.

If there is any truth in it, it might shed a bit of light on why the team have been so poor lately. If we don't raise our game for next week we'll get done in.
If Strachan has made up his mind to go, I think he should go now and let's get a new manager in to give the place a big shake up.
27

,

08/02/2009 13:34:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

Shape to Shoot,

08/02/2009 13:47:37
27

You know, we have so many problems of our own at the moment having a go at the rearrangerz holds no joy for me.

I watched what was possibly the worst performance by any Celtic team that I can ever remember. We WERE playing against a team of amateurs sitting 7th in the second division.
It was shocking. No disrespect to QP - in fact I salute their resolution - but they shouldn't even be on the same park as us to be quite honest.

Had it been a one off, I could have dismissed it as a bad day at the office, but we've been toiling against everyone for what has become months.
Some of our supporters travel from Ireland and the South of England to come to CP ....just how much longer they can go on devoting all that time and money to Celtic when being served up kak week after week remains to be seen.
29

,

08/02/2009 13:55:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

xcaledoniaco,

The Emerald City 08/02/2009 13:55:27
Hey mod, why did you remove my post at #1 there wasn't anything offensive in it, the only thing I can think of is by me saying that I am one very disappointed Tim, am I not allowed to call myself a Tim?

You have my email, please advise.



31

,

08/02/2009 13:58:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

Ajax MacKindling,

08/02/2009 13:58:44
24 Shape to Shoot

Couldn't agree more. If TE's article had appeared as comment then the thread would have been shutdown.
Just what has it got to do with football and why is it on a sports page?
There doesn't even seem to be any link with the guy singing sectarian songs on the train to any football club at all, yet he seems to be the point of the whole article.

Also why have the early post on this thread been removed, I can't recall anyone posting anything offensive on them.

Just a normal day in Scotsman-online-land I see.

D
33

Shape to Shoot,

08/02/2009 14:13:46
31

I was a staunch Strachan supporter until we lost 1V0 at home to motherwell last season. In the weeks leading up to that game, I was beginning to doubt him, but resisted calling for a change.
However, having lost my support, he won it back in spades by delivering the title in sensational fashion.

I can honestly say that Celtic have only impressed me in flashes here and there this season. Losing out to Aalborg for the uefa spot was a poor show. But the overall picture gets a resounding 'not good enough' from me and who else can you blame except the manager.

This is Strachan's squad, and he can't get a game out them.
34

,

08/02/2009 14:40:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 14:46:04
33

Both are unsuitable when used in the derogatory.

However on the funny side, I imagine a couple of mad football fans who support Clyde but have been given comps for the next OF game.

At the game, the guy's real name is Tim and calls his wife honey or hon for short, and she calls him Tim or hon in reply.

Can you imagine the scenario; my hon and I went to the game the other day it was freezing cold so I asked her "hon would you like a Bovril" She replied "Sod the bovril Tim, I'll have a hot pie instead Hon"

The guy goes to the pie stand and finds a long queue. He sees his nephew Billy at the front of the queue and shouts "Hey Billy boy, can you get me a bovril and a hot pie for ma wee hon"

Billy boy turns to the guy behind a bar - "Oh aye...whit wiz that again...oh aye gottit...A hot pie for ma auntie hon and a bovril fur ma Uncle Tim and an orange juice for me - Billy Boy."

Do you think the guy behind the bar would call the stewards and get him arrested for racial or sectarian abuse.

If Billy Boy gets served he would take the pie and bovril back to his aunt and uncle. "Here's yer hot pie and yer Bovril Tim."

Tim sipping his bovril. "Aye that's great bovril hon. How's yer pie?"

Hon nibbling on pie. "Aye it's lovely. Nice and juicy and hot"

Tim: "Look's nice gies a wee nibble hon"

Billy Boy on the mobile. "Oh hi Da, aye the game's rubbish. Whit's that? Uncle Tim? Oh haud on a minute Tim's munching through his hon's hot pie"

Can't see this post lasting long can you?



36

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 14:51:25
35

Can you not give your jibberish a break?

What has Charlie Adam's sending off at Blackpool got to do with Scottish football, referees or Rangers FC?



37

xcaledoniaco,

The Emerald City 08/02/2009 14:52:48
Mod here are the four offending posts!

xcaledoniaco,
The Emerald City 08/02/2009 00:10:16
Another poor Celtic performance yesterday, that's 4 or 5 games on the trot now, what will WGS do to fire these guys up for next week? Who knows but something has to be done.

Once again most of the team didn't show up, thank G+d it was a cup game, I'm one very disappointed Jungle Jim here, we were that poor miller and boyd would have shone in that team yesterday, as someone who is a big fan of WGS, maybe just maybe it's time for a change, no ranting or raving here with sack the board comments, I just think that it might be time to move on, if you pick a team and cant motivate them maybe its time, but I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong.

Right now I'm dreading the next OF game, although that will change as we get closer to it.

No 4 in a row coming you way endings on this one!
Report Unsuitable
2
thepundit,
08/02/2009 00:41:03
Shocking performance from Celtic.

If they play like that against the new champions then we will demolish them 3 or 4 nil.

1 In A Row coming your way!...
Report Unsuitable
3
Ajax MacKindling,
08/02/2009 01:41:42
Has anyone got any idea what provoked the rant.. "Tom English: 'No reasonable fan can think the media has one rule for Rangers'" ?
Report Unsuitable
4
Shantaram,
08/02/2009 02:46:57
#1 - Gordon Strachan is leaving at the end of the season. He has already told the board and they already have a replacement lined up. The board tried to persuade him to stay at least another year but he has made his mind up.

Gordon feels that 4 years is enough and he fancies another crack at the EPL.
38

,

08/02/2009 14:53:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
39

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 14:58:29
39

Of what interest is it to you where Rangers chairman gets his money? You support Celtic do you not?

Of what interest is it to you what Rangers fans deserve? You support Celtic do you not?

Of what interest is it to you if some Rangers fans are running campaign to change their club? You support Celtic do you not?

Celtic supporter? Sad isn't it?

40

,

08/02/2009 14:58:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
41

,

08/02/2009 15:02:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 15:02:59
41

That's what you would like isn't it?

You are a typical cyber bully.

As soon as someone challenges your views you ask them to go away. Can't you handle it big man? Haven't you the spine to back up your warped views?

You seem to find the most tenous link to rubbish Rangers FC. The latest example being Charlie Adam's sending off at Blackpool.

You are seriously sad.
43

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 15:06:52
42

I am not a Rangers supporter. But I refuse to watch a nonentity like you spout sheer rubbish on a scottish football forum.

Rangers fans do not deserve anything. Better or otherwise. They may expect better or demand better but they are like every other football fan in the country -a paying customer. They are nothing special.

Why can't you let Rangers fans sort their own issue out and start supporting your own team?



44

,

08/02/2009 15:21:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

Del Amitri,

08/02/2009 15:27:40
46

You are seriously sad and give Celtic supporters a bad name.

Twice you have told me to go away to another thread. Don't you like it back? Can't you handle it? Just say and I'll stop asking you the basic questions which you find uncomfortable to answer.

Post 36 obviously the ironic humour escaped, that didn't surprise me in the slightest as your world is narrowed down to one thing - attacking Rangers FC.

Give it a break and support your team.

Rangers fans deserve to know how their club is run, but they don't need YOU to point that out to them.




46

,

08/02/2009 15:31:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
47

,

08/02/2009 15:41:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
48

,

08/02/2009 15:50:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
49

thepundit,

08/02/2009 15:59:39
Idee.

You're raging arent you?

No oblivion, No financial loss against Milan and your team is playing pure gash.

Imagine struggling against a complete diddy team languishing 7th in the second division.

David Murray's masterplan has worked a treat. He pretended we had to sell because he knew complacency would kick in at Celtic an they wouldnt strengthen, now we have Fleck and Naismith in our team while you's have stood still.

The man you criticise so much has out-thought your club and made them look like fools.

Get it right up ye!.
50

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 16:03:23
Puntit, I have often thought that you were a daft wee 14 year old who spends more time on these threads than is healthy.

your post at #51...if you think that the whole ReaRangers financial crisis, linked to MIH, linked to the overall financial recession was a bluff my Minty, then you are a biggre punTIT than I previously thought.

Isn't it time for you to log in as Feriens, FTSPL, London Calling or one of the other monickers you used for posting the blatant sectarian stuff??

51

thepundit,

08/02/2009 16:09:05
#52

I think you have me confused with someone else.
52

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 16:13:24
#53 - no, bang to rights actually.

53

thepundit,

08/02/2009 16:18:20
#54

Ive never made any sectarian comments on here.

And if i did they would be offensive to RANGERS fans, not the likes of you.
54

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 16:31:55
#55 - theres logic in that post somewhere....i'm just not sure where.

When you cut through the paper thin bravado of the Rangers support right now, its based on 3 very flimsy points. 1) they never managed to sell the player they needed to in Jan (no one wanted any of them). 2) Celtic never signed anyone (possibly linked to the strong rumours that WGS is seeing out his notice) and 3) Celtic are in poor form.

Point 3 could change on Sunday and Rangers could be bumped 5 points behind...

When you put things in that context...its hardly worth getting too confident.

55

thepundit,

08/02/2009 16:42:50
I wouldnt say the Rangers fans are 'too' confident.

That would suggest that we are being cocky.

Im confident we'll win the championship because of the 3 points you mentioned and also the fact that there is disharmony in the Celtic ranks.

1 In A Row!

Ps, Nobody wanted any of our players? Big Eck wanted Boyd, Kinnear wanted Bazza and Megson wanted Pedro.
56

thepundit,

08/02/2009 16:44:36
#57

Shocking turnout.

The Glory Hunters who stayed away will be Rangers fans by the end of the season. lol
57

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 16:49:12
#57 - thats about 21k more than the showed up for the national cup semi final against Falkirk which wasn't shown on national TV.

That humphing off Kaunas must have hurt a lot.
58

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 17:00:26
#61 - thats a bit of a silly comment is it not?

Isn't it better to lose in the Champs League proper than in the prelims?

Remind us again, who did Aalburg dispose of home and away in qualifying for the Champions League?
59

,

08/02/2009 17:00:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
60

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 17:10:39
The fact that the Milan game was so well attended by the success starved Rangers support is further testimony to the decline of the club.

When you consider that Mighty Celtic have seen off the following former European Champions - AC Milan, Barcelona, Man Utd, Juventus, Ajax,Liverpool....in various Euro competitions this millenium, it makes the friendly draw with Milan (who came for the money having also missed out on Champions League case this year) look slightly ham fisted.

Still - well done and all that
61

,

08/02/2009 17:22:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
62

,

08/02/2009 17:36:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
63

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 17:41:41
wiggy - all that money spent, all that debt accrued and no real tales of glory.

thats really sad now.....surely?
64

thepundit,

08/02/2009 17:49:11
Idee and Riot Survivor:

McGeady and Boruc had a bust up in the dressing room yet the pess got wind of it - Which Celtic player do you think went to the press?
65

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 17:49:39
#69 - cos you mortgaged your future to beat Motherwell and Hearts for the first 7 of those.

Have you seen your team beat Juventus? I have

Have you seen your team beat Milan? I have

Have you seen your team beat Man Utd? I have

Have you seen your team beat Liverpool? I have

Have you seen your team beat Barcelona? I have

Have you seen your team beat Ajax? I have.

All that money spent, all that debt accrued and no REAL tales of glory.
66

thepundit,

08/02/2009 18:00:05
Anybody?
67

BEMUSED EXILE,

08/02/2009 18:25:55
#71

It's very misleading to equate Rangers NIAR campaign with the legacy of debt that the club now has to deal with.

I would imagine, without checking, that Souness and Smith, during the NIAR period, probably struggled to spend as much as Advocaat did during his three summers in charge of the club.

When assessing Rangers debt today compared to how it stood at the moment that SDM bought the club, you have to judge it against what has been achieved during the 20 year period: The amount of trophies won that have turned RFC into the statistically most successful professional football club on the planet; their pre-eminent position in Scottish football based on their success over that period as a whole; the redevelopment of Ibrox Stadium into a UEFA 5-star venue; the superb training facility/youth academy that is Murray Park; the opportunity for the fans to see players of world-class quality and fame such as Laudrup, Gascoigne and De Boer become RFC favourites; participation in several CL campaigns that created a list of "firsts", such as first Scottish side to qualify for the CL group stage, first (and only) Scottish side to complete a CL group stage undefeated, and first Scottish side to qualify from the group stage to the knockout stage.

Very few RFC fans who have lived through the whole journey will be regretting it merely because the debt is now uncomfortably high.
68

accies till i die,

08/02/2009 18:26:30
though this page was for talking about motherwell and st mirrens match mind you nothing much to comment about apart from the pig sty pitch
69

thepundit,

08/02/2009 18:30:20
Advocaat may have spent millions during his short time at Rangers but it was his insistance on Murray Park that will make us millions in the future.

The quality of the youngsters coming through the ranks at Rangers is partially down to Advocaat.

Ps, Is anyone going to tell me which Celtic player leaked the news of the dressing room bust up? It has to be one of them.
70

Bosco Bhoy,

08/02/2009 19:07:39

"the debt is now uncomfortably high"

As in the water the passengers jumped off the Titanic and into was 'uncomfortably' cold.

71

Bosco Bhoy,

08/02/2009 19:11:20
Rangers under Souness,Smith and Advocaat were the footballing equivalent of a family burning the visa card and going 3 Disney holidays in a year.

Simply not sustainable and will in the end tarnish those nice memories when it all comes home to roost.

You know its true.
72

Bosco Bhoy,

08/02/2009 19:14:56
Really tragic to see so many people make a fuss over Beckham during the week.

Has there ever been such an overated player within the game?

Remarkable that with the players AC have that so much media time was devoted to this average talent.

73

Absolutely, Unequivocally, Not The Riot Survivor,

08/02/2009 19:35:38
#73....how much money was piled into the club over that period by ENIC, NTL, Dave King and unchallenged access into the Champions League?

Yet, at the onset of this millenium, SDM had ripped through that cash "chasing the dream" and Rangers were some 70m in debt.

Effectively, hundreds of millions were spent to secure the NIAR (as evident in the debt) was the foundation of Rangers current issues. It hasn't gone away since.
74

Shape to Shoot,

08/02/2009 19:39:53
The threadbears have their problems alright, far more worrying than a loss of form methinks...I'd rather be carrying our cross than theirs by a long, long shot.

Still, I am much more content winding up the rearrangerz when things are going well at CP, and at the moment, things are going very badly.

Our three strikers can hardly buy a goal ( 1 between the three of them in the last 300 minutes of football and it came against a bunch of amateurs.)

Our defence has looked downright awful in recent weeks and but for a good performance by Naka against Dundee United, we haven't really had much to cheer about since the first half in the 3v1 game against hibs, and that match interrupted a poor run of results and performances.

Strachan knows himself that he'll have to get this team playing, and quickly. Losing to rangerz next weekend wouldn't be a disaster in itself (a 1 point gap ffs) but as part of an overall picture of kak football for donkeys, it would be a disaster.

Strachan sounded quite despairing in interview after the inverness match, and gloomy after yesterday's match. Even in the darkest moments in last year's title, I don't recall finding him despairing or gloomy.

So my guess is that whatever the problems are, he regards them as more difficult to resolve than those he dealt with to turn the team around for 3 in a row.


75

Shape to Shoot,

08/02/2009 19:42:35
BTW

I see big sutty is looking for a job at the moment...we could do a helluva lot worse than bring the big fella into the coaching staff until the end of the season to try and get this team moving.
76

thepundit,

08/02/2009 20:27:43
When is this site going to sort out its signing in problems?

MOD - Sort it oot!

You're quick enough to ban people for no reason.
77

,

08/02/2009 20:45:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
78

,

08/02/2009 20:49:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
79

,

08/02/2009 20:50:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
80

thepundit,

08/02/2009 22:12:43
#84

Thats me just seeing your post now and ive been on this thread a few times in the last hour or so and there's been nothing there.

Something isnt right.

At least they've stopped banning us though....

#85

C'mon Idee, you're better than that are you not?

They were only arguing on the Lennoxtown playing field. It was when they were in the dressing room that Boruc landed a few blows on wee Aiden.
81

Kirrie_Tim,

In Residence 08/02/2009 23:35:47
thepundit, you are a pillock.

Anyone that disagrees please post your rebuttals now.
82

Kirrie_Tim,

08/02/2009 23:38:47
Keep thinking people, a redeeming feature belonging to thepundit may come to mind.

Oh.... my grandfathers clock was to big for the shelf...
83

thepundit,

08/02/2009 23:45:06
#88

Thanks mate.
84

Kirrie_Tim,

08/02/2009 23:47:10
90
thepundit

You're welcome.

So, do you expect any rebuttals then?
85

thepundit,

08/02/2009 23:51:46
#91

Depends who sees it.
86

thepundit,

08/02/2009 23:53:32
Im not about popularity anyway.

You should know that by now.

I just do my duty as a pundit.
87

Kirrie_Tim,

08/02/2009 23:58:30
92
thepundit

Quite a few I'd imagine. I have a sweepy running on who'll answer. (Come on 78 mins!)

I think ya've nailed the popularity issue there as well (snaps fingers, points then winks).

Duty bound you'll carry on no doubt.
88

thepundit,

09/02/2009 00:00:16
Yep, i will carry on.

The new story's will be up in a minute so i'll see you later.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.