Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hoy: keep cheat out of Games

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 July 2008
SCOTLAND'S Olympic champion Chris Hoy has joined the growing chorus against sprinter Dwain Chambers being allowed to represent Great Britain at the Beijing Games.
The confirmed drugs cheat moved a step closer to securing his place in the Olympics line-up next month by winning a qualifying race in Birmingham yesterday.

The 30-year-old runner, who won team gold at the 2006 European Championships, is also this week planning to legally challenge a British Olympic Association (BOA) by-law aimed at banning cheats for life.

But Hoy, writing in Scotland on Sunday today, says Chambers should not be allowed to travel to China, whatever the outcome of qualifying events, as he is "making a mockery" of the Olympic ideals.

"The hope is he will not be allowed to travel to Beijing and that everyone can start to concentrate on the clean athletes who are aiming to do themselves and their country justice and, hopefully, bring back as many medals as possible," says Hoy, a World Championships and Olympics gold medallist.

He says it was a "simple decision" to be among the 100 past and present British competitors to write in support of the BOA by-law. "It is not a personal attack on Dwain, it is about the principle, and my own strongly held belief that we need to have the toughest possible deterrents if we are ever going to eradicate the illegal use of drugs in our sports," Hoy says.

"The majority of people who compete in Beijing will be clean. Some people may think I am being naive, but I look about the cycle track and I look at my main rivals and I am sure that they don't take drugs. But that doesn't stop the innuendo… drugs cheats don't just risk their own reputation; they try to deprive honest and dedicated athletes of the medals they deserve and they deprive youngsters of worthwhile role models."

Hoy insists punishments, if athletes are caught, are too lenient. "What's the punishment? A year or two out the sport. In my opinion that is not enough, especially if the ban is served outwith Olympic years."

Yesterday, Chambers won the 100 metres qualifying final in exactly 10 seconds. Speaking after the race, he said: "That was hard work. I'm just glad I've done my part of it. Hopefully, next week things will go well. It's going to be tough but I'm going to keep my spirits high.

"I'd like to say thank you for everyone that supported me throughout this whole ordeal. Hopefully, all that will go in my favour for Beijing this summer. I just want to go and do well for my country."

Triple jump world record holder Jonathan Edwards said the atmosphere was muted. "Even with athletics fans there is a real antipathy towards Dwain," he added.

Chambers' legal team must now convince a High Court judge on Wednesday to grant an injunction against the BOA by-law.

If successful it will allow him to run in Beijing, even though the full hearing will not be heard until next year.

Chambers tested positive in 2003 for tetrahydrogestrinone and served a two-year ban.


Page 1 of 1

 
1

Douglas,

Bathgate 13/07/2008 08:28:21
Nice to have an opinion from the man on the bike instead of just the usual man in the street.
Clearly once someone has transgressed, been caught and punished there is still no place for them in civilised society.
If the man was a convicted killer he'd be given more chance to redeem himself FFS.
2

bawcus,

Benthehoose 13/07/2008 09:48:52
Douglas Bathgate,

I agree. There is no room for a cheat at the Olympics or any other sports gathering.

The badge of cheating should be a lifetime sentence of sporting shame. Saying sorry does not obliterate the cheating act.
3

Norman C.,

London 13/07/2008 09:53:00
How right Douglas is. Chambers should be given a chance to redeem himself. And of course, he has that chance. He can show that he realises that deliberate and prolonged and cheating is unacceptable. He can do so in many ways.

He might for example drop out of the limelight and the self-promotion business to help the underprivileged, quietly, unobtrusively, modestly, without fuss or bother. For, say, a year or two.

You don't redeem yourself by insisting on representing your country, which is an honour, when you seem to have no respect for your country.
4

Douglas,

Bathgate 13/07/2008 10:38:00
Norman, don't you think that the work Chambers has put in to get himself to a place where he can compete (clean) with the best again is testament to his new leaf.
The sack cloth and ashes uniform was dropped a few years ago.
While two wrongs don't make a right and, if you'll allow a side issue, the highest profile UK sportsmen, professional footballers, cheat as a matter of course and it is condoned to a degree by authorities from the referee all the way up to FIFA.
The whole sporting setup is compromise heaped upon double standard eventually topped off with the cherry that is Dwain Chambers or whoever else is in the wrong place at the wrong time when an example needs to be made.
5

truthsleuth,

13/07/2008 10:56:51
AS I understand it Chambers broke the rules and knew the penalty at the time was a ban on ever being an Olympic entry.

He should not be allowed to enter in these days when drugs cheats are always one step ahead of them being detected.
6

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 12:01:55
He cheated, end of story!
The rules are the rules, they cannot be changed to help him come to terms with his despair. He made this bed, he must now lie in it.
It is called consequence, end of story.
7

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 12:05:02
The olympic committee have been going soft of late though, so lets hope the British Olympic Committee dont.
We have a runner in South Africa called Oscar Pistorious. He runs on blades because he has no legs below the knee. He has been allowed to compete with able bodied runners, which I find disgrceful. He is also competing in the para olympics later in the year, thus ejoying the best of both worlds whilst failing to respect the Olympic Games.
What next, able bodied runners asking for permission to run in the para olympics?
8

foolofatook,

Raleigh 13/07/2008 13:20:52
I'm usually a very 'rules are rules' kind of person but Douglas in Bathgate got it right when he said 'if the man was a convicted killer he'd be given more chance to redeem himself.'

Lots of athletes are taking some sort of illegal drug (wittingly or not) so I think the better example this case could set for people currently using is how much better it is to perform clean!

Of course 'cheaters never win' should always be the message, loud and clear, but maybe the people being the loudest about banning Chambers from the Games are just jealous he can do so well without cheating!

I say Chambers' hard work since rejecting illegal drugs should be an inspirational 'second chance at doing the right thing' story to encourage everyone to embrace honest hard work in their own training.
9

Media 1,

foolofatook 13/07/2008 13:31:44
#9

Whilst Douglas is right in suggesting thata convicted killer would be permitted to redeem himself, what he fails to do is openly announce that a convicted killer should NEVER be able to redeem his or himself. We live in a sociey in which our adherence to rules and regulations became so slack that we ended up in a position in which savage criminals can redeem themselves, whereas we should be living in a society in which they should not.

Therefore, whist the British Olympic Commitee still has its integrity and its strict code of conduct, it should do what it can to maintain those levels of integrity by denying Chambers the right to participate.
Chambers is only sorry because he got caught, he would be quite prepared to continue cheating if he could get away with it. The man cheated and for that there is consequences which he new about it. Therefore, he must sleep in the bed he made for himself. This is HIS fault not the British Olympic Committees fault. Chambers and Chambers only created this problem for himself, nobody else.
In fact, any lawyer representing him must surely be viewed as a disgrace to their profession.
10

GlenB,

13/07/2008 15:13:51
The drug tetrahydrogestrinone that Chambers was taking has the effect of increasing muscle growth so even after ceasing to take it he will still have the benefits of it.
So on that basis he is still cheating the athletes who have never used enhancers but worked even harder to reach the level that they are at.

11

,

13/07/2008 15:55:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 16:04:28
Jwil

Spot on - One strike and your out!
Say no to drugs is supposed to be the world wide message.
Are we now saying, "say yes to drugs, but only until your caught and then ask for forgiveness and all will be well"
13

Sandi,

San Diego 13/07/2008 17:23:19
If he's clean now, and has been since being caught, then he should be able to run in the Olympics. He made a mistake, paid his penalty and now he should be able to get on with life. Isn't that what justice is all about?

I think Chris Hoy's attitude is a little arrogant. Maybe in cycling taking a forced two years out of your sport doesn't make much difference, but in track it does.

In any case, Chambers won't medal with a 10 second 100m.
14

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 17:38:37
Sandi

Please embrace common sense in this regard, I know you are not as stupid as you are pretending to be.

The rule book PRIOR to Chambers cheating said,"that any athlete caught cheating, will be banned for life"

That is what the rule book said, it was clear and it was there for all to see.

So let us rewind the clock here. Chambers decides to cheat, he makes a conscious decision to cheat. In doing so he also understands that if he is caught he will be banned for life.
Are you saying it was alright for him in that moment to say "well I know the book says I will be banned for life, but if I cheat and nobody catches me then I get away with it, whereas if I cheat and get caught I will just challenge the rules to suit my own agenda.

Is that ok in your eyes?
15

Sandi,

San Diego 13/07/2008 19:02:33
Media,

Bit sarcastic today, aren't we?

Explain to me the point of a two-year ban if you're automatically banned for life.

IMO, it should be changed for the future, but as he knew what the penalty would be, he should have to live with it. That suit you?

16

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 19:08:10
Sandi

The International Olympic Committee have a two year ban limit, but the British Olympic Committee have a life ban.
Had he been French or Spanish, even American, then he would be able to participate. But unluckily for him he is British and their constitution is clear, if you cheat you are banned for life!
17

jerrymanders,

13/07/2008 20:44:52
M1

Great. I take it that you don't agree with League extensions then? Rules are rules afterall.
18

Silence of the Yams,

13/07/2008 21:28:43
I like how Colin Jackson praised Chambers, saying "he runs fast when clean, he didn't need the drugs". Yeah, sure Colin, the drugs built up the muscle power for him to do these times like yesterday. He should not get near an Olympic team.
19

indune1,

Canada 13/07/2008 22:23:47


My two sons were competitive swimmers: one, was nationally ranked #1 in his main event and top 3 in two others.

I mention this only in that I witnessed first hand the incredible commitment they both made to their sport and yet trying to balance that with getting an education.

Chambers is both a proven liar and cheat. He knew exactly what he was doing and that was cheating. He was taking money, support from a nation, and praise under false pretences.

In other walks of life that is called fraud- a crime.

If such bans are seen by cheats as having no deterrent value then just scrap the system and let's have a state-funded athletic factory system that produced steroid freaks like the East Germans did.

Is the principle to become win at any cost and become a millionaire by doing so?

If so, such a moral problem is symptomatic of a problem that goes beyond the Olympics.

Just an opinion.
20

"Scotty",

Usa 13/07/2008 23:12:52
I stopped watching the Olympics many years ago when "professional" athletes took part. I always thought these Games were totally for amateurs which made the Games MUCH more exciting. I do believe that drugs play a huge part in ALL athletics; it is rampant in professional sports in this country - - - basketball, american football and baseball.
ALL sports are a huge disappointment and here, extremely costly to attend the matches. After all, mones does talk, as does power.
21

glen urquhart,

glasgow 13/07/2008 23:22:36
It must really stick in the craw of the likes of Dame Kelly Holmes if Chambers is allowed to represent GB in China as she became a top class athlete without taking any illegal drugs.

Or so we're led to believe.
22

McHoot,

brisbane 13/07/2008 23:46:24
You can bet your bottom dollar that if Dwain runs at Beijing he will be watched like a hawk by the drug sniffers.
Let's all try to remember what the Olympic spirit is all about - especially those who are using it for political gain.
G'day Dunny. Good to hear about your boys. Oor grandkids are an athletic bunch, too.
Maple Syrup Forever! Did you get my thing about the roo not producing methane when it farts?
23

indune1,

Canada 14/07/2008 01:05:50

McHoot!!! G'day mate!

Yes. I got your message about the Roos. I replied but probably too late.

Hope you are well and good luck to the swimmers from Oz. In the eighties, the Aussie-Canuck rivalry was really intense and so wonderfully entertaining.

Cheers.
24

indune1,

14/07/2008 02:19:31
*Please enter your comment*
25

StopTheNumpties,

Bill's Pill Shop 14/07/2008 08:16:25
At some point we ought to reach the spot where we say: "OK, here's the deal. You cheat, you're through. We appreciate you being rehabilitated and your remorse and now you are a nice person and all, but you did throw every bit of your future life in sanctioned athletic competition when you cheated." No second chance for cheats. It's like the reluctance of authorities to disbar a barrister for misconduct: "What will he do to earn a living if he's disbarred?" Start asking "would you like chips with that order?" sounds like a good place for him to start. We need to raise our expectations for everyone who knows better and make sure they understand that they, not the authorities, decided to bin their future when they cheat.
26

voltaire's janny,

14/07/2008 10:56:04
If Dwain is allowed to compete, I for one will boycott the games and watch not a single race.

The arrogance of the man is breathtaking. His argument appears to be that despite systemmatically and repeatedly doping in order to cheat, this should be OK because other countries let their cheats back in with a nod and a wink.

How do we know his dopers are not one step ahead this time with another cocktail or treatment?

And it's all about cash - millionaire status goes with the sprint titles through appearance money and commercial opportunities.

What a see you (CU) Next Tuesday........

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.