Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


£5.6m to turn a safe road into an accident blackspot

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 February 2008
ROAD chiefs spent £5.6m "improving" a crash-free stretch of dual carriageway and created an accident blackspot, Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
Fifty-three people have been injured – two of them seriously – since a section of the Edinburgh City Bypass was resurfaced in 1999. Before the work, no accidents had been recorded.

Traffic chiefs say the surface was applied during bad weather and
that could be the reason why the 850-metre section eastbound near the Dreghorn junction has become a blackspot.

Six other sections of road in the south-east of Scotland – including two motorway stretches – are either under investigation or about to be examined amid similar fears they pose an accident risk, and many more across Scotland could be affected.

Road bosses have suspected problems at Dreghorn since August 2005, and in 2006 tried unsuccessfully to remedy drainage problems on the stretch. But at no point have drivers been warned about the potential risk.

Last night, a leading lawyer warned that road chiefs could be open to compensation claims over the bungled repairs, which are linked to 36 accidents, a rate 12 times the Scottish average.

The bypass carries up to 85,000 cars a day and is one of Scotland's busiest stretches of road. Documents obtained under Freedom of Information laws reveal that Transport Scotland investigators have been analysing the disturbing spate of accidents on its Dreghorn to Lothianburn section.

The vast majority of the accidents took place during wet weather, leading the experts to examine whether the stretch of road was draining properly. They found that the area is prone to having water lie on the road rather than drain off, leading to accidents.

Roadworks in 2006 aimed at fixing drains on the road, at a cost of £20,000, failed to make any difference.

One investigation, written in August, concluded: "It can be seen that no accidents occurred on this section of the A720 prior to the major upgrade in 1999. Since then, there has been a

continuing problem of wet-weather accidents occurring on this section of the City Bypass. Standing water resulting from a flat spot and poor surface-water drainage is considered to be the primary cause of these accidents."

Experts have considered a 50mph speed limit for the stretch, but police argued that it would be difficult to enforce. Advanced warning systems to urge motorists to slow down in the wet were seen as not getting to the root of the problem.

Technicians have decided to rebuild the road surface at an angle to help the rain run off. The works are scheduled for next month and will cost a further £130,000.

Investigators have still to come to a firm conclusion about what caused the problems in the first place. Another investigation, carried out last year, noted that the roadworks were carried out during bad weather, including heavy rain, and problems with snow and ice. The report added that today's construction standards for bonding together different layers of asphalt did not apply at the time.

In addition, Transport Scotland has admitted that they are examining a number of other road sections in the south-east of the country which have similar problems with drainage, although they were not necessarily constructed in the same way or at the same time.

They are the three sections of the A68, at Juniperlea, Blainslie junction and north of Earlston, the A7 at the Dunk south of Hawick, the M9 eastbound junctions three to two, and where the M9/M80 merge near Stirling.

A Transport Scotland spokesman said that it had no records of accidents at those six locations.

Willie Wills, the Scottish road safety manager for the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, said: "There is an urgent need to find other parts of the road network that were repaired at a similar time with similar materials."

Neil Greig, director of the IAM Motoring Trust, added:

"Drivers who use the City Bypass and other roads with issues like this have a right to know about these concerns so that they can modify their driving behaviour."

And leading compensation lawyer Cameron Fyfe said: "An accident victim could have a case to sue if it could be shown that someone was negligent."

A spokeswoman for Transport Scotland said: "Where investigations or reviews point to the need for remedial measures, we will seek to implement these as quickly as possible. This is the case on the busy A720 at Dreghorn."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 February 2008 9:38 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 03/02/2008 00:21:14
I've driven on that stretch of the bypass many a time, before and after 1999 and after 2005. The main point of comment about this is the fact that the outside lane drivers are like elephants in a procession, closed rank to prevent any inside laners moving out in front of them.

The closed rank becomes tighter at junctions as vehicles enter from the slip roads.

Bootbumpers, tailgaters or whatever you want to call them, that's what the bypass drivers are. Now that might have something to do with the accidents.
2

Navvy,

03/02/2008 02:17:56
#1 Jock, what you write has little to do with the article.

On your post, the problem is that that stretch is a steep hill and should have a crawler lane for HGVs.

In fact, the whole bypass is pathetic it should be 3 lane plus crawler lanes on the steep sections and there should be grade separated junctions for the A68 and A7 Dalkieth, Lasswade etc
3

nell from falkirk,

03/02/2008 07:51:36
Roads don't cause accidents - drivers do!

If people gave up the apparent requirement to drive at 80mph in all conditions, and as #1 says, didn't drive right up the tail of the car in front, most of these accidents wouldn't happen.

You drive to conditions.
If it's raining, or frosty, or icy, or snowy, or there are high winds, you slow down.

But that seems to be too difficult for many drivers, unfortunately.
4

terry osser,

morden 03/02/2008 07:58:17
it may be a material problem see dt
5

donald,

glasgow 03/02/2008 08:28:52
How about the same number of autobahn lanes as the Faitherland in Englerland?
6

Drum Major,

Keperra 03/02/2008 09:09:04
In Queensland our great Main Roads people used an ashpalt that becomes like ice in the wet on a number of stretches of road that became black spots. We are still trying to get them to replace many of these disasters. Hope you do better with this one.
7

Isonomia,

Lenzie 03/02/2008 09:25:58
I hate comments like these that use names only known to locals. I use the bypass regularly, but I've no idea where Dreghorn is. Can anyone help identify this stretch of a road map?
8

Gopher,

edinburgh 03/02/2008 09:27:45
#2. What steep hill. Read the article. It is east bound between dreghorn and the 'burn.
9

James, Edinburgh,

03/02/2008 09:30:17
They could try the cheap and simple method used on the M6, i.e. paint chevrons on the carriageway and ask drivers to leave two of them visible between themselves and the car in front.
10

calum,

03/02/2008 09:31:16
#8 If you use it regularly you should know where it is - there's a huge sign wich says Dreghorn Junction!! But to save you actually looking at roadsigns as you drive, it's the junction after Hillend (going west) where the service station and the Travelodge is.
A big contributory factor to the crash recorsd is the fact the there are 2 junctions within 1/3 mile and the speed limit is 70mph. If ever there was a case for a 50mph limit with accompanying speed cameras being able to reduce crashes this is it.
11

Aye Right...,

03/02/2008 09:52:13
#8 I'm with you on this one... This link shows exactly where Dreghorn is. No idea what #2 is rambling on about.. Steep hill? Hmmm..

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en-GB&ie=UTF8&q=dreghorn+edinburgh&ll=55.899114,-3.234315&spn=0.016698,0.039568&z=15&om=0>

Dreghorn Link
12

scottish person,

Paisley 03/02/2008 09:55:24
I take your point #11, but a 50mph speed limit is of little use as the 14 wheel nutters drive at 60mph everywhere. They cause most accidents, them and the little puddle jumping females who think weather has no consequence to driving with your right foot firmly to the floor.
13

SS,

03/02/2008 09:57:20
Can someone please turn the music off that plays everytime I read a story - it is incredibly irritating. I know I can turn the volume down but that's beside the point. Why is the music required in the first place? What can it possibly add?
14

Flossie,

Elgin 03/02/2008 10:40:38
The government attitude to Scotland and all things Scottish is particularly evident in the quality of the roads system. One just has to look at the apology for a major trunk road linking North and South Scotland called the M90. To start with there are long stretches with no hard shoulder, just a series of lay byes situated at least 1/4 mile apart.. Their attitude seems to be "don't break down until you are within reach of one".
Bearing in mind that the road was built over 30years ago when even backwater districts of England were given at least two lane dual carriageways plus a continuous hard shoulder showed their attitude quite plainly. When asked about their decision the answer was "COSTS".
15

BK,

Cyberspace 03/02/2008 10:43:32
#8 It's the junction where the big sign says D R E G H O R N - is that too difficult for you?
16

Flossie,

Elgin 03/02/2008 10:45:02
As top-up to my previous post, can I ask, seriously please, where does all teh money from camera fines go to. Was it not the intention for it to go towards improving the infra-structure?.
17

cabrach loon,

Inverness 03/02/2008 10:47:28
Hard to identify the cause other than incompetence since it is a long time since I saw the bypass!
Drainage is easy to fix, in addition if the superelevation is too little increase it, easily done with hot AC. If the resurfacing stripped put on an immediate slurry to increase the friction. There are very many sections of surfaced dressed roads in Scotland where the work has been badly done and the surfacing has stripped and ravelled yet the contractors have been let off without fixing the bad work, A9 out of Inverness to Daviot,A833 west of Beauly, A862 Inverness to Beauly. So much bad work and so little proper contract supervision and control. The highways agency and consultants do not appear to have been doing a proper job for the ever suffering taxpayer.
18

calum,

03/02/2008 10:47:45
#15 And of course there needs to be serious money invested in the transport infrastructure throughout Scotland. Like the example you give of the sub-standard M90, dualling of the A1, electrification of railways north of Edinburgh, upgradiong the A9 etc. etc. but none of this will be possible whilst money is squandered on a tramLINE in Edinburgh which, by any rational standards, is not needed in the broader context of Scotland's transport.
19

Flossie,

Elgin 03/02/2008 10:55:10
On reading the above report by Murdo Mcleod what part of the word CAMBER did the "technicians" not understand?
20

Van (not white) Diesel,

Amsterdam & Augsburg 03/02/2008 11:13:08
#15 Flossie
Ask any motorist if the road infrastructure requires improvement, and most of the time you will receive a resounding 'yes'. Having driven most of the UK over the years, and I'm taking it that you may not have, I can assure you that the road network here compares very favourably indeed with that south of the border - in particular relative to the volume of traffic. You mention backwaters down south. May I suggest you attempt to navigate much of Devon and Cornwall, or virtually the whole of East Anglia. There are, of course, areas here that demand attention, as posters have observed, notably the A1, and the A9.
21

suz,

03/02/2008 11:40:54
The bypass needs to be three lane nowadays. Traffic can virtually become gridlocked on sections of the bypass caused by nothing more than a car pulling a slow moving horse trailer or one of those huge tractors carrying bales of hay. I travel the bypass daily and don't accept that the problem is caused by tailgating drivers per se but it is very hard not to be close to the tail of another driver wh
22

suz,

03/02/2008 11:41:43
oops! Continued...when traffic slows so suddenly in response to slow moic.ving traff
23

suz,

03/02/2008 11:42:41
Gremlins in the system this morning. Sorry!
24

fritigern,

Inverness 03/02/2008 12:33:45
One problem with the Edinburgh City Bypass, shared with the M60 round Manchester and the M25 to the west of London, is that it has too many junctions. If it is a "bypass" then its principal use should be for long distance traffic.

The lack of virtually any new road building in Scotland is a scandal. Up to last year I drove around with a 1994 road atlas. This was fine for Scotland since there have been almost no new roads bulit since 1994. But in England it became increasingly unreliable with the number of new roads and bypasses. I use the A9 from Inverness to the central belt. To Perth it is a disgrace to a Eurpopean country. Last year I drove along the E4 in Sweden which goes right to the Finnish border on the Gulf of Bothnia, through an area no more populated than northern Scotland. Although there was only a bit of dual carriageway, three lane stretches were provided at regular intervals allowing overtaking, no crawling behind the inevitable Tesco lorry for mile after mile. I doubt if any area of western Europe has such poor communications as Scotland north of Perth.
25

yockel,

03/02/2008 13:05:56
#27 fritigern. Tesco on the Gulf of Bothnia! Is there no escape?
26

The Voice,

03/02/2008 13:11:19
Yes we should all grow up! Irresponsible driving causes accidents, we should drive to the conditions. Slow down and leave a large gap between you and the person in front, and be courteous to other drivers.
27

Bruce Young, Association of British Drivers,

03/02/2008 15:42:55
Neil (3) said "Roads don't cause accidents - drivers do!" and is correct up to a point. Drivers should drive according to the conditions - but there are engineering faults, like at this site, which make a stretch of apparently good road dangerous.

JJ Leeming, a traffic engineer did a lot of research in the '60s into engineering shortcomings, earning himself the nickname "the accidental expert".

He wrote a book "Protect or Punish" which should be compulsory reading for anyone aspiring to become a road engineer. It is sad that, 40 years later, the lesson still has not been learned.

For more detail see "JJ Leeming - the accidental expert" at www.abd.org.uk from which the book is available to buy.
28

Russell M,

Stirling 03/02/2008 16:11:26
How many of the "so called" experts drive the Edinburgh City Bypass on a daily basis in all kinds of weather and traffic conditions? In fact, how many of the so called experts drive at all?

The problems with Scotland's roads are:
1. Conception, design and funding from within the M25 for centuries.
2. Siege mentality - "system" designed with choke points to hinder and confuse an invading/rebel army.
3. Primary purpose of any civil engineering project is to enrich contractors and the supervising civil servant bureaucracy.
4. It has been official policy of both Tory and Labour governments to reduce road traffic by increasing both the cost of driving and inconvenience of travel by car.
5. The Beeching Axe left parts of Scotland more isolated than any other areas in the whole of the UK. (Pure coincidence I'm sure.)
6. Good roads only encourage the working-class to drive more, thereby increasing their physical and, God forbid, maybe even social mobility.
29

Eddie the Expat,

Home Counties 03/02/2008 16:52:36
Sorry James #10. Those chevrons have now all been removed and from my frequent experience on the M6 when the road was busy no one paid any heed. Tailgating was the norm. Ye'll just have to look for a local solution.
30

nell from falkirk,

03/02/2008 17:18:28
#15 #19 #22 & #27 - I have to agree with #21 - you have obviously not driven in much of the rest of the UK!
The Scots whinge interminably about the state of Scotland's roads, and how much the government spends on the South of England, but it's so much rubbish.
Away and have a drive round Devon, THEN you'll maybe see some roads which ARE hard to navigate.

But people down there manage, they drive to the road conditions; and what's more, they do it in a good-natured, considerate and patient fashion.
Pity the Scots can't seem to do the same.
31

Cycling Instructor,

Edinburgh 03/02/2008 17:44:22
The original article does not mention the wet weather conditions prior to 1999 compared to the conditions after 1999. Since 1961 there has been an increase in the number of heavy rainfall days per annum such that there is a statistical trend. If here is problem with water drainage around Dreghorn then expect to see and increase in disruptions and accidents until the remedial work is put in place.
32

Harry Carnie,

British Columbia, Canada 03/02/2008 19:58:32
#29 The Voice you have it!

The same applies here in Canada, winter, or summer.
"Betcha" we have more idiots here per population
than you have in Scotland.

When it comes to stupidity, our Canadian drivers are hard to beat.
33

ascrever,

Fife 03/02/2008 21:28:15
If Transport Scotland have more than a year's difficulty in alalysing a surface water drainage problem in a newly resurfaced section of plain dual carriageway, what hope is there of these "experts" coming up with a proper solution for the new Forth Crossing? How much of the £4bn will be wasted on such people and their consultants?
It is high time that our Transport Minister appointed some competent people to supervise this government-funded gravy train, and spend the road budget on developing and maintaining the road network instead of on unproductive studies, frequently disregarded through political interference, and the salaries of incompetent staff .
34

alexb,

penicuik 03/02/2008 23:49:43
A well known problem with material SMA its all down to cost about 60% less than best available only lasts 40% of best is that good value or is it better to have the disruption of repairs to slow traffic down?
35

truthsleuth,

South of the Border 03/02/2008 23:51:09
THE ROAD IS NOT THE PROBLEM
THE DRIVERS ARE
READ THE HIGHWAY CODE
36

Friar Tuck,

Port Perry, Ontario, Canada 04/02/2008 00:08:21
#36 - Harry Carnie, British Columbia, Canada.

I agree with you about Canadian drivers. I would much rather drive in the UK where the majority of drivers know how to drive. I don't about British Columbia but in Ontario, the politicians don't listen to the engineers. We have roads where the camber is reversed and they blame the drivers if there's an accident. We also have too many speed bumps, too many all-way stops and too low speed limits. Now they are introducing roundabouts which the Canadian idiots don't understand!
37

Harry Carnie,

British Columbia, Canada 04/02/2008 00:47:45
#40 Friar Tuck.

Here in B.C. years ago, roundabouts were removed from Vancouver, and Victoria street intersections and replaced by lights .
BECAUSE THEY RESULTED IN TOO MANY COLLISIONS(will NOT say accidents)
Now they are considering reinstalling them. GUESS WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND?(excuse the bad pun)

They are wonderful if driven with a little common sense
not found in our Canadian vehicles to any extent..too bad.
38

Expat in Amsterdam,

Amsterdam 04/02/2008 13:53:49
1. Yes, idiot drivers who fail to realise that all the other drivers are idiots too, cause accidents, however...
2. The scientists and the road engineers design and plan the roads, but then it's handed over to contractors who, in the interest of pecuniary matters, get the job done as quickly and, er, efficiently as possibly, potentially ignoring little things like the effect bad weather might have on the finished product.
3. The ring road around Amsterdam is another example of insanity.
There are many junctions, some of which are too close together, causing traffic chaos during the peak hours (which used to be 07:00 to 09:30 and 16:00 to 18:00, but are now more like 05:30 to 11:00 and 15:00 to 19:00!).
Also, the 'Ring' is not a ring! Travelling clockwise, coming out of the infamous 'Coen tunnel', you have to leave the road you're on to stay on the ring road (!?) Travelling anti-clockwise, to get onto the ring road just North of the Coen tunnel, you have to join the road (a full blown, official motorway with speed limit 100 kph) on the FAST lane!!!
I guess it's not just a Scottish problem.
39

scottishallan,

edinburgh 05/02/2008 23:20:50
I think that everyone is missing the point here its a story about the drainage problem just before dreghorn not about the m6 or any other road in the world.
I was driving home on a wet night 3 years ago and hit the huge puddle of water that gathers at the place this article is about my car flew off the road backwards into the trees and completely destroyed the car and me ive spend years recovering from this and was very lucky to survive, its not until now that anyone is admitting there a problem at this location. Since my crash they have put up the alco barrier at the trees which has been destroyed at least another 7-8 times infact it is destroyed right now again. This section is a death trap the people of edinburgh need to know how dangerous it is here in the wet. The plain and simple fact is the road and drainage cant handle the scottish weather and it should have been fixed years ago before there were so many accidents, or will it take a death first?
40

Brian not the messiah,

East Lothian 12/02/2008 13:49:06
I use the bypass every day to get to sunny sighthill from East Lothian.
If there is any significant rain my inbound journey time goes from 40mins to 1hr30 and sometimes more so drainage must be a factor.
Aquaplaning conditions are pretty common on the stretch. Few people seem to leave the a720 but from Lasswade to Straiton there are 3 busy onramps where filtering jostling and tailgating takes place. Once past these everyone mellows out and the traffic flows a lot better. If an extra lane or two was added for this section it would help, alas most of the bridges are built to only accomodate 2 lanes! Duh, forward thinking, not!

Basically from my point of view the amount of jobs and offices put into the gyle area is largely to blame. Its selfish I know, but why can't we have some jobs on the east of the city, or at the very least, better transport links from east to west.
Buses tend to be routed via the town centre from Mid and East lothian and the train options are pretty convuluted, so there are few options for us office drones to bypass the bypass.
To get round the problem to some degree I've agreed just to work at home more often. If I come across a standstill at sherriffhall westbound I do a rat run via lasswade, loanhead, damhead and then fairmilehead ie the road we used to take before they built the bypass!!! Nuts!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.