Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Death row campaigner MacDonald 'nervous' ahead of Richey's retrial

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 September 2007
A LEADING supporter of a Scot who has spent more than 20 years on death row in the US yesterday said she was "nervous" after hearing he will be retried.
Kenny Richey's conviction for murder over a fire that killed a two-year-old girl in Ohio was overturned last month.

A local prosecutor has decided the Edinburgh-raised former US marine should stand trial, rather than be released, after discussing
the case with the victim's family.

The 43-year-old, who was born to a Scottish mother and an American father, has always claimed he is innocent.

Independent Lothians MSP Margo MacDonald said: "I know his lawyer believes the case against Kenny has weakened over the years and the case in his favour has strengthened, but I'm still just a bit nervous about the process in Ohio."

MacDonald, who has campaigned on Richey's behalf for several years, is concerned that the case could have repercussion for other convictions from the time.

"I'm particularly aware of the very suspect nature of the forensic evidence that convicted Kenny," she added.

"If the procedure followed and the tests used at the time are found to have been woefully inadequate, even according to the standards of the time, that would apply to all services from the department of the Ohio justice system that operated that particular part of the process. I think that most people could then see how the decisions of that whole era could be called into question, not just Kenny's case.

"That and the death or disappearance of witnesses does I think make for more uncertainty than I would like."

However, lawyer Ken Parsigian, who now represents Richey but did not at his original trial, believes the state's case will be tough to prove 21 years later.

Witnesses have died, become incapacitated or cannot be found, he said.

"This is kind of an odd decision," Parsigian said.

"Their case has gotten dramatically weaker and ours has gotten dramatically stronger."

Richey, who has dual citizenship, came within an hour of being executed 13 years ago.

Prosecutors said Richey started the 1986 blaze in Columbus Grove in north-west Ohio to get even with his former girlfriend, who lived in the same apartment building as the girl who died.

Leo Jennings, a spokesman for the attorney general, said no decisions have been made on the exact charges on which to try Richey or whether the state would seek the death penalty.

John Watson, Amnesty International's programme director for Scotland, said: "If the state of Ohio thinks they have evidence against a man they have every right to hold a trial just as with anyone else.

"But from our reading of the evidence it is hard to see how they could have a case against him.

"The key thing is that last time he was treated shoddily - this time the standards have to be higher."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 September 2007 6:58 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Kenny Richey
 
1

Lindsey, Glasgow,

02/09/2007 01:19:43

OHIO..................We are watching. You are under International scrutiny.

For the sake of the reputation of your state.... please get it right this time.

KENNY............ You'll be home soon. Chin up.

2

Riley Hamish,

EDINBURGH 02/09/2007 09:57:32

Trouble is......the vindictiveness of the US system is never more clearly illustrated than in this case.
Having been found guilty(?)...in a highly debatable trial.Richey could have been released after 11 years (Yes..10years ago) ...if he'd been willing to admit guilt.
Having spent the extra 10 years inside rather than admit same, it's a "harsh and unusual punishment" in ANYBODY's language to try him AGAIN.....and even if he was found guilty (and that is HIGHLY unlikely, even in Ohio) he SHOULD then be released, by any humanitarian standards anywhere else in the world.
Of course, I remember the wee "alleged victim" but this is vengeance by a foul US system !!

3

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 02/09/2007 11:18:55

Hello Riley Hamish,

Well, well, well, another stalwart of blaming the victim, using a possible exception to avoid debating the rule, and promoting yet another Euro-style slave mentality: the Euro-State is God and individuals who are victims of crimes are mere scum.

You lot who whine over major felons doing either long stretches of time or facing being put to death for their crimes, raise nary a word about millions of babies exterminated in a "legal" and coordinated genocide, each and every year in Europe, the USA, and much of the rest of the world.

Mind you, you and others anti-death penalty bleating doesn't stop with exceptions, you don't want 100% proven (eyewitnesses, video tape, confirmed forensics) and convicted felons put to death.

You sorry lot leave the victims and their families in a ditch somewhere-with paltry words mumbled dispassionately and out of both sides of your mouths.

Same thing you do with victims of other crimes: blame the victims, blame the innocent law abiding citizens (as in the Dunblane killing spree), but by all means, give every consideration for the criminals.

Somebody breaks into your home and you beat him unconscious as he tries to crush your head, having intended to rob you blind, then rape your wife and daughters, and then murder them to cover his tracks: you answer is to ARREST the home owner and charge the poor fellow with assault and battery.

YOU and those who think like you put innocent victims in jail, though the lunacy of "everybody's guilty" who commits violence.

In your Social Progressive world, there is no justified violence, no objective code of conduct, no rational absolutes, merely SP relativism: which dictates that homeowners are NOT entitled to protect themselves, their families, or their property.

You genuflect quite nicely for criminals, but call for the heads of the innocent.

For you the USA is always wrong. Well and good:
You don

4

Karen,

Glasgow 02/09/2007 11:34:26

# 4 Where are you reading that anyone blames the victim ? Or any victim?

I oppose injustice and the death penalty but I also support victims families and have done for many years.

Innocent people do end up in prison and this particular case has been flawed from the start.

What innocents where blamed in the Dunblane gun massacre? Thomas Hamilton was guilty of shooting those kids. No one else was accused.

5

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 02/09/2007 11:35:55

Hello Lindsey Glasgow,

Oooooooohhhhhhhhh, I'm sure the Ohioans are shaking in their boots at the booming doom in your threat to them!!!

I can tell that most of you know and understand American politics, culture, social particulars, and legal matters, about as well as you do your butts from a hole in the ground!!

Ohioans are for the most part, an even headed, calm, deliberative, and common sense part of the USA-extremes to the far Left or the far Right are far and few between for most Ohioans.

But you wouldn't know that would you Lindsey? What you know about Ohio or anywhere else in the American Midwest, is probably similar to what you know about firearms usage, quantum physics, making soap, raising chickens, ranching, or subsistence hunting (which many people do in my neck of the woods, including myself).

In short, your understanding of life outside of your little enclave is quite probably taken from the Rad Left websites you visit, your local clique of pub friends (who all think much as do you-which only reinforces the biases, prejudices, and hatreds you have in common), and the sensationalist newspapers that you read (the Scotsman has less anti-Americanism than most, but it is still quite readily apparent).

When I've traveled to Scotland, I do my best to actually try and LEARN from local folks. Before I go I do as much research as possible (and NOT from Wikipedia), so that I can get a good, solid general background about the peoples, the cultures, and the history of the area I'm going to visit.

Wow, what a concept: trying to actually LEARN about a people, a culture, and a nation, rather than trying to impose skewed personal stereotypes.

Ah, the whole concept is no doubt beyond you: the desire to rely upon facts rather than personal fictions, would probably be too much of a mental strain for you.

How about giving the people of an ENTIRE STATE the benefit of the doubt, rather than threatening and condemning th

6

Karen,

Glasgow 02/09/2007 11:41:43

Margo has raised some good points!

However Kenny's supporters and campaign are not nervous about a retrial.

Perhaps wary, is the proper word. Wary due to the reasons Margo suggests and how the system works in Ohio. Wary due to the ole boys network and the dirty tricks that could be pulled.

Ohio is on a massive face saving exercise here.

Kenny did not have a fair and impartial trial before and we have to hope that he gets a fair crack at justice this time.

This time however,as Lyndsay says, the world is watching quite literally, so Ohio has to be seen to be proving that this case is about true justice and not political covering of backs.

7

,

02/09/2007 13:25:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Nemesis,

02/09/2007 14:07:47

I know what wishful thinking this is, but ideally, every monster responsible for this travesty of justice would themselves be in the dock for attempted 'first degree' murder. Ideally also, Richey would receive enough compensation to completely bankrupt the state of Ohio for the next century, because every adult living in that state ultimately bares some responsiblity for what has happened to Richey, unless they have gone on record in his defence. That would be justice. Of course, if Kenny is released at all, he will be lucky to receive even a pittance of compensation. Plus, the monsters responsible will go from strength to strength, due to all the swinish retards, so much in evidence even on this site, who will persistently think it far better to execute an innocent person for a crime that never even occurred, than execute nobody at all. My congratualtions to Karen for so diligently dismissing all the old prosecution lies, which so many swinish retards uncritically repeat ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
All that said, I vehemently disagree with those who say that twenty one years in prison, even in the undoubted hell of death row, would be adequate punishment imagining Richey were in fact guilty. Those actually guilty of murder or attempted murder, which Richey IS NOT, should never be released alive, even in the exceptional event that they are genuinely reformed. They must still pay the price for their actions and potential future murderers must still be deterred. 'Human Rights' legislation is Criminal Rights legislation and should be scrapped, not extended. Granted, some innocent people were convicted by British courts before criminal rights legislation, and I wish prosecutors would be held criminally accountable for malicious, baseless prosecutions such as in Richey's case. However those in the law abiding majority are likelier to suffer with criminal rights legislation than without it, because criminals are running amok.

9

Nemesis,

02/09/2007 14:22:44

#3. "even if he was found guilty (and that is HIGHLY unlikely, even in Ohio) he SHOULD then be released, by any humanitarian standards anywhere else in the world."

If he were indeed guilty then it would be out of order ever to release him alive.Those actually guilty of murder or attempted murder, which Richey IS NOT, should never be released alive, even in the exceptional event that they are genuinely reformed. They must still pay the price for their actions and potential future murderers must still be deterred.

10

Nemesis,

02/09/2007 14:33:03

Kenny Richey is obviously innocent, and although swinish retards may be blind to that fact, smart prosecutors are not. That makes their sin all the more grievous.
However, I am very much afraid that the decision makers in Britain, are undoubtedly biased in favour of the criminal and against the victim and potential victims. If victims and potential victims want criminals locked away for very long periods and murderers until they die, then that is what should happen. Whether it offers closure or not,deterrence should be pursued as far as possible, without actually making the penalty worse than the crime.

11

freethekillie2,

kilmarnock 02/09/2007 15:04:15

Kenny will have his day in court that is the most important thing.
as for compensation for 21 years, i dont think money comes into it they could offer millions but does that bring an end to years on death row.

look at the miscarraiges of justice in scotland
and ask if money makes them feel any better.

good luck kenny.

12

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 02/09/2007 19:52:54

yon neanderthal75 has been in the mountains a long time I reckon.

"Tin soldiers and Nixon coming"
"4 dead in the Ohio"

Yep. The rednecks are there too. That was a Neil Young song about shooting students rioting on a campus in, guess where?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV0rAwk4lFE&mode=relat...=

Link to song from 1971. Along time ago but so was Richey's prosecution and it was already reported that he would have been convicted in Scotland and a lot of other European countries.

It appears that the American legal system is still based on English colonial law, Neanderthal, which would brobably be right up your street.

13

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 02/09/2007 19:58:40

13

It was already reported that he would NOT have been convicted......

14

Horrible Cankers esq,

03/09/2007 08:53:26

That Neanderthal...at it already...insulting people, using nasty sarcasm and being patronising.....the man's out of control....must be too damp in the cave...some type of fungus that invades the brain..then short circuits a wee bit here and a wee bit there...

Watch out for the 'Rad left' tag...when you see that best close down the computer as thats when the crashingly boring pompous monologues come in...

15

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 03/09/2007 14:00:29

Hello Cankers,

Ah yes, your Rad Left version of "cogent debate": don't bother actually addressing facts, logic, and reason-just do a quaint Social Progressive version of The Dodge.

Dodgy indeed are you my dear Cankers: S-P strategy is to avoid empirical evidence at all costs: the real world puts a nasty halt to the mindless emotionalism of the Social Progressive blather.

The horror of Dunblane illustrated quite clearly, that S-Ps (the Rad Left by another name), have zero understanding fo the real world and real world problems.

Law abiding citizens were accused of being criminals, and made so by the quick and mindless passage of legislation, based SOLELY upon emotion, rather than deliberation, logic, and rational thought.

All the handguns were outlawed: 99.9% of all gun owners were law abiding citizens, but you S-Ps turned them all into criminals, for crimes they never committed: all with the promise of stopping criminal handgun deaths.

Well, well, well, seems that S-P "logic" hasn't worked out too well: people still being murdered with illegal artifacts, by people you S-Ps coddle; you know, the "poor criminals." So misunderstood are they and you no doubt.

Robbing banks has been against the law since the first bank was built-but that hasn't kept CRIMINALS from robbing them now has it?

The point my dear S-P Cankers, is that I'm all for reality based, logic based, fact based, legislation, judicial system, and policing. What you folks have now in Briton, is a country gone mad; lead there by emotively based politicians who believe that actually thinking about issues rationally, BEFORE any legislation is passed, is a bad thing.

Should an investigation show evidence (there I go again, actually requiring FACTS before coming to a conclusion-shame on me) that the prosecution have acted in bad faith-that is, having prosecuted the Scot knowing he was innocent, then I'm all for giving the pros

16

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 03/09/2007 14:22:40

Hello Jock (number 13),

My dear fellow, how about you bother applying logic to the example you offered:

Kent State was the university to which you alluded.

Kent State had Ohioan Students-the majority there. They were the victims of the violence, so just where does that leave you little example?

Nixon, for all his foibles, was also the fellow who opened up Red China to the West.

My point Jock, is that trying to turn everything into ALL bad or ALL good, does issues under debate, NO good, and certainly doesn't allow us any greater understanding of the events.

Further, you noted that had Ritchey been tried in Europe or Great Britain, "he would have been convicted"; so what's with the snide remark about American/British Colonial Law?

My idea of rational jurisprudence, is letting the chips fall where they may-let the EVIDENCE be presented, both sides address said evidence, and then had it to the jury or judge.

What has happened in America, Great Britain, and Europe, is that Social Progressives have set things upside down. We now have a "Group Think" mentality, wherein we look at GROUPS of people in prisons, and try to extrapolate some weird "social justice" paradigm, extraneous to any particulars of individual cases.

Issues of innocence or guilt are chucked out the window, in favor of convicting or not convicting people according to color, religion, origin, or sexual preference.

Wasn't that whole concept of subjective jurisprudence a model which were trying to AVOID? Something which rational people strove to REJECT?

Wasn't this the reason that the Roman concept of the Rule of Law was so closely studied and then implimented in both the British Empire and American nation?

When Continental Europe was still adjudicating according to either Aristocratic Fiat, Religious Dictate, or Divine Right, Great Britain and the USA were far ahead of those antiquated concepts: we were

17

Milky Residue,

03/09/2007 19:05:16

15. Horrible Cankers esq = TROLL

18

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 03/09/2007 19:11:54

17, Neanderthat. It was the local national guard wot did it.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you welcome the return of Kenny Richey to Edinburgh?
Yes, he was clearly an innocent man
Yes, but now he should be left alone
No, he’s just another drain on taxpayers’ money

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.