Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ballot paper design at fault for record number of spoilt votes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 June 2007
THE record number of spoilt votes at last month's Scottish elections were largely caused by major faults in the design of the ballot paper, according to an academic study.
Researchers at Strathclyde University have concluded that thousands of people made mistakes because they did not understand the instructions on the papers which, for the first time, asked them to mark two votes on a single sheet.

In both Glasgow
and Edinburgh, some of the instructions were truncated to make room for the 23 different parties on the regional list. This, the researchers concluded, was a key reason why people got confused and spoiled their papers.

The findings, by Dr Christopher Carman and Professor James Mitchell, concluded that there were a total of 146,097 spoiled papers. This compares to just 15,107 in the 2003 election. Of Scotland's 73 constituencies, there were 16 where the winning margin was less than the number of ballots spoiled.

The elections saw votes counted by electronic machines for the first time. Both the Holyrood votes - the constituency and regional vote - were then placed on the same sheet of A4 paper, unlike in 1999 and 2003, where they were on different sheets.

In regions such as Glasgow and Edinburgh, where there were more parties standing for election, the long list meant that names had to be squeezed in. The researchers concluded this was a key factor in the chaos.

Mitchell said: "There does seem ample evidence that the ballot design was the problem. The relationship between the number of parties on the list and the number of rejected ballots was significant."

Their report concludes: "It will come as no surprise to people familiar with election administration and ballot design that altering a ballot and, more specifically, altering the instructions to voters on the ballot would cause problems in election returns and ballot spoilage."

Ron Gould, a former assistant chief electoral officer of Canada, is currently undertaking an official inquiry into the fiasco on behalf of the Scotland Office.

A spokesman for the Scotland Office said: "The inquiry is under way and we will let it run its course."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 June 2007 6:28 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Holyrood Elections
 
1

Jimmy the Pie,

North Sea 24/06/2007 01:53:41

What about a seat in the Lords for Dougie Alexander? Perfect reward for his utter incompetance. He could sit next to Lord Joke

2

Ubi,

Edinburgh 24/06/2007 05:42:50

The irony that we have an SNP government only because Labour was so intent on rigging the ballot. Too delicious for words.

3

Guga II,

Rockall 24/06/2007 05:58:29

#1 Jimmy. Excellent idea. They could put his sister there too, to make up a matching set of numpties.

4

DementedsDaughter,

Edinburgh 24/06/2007 07:10:13

Natural disenfranchisement - works a bit like natural selection - if you are too thick to understand the ballot paper, you are too thick to have your vote counted.

Excellent, now if we could just work out how to stop them breeding.

5

Alamo,

Glasgow 24/06/2007 07:28:41

#4 Evident, Edinburgh

You will get slated for these remarks, but you are not too far away from the truth!!!!

6

nell from falkirk,

24/06/2007 08:06:19

#4 "Now if we could just work out how to stop them breeding."

Who? Douglas Alexander and the numpties who decided to hold two elections simultaneously, despite being advised that it would lead to confusion and miscast votes?

7

Mallory,

24/06/2007 08:42:32

Why did we need a report from a university to tell us what we all already knew? I agree with UBI (#2)

8

Ted,

24/06/2007 09:53:52

As the American observers found, the main impact on the outcome was the under-representation of the Greens. Sad sad sad.

9

Brisbane Scot,

24/06/2007 14:21:16

Alexander was the man who made the decision to squeeze all the names onto the single sheet, even though he was advised that it would be unadvised to do so because of the amount of information. He needs to go, and an SNP supporter should be made minister. At the last minute he could insert the question about independance.

By the way I would bet that the SNP would have won more seats judging by the pre election polls.

10

fifeis great,

kirkcaldy 24/06/2007 15:34:17

Sad, that we are prepared to blame everyone else, the true culprates are the people who could not be bothered to vote and people who could not follow simple instructions on how to vote


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.