Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Obama takes the initiative with three more states

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 February 2008
BARACK Obama has won three more states - Louisiana, Nebraska and Washington state - to boost his chances of being the Democratic candidate in November's US elections.
The Illinois senator won the Louisiana primary and caucuses in Nebraska and Washington state, while also notching a victory in the US Virgin Islands.

The first-term senator's winning margins were substantial, ranging from roughly two-thirds of th
e vote in Washington and Nebraska to nearly 90 per cent in the Virgin Islands.

"Today, voters from the West Coast to the Gulf Coast to the heart of America stood up to say 'yes we can"' Obama told a cheering audience of Democrats at a party dinner in Richmond, Virginia.

Clinton preceded Obama to the podium. She did not refer to the night's voting, instead turning against McCain. "We have tried it President Bush's way," the former first lady said, "and now the Republicans have chosen more of the same."

She left quickly after her speech, departing before Obama's arrival. But his supporters made their presence known, sending up chants of "Obama" from the audience as she exited.

In all, the Democrats scrapped for 161 delegates in the night's contests. In incomplete allocations, Obama won 72, Clinton 40.

In overall totals for the race so far, Clinton had 1,095 delegates to 1,070 for Obama. A total of 2,025 delegates is required to win the nomination at the national convention in Denver in late August.

Today Obama and Clinton compete in caucuses in Maine, where 24 delegates are at stake.

Meanwhile, in the Republican race, John McCain flunked his first ballot test since becoming the nominee-in-waiting, losing Kansas and Louisiana to Mike Huckabee.

McCain won the night's third Republican race, in Washington state.

Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, got nearly 60 per cent of the caucus vote in Kansas, winning all 36 delegates at stake.

He also won the Louisiana primary, but fell short of 50 per cent, the threshold necessary to pocket the 20 delegates that were available.

Huckabee was still hopelessly behind McCain with his 719 delegates out of a total 1,191 needed to secure the Republican nomination. The preacher-turned-politician had 234 delegates.

He is now the only major opponent for McCain, who has rolled up more than 700 of the 1,191 delegates needed to win the Republican nomination at this summer's convention, although Texan Ron Paul also remains in the race.

McCain continues to face widespread opposition from conservatives unhappy with his views on immigration, tax cuts and other issues.

Huckabee promised at a conference of conservative activists to continue his shoestring campaign, which has made inroads with social and religious conservatives.

"Am I quitting? Let's get that settled right now. No, I'm not," he said to cheers at a Washington hotel.

He promised to continue at least until McCain clinched the nomination.
"I know that I won't drop out until at least that happens and then we'll see," he said while denying he was hoping to become McCain's vice-presidential running mate.

He shrugged off a call from Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a McCain supporter, urging him to drop out. "Since he was endorsing my opponent, it rang a little hollow to me," Huckabee added.

"I did not major in math, but I majored in miracles, and I still believe in them," Huckabee said at a rally at the University of Maryland in College Park.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 February 2008 12:37 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Hillary Clinton
 
1

Max Born,

10/02/2008 08:45:12
He is about to become the first black US president...........................
2

Max Born,

10/02/2008 08:50:43
..........To be assassinated, sadly the extreme right will be incandesant with rage if and when he gets to the White House.
3

Boy Wonder,

10/02/2008 09:06:21
I still think it'll be Hillary.
4

Giffnock Tim,

GLASGOW 10/02/2008 09:17:18
When I went onto this page I got music blaring at me from the STV advert.
Not a good idea if you want people to read the Scotsman without a problem. Had I been doing that at work or say in a room where someone was asleep I would not have been popular.
5

Media 1,

cape town 10/02/2008 09:27:10
I dont think America is ready for a black president! I think when the time comes to make the decision, the Americans will vote for McCain....
Mind you, Obama might not be the democratic candidate, Hillary will probably come out trumps!
But on the up side, at least America has embraced the possibility of change, which is more than can be said for a lot of other countries around the world!
6

Max Born,

10/02/2008 09:35:46
Hillary if elected can use the CIA to keep an eye on Bill, in case he gets up tp his cigar antics again.
7

Kilted Hulk,

Lacey 10/02/2008 10:26:29
Sorry guys, Washington State hasn't even voted yet. Where dooooooYou get your news...........
8

Morbo,

10/02/2008 10:48:33
#2 Do you not watch 24?

Are Americans really going to elect a black Muslim?
9

Silence of the Yams,

10/02/2008 11:52:46
9. Absolute no chance.
10

Neil,

Glasgow 10/02/2008 13:25:51
For a black guy to win Louisiana would have been impossible only a few years ago. Things are definitely moving.
11

quill,

IL, USA 10/02/2008 13:33:55
To those who say Americans are not ready for a black President, I need only point out that Barack has already swept through the whitest parts of the country, and not only won, but won by landslides.
12

Morbo,

10/02/2008 14:40:25
#11 The reason this contest is so tight is because there have been no landslides and the Democratic party does not have a winner takes all policy. Also those that voted for him were Democrats who have a somewhat limited choice. States where he won will be Republican wins come an election, states where the wicked witch won are Democrat heartland and where those votes would make a difference. People in the South and Mid-West loathe the Clintons and all that New York in-your-face stuff and have voted accordingly. Maybe one year the Democrats will find a candidate that unifies support, instead of splitting it. Prediction: McCain by a narrow margin - and he'll serve only one term.
13

SouthernGent,

10/02/2008 15:06:15
While Obama is a great orator, he has accomplished nothing. When the question "can you name one accomplishment of Mr. Obama" was asked of an assembled group of democrats, not one person in the room could name one. Unlike GB, these voters are picking a candidate on how well he speaks, not on the issues. Be careful what you wish for.
14

Finnking,

Lempäälä 10/02/2008 15:26:23
I look forward to the day when a candidate's colour, gender and faith are not major factors in the US (so called) democratic process.
15

Dunnie,

Canada 10/02/2008 16:28:54

11 - quill - good point but I think it important to remember that those who have voted for Obama were either registered Democrats or independents and not the overall, general population as will happen this November.

16

VC Horseguy,

USA 10/02/2008 16:55:05
#2. Most people do not know or choose to forget the right wing doesn't assasinate black politicians or activists. That has and still is the exclusive domain of democrats, at least here is the USA. The KKK was founded by democrats against freeing the slaves, Lincoln's assasin was a democrat, Dr King's assasin was a democrat, the mobs who lynched, burned, and bombed the blacks were democrats. The pro-slavery factions that did the most to destroy the union during our civil war were democrats. The majority of those opposing ALL civil rights legislation and activism were democrats. The US senator who gave military secrets to north Vietnam via the Soviets was a democrat, Senator Leahy (a member of the senate intelligence committee until removed when his actions were discovered) has since been known as Senator "Leaky". So before painting a would be assasin of Obama as right wing please consider the statistical and historical record of our history. Now the right wing does own exclusive rights to the intimidation, bombing, and murder of pro-abortionists. But that is a topic for another day.
17

Sandi,

San Diego 10/02/2008 17:03:36
#13 SouthernGent,

He's only a great orator when he can read a prepared (by someone else) speech fom a teleprompter. He is the only candidate to use teleprompters. He's not very good, otherwise, and has such a poor grasp of detail that he rarely if ever takes questions. But I don't think content and detail are important parts of Obama.
18

keystone,

WI U.S.A. 10/02/2008 17:04:46
To those who think Obama will be president I can only say, DO NOT bet more money on that than you wish to lose. This second rate, Illinois politician, a state known for less than honest politics, and politicians, will find out in the very near future that his Walter Mitty dream will be crushed by the reality of EXPOSURE of what he really is, and stands for. But for now the band plays on, and the party goes on. But all parties end, and so will Osama's as Teddy Kennedy sometimes calls him. AKA, REALITY!
19

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 17:32:39
Well, i think it does not matter if your black or white, the only thing that matters to me is the qulities they have to be a great president.I am in a desision on which i should vote for: i both like Obama or Hilliry(they are both good)press 3 if u agree with me
20

Dunnie,

Dunnie 10/02/2008 17:41:14
19 - Nightgirl - What exactly are Obama and Hillary good at?

By the way, I pressed "Shift and forward slash".
21

NightGirl,

10/02/2008 17:46:08
well it will be good that we have a women for a president. they both have really interesting topics that we might need.
22

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 17:50:01
For example:
they talk about:
education,health, end war in Iraq, reduce our dependence on foreign oil
23

Tearlach,

Juneau 10/02/2008 17:53:09
Obama won Alaska with upwards of 70% of the vote even the black minority is very small here. His color is not an issue, his positions are. If he fails to be elected, it will be more because he has the most liberal voting record in the Senate which politically puts way outside the mainstream. Of course his charm offensive might over-ride that.
24

NightGirl,

10/02/2008 17:57:49
P.S:
i am voting for Hillary because she is offering us good things that we need in our everyday lifes and why r u disagreeing ur from canada i dont care about your opinoin i care about the U.s citizens!Thank you=]
25

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 18:00:51
I agree with Tearlach
26

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 10/02/2008 18:05:35
Americans beware. In 1997 a man was swept to power in the UK. He was young, dynamic, charismatic. He promised change and that 'Things Can Only Get Better'. He turned out to be a liar, a chancer and an empty vessel. Make sure you don't vote for the book by its cover. Read right the way to the index and analyse its contents.
27

Dunnie,

Canada 10/02/2008 18:26:23

Nightgirl -

Being from NY,a state that borders Canada, I thought you might have been a little more informed about Canadians.

We follow your politics very carefully. We have to.
We are your neighbours.

We are very concerned about issues such as cross-border pollution and your coveting of our vast supplies of fresh water.

By the way, if your re-read my original posting, you will see that I didn't offer an opinion or disagree with you. I simply asked you a question.

I will ask you three more:

If you don't care about the opinions of non-Americans, what motivates you to post yours on the website of a foreign newspaper and think it is of value or noteworthy?

If you don't care about my opinion - not that I offered one - what caused you to post 3 responses?

A bit defensive are we?

28

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 18:49:38
I apologize for my sayings -dunnie-
29

NightGirl,

10/02/2008 18:53:28
P.S:
I am not inform about canadians. Sorry
30

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 18:55:30
Dunnie-
WHO would you like to vote for and why?
31

NightGirl,

10/02/2008 18:56:51
i am very into our elections, but i am to to to young.
32

Dunnie,

Canada 10/02/2008 19:07:30

Nightgirl - no apologies necessary.

I would vote for the candidate that would have the most-informed view about the issues we Canadians care about.

So far, I have heard nothing which is not surprising given the issues before the American electorate.

There are 300 million of you and only 30 million of us.

So when the elephant rolls over - we mice have to be very nimble on our feet!
33

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 19:08:59
THANK YOU=]
34

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 19:12:15
Any way i am just here cuz i have a report due tomorrow
and so far i got no information down=[
35

Reading Public 1,

Wisc 10/02/2008 19:27:17
#15 Dunnie, Canada
:"http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnists/neuharth/neu057.htm

Here's a link that might interest you.:


"11 - quill - good point but I think it important to remember that those who have voted for Obama were either registered Democrats or independents and not the overall, general population as will happen this November."
I think you might want to rephrase this.

Finnking,Lempäälä, I always thought of us being more liberal in most American's thinking.

#17 Sandi, I think a realty check to your statement is required.
I would vote for the Pope before Billary. At least Obama does not change with the wind and lie like her.
Maybe he should cry and say I feel your pain.
36

Laurette,

Southern California 10/02/2008 19:31:21
I'll be voting for whoever the Democrats nominate. Otherwise, we will have either a Warmonger or a Theocrat in the White House.
37

Sandi,

San Diego 10/02/2008 19:37:21
#35 Reading Public 1,Wisc,

How would we know whether or not Obama has changed "with the wind"? He has consistently not voted on controversial issues. In Illinois, he vote "present" and in the US Senate he just doesn't show up to vote.

Hillary hasn't changed with the wind on anything.

Did you know that Obama owes his seat in the US Senate in large part to Hillary's support and fundraising for him in 2004? She did more to help him then than any other Democratic Senator. Back then, when he needed her help and influence, he had no intention of running for president this year. Nice way to repay her. NOT how to make friends and influence people in politics.
38

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 20:06:54
who would u vote for?
39

Reading Public 1,

Wisc 10/02/2008 20:30:11
I went through the Clinton Presidency and watched Billary make mincemeat out of the Heath Care System.
She had a workable system and shelved it for the present system for political expediency for votes knowing the system they brought forth was badly flawed.
As a result we have many without health care and people like myself paying an exorbitant price for Health Ins. If you are not aware of this Goggle her health care record going back to the first years of her being First Lady. You might also look at the Clinton Foundations influence money wise on her elect-ability.
If Obama is so bad and I am not saying he is great only marginally better the Billary how has he gotten this far. If his record is so bad why is it not a prime issue. If his debates are so bad why do the polls show them even?
I'm not saying I will vote for him only never for Billary.
40

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 20:33:11
well i would vote for hillary becuase she offers us good things
41

emily carlson,

minneapolis 10/02/2008 20:36:56
Different Delegate totals - Emily Carlson
Ask MSNBC, and they'll tell you Barak Obama has more delegates.
Over at Politico.com, Sen. Hillary Clinton is winning the delegate race.
And The New York Times says Clinton has more than one hundred fifty more delegates than Obama.
Welcome to the confusing world of the Democratic nominating process. While the process has always been mind boggling, this year, the stakes are high and the audience is large. While media outlets try to break down the process, viewers sit at home frustrated, trying to understand how the delegate counts can be so different.
Depending on who you ask, Hillary is ahead 1,000 to 902, or 912 to 741. MSNBC has Barak leading the delegate count by 4. The variables in coming up with a total number of delegates are many. The first is primaries vs. caucuses. In most cases, primaries are binding, but caucuses are not. A caucus is just the first step in the political process where delegates are chosen. Those delegates do not have to pick their presidental candidate until the national convention, so some media outlets do not count that state's delegates in their numbers.
Then there are superdelegates, who can support which ever candidate they prefer. Superdelegates are made up of elected officials and party leaders. There are 796 superdelegates across the country, and as of Friday, only 303 have publicly supported a candidate. The superdelegates can change their mind at any time, therefore some media outlets are not counting their votes just yet either.
And don't forget the states whose primaries don't even count. Florida and Michigan were punished by the Democratic National Committee for moving their primary dates up. They still held the primary, but their delegates won't count at the convention.
Lots of different delegate totals, yes. Confusing, yes. Important, YES! There is just not sure way to calculate those delegate totals right now. It's neck and neck. Clinton and Obama will duke it out all the w
42

emily carlson,

10/02/2008 20:37:13
Clinton and Obama will duke it out all the way to the National Convention. Let's not jump the gun, and let's REALLY not get wrapped up in the specifics of the delegate total right now. The numbers will most certainly change. This could be the tightest race for the Democratic nomination of all time. It's going to be a LONG time before the numbers will declare a winner.
More:
http://clearblogs.com/emilycarlson/
http://emilyacarlson.wordpress.com/
http://eacarlson3.bravejournal.com/
43

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 20:44:35
Nice website emily
44

NightGirl,

10/02/2008 20:47:45
VOTE FOR HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
45

NightGirl,

10/02/2008 20:48:19
VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
46

Wally,

By The Rivers Of babylon (USA) 10/02/2008 20:50:25
NightGirl - the candidate you should be interested in is Ron Paul. He is a republican candidate and the only one left in the race that would end the war in Iraq. Back in early december at a debate in California for Democrats a journalist asked each candidate if they would set a date for withdrawing all troops from Iraq. All the major democrat candidates said that during the entire 4 years of their term they don't have a date they'd set to withdraw. Obama says he is anti-war, but his web site says he'll leave troops in Iraq indefinitely to be able to stage attacks on neighboring nations. Also, clinton & Obama each have pro-war vote records. Both have voted recently to fund the war in Iraq. All it takes is a 50% vote in both houses of congress to stop funding the war and then by law the president would have to bring the troops home as further spending on the war would be specifically unauthorized. Yet about 80% of the democrats in the last few months have voted to continue funding for the war, and nearly 100% of the republicans have done so. We are a nation where many opinion polls show that between 65 & 75% of our people want all troops home from Iraq. and even among out troops in Iraq over 70% think it best to withdraw completely. Yet our government which allegedly represents us will not consider bringing them home. here is Ron Paul's web site.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

The 2 democrat candidates who were anti-war were Kucinich & Graves. both have dropped out. Contrary to what the media would have you believe Ron Paul is very popular. In the early debates that occurred polls were taken among people who saw the debates and Paul won all of those polls. Paul defeated Guiliani in the primaries of 6 of 7 states that guiliani ran in before he dropped out, and guiliani was the media's front-runner for a long time. Paul finished 2'nd in about 5 states and competed for 1'st in some including Louisiana, Nevada & Washington. When you consider that Paul
47

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 20:55:39
GOOD Point
48

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 20:58:47
Wally-
i think i am goin to vote for Hillary becuase hillary has the quelities that a good president should have she is offering us better health care, better education, and also to end war in Iraqand send troops home to there families
49

NightGirl,

n.y 10/02/2008 21:03:24
EVEN THOUGH OBAMA IS BETTING HILLARY I AM STILL VOTING FOR HER
50

NightGirl,

N.Y 10/02/2008 21:10:25
Ladies and gentlemen of the U.S.A we are here to have a dibate on which we shall choose who is the best president of our country.
-hillary
-obama
-ron
-others *Who will u choose!? AND WHY!?*
51

Wally,

By The rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/02/2008 21:36:40
Nightgirl - if you did not like George W. bush as president, then you will not like Hilary clinton. I tell you that they both work for the same masters & follow the same agenda. Hilary nurtures a contrasting image, but the reality behind the image is same as bush.

When Hilary's husband was governor of Arkansas she engaged in criminal activity for profit, as did her husband. It's not good to elect people with a criminal background. You should understand that the mass media in America is very much controlled & owned by 6 corporations who serve the people that rule us. That is why information on this criminal activity was not made widely known. but it was reported in some news outlets including major outlets. I think if you read English author Ambrose evans Pritchard's book on Clinton, then you'd be enlightened to it. the big sex scandal the mass media focused on during the late 1990's involving Clinton was the mass media's defense of clinton, cluttering the air-waves with that scandal so that the others could be avoided and they could pretend this was the only one. This defense had the desired effect, people grew to believe that the only reason to criticize or impeach clinton was that sex scandal.

I tell you again that Hilary Clinton's actual record is pro-war, and she only projects an anti-war image, but when people ask her directly she has no plans to withdraw troops from Iraq. consider that the US has attacked by surprise and in an unprovoked manner and then overthrown the governments of 6 countries since 1989, the US has become very war-like and aggressive. Panama, Haiti, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia. Republicans & Democrats both have participated in these attacks, and all of them were unprovoked.

what the americans need to overthrow this clique that rules them is a revolution, and they are not up to it.
52

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/02/2008 21:42:43
Ron Paul I say is the best candidate. Why?

he'd withdraw all troops from all foreign countries and that includes dozens of countries. He'd reduce defense spending radically from about 800 billion to 200 billion. He'd slash intelligence spending by at least another 100 billion. He'd eliminate many government programs such as the Department of Education. The DOE interferes in the functioning of public schools all over the country. We can't have good education unless the local schools are free to avoid the dictates of the central bureaucracy in Washington which has been controlled by Republicans for 7 years now.

Paul would also eliminate the Federal Reserve banking system which is a debt & usury based money creation system whereby the American people are sucked dry as slaves would be all for the private profit of a very few people. Money should be created by the federal government not by a private bank. The private bank currently charges fees of 8-10% of our entire economy to create money. If you want a source for your school report, then look for Sheldon Emry's essay on a debt-based money creation system.

Paul is a believer in the rule of law and thus the US Constitution. Whereas other modern politicians ignore the constitution & the government is not limited by it, thus we live in an atmosphere of lawlessness.
53

Leslie_Anne,

Seattle WA USA 10/02/2008 21:59:46
Personally I am not excited about any of our Presidential candidates. Hilary is my least favorite of the front runners. I would encourage anyone wanting to vote for Hilary to research not only her past political career but also Bill's since it would be a "Clinton" presidency if she wins. The other concern that I have with Hilary is with the war on terror. Is this really the right time to put a woman in office? Are the muslim terrorists really going to respect or fear a woman president? They view women as second class citizens. We need to have a strong president to continue to fight the war on terror. Since there were several attacks against our nation while Bill was in office, such as the Embassy attacks and the US Cole with no retaliation, wont the terrorist expect Hillary to react the same way? I'm not one to jump on the war wagon but we need to react in some way to attacks on us or our friends or at least have someone in office who the terrorist fear. I don't think they will fear Hilary at all. We need Ronald Reagan back!
54

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 10/02/2008 22:01:23
This morning's results show Obama gathering victories in more states and Clinton growing more and more concerned.

I've heard Obama speak and I've spoken with people who benefited from his work in Illinois. The one thing that sets him apart, for me, is that he speaks like a leader.

I don't need to hear the leader of the United States articulate every single detail of every single imaginable policy. If you tell me that, at this stage in the game, you know all of that, I'll believe you're deluded (if I'm being charitable).

I need to hear a leader be inspirational and challenge me to do my best. How many years has it been since someone said, "Ask not what America can do for you......"? How many years of spiteful, "I'll govern for my side and only my side" politics?

The United States is a country of almost unimaginable potential. That potential is squandered, year after year, by divisiveness and rancour. "I'll commit to this policy because the people who paid for my election expect me to." - instead of because it's right for America or the world.

So I'll continue to support Obama and wish Good Luck to the supporters of the other candidates. Perhaps Obama's success - such as it has been so far - will teach other candidates that it's better to send a message of hope than to spend your time and money denigrating your fellow candidates.
55

Elizabeth M,

USA (formerly Edinburgh) 11/02/2008 00:23:54
Have any of you lot heard Obama's 'preacher' talking? When 'he' (Obama) was in church? Apparently not ................................. make sure you hear ALL he facts boys. Might be interesting to you. And as for Hilarious (I mean Hilary) ..... puke! But do make sure that you hear ALL her speeches on this vote and that vote, and why she changed her mind, and why she didn't mean to say this, or that, or vote this way or that ..... confusing? You betcha!


56

Friend-at-large,

USA 11/02/2008 08:42:22
A co-worker commented she found participating in her local caucus invigorating.

Years ago I studied handwriting analysis and I have drawn some tentative conclusions about certain of the candidates.

When I was young and dating I would sometimes meet someone who had the style of making empty overblown promises. Since my education included debate club I could catch this.

I would urge honest and talented public servants to stay in government, since someone real has to help the mundane world function. A big thank you to all honest government employees.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.