Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


NHS 24 staff to get their own health line in bid to cut soaring absentee rates

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 March 2008
NHS 24 is set to get its own helpline to deal with alarming rates of absenteeism in the health hotline service.
Managers at the under-fire health line are considering the move to tackle the worst absenteeism rate of any major Scottish public organisation. NHS 24 employees are off work for an average of 18 days a year, more than twice the average for other o
rganisations.

NHS 24 managers have not costed the plan yet, but a similar pilot at East Ayrshire Council was calculated at £28,000.

The organisation has defended the scheme on grounds of "confidentiality" for employees so they will not have to discuss their symptoms with colleagues. Critics claim the need for the plan shows the flaws in the idea behind NHS 24.

The plan is contained in a document on managing absenteeism in NHS 24, obtained under Freedom of Information legislation. Written last autumn, it details a number of options for reducing absentee rates.

It said: "A six-month pilot of a central telephone number for staff reporting sickness absence will be manned externally by professional occupational health nurses."

But the move has enraged critics of the service, which has come under fire for leaving patients hanging on the line waiting to speak to a nurse and for dispensing poor advice.

Dr Jean Turner, of the Scotland Patients Association, said: "This simply shows the inherent problem of NHS 24. There are many good people who work for it and they are very dedicated, but they are under immense pressure because it is impossible to reliably diagnose a person over the phone.

"And so you will do your best and put the phone down and always be wondering whether you got things right and that will be immensely stressful."

Scottish Conservative health spokeswoman, Mary Scanlon, said: "I have visited NHS 24 and I know that they have many dedicated people who do a good job when faced with a lot of stress, but it is wrong to give them a special service which is not available to other people in the health service.

"There are front-line staff in accident and emergency wards who have to deal with abuse and violence and they are not getting this kind of service."

However, NHS 24 defended the plan. A spokeswoman said: "It is for staff confidentiality, so that they are not having to discuss their situation with colleagues. The plan is still under consideration.

"We are working on getting our absence levels down."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 March 2008 7:32 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

Deeside,

Scotland 23/03/2008 15:50:45
I think this is just another attempt to force staff to work in horrific conditions whilst they are unwell. Staff who go off sick for whatever reason are harrassed and put under immense pressure to return to work even when they have been medically signed off by their own GP.

Forcing staff to further disclose personal details of their medical conditions to strangers at occupational health is outrageous especially on the end of the telephone - its bad enough that they already in some cases are forced to sit in front of a total stranger at occupational health and reveal all about their medical history and other aspects of their personal lives - its tantermount to rape! But to say this is a support service for the employee is a load of tosh - it is just another desperate attempt by NHS24 to cover up their terrible track record of staff sickness absenses using a two-bit quacks to rule against the diaognosis and opinions of well experienced GPs who know the patient's case histories.





2

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 23/03/2008 19:24:03
Could it be that managers in the private sector are a wee harder to convince than those in the public sector?
Sickies are far more common in the public sector but I'd be hard pushed to believe that the jobs are more stressful.
3

Evia,

23/03/2008 19:39:22
1 Deeside

I agree.

Much sickness is caused by stress yet employers do nothing to alleviate it. Instead, they pile on more work and expect staff to meet unrealistic targets. NHS 24 is just like a giant call centre and we all know how bad they are. Staff are left to deal with questions they are unable to answer correctly.

To have to speak to someone not acquainted with one's medical history is ridiculous and, in my opinion, an intrusion into one's privacy.
4

Deeside,

Scotland 24/03/2008 00:18:17
I agree that its sometimes easy for anyone to take a sickie here and there because its just too much effort to roll out of bed etc etc .... but there is clearly a problem when sickness rates are double those of other 'comparable' industries. I know people who work at NHS 24 not just in the call centres, and in one case, when the employee was signed off with a medical note and full letter from their GP they received call after call from managers at NHS 24 - almost begging them to come back to work because they didn't have anyone to cover their work! When the illness continued and became more serioius, it then became more of a harrassment situation. If this happened in the private sector, trade unions would be outraged.

5

Robert,

Kirriemuir 24/03/2008 23:50:35
When the staff sickness rate is high it is manifest that the problem is the lack of competent management but, not at subordinate management level but, rather, at the top echelon, the chief executive's post. It is too easy for the CE to project blame outwardly either on staff or the conditions under which they operate or lack of resources or poor pay and ad nauseum but the problem stems from one source only a poor, inefficient, incompetent, Chief Executive. Sack the person and recruit someone who can resolve the organisation's problems. Centralisation and monolthic staff structures create those problems. There is research from the 1950/60s showing that institutions (of whatever type) that have more than 250 client places then the manager losses touch with what is occurring within his area of responsibility but the selfishness of individuals to be remote gods in large combines choose to ignore minor detail like this so we bumble along 'w.lly-nilly' (not a spelling mistake; just a bit of puerile censorship) blind to what is actually happening. Maybe some day someone will inform the government of this extortionately costly problem it has created through ignorance in the mistaken belief that it is cost-effective and efficient; can't they see what is happening or do they all suffer from intellectual myopia?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should the Western General ditch its fresh-cooked meals to make more room?
Yes, it’s cheaper to bring in food from elsewhere
No, patients need decent food to help them get better
Maybe, it depends what they make room for

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.