Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Call for ban on superbug gels in hospitals

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 August 2008
ONE of Scotland's most senior doctors has called for alcohol gel hand-rubs to be removed from hospitals because they are ineffective against the deadly C diff superbug.
Alcohol hand-rub dispensers have been placed in wards and clinical areas throughout the country at a cost of more than £1m, largely to combat another superbug, MRSA. However, they do not provide a defence against C diff, which has killed hundreds of
patients in Scotland in recent years.

But Dr Charles Saunders, head of the British Medical Association's Consultants' Committee in Scotland, said most doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals are unaware that the gels were ineffective and they must wash their hands with soap and water between dealing with each patient.

He said the dispensers should be scrapped because they are causing confusion about the best method of infection control.

However, the Scottish Government has insisted that the dispensers – introduced to most hospital bedsides over the past three years – will remain on wards as part of the strategy against hospital-acquired infections.

Lack of knowledge among healthcare staff about the ineffectiveness of the gels may be one of the reasons for Scotland's appalling C diff figures. It was cited this month as being among the factors behind the outbreak which killed 18 patients at the Vale of Leven hospital in West Dunbartonshire earlier this year.

Saunders said: "In terms of preventing the spread of infection, the most important and effective method is hand-washing, whatever the organism. People should be washing their hands after touching each patient. The problem is that some hospitals do not have adequate facilities for handwashing, which is one of the issues highlighted in the report into Vale of Leven."

The gels, designed to remove potentially harmful bugs from the skin surface, had become a substitute. "Staff have been told that they could use alcohol gel instead of washing their hands," said Saunders. "That is not a good message to give people. They should be told they should wash their hands, but a lot of wards have dispensers when they should have more hand-basins.

"What would make sense would be for hospitals to remove the dispensers and replace them with adequate hand-washing facilities in wards and clinical areas."

Studies have shown that the gels are effective against MRSA but cannot tackle C diff, which forms tough spores highly resistant to damage.

Asked if staff were aware that the gels were ineffective against C diff, Saunders replied: "By and large, no. I suspect it's because staff have been told that they can use alcohol gel rather than washing their hands and they have come to the conclusion that they are being told that because it is effective."

The previous Labour-Lib Dem Executive allocated more than £1m to the NHS in Scotland in 2005 to help hospital managers install alcohol gel dispensers beside each bed.

A spokeswoman for the Scottish Government said studies have proved that alcohol hand gels were "very effective at disinfecting hands and killing a whole host of bugs and germs".

She added: "Hand gel provides healthcare workers with a quick method of decontaminating their hands between healthcare interventions and facilitates higher levels of compliance with hand hygiene."

She acknowledged that the gels were less effective against C diff. However, the Government had no intention of removing the dispensers. "It is important that staff, patients and visitors not only wash their hands with soap and water but combine this practice with the use of alcohol-based hand gels," she said.

Labour's health spokesman, Richard Simpson, said he would not support the removal of the dispensers because of their role in tackling MRSA. However, he said ministers must make sure that staff comply with targets that stipulate that they must hand-wash at least 90% of the time when moving from patient to patient.

The investigation into the Vale of Leven outbreak found staff did not know that soap and water, rather than alcohol gel, were required to prevent the spread of C diff. Although there were plans to upgrade hand-washing facilities, investigators heard the work was expected to take 20 weeks to complete.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 August 2008 11:28 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Hospital superbugs
 
1

Unimpressed one,

17/08/2008 09:13:36
"What would make sense would be for hospitals to remove the dispensers and replace them with adequate hand-washing facilities in wards and clinical areas."

Really? So visitors will actually seek out hand-washing facilities then take the time to wash in preference to using quick and easy alcohol gel dispensers?
2

Dunedinhen,

Darlington 17/08/2008 12:11:05
there is a sink on every ward to be used by everyone. if the vivitors are serious about avoiding cross infection then they SHOULD seek out a sink!
3

Spondoolicks,

qwq 17/08/2008 12:15:27
Sadly, I was in hospital last week and while the staff seemed to be quite good at "gelling' or washing their hands not one visitor bothered to use either the gel or the hand-basins.

Hardly surprising then the rates of "hospital-acquired" infections...
4

KIRKY COOK,

Kirkliston 17/08/2008 13:20:55
I'm all for keeping the hand gel dispenser's,
but also everyone should have to scrub thier hand's before entering a ward.
Also why are hospital staff allowed to wear their uniform when not at work?
You see as many people in livingston centre etc wearing their's before or after work!
Surely not very hygenic!!
5

Dunedinhen,

Darlington 17/08/2008 14:15:30
#4 staff uniforms are not a source of HAI. it may be thought of as one but literature states that this perception is false. If staff uniform are considered unclean, why do we not strip everyone patients, visitors and staff, of their outdoor clothes and put them in scrubs or gows?
6

Dunedinhen,

Darlington 17/08/2008 14:16:56
cont'd not everyone you see at a shopping centre in uniform actually works for the NHS......our local centre has their cleaning staff in uniforms that usually adorn sisters on the wards
7

bettylou,

Arkansas USA. 17/08/2008 19:39:07
As an Registered Nurse with nearly 40 years experience, I am disturbed by Health Spokesman Richard Simpson's statement that hospital staff aim for handwashing between patients 90% of the time. Sorry Mr Simpson, only 100% is acceptable. What happens the other 10% of the time?
8

linda mccafferty,

Glasgow 18/08/2008 13:25:32
post #5 id like to see the literture that stats nurses uniforms are not a source of HAIs & how this perception is false can you put a link up ?
9

Dunedinhen,

Darlington 18/08/2008 17:12:16
#8 i cannot provide a link but can say that in the hospitals that i work in there has been biological tests on uniforms. this has proved that they are not a source of HAI. From patient surveys, it was concluded that they thought that uniforms were unhygienic. As said before why don't we get all outdoor clothes removed. If you could see some of the dirty clothes that some patients turn up to prebooked appointments you would realise that staff are not wholely to blame. My local hospital which only operates under an elective admission policy has seen MRSA rates dropped to ZERO. This is due to screening patients before admission and treating. Surely this proves that some HAI's are borne by the patients themselves.
10

BK,

23/08/2008 23:20:49
The story is that in Glasgow hospitals, patients have been caught diluting the alcohol gels with water and drinking it. Banning it will be a big blow to hospitalised jaikies.
11

JennyA,

Scotland 06/09/2008 17:53:55
One of the first 'alcopops' for sale was an alcoholic jelly called 'Fathead'. It was banned shortly afterwards. 'Nuff said!!!'

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.