Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Trump drives golf course plan on despite nine holes being 'out of bounds'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 August 2007
US BILLIONAIRE Donald Trump has ignored repeated pleas to move his planned Scottish golf course away from a protected environment site, despite being told such a move would virtually secure official approval.
Documents show officials from Aberdeenshire Council have suggested on several occasions that the tycoon should rethink his controversial plan to site nine holes on a unique coastal dune system containing a dome of sand.

Planning permission for hi
s golf development at Menie Links would be easier to obtain if Trump moved the course a few yards inland and away from the dunes, officials hint.

But the New York property developer and his staff have told the planners that they will not change their minds. According to minutes of a meeting between the Trump team and officials last month, project director Neil Hobday said the tycoon's "vision" was to create "a world class championship course and development of the sand dome is a key part of this. It was felt that to remove holes from this part of the site would result in a second-rate course."

Planning consultants working for Trump said they had not been given the "flexibility" to take the holes out of the Special Site of Scientific Interest on which the developer wants to build the course.

The newly released documents also reveal:

• Consultants working for Trump opposed a decision to grant government advisers more time to prepare an environmental report on the site;

• The consultants tried to get the Ministry of Defence to relax restrictions on the height of buildings so the resort hotel can be built on a bigger scale;

• The perimeter of the 1,100-acre site will be enclosed by a wire fence with restricted access points.

Trump announced plans to build his £1bn Trump International Golf Links resort at Balmedie, 10 miles north of Aberdeen, last year, saying the scale of the investment would be the biggest in the north-east of Scotland since the discovery of North Sea oil and would revitalise the local economy.

As well as building the "best seaside course in the world", he intended to develop a second course, a 450-room hotel, 500 luxury homes, and hundreds of holiday apartments.

But his plan to build part of his signature course on an officially protected, wildlife-rich natural dune system, has brought objections from environmental bodies including Scottish Natural Heritage, the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, the RSPB and the Scottish Wildlife Trust.

In a response last May, SNH said that building golf holes among the dunes would "effectively destroy" the conservation site and urged Trump to move the course onto nearby farmland within his estate.

There have so far been 78 objections against the development lodged with the council and only 11 letters of support.

In a letter to the Trump organisation in June, Lesley Aitken, the Aberdeenshire planning official assigned to the case, says it is clear that the northern area of the development lies within the Foveran Links SSSI, "a dynamic and mobile area of the coast where the vegetation present is entirely dependant on this continuous change. This would be lost if the development is permitted."

She adds that it would appear from discussions (with SNH) that there is little scope for removal of its objection as it is unlikely that location of the golf course will change.

The council was told by Ironside Farrar, Trump's Edinburgh-based consultants, there would be no layout changes.

Reaffirming Trump's threat to pull out of the project unless his plans are accepted in their entirety, the firm said: "Without the ability to form the course in this location, there would be no basis for the resort, and it would not proceed."

Trump's intransigence will heap pressure on the council's Formartine area planning committee, which is due to decide the first stage of the planning application on September 18.

If councillors reject the plan on environmental grounds, they risk the wrath of the north-east business community, which welcomes Trump's claims that the project will create more than 1,000 permanent jobs and inject around £47m into the local economy annually.

jwatson@scotlandonsunday.com



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 August 2007 5:50 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Donald Trump
 
1

Boy Wonder,

05/08/2007 00:51:25

Don't say you weren't warned about shenanigans like this months ago when Trump first mooted his golf course. The only environment he cares for is the one he wants to make a profit out of. And Nature reserves aren't profitable!

2

Dougie Douglas,

Brisbane 05/08/2007 00:57:52

Hmmm

Bit of a conundrum here!

There is nothing more distasteful than a cashed up yank trying to bully and twist planning rules.

Would be helpful if SOS could give some insight into the how unique this environment is - does it exist in other areas nearby or along the east coast?

If it is not an entirely unique area you would think that their should be some flexibility in the development 'rules' as a development of this size would obviously be of great economic benefit.

Yet another half-arsed piece of writing by SOS

3

American,

USA 05/08/2007 01:37:16

#1-boy wonder-And if the golf course isn't making a big enough profit, he can always declare bankruptcy for it; this way he won't have to pay all the contractors. But, at least the "trump" name will still be on it and that's what really matters.

4

Mallory,

05/08/2007 04:21:22

Golf courses promote elitism and the anti-social misuse of the nation's land resources by a minority.

Surely there are more than enough here already?

5

GalacticCannibal,

05/08/2007 04:41:04

2. Dougie Douglas, Brisbane / 1:57am 5 Aug 2007
You wrote:

"as a development of this size would obviously be of great economic benefit".

Oh yeh!!!!! a great economic benefit for minimum wage workers and immigrant workers who will work for even less.

Trump's record in the States is one of absolute greed.

Even in his private life he tosses wives overboard like they are used pleasure commodities.

But he is convinced that the wimp bureaucrats in Scotland will give in first, now that Salmond 's SNP are in power.

Salmond with the SNP will use this project as an International benefit to low paid worker in Scotland.

And if the project does not make money Trump will shut it down . Like his casino's in Alantic City.

BEWARE of TRUMP and his supporter SNP.

GC

6

GCL,

Midwest, USA 05/08/2007 04:56:20

It's not my place to say that you shouldn't allow Trump to build this, as it is not my economic development sacrifice. Nevertheless, I will admit that it would give me pleasure to read that the permits have been denied.

I don't like the thought of the planning authority being bullied. Clearly Trump has the room to pursue alternatives that wouldn't destroy the dune system. With some creativity and a good design, it wouldn't be any less of a course. The Old Course at St. Andrews isn't the closest one to the beach, for heaven's sake. I particularly don't like the pressure to come from an American developer, which perpetuates the "ugly American" image that I'm afraid we deserve for many of our actions.

As a frequent visitor to Scotland, I can say that this Trump development won't encourage me to come more often. It would never even be on my itinerary.

Donald, if you don't like the rules, either live with it or come home and foul some piece of land back here. We have more room for it, and at least we'd be doing it to ourselves.

7

Scottish/American,

USA 05/08/2007 06:03:39

Trump is Scottish. On his mother's side.I think he wants to put his Scottish Stamp on Scotland somewhere.
This man is a genius when it comes to developing. Look at his "stuff" around the planet.

I think if his golf course/hotel/academy is denied, then, it could be a huge embarrassment to the Scottish economy.

I am talking well into the future here...lots of red faces.

8

Erse,

Middle East 05/08/2007 06:12:23

Hair today gone tomorrow!

9

Born to roughneck,

05/08/2007 06:15:29

Tell the to$$er to bu**er off. Why not build it in Iraq??

10

an interested party,

05/08/2007 06:24:04

No 8 lol

plenty sand dunes there

11

ex katman 2,

ex sudan 05/08/2007 07:15:36

Will he come up Trumps?

12

Calum Mac,

05/08/2007 07:40:19

He should take his development to Ireland where vision, investment, jobs and tourism are appreciated and an integral part of the Irish economy. Here in Scotland, we specialise in whinging, greetin', mumpin' and crap service. I take my holidays in Scotland and I am totally embarassed by the tourism industry which should be re-named the anti-tourism industry.

13

Boy Wonder,

05/08/2007 07:45:37

I have one word for Mr Trump ....... Ivana!!! :)

14

Conan,

Here 05/08/2007 07:47:09

#11 - you are being a bit harsh. Scotland has one thing going for it that the Irish don't have - we Scots are still sucking of the English tit. Let the Irish top that, if they dare.

15

Cadgers,

Perth 05/08/2007 08:19:58

Trump should be told to sling his hook, and take his toupee with him.

16

Upbeat,

05/08/2007 09:19:08

Yes.... by all means tell him to go elsewhere and take his $ billions with him.....clever.... really clever .!

Just think a minute first.

We are speaking about $ billions here. ...we are speaking about building contracts, we are speaking about earth moving contracts...then- ongoing -we are speaking about continuity of local employment, and increases in supply chain employment. We are speaking about increased use of Aberdeen airport. etc.

This is a huge question of enormous significance to a Region of the UK which is starting to see the effects of the "wind down" of new investment in the North Sea oil and gas industry.

To dismiss the plans for the Trump largess directed at this region, , without serious debate, is daft. Until it is shown clearly that there is something totally unique, irreplaceable and vibrant about the dune system that has, at all costs, to be conserved then perhaps we would be wiser hold our ill informed opinions in check.

17

Pilar la Guapita Escocesa,

never a dull moment in Langholm 05/08/2007 12:56:16

Trump?
Good for the Scottish economy?
Fascinating Captain (to paraphrase Mr. Spock)

hasta la vista tonto

18

Pilar la Guapita Escocesa,

never a dull moment in Langholm 05/08/2007 13:06:11

#18
Airse ...?
Ever so slightly 'mucho sarcastico' old bean.
I can only assume that the sun never sets in your part o' Inglaterra's empire huh?

19

I'm no really here,

05/08/2007 13:59:54

Told you months ago: Environmental Impact Report was done by the developers: Double the environmental impact, and cut the expected financial benefit by 80%.

20

,

05/08/2007 18:27:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 848448, Article id was mapped to record!
21

,

05/08/2007 21:19:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 848805, Article id was mapped to record!
22

Faye,

05/08/2007 21:21:10

#16 You speakith too much.

23

GalacticCannibal,

05/08/2007 23:46:23

21. Scottish/American, USA /

Trump cares nothing about Scotland . But he sees another opportunity to clean up on profit.

The business of America is business and Trump is a crass act in that respect.

My country is the world expert in hoodwinking others.

Like our idiot Pres. Bush, forcing a missile base on Russia's door step.


Scottish people if you want high paying jobs encourage the HP's the IBM's to look again Scotland .

The Trumps will ripe you off. big time.

Happy non-trump day

GC

24

The Wizard,

OZ 05/08/2007 23:49:38

Do you need more golf courses in Scotland?

25

shacks,

australia 06/08/2007 01:27:55

maybe he will have golf cart babe's to drive the golfers around. that will put the wind up some of those old bags that dress like something out of the 20's

26

Mora,

06/08/2007 02:05:53

Trump's vision must be through cataracts - the values are blurred. High value landscapes will be trashed not beautified. He's got it the wrong way around. He could be restoring derelict land or building very close to existing infrastructure (railways, airport, roads, sewerage, water supply, homes for workers etc) to benefit a much wider community - and keep more pristine natural areas as a benefit for future generations - people who will only exist if his plans are reined in.

27

mr chips,

06/08/2007 06:52:21

5. GalacticCannibal /What are you on ya tube, It was your hero joke mconnell that was brown nosing trump. You seem to attatch the letters SNP TO ALL YOUR PATHETIC NEGATIVE COMMENTS.

28

Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD,

Dar-Es-Salaam Tanzania 06/08/2007 10:03:18

Sir. We have similar problem in smaller scale but like the termites they eat us up. The graft. We have bribery. Mr. Bush goes after the collapsed bridges. That is good news. The bodies will get the posthumous welfare benefits if any or the family will receive a letter stating, “Sir/Madam. We are sorry you lost one of the family members. We sincerely grief this but this was not in our hand (nor in the head). It just happened. Even we were taken by surprise. Why? We had the inspection team doing the routine checks on and off every five years. This bridge must have been omitted in the map. We regret this but we assure you that we are trying our best to see that we no longer have any bridged falling down like the branch of the tree. I mean we hate deaths. We want to pull out from Iraq. We do not like war. But this is not in our hand\s. You see we are but the engineers. The magic wand is with VETO of the top brass shots. They pay us and tell us what to do. So please next time take another bridge. You know that one that is five km long. That one. We again say we are sorry we cannot bring the dead alive but we can save the future generation if NASDEQ and Dollar goes up an inch. There also we fail. Sorry.” Sincerely the architect retired in 1900.

29

Rhonda,

06/08/2007 16:01:21

Story, big deal! So what. Just gives us all something else to complain about. I want to hear some good happy stuff.

30

Peter S,

Fife 07/08/2007 10:10:43

To #21 - Nose out pal!
This is our backyard and (theoretically) it is our decision to make with regards to DT's intentional destruction of OUR environment.
There will be nothing but crumbs for the North East - low paid jobs and lowly positions; and for those who believe in huge quantities of inward investment and franchise business - just remember that the returns on investments travel the opposite way - OUTwards.
We shall lose, permanently, yet another reason for regarding Scotland as a beautiful place to be in.
Unfortunately I can see our official representatives just rolling over to accommodate this reprehensible act of environmental vandalism - aided no doubt by a number of 'incentives' in the right pockets.
There's no economic renewal of the North East just dependent upon the building of a blithering golf course for goodness' sake - he's intent upon building an American style protected 'community' inside a restricted access area because we're cheaper to bribe and easier to fool than just about anyone else in the 'civilised' world.
If it needs doing then there's no reason why we can't do the job ourselves - properly and to the real benefit of the community that supports it.
And in answer to #16 - there's no such thing as Trump largess; and serious debate doesn't mean "Yes Mr Trump, no Mr Trump, three bags full Mr Trump, do what you will Mr Trump".

31

Brian Hill,

09/08/2007 15:00:43

I have to wonder how far a field some of our posters have traveled. Clearly not to the Middle East or Far East where major projects and buildings have been and continue to be erected attracting millions of tourists in their wake.

Tourism is the fastest growing industry in the world and the competition to attract worldwide travelers is fierce.

This project will be a major triumph for the North East and Scotland. Donald Trump will be forever advertising it worldwide (and Scotland of course). It would be crass stupidity to continue putting barriers of this nature up to stop the development.

Move the birds and the dunes to a new outdoors site or build a suitable venue indoors for them to survive but let's get a bit of American ‘can do’ spirit moving on this one before we lose it altogether....

oh and just for the record, I am a major critic of America and her warmongering since the end of world war 2 but I recognise quality from anywhere when I see it.

32

Iain Rtchie,

São Paulo 19/12/2007 20:07:01
I commented against this Trump deal since I believe that Scotland‘s
beauty, both shore line and inland, should be left as nature designed
it, for there is nowhere else comparable. The dunes, lakes and highlands
are sufficient to attract tourists, as many as Scotland can handle. If we
start developing Trump Towers or Disney type attractions, then we will
be unable to handle the tourist flow because the quality of these tourists
will differ and Macs, Pizza Huts, Burger King, and etc will follow. If in doubt,
I was born in Glasgow, studied in Edinburgh and am a very proud Scotsman,
wore a kilt and belong to the Church of Scotland. So I need say no more, only
please leave Scotland alone and let us hinder politics from spoiling our nature.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.