Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scientists bid to take Neanderthal DNA sample

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 October 2006
SCIENTISTS are attempting to extract DNA for the first time from the fossilised bones thought to be of a Neanderthal man who roamed Britain 35,000 years ago.
Experts plan to use a tooth from an upper jaw to establish whether the closest relative of modern humans lived on the British Isles later than it was once thought.

The fragment of an upper jaw, which was found in 1926 at Kent's Cavern in Devon, w
as originally thought to be human, but experts now think it could date back even further.

Chris Stringer, research leader in Human Origins at the Natural History Museum in London, said it was a critical test that could have historic results. The only late Neanderthal fossils on the British Isles were found on the Channel Islands around 1910.

However, Stringer said the teeth discovered at the site date back to a time when the island was joined to France around 50,000 years ago.

The director of the Ancient Human Occupation of Britain (AHOB) project said: "Neanderthal DNA is very distinct and would show up clearly in tests. It is a critical test as this could be the first late Neanderthal fossil on mainline Britain.

"But it is also historic if there is modern human DNA as this would prove they were here earlier than previously thought.

"Neanderthals are so close to us in time, living 30,000 to 40,000 years ago, and a closely related species. We have lots of Neanderthal tools but no fossils. The team is excited about the tests, but we need a bit of luck as the DNA may not have survived."

The roots, crown, size and shape of the tooth, which is thought to date back 35,000 years, would also be studied.

Torquay Museum in Devon, which looks after the piece of jaw bone, has agreed in principle to the DNA and carbon dating tests, Stringer said.

The group, which found evidence which dated the arrival of primitive ancestors in Britain to 700,000 years ago, 200,000 years earlier than previous findings, includes archaeologists, paleontologists and geologists from the Natural History Museum, the British Museum, Royal Holloway, University of London, and the University of Durham.

AHOB was set up in 2001 and funded for five years with £1.2m from the Leverhulme Trust which provides grants for education and research.

The second phase of research, which is called AHOB2 and runs until 2010, starts today after the Leverhulme Trust provided a £999,000 grant.

The next phase will include comparative studies in continental Europe.

The new project will also test the theory that there were no humans in Britain between 180,000 and 60,000 years ago due to the creation of the English Channel, making access to Britain more difficult.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

AJ,

Fife 01/10/2006 21:08:34

Surely getting a blood sample from Wayne Rooney would be simpler!!

2

michaelbix,

Brattleboro, VT 03/10/2006 05:28:09

The email headline and opening paragraph are a tad misleadingly worded. Neaderthal DNA has been extracted in the past by at least two researchers, albeit not entire sequences.

If one reads sentences very closely you CAN construct, perhaps, that these particular British bones have been used for the first time as a source for DNA sequencing - rather than that this is the first time Neaderthal fossil bones have been sampled for DNA (which is the quick first impressions).

And... I'm always mystified why the obstacles of one or two hundred sea miles of water should automatically be presumed to deter prehistoric Neanderthals (or CroMagnons, or homo sapiens) from constructing rafts or boats to get to the other side.

3

Pete39,

Tasmania 03/10/2006 06:19:11

Well if you have the DNA you should be able to find out if the really died or just got absorbed with the rest of humanity.

4

David,

North Carolina/October 5 05/10/2006 19:39:23

DNA so far has all been mitochondrial, 'proving' we're not related. Someone needs to check with a breeder, or a zookeeper where breeding accidents happen between closely related species. One or both of the offspring may be infertile. What if only male neandertal/sapiens hybrids were fertile? There goes the mitochondria. Lets hope genomic DNA extraction scores with a little real information.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.