Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Tory 'toff' image 'worse than drugs'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
18 February 2007
THEY provoked David Cameron's most uncomfortable 24 hours since taking the mantle of Tory leader last year, but the revelations over his drug-taking at Eton might not turn out to be the worst problem to emerge.
Senior members of Cameron's inner circle last night confessed that, when it came to damaging revelations, photographs laying bare Cameron's pedigree as a bona fide 'toff' were far more dangerous.

"There is a sensitivity here," a close colleague s
aid. "David's appeal is focused on his ability to share common ground with the ordinary voter. We know our opponents will have a field day with pictures of him looking smart at Eton or Oxford."

Cameron's background, an Eton and Oxford education and the bloodline to Henry VII, has been a cause of concern for his campaign team.

He has made much of his 'ordinary' lifestyle, but the background the leader himself has described as "hideously privileged" is a source of enduring anxiety.

Although a poll before his election as leader suggested it was not such an issue, image makers have strongly advised Cameron to keep his past under wraps. And it is not just a personal problem. The Tories have based their strategy on the Blairite tactic of winning popular support for their exciting new leader in the hope this will rub off on the party.

A forthcoming study by Britain's most experienced pollster, Sir Bob Worcester, reveals Cameron's personal popularity leads his party's by 14%. But if Cameron starts to tumble now, then there is little hope of a recovery for the Conservatives before the general election.

"Eton personifies world-class privilege," said left-wing Labour MP Dennis Skinner. "The Tories have gone back to the snobs."

It is a charge to which the Cameron hierarchy is sensitive. At a recent Tory fund-raising event, at Blenheim Palace, Oxfordshire, Cameron worked the room, extracting pledges of support from bankers, stockbrokers and businessmen. But

"the Cameron people refused, point blank, to allow photographs," said one observer.

The emergence of the Bullingdon Club picture last week, with Cameron lining up alongside a group of absurdly privileged Oxford students before they trashed a restaurant, was his minders' worst nightmare.

Labour strategists are rubbing their hands. "We have been pushing this idea of Cameron the toff for so long with no real success that we had, frankly, just about given it up," one Labour campaigner said last night.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Mev Brown,

Edinburgh 18/02/2007 01:41:09

Correct me if I’m wrong, but something like 70% of New Labour MPs have a similar background to Cameron.

The days when Labour MPs were working class people are almost over.

Watch this space: www.nhsfirst.org.uk

2

Navvy,

18/02/2007 03:03:53

Mev
Please define working class in the 21st century

3

Guga,

Rockall 18/02/2007 06:56:58

#1 Mev. You are correct. Not only that, but a high number of New Labour people send their children to private schools, have private health insurance, and make sure their kids don't go to Iraq or Afghanistan.

So, whilst they are identical to the Tories in that regard, they are even worse than the Tories when it comes to sleaze and corruption.

#2 Navvy. You use a strange name for a Tory supporter.

4

Sinnerman,

Another Planet 18/02/2007 07:15:46

Try defining class in the 21st century.

5

Pete39,

Tassy 18/02/2007 08:39:46

#4 Sinnerman, I will give it a try but it is hell of a difficult and obviously you do not want the Labour party description. How about " a sweet young thing, snazzy dresser, never criticised you in public, drove you home from parties and wore her skirts round about knee level." I would add "and gave you a black eye if you suggested you know what before you had known her for six months" Times change, even if you both agreed on one month, that is still my description of "class".

6

Carnegie,

18/02/2007 09:34:36

"Correct me if I’m wrong, but something like 70% of New Labour MPs have a similar background to Cameron"

Ok I'll correct you - that's mince - you'll struggle to find more than more than 10 Labour MPs who have personaly (or their familes) have "benefited" from private education and probably none in Scotland.

7

Scots Ted,

Glasgow 18/02/2007 09:43:01

Class class class - yawn yawn yawn. We want answers to the problems of social deprivation, crime, drugs etc. I don't give a toss what some tories background is. If he others a solution to the problems we face lets give him a hearing.

It would be wrong for Labour to use the politics of the gutter to smear the opposition - after all isnt this what the tories did in the 1990s and what New Labour said what was so worng with British politics when they were the opposition.

Things have now gone full circle!

8

Mallory,

18/02/2007 09:50:10
9

heather fae the hills,

18/02/2007 10:02:04

It is not so much as the clothes that bother me, more the arrogance and dishonesty.

Nothing mentioned about Fettes Old Boys, eh?

10

Scaramouche,

18/02/2007 10:49:49

#8. Very interesting site, Mallory.

Please allow me to reproduce this part for the readers ....

David Cameron is the cousin of the Conservative political journalist and editor Sir Ferdinand Mount, 3rd Baronet and the grandson of Sir William Mount, 2nd Baronet. Through the Mounts, he is related to many British aristocratic families, being descended from the 7th Earl of Denbigh, the 1st Earl of Ducie, the 1st Earl of Carnarvon, the 2nd Earl of Egremont, the 6th Duke of Somerset and the 2nd Earl of Shrewsbury, as discussed here. He is also related to the British Royal Family by descent through his paternal grandmother from King William IV by his mistress Dorothea Jordan. He is a fifth cousin, twice removed of Queen Elizabeth II. He is also a descendant of the 1st Marquess of Montrose, as well as of Frederick V, Elector Palatine and Queen Elizabeth of Bohemia, the daughter of King James I.

His wife is a descendant of King Charles II and Barbara Palmer, 1st Duchess of Cleveland, as well a descendant of King Charles II via his daughter by Moll Davies. She is also a descendant of Francesco I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany.

Just "one of us"??? Aye, right!!

Let's not let the Tories inflict their old party values back on the rest of us. They've always been the enemy! Even more than Blair!

11

Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 18/02/2007 12:22:43

The Tory leader is attempting to spin the same line as the privileged and privately educated Tony Blair! It might work but then again he has to face a son of the manse, and actutality of a real politician: Gordon Brown! I wonder if the voters will allow themselves to fooled twice? Lachie Todd

12

Lynn,

Madison, Wisconsin, USA 18/02/2007 21:19:59

Awwww.

13

Dougie, Edinburgh,

18/02/2007 23:11:02

It seems Dennis Skinner thinks it's acceptable to criticise and insult people because of the background they're born in to.

14

Ari_1965,

Woodbury, MN USA 19/02/2007 03:09:04

I don't think it's his background that is the problem here. It's the lying about it. Why not say, "I was fortunate to be a child of privilege, and I want to work to improve life for others." Instead, he hides facts and tries to rewrite his personal history in order to get support and votes. What else will he lie about?

15

Mrs Numpty,

19/02/2007 09:31:34

Surley with a name like Cameron he just has to be Scottish.

16

barn,

Glasgow 19/02/2007 23:09:26

What is wrong where he went to school? So they guys educated...surely that makes him more able to govern well!!!!!

I find it sad that some people's main arguements against him is where he went to school. It should be a meritocracy and whomever would do the best job should be elected.

17

barn,

Glasgow 19/02/2007 23:15:11

PS-Most people who go to public school are there not because their parents are born rich, but becuase their parents work long hours doing boring jobs to earn money to pay for their children to go. Why is that a problem for some people...

My own parents grew up in poverty, in a really awful area. But they made sure I was well brough up and educated...why is that such a problem?

We should build a strong economy, manage our public services better and use the increaced revenue from a strong economy to encourage small business and better public services. But thats not whats happening under Labour...


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.