Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Canada's 2014 bid in disarray

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 March 2007
GLASGOW'S bid to win the Commonwealth Games in 2014 has been handed a massive boost by its main rival, whose campaign is on the brink of imploding.
Organisational faults and political squabbles have surfaced in Halifax, Nova Scotia, with city councillors saying they will not support a final bid if the cost rises well above the original $785million budget, as is expected. With the other contender
, Abuja in Nigeria, conceding that Glasgow is ahead in the race, Scotland's biggest city now appears to be warm favourite to win the 2014 Games.

The public rows over Halifax's bid caused the Premier of Nova Scotia province, Rodney MacDonald, to warn the warring factions to keep quiet or risk damaging the bid.

"These types of discussions are better behind closed doors," said MacDonald. "We have to make sure through this whole process, that we don't hurt the bid process by being out there with too much talking about it, talking about numbers that may or may not be accurate."

MacDonald was speaking after councillors openly speculated that the Halifax bidding process - itself costed at $14.3m - would be cancelled if the final projected cost of the Games rises to more than $1.3 billion, as has been widely reported in Canada.

But Premier MacDonald himself sparked a row when he was reported as saying: "I'm not willing to break the bank to host [the Games]," and both he and Halifax's Mayor Peter Kelly called on the Canadian federal government to increase their promised contribution of $400m.

That prompted Canada's federal secretary of state for sport, Helena Guergis, to issue a stinging reply: "To be all of a sudden asked to be increasing that amount when the province and the city haven't put their financial contribution on the table is rather strange."

Glasgow, Halifax and Abuja must file their final bid documents with the Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) by May 9, with the final decision being taken by the CGF in November. Last month, a senior official in the Abuja bid said Glasgow was ahead after the Nigerian city experienced serious problems - including an outbreak of illness - at the recent All-African games in the city.

By CGF rules, neither Glasgow or Abuja can comment on Halifax's problems, but Glasgow's organisers are quietly jubilant at the highly-public political rows in Canada - unanimity of political backing is now seen as a pre-requisite for any major events bid.

The Halifax bid, meanwhile, has also hit a major organisational snag. It was recently discovered that there is not enough suitable land for the stadium and athletes' village planned for Shannon Park in the Dartmouth area of the city, and Halifax Regional Municipality is carrying out a frantic search for more land in the vicinity.

The municipality and the federal and regional governments also ordered independent consultants to review the costs of the bid after a proposed budget was passed to them in secret early last month. As a result, a meeting of Halifax councillors to decide on their support for the final bid has been put back to March 20.

Public support for the bid has declined from 79% to 72% according to a recent opinion poll, while the Halifax Bid Committee's failure to finalise costs has lost it the unanimous political support it previously enjoyed in the city.

"More than likely, barring unforeseen circumstances, the bid is dead," Councillor Andrew Younger told the Halifax Daily News, itself ironically one of the founding partners of the bid.

"What I'm hearing is there are a lot of people on council that are fed up with the bid committee and their attitude towards the council."

Halifax's main problem has always been the lack of a suitable outdoor stadium. Sources in Canada say a lot of the problems have arisen because of "politicking" over the facilities, with the city and provincial leaders trying to get the federal government to pay more for these developments.

Premier MacDonald said the Canadian Government had invested in larger cities such as Vancouver and Calgary, and Halifax should be "treated on an equal footing". But, according to one source in Nova Scotia, the fear is that the city, province and country will end up with "a Montreal-type situation", a reference to the 1976 Olympic Games which lost $2b - the final payment on the city's Olympic debt was only paid last year.

Deborah Hashey, director of communications for Halifax 2014, said the various negative comments "in no way" reflected the commitment of the three levels of government, but were part of "a negotiating process" between the three funding partners.

"It could have been done earlier, but we came to the whole process later than Glasgow and Abuja because of the competition between Canadian cities to make the bid," said Hashey.

Glasgow's bid, meanwhile, will be the centrepiece of the first-ever National Events Conference which will take place in the city's Royal Concert Hall on Tuesday. In a keynote speech, Glasgow's bid director Derek Casey will tell 300 delegates of the progress made to date.

EventScotland chief executive David Williams, who leaves his post on March 30 to return home to Australia for family reasons, praised the Glasgow bid team yesterday.

"I am very optimistic that we will win it," said Williams. "Glasgow is already doing a fantastic job in regenerating the city, and the developments at Kelvingrove Art Galleries and the SECC area are world class. Put the games on top of this and the city will have the confidence to do what Brisbane did in 1982, when the Commonwealth Games were the catalyst for it becoming the fastest-growing city in the country."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 March 2007 11:54 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Commonwealth Games
 
1

rpb,

04/03/2007 05:54:08

Who is going to pay for this?

Given the fuss over the extreme costs of the olympics, I for one do not want to pick up the tab for this overblown ridiculous event that only exists to give lesser places a lot of medals because they can't beat US/Russia/Europe in other competitions.

As per the hit that Londoners must take, if Glasgow (or is that Glasgow politicians?) wants this, then Glasgow must pay.

Living in the North I fail to see why my life will be improved with yet more subsidy going to central Scotland by vile MSPs.

2

Bruce DeVenne,

Halifax Nova Scotia 04/03/2007 14:14:08

Premier MacDonald's provincial government, as recently as Saturday, warned Nova Scotians about possible service cuts and or tax hikes to offset a $79,000,000 transfer of funds cut from the federal governmtnt. If we can't easily absorb that amount how can we afford the billions that building, securing, staging and maintaining the games facilities after the fact will cost?

3

Victor Matthews,

Dartmouth Nova Scotia 05/03/2007 16:02:57

First off the Halifax Regional Municipality is not classed as a city by the piorvince of Nova Scotia in fact that no such a thing as a city in Nova Scotia they were changed to "Regional Municipalities" in 1996 . Datmouth which is in the Halifax Regional Municipality is a community . Also to note there 188 other communities beside Halifax and Dartmouth many which are rural according the halifax Regional Municipality website . All of them distinguish themselves from Halifax . The HRM mostly refers to the municipal level in the former area of the Cities of Halifax and Dartmouth and the former town of Bedford and former county of Halifax .

As for the games there is really too much information not told about the cost to judge that the Halifax Regional Municipality can afford such an event . what is known the cost of it should shared by all levels of government . But if we a provincial government who cannot afford to fix the roads and a federal government who cannot afford to buy fuel for th navy . Then before we have the game than government should prioritize spending where it needed the most

4

Hali1985,

Halifax, NS 05/03/2007 20:38:52

I just thought it would be interesting to point out that our media here in Halifax have been reporting about this article and to be honest, I think it’s great. There is no way we can afford these games. I’m with Victor, our government needs to prioritize spending where it is needed the most. My only hope is that our government does not put anymore money into a bid that’s going cost tax payers millions. Good luck Glasgow

5

Cimar Math Thu?,

Halifax 06/03/2007 14:44:45

It is very unfortunate that a event such as the Commonwealth Games is going to be mired down in negative press on all fronts. Should the Commonwealth Games come to Halifax? I tend to support the concept, however given the shroud of secrecy that our civic leaders and bid committee have been standing behind, it's no wonder the tax payers are questioning whether or not we should even commit to it.

For instance, the Mayor of Halifax has been a key supporter of the event and has been working closely with the organizing committee and so he should, however, he publicly states that he does not know what the final cost will be. Wait a second, sitting on the bid committee is the Mayor's Chief Administrative Officer and the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer whose role is to represent the council and he declares that he does not know the cost of the games!!?? With a pending civic election, the mayor is now playing politics with the issue that he once so publiclly supported but is now "blowing and sucking" at the same time. Then again this is the same mayor who was unaware that Glasgow already has key sports infrastucture in place like Parkhead, Ibrox and Hampden Park!

I think Halifax can put together a solid product and based upon the previous successes acheived by Fred MacGillivray (Chair of the Halifax Bid Committee) on previous World Class Events he attracted to Halifax, I would think that this event would be a success as well.

If there are any flaws to the Halifax bid I think is that it lacked a solid communication strategy or if they did have one, they did not execute properly.

In the "Big Picture" scheme of things, the Commonwealth Games would be the catylst for a strong future in Halifax and Nova Scotia and we need this sort of kick start, but the economics of mortaging our future generations has to be included as well.

All the noise that you folks in Scotland have been hearing about is just that...noise. I think

6

jim jones,

Georgeotown Guyanna 07/03/2007 06:14:46

Well who is to blame in Halifax the Free Press that was a cornerstone of the original premier of the province
Joseph Howe or a Premier who believes this bid should be only talked about behind closed doors because debate in public might hurt the bid.

It was apparent that the federal Tories laid down the gauntlet for the Nova Scotia and HRM governments.
A committee and a politican makes absolutely no friends with the press by surpressing information that should be in the public domain .

Why does a career bureaucrat like Scott Logan to tell the peoples representative what to do and how to conduct meetings in a government house.

This bid is emploding not because the press is reporting. it is emploiting because it cant be held up as a real bid when the numbers made available are at best a fantasy and at worst a smoke screen to the real costs.

If this was such a great idea then fred mac gillivray would get off the most expensive child booster seat in the world he is sitting on in the office of the WTC.
600,000 dollars was spent on a feasibility study for Halifax bid for the 2010 commonwealth games yet
we pay for another study while Fast Freddie denies access to the 2002 study.

If it was good news and viable Fast freddie would be crowing on the top of citidel hill singing the phrases of have mass viewing for the results.

jim jones


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.