Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Labour officials face charges over secret loans as Levy allies protest at 'scapegoating'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 March 2007
SENIOR Labour officials face charges over their handling of millions of pounds in secret loans gathered to help the stricken party fight the last election, it emerged last night.
Scotland Yard detectives are considering bringing "specimen charges" against the officials over allegations that they broke funding laws over their management of some of the loans accepted from 12 wealthy backers.

Members of the 'cash-for-honours
' inquiry team are still focusing on the question of whether the loans were offered at a commercial rate of interest, dictated by the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (PPERA) 2000 - and whether they were paid back.

A source close to the inquiry said the proposed charges would be in addition to expected actions in relation to alleged breaches of honours regulations and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

He also warned that the police report was expected with prosecutors by the end of the month, with a decision on any charges shortly after - raising the prospect of Labour figures being officially charged during the final days of the party's campaign to win the Holyrood elections on May 3.

Scotland on Sunday also understands that, following a wave of complaints from friends of Labour fundraiser Lord Levy, the Prime Minister last week ordered aides not to "brief" against the peer, who has become a focus for the investigation.

The declaration that Levy would not be "hung out to dry" underlines growing anxiety within the party over the possibility that he might "implode" amid the pressure being heaped upon him.

Labour-supporting tycoon Sir Alan Sugar warned that a wave of stories regarding Levy's role in drawing up a list of nominations for honours suggested he was being made "a scapegoat". The intervention followed a complaint that Levy, Blair's tennis partner, was being left "twisting in the wind".

Levy last night fuelled fears he was about to turn against the Labour Party after telling friends he was furious at the lack of public support from senior ministers.

A Cabinet minister close to Blair's chief fundraiser, Levy was incensed at the failure of the Labour establishment to rally to his defence.

"He feels that he has given the party everything," the minister said. "He's helped raise between £60m and £80m for us - and without that money we might well not be in government - and yet people are not standing by him.

"He feels badly let down, not so much by Blair but others who he feels could be showing a bit more public support right now."

Downing Street has tried desperately hard in recent days to reassure Levy that he is not being made a scapegoat as the year-long police inquiry draws to a close.

The peer has been arrested by police and questioned under suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in the course of their investigation into whether honours were sold for cash.

The only other member of Blair's inner circle to have been arrested is Ruth Turner, who was questioned under suspicion of perverting the course of justice.

The police investigation into allegations that honours were being sold was launched last year. But it has switched focus to allegations of a cover-up, with the BBC being temporarily banned from reporting concerns expressed by a Downing Street aide about Levy's role in drawing up the Honours List.

It emerged that Turner had sent an internal document to Jonathan Powell, Blair's chief of staff alleging that she was being pressured by Levy to "shape" her evidence to police.

Another aide, Blair's political secretary John McTernan, is said to have given police details of a meeting to discuss peerage nominations at which Levy lobbied for Labour donors.

Yitzchak Schochet, a rabbi at the Mill Hill Synagogue which Levy attends, Sir Alan Sugar and David Rowan, editor of the Jewish Chronicle, have all rallied to his defence in recent days.

"There is a general feeling, and it is increasingly sensitive, that this is all about 'get the Jew'. I do not play the anti-Semitic card. But within my immediate community, and the Jewish community generally, they are sensitive to the fact that this is becoming all about one Jew," Schochet said.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 March 2007 8:19 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Cash for Honours Scandal
 
1

Bill, Dunblane,

11/03/2007 01:48:32

Ferrets in a sack!

Don't know 'bout the rest of you, but I AM enjoying this.

Payback time, in more ways than one.

Coming to a prime minister near you! - Don't miss it!

2

Mallory,

11/03/2007 05:10:19

Any court cases will produce some interesting defences. However this and allied stories have much further to run....

3

Ubi,

Edinburgh 11/03/2007 08:36:22

Is he still Blair's tennis partner ?

4

Jeeemy,

11/03/2007 09:23:30

Ubi# yup it's love all,
but as the usual Political Parties, do not think any law applies to them.
Taxi, Buckie,Rent, and back tax's or was that a "Computer failure" again.

5

BlairSupporter,

UK 11/03/2007 10:26:02

"Innocent until and unless proven guilty", folks?

What a sad judgemental country we have become. And if the "specimen charges" - petty, silly and unnecessary - are the only substantive ones, does anyone then hang out Yates to dry? Nope. Thought not.

I still support THIS prime minister, and I for one will not be brainwashed or intimidated into believing that this country is a backwater of democracy or political integrity. That's patently RUBBISH!

Google- Keep Tony Blair For PM.

6

BK,

Cyberspace 11/03/2007 10:42:15

We all know who the real criminal is in this affair, but he is Teflon coated, so notjing sticks.

7

Mrs. Trellis,

Devon 11/03/2007 13:01:54

1 Bill..Yes, sadly " Ferrets in a sack" !!

Elsewhere I read that the CPS, ( having now received a file), will not be likely be able to come to a decision regarding final charges if any for about another " two months"??. which I think is a bit too convenient,isn't it?. As it will let the biggest ferret out the bag. The ramifications of which will also certainly totally destroy the current honours system, as TB will then be still able to award himself and all his chums, peerages, which, (unlike knighthoods), can't be taken away from them. Hmm
One other thing is apparent in the reports today, that one of the leakers has an overview of ALL the various emailed evidence, which if true? probably lays the leaking responsibility on the police or the CPS..if so, this "entertainment" would really descend into a theatrical farce in the courts..All we will need then is a good supply of custard pies for the lawyers to throw at one another,.. just to complete the debacle!

Mrs. T

8

James,

Dundee 11/03/2007 13:53:23

#6
Blair is a WAR criminal as well as a cheap tart to the establishment.

Labour my a**e

9

Alexander,

edinburgh 11/03/2007 14:31:58

6. BlairSupporter,
"I still support THIS prime minister"
You must feel lonely!

10

Alexander,

edinburgh 11/03/2007 14:34:32

The Blair legacy
Bernie Ecclestone, "free" holidays, Iraq and cash for peerages.

11

Derick fae Yell,

11/03/2007 18:54:39

Nice to see Bliar and co get a doing, but would be better if they were in the cells at the Hague

But West Dunbartonshire Labour's disintegration is good fun too.

Google 'Dumbarton' and 'Lennox' which will bring you to the Lennox Herald and all the (alleged) toe-sucking, wheelchair bashing, glory of West Dunbartonshire Labour. GREAT!

Please don't compare this lot to ferrets. Unfair to ferrets!!

12

iRoy,

12/03/2007 01:54:17

The worst thing about this whole situtation in the constant use of the word 'loan'.

These are donations by the backdoor. Nobody expects this money to be paid back.

For a start how does a political party generate income to pay back loans of this magnitude? Obviously the subscriptions, and legitimate donations don't cover the costs that these parties throw at elections now so there is no new sources or revenue to pay back donors is there?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.