Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Response to Fife bird flu attacked

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 March 2007
SHOCKING failings in Scotland's preparations for dealing with an outbreak of bird flu have been laid bare in a report on the handling of the crisis sparked when a swan carrying the disease washed up on the Fife coast last year.
An internal 'debriefing' document obtained by Scotland on Sunday has revealed a series of shortcomings in the response to the emergency, beginning with the incorrect identification of the stricken bird and a day's delay in getting the crisis operatio
n off the ground.

It goes on to catalogue failings in areas ranging from organisation and communications to the entire health-protection operation established to guide and reassure the public.

The problems encountered when dealing with the impact of a single diseased bird raise serious concerns over the nation's ability to cope with a mass outbreak similar to the one that crippled the Bernard Matthews plant in Norfolk last month.

Scotland's public health authorities were criticised last year over the eight-day delay in confirming that a dead swan found lying on the harbour slipway at Cellardyke last March had been suffering from the deadly H5N1 strain of the avian flu virus.

But the 'Fife Avian Influenza Incident - Debriefing Report', compiled by Health Protection Scotland (HPS) after consultation with a range of health and emergency organisations involved in the Scottish incident, reveals the full scale of the organisational problems.

The seven-page document lists a series of failings, including the following:

• Expert vets mistook the dead whooper swan for a mute swan, which is native to Scotland;

• The delay in experts alerting authorities to a potential bird flu incident - meaning that the huge public health response wasn't mounted until a day late;

• The failure to activate the HPS's Major Incident Plan;

• Organisational failings, meaning the crisis team didn't have a board room from which they could direct the operation. Technical failures left a number of people out of key meetings held via teleconference links;

• Problems in communicating crucial information to key organisations - for example, health agencies didn't know the bird had been confirmed as H5N1 until they saw a newsflash on BBC News 24;

• Officials did not know where and how to handle crucial follow-up blood samples from those at risk of infection through contact with the swan;

• Chaos caused by too many official organisations providing the public with information on the disease, as well as the inconsistency of that advice.

The public health authorities charged with managing Scotland's bird flu crisis faced criticism in the weeks immediately after the swan was found, over a series of delays at a time when speed of action was at a premium.

Experts and Cellardyke residents registered their concern that the bird was allowed to remain in the village for several days.

St Andrews University technician Tina Briscoe, who contacted police after spotting the dead bird - which had already been partly eaten by other animals - was first told to ring the RSPCA.

She said: "I would have expected a quicker reaction, particularly because in the tidal water it could have been washed away or cats could have picked on it."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 March 2007 8:21 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Bird flu
 
1

lisa,

perth 11/03/2007 08:36:25

Can't comment on much of this, but the reference to operational accommodation is not correct.

The SEERAD office at Broxden in Perth has a whole floor set aside for emergencies like foot and mouth and bird flu. It is kept permanently empty and I am told it is equipped with desks, filing cabinets, telecommunications equipment and a couple of fridges for the milk (if it is safe to drink!!). The rooms were available when the swan was found at Cellardyke but I don't know if they were used.

2

AD,

rainy Livingston 11/03/2007 14:48:41

"St Andrews University technician Tina Briscoe, who contacted police after spotting the dead bird - which had already been partly eaten by other animals - was first told to ring the RSPCA....."

Apart from anything else - the RSPCA don't even operate in Scotland!!!!!!

3

ignorant townie?,

Scotland 12/03/2007 10:02:50

Still cant believe the point number one!!...Fife is full of birdwatchers....or a call to the local police wildlife liaison officer would have sorted this out about the swan's identity.

...this attitude however is also prevalent in scotland's justice system...use real bird experts as you would a real forensic expert in any other area...

a bit of work on the plumage of this bird and you could possibly tell what its age was and where it came from...

4

SusanF,

Scotland 12/03/2007 15:14:02

The bird was partially decomposed, had no head and little tail. These are the features used to distinguish between these breeds. It was necessary to use the differences between internal organs and DNA. There are not too many people lurking around who are experts in determining the difference between half carcasses of dead swans.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.