Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hillary counts on old pals act

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 January 2008
HILLARY Clinton is using an old pals act to win the presidential nomination, a political manoeuvre which is threatening to split the Democrats and leaving some members fearing it will ultimately see them lose another election.
Clinton has inflated her numbers by calling on so-called Super Delegates, many of whom are close friends and colleagues. Like normal delegates, they vote to decide the presidential candidate at the summer convention, but unlike other delegates they a
re not elected. Instead they are appointed by the party top brass – who are overwhelmingly in Clinton's pocket.

Some Democrats fear a repeat of 1984, when Special Delegates gave party loyalist Walter Mondale victory over the younger, more radical Gary Hart.

This time, though, the stakes are higher. "We really need change, we need a new generation of leaders," says Patricia Horotan, a 36-year-old Democrat Party member in New York who plans to vote for Obama. "If Obama gets the most votes, and Hillary beats him by using her Super Delegates, there's going to be a riot."

The first two primary elections have seen Clinton win 24 candidates to send to the summer national convention, as against 25 for Barack Obama. But with the primary election less than two weeks old, 159 Super Delegates have aligned themselves to Clinton, three times as many as have declared for Obama, leaving him worse off than before the primary season started.

To put it in perspective, even if Obama won a clean sweep in the two biggest primary states in the union, California and New York, he would still not equal Clinton's present total.

It is a conundrum that highlights Clinton's grip on the Democratic Party leadership.

"Hillary Clinton has a near-lock on the Democratic establishment," says Thomas Edsall, a commentator with the Huffington Post, an influential politics website. "Clinton people are embedded in crucial positions."

When Bill Clinton stepped down as President in 2000, he ensured former government officials got plum jobs in the Democratic Party apparatus.

As a result, his influence, and that of his wife, is vast. The two key Democratic think-tanks are in Clinton hands, with Brookings Institute run by his former assistant secretary of state, Strobe Talbot, and the Centre for American Progress run by his former chief of staff, John Podesta. Meanwhile, Clinton's former chief-of-staff, Howard Wolfson, is a prominent figure in Glover Park, the biggest Democratic Party PR agency.

And then there are the lobbyists. Since Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff was convicted in 2006 of channelling millions of dollars from the gambling industry into congressional pockets, lobbyists have a bad name in America.

Yet Clinton has surrounded herself with some of the most influential lobbyists in Washington, starting with her current chief-of-staff, Mark Penn, who once lobbied Congress on behalf of Microsoft and the nuclear power industry.

The key to Clinton's success is her husband Bill, who has come out of the shadows to act as conductor for her campaign. "Right now we have the Clinton three-ring circus," says Carl Bernstein, author of a book on Hillary Clinton. "This is about the restoration of the Clintons to the White House."

But many inside the Democratic Party are uneasy. Some worry about opinion polls that show Clinton to be too divisive among Middle America to win a presidential race, with Obama more likely to win the crucial middle ground. "Clinton offers a very bitter polarising brand of politics. A lot of people (in the party] are sick of the way politics has been the last 15 years," says Philip Klein, a writer for The American Spectator magazine. "But there is a fear of retribution if they don't get behind the Clintons – the Clintons are known for being very vindictive."

One man who braved the brickbats this week was John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic Party candidate, who came off the fence to announce his support for the Obama campaign. Kerry is unlikely to set the Obama campaign on fire, but he will provide some ballast in the form of a party heavyweight willing to break ranks.

Obama, shut out of much of the Democratic machine, has appealed over the heads of party chiefs, finding a large constituency among the grassroots of the party. He has also garnered support from Hollywood and, most crucial of all, from America's top chat-show host, Oprah Winfrey.

But endorsements and a majority of voters will not be enough if Clinton chooses to play the Special Delegate card.

Three key figures with an arm-lock on the party

BILL CLINTON

The pin-up boy of the Democrats, his two terms as president in the Nineties is remembered as a golden age for the party. He has taken care to put key allies in important seats of power within the Democratic establishment, propelling his wife to the presidential candidacy.

HOWARD WOLFSON

Hillary Clinton's communications director was head of the New York office of Glover Park Group, the PR agency favoured by the Democrats. His wife, Terri, is chief-of-staff to the leader of the House Democrats in Congress, Nancy Pelosi, and his clients include Rupert Murdoch's news empire.

MARK PENN

Hillary Clinton's chief strategist is one of the most sought-after lobbyists in Washington. He is to Hillary Clinton what election guru Karl Rove was to George Bush. But his PR client list has raised eyebrows among Democrats as it contains firms the party has campaigned against, including tobacco giant Philip Morris and pharmaceutical companies. Democratic candidate John Edwards criticised Penn for allowing a subsidiary of his company to represent Blackwater, the American mercenary organisation involved in the shooting of civilians in Baghdad, but Hillary Clinton has made no protest.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Trevor,

13/01/2008 00:43:24
I'm a little hacked off at the tone of this article. Hillary has been a stalwart of the Democratic movement for decades - presumably that should count for something? The chances of Obama winning California and New York are fairly slight at the moment so I can't see it being an issue anyway.

Hillary for President :-)
2

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 13/01/2008 02:17:26
Ron Paul for President,
3

,

13/01/2008 05:32:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

El Sabio,

South Africa 13/01/2008 08:49:58
I am not black but Obama would have my vote if I were an American. He brings new ideas and hope.

Hilary and company just want the power. She sounds hollow.
5

El Sabio,

South Africa 13/01/2008 08:52:48
If Clinton is chosen then vote for John McCain
6

Reckless,

Fife 13/01/2008 09:15:36
New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1601

Did Hillary Really Win New Hampshire?
In New Hampshire, 81 per cent of the voting was done in towns and cities that had purchased optical scan machines from the Diebold Election Systems (now called Premiere Election Solutions), a division of Diebold Corp., a company founded by and still linked to wealthy right-wing investors. In those towns, all voting was done on the devices, called Accuvote machines, which read paper ballots completed by voters who use pens or pencils to fill in little ovals next to the candidate of their choice. The ballots are then fed into, read, and tallied by the machines. The other 19 per cent of voting was done in towns that had opted not to use the machine, and to use hand-counted paper ballots instead.

The machine tally was Clinton 39.6 per cent, Obama 36.3 per cent - fairly close to the final outcome. But the hand-counted ballot count broke significantly differently: Clinton 34.9 per cent, Obama 38.6 per cent.
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1641

7

Finnking,

Lempäälä 13/01/2008 09:47:59
Reckless

Aye, it's amazing. This is the "democracy" that Bush, Clinton et al promote around the world. IE encourage local elites to fix elections and keep the local herd in the dark via their media; mushrooms: in dark and fed a diet of bull.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-341875033389250589

Here's Reporters Without Borders reporting on press freedom in the world. It shows that the US citizen is kept in the dark about foreign news.

http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/rapport_en_bd-4.pdf

Moi!
8

Finnking,

Lempäälä 13/01/2008 09:50:42
Reckless

Oops, wrong link. Try:

http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=24025
9

ddmc,

13/01/2008 10:15:58
Ron Paul, the only one who seems sane !
10

,

13/01/2008 12:49:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Biker,

Ayr 13/01/2008 12:50:17
Nancy. I think the comment that Clintons were only in it for the power is missguided. After all when Bill Clinton left power, the economy was healthy and robust. I firmly believe that Hillary and her quest for healthcare is the correct way to proceed.
Finnking old mate, good to see you back online!!
12

,

13/01/2008 12:54:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

13/01/2008 12:57:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Regret,

US 13/01/2008 15:04:21
Hillary scares me. It's time for change in the US - but time for GOOD change. I think John Edwards was the ONE who started talking about change being needed and Washington needed changed for the better. Any change coming from Hillary, I sense would be BAD for the people - that type of change is usually called: Reform. Edwards is right: the people need to take their country back - but will the people listen to good advice?
15

Sandi,

San Diego 13/01/2008 17:28:42
#14, you're right. John Edwards IS the one. He is the only one that would truly bring significant change. He is the one who would make sure that our laws were written by elected Members of Congress, not lobbyists from energy companies or drug companies. Of course, because he is so vocal about limiting the power of corporations and big business generally, they make sure he gets little media time. After all, the media is owned by mega corporations.

Obama may have lots of good ideas, but many of them were copied from John Edwards. Edwards has defined national policy for the Democrats, the others have all copied him to some extent or another.

If John Edwards drops out before my State's primary on Feb. 5, my vote will go to Hillary. She is much too "corporate" in my view, but Obama is no better. Hillary at least has been around the block enough to know when to tell them to shove it. Obama is still learning and kissing up. Obama talks about "change" all the time, but there is no history of actually doing much to make change happen. Hillary has that experience.

#13 Finnking, yes the Congress had something to do with it. However, until a year ago, George W. Bush, a Republican, had a Republican Congress with enough of a majority to pass anything it wanted. Between them they have destroyed this country's finances and our reputation. Bill Clinton worked successfully with a Congress dominated by his political enemies and managed to leave the country in a pretty good state. No president is perfect, most are far from it, but Bill Clinton was not bad.
16

Pilrig.,

Livingston 13/01/2008 18:11:46
5 - he's had his chips !
17

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 13/01/2008 19:02:23
if the economy does well or poorly, then it is frequently somewhat independent of the current leaders in government. the policies that affect the economy negatively or positively are long-term policies and enacted long before the current government. but I will admit that the economy was good under clinton. The government in the 1990's contributed to this by keeping spending growth down. The economy was programmed to go bad with the dollar being too valuable especially relating to the currency of china, combined with the trade treaties. Also, believe it or not the actions of the financial industries have a huge effect on our economy.

here's a nice video about the Ron Paul Limo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pN49GfdXpbs&eurl=http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=70813

18

henrymanchester,

UK 13/01/2008 19:47:46
Ozzy Osbourne for president!
19

msspurlock,

Reality 13/01/2008 20:14:50
As it always is with the liberals, THE FIX IS IN.
20

,

13/01/2008 20:32:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta... captured Mexican territory 1845 13/01/2008 21:24:43
Hilary Clinton for US Pres.

At least she doesn't go about calling herself an "European-American.

She is an American and answers to that...

Just like Barak Obama is an American but refuses to answer to that.

So as a true racist Obama calls himself an "African - American...while he is really an American.

If this racist gets elected, "Watch out America", we are in for a Tsunami of racism across our nation.

Not good for America , not good for the World

GC
22

,

13/01/2008 22:05:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Pelon,

New Mexico, Gov. Bill Richardson's state 13/01/2008 22:14:53
Hillary stands a significant chance of being elected the next POTUS, and she will be elected by some voting for her, but for all the wrong reasons. Other votes for her will be true and fair.

We often vote for the "least offensive" candidate, or the "nicest candidate", disregarding content we hardly understand, or understand all too well.

Our national POTUS track record is ALL MALE, ALL WHITE, and predominantly PROTESTANT. Our country is being given an opportunity to grow out of adolescence. It's a wonderful time to be alive!
24

,

13/01/2008 22:29:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.