Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Irish legal threat to Salmond's alcohol reduction plan

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 March 2009
THE Irish drinks industry is preparing to go to court in an attempt to block Alex Salmond's plans to tackle Scotland's drink problem.
The Irish Spirits Association has taken legal advice, seeking to stop the Scottish Government imposing a minimum price on booze.

The ISA believes the plan violates EU law and is looking at challenging the legislation in the European Court of Justi
ce in Luxembourg.

The fear is that Salmond's plans will result in sales of Irish whiskey and other spirits plummeting in the UK.

Yesterday Aoife Clarke, a senior executive with the ISA, said: "

We have a product we can sell on the UK market at an attractive price but with this minimum pricing we will lose the ability to sell. We have lawyers looking at this and looking at how we can try and prevent this happening in Scotland."

The ISA has also been advised by the Scotch Whisky Association, which claims that European Court of Justice cases going back 30 years have demonstrated that minimum alcohol retail prices violate EU law.

In 1978, the Court of Justice ruled that minimum retail prices for spirits were illegal, because they would prevent imported products from having the chance to compete with domestic products on the basis that they cost less.

The UK market is the fourth biggest in the world for Irish whiskey. The US is the biggest, commanding 21% of Irish whiskey exports. The Irish domestic market is the next largest at 14.2%, followed by France and the UK with 9.5%. each.

The ISA has calculated that the liqueur Irish Meadow Cream would rise from £3.47 to £4.06 a bottle – a 17% increase, while Boru Vodka would suffer a 14% hike, rising from £9.19 to £10.50.

Jamie Fortescue, director general of the European Spirits Organisation, said: "

We certainly have concerns over the legality of what we've heard so far. Minimum pricing does not exist anywhere else in the EU. Foreign spirits could lose their competitive advantage, because there will be a trade barrier.

"If a country like Scotland, which produces one of the most famous spirits in the world, is seen to be creating trade barriers – that could have a retaliatory effect."

David Williamson of the Scotch Whisky Association said: "Our concern is that (a trade barrier] would encourage discriminatory treatment of Scotch whisky overseas."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 March 2009 7:30 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Alcohol & binge drinking
 
1

,

22/03/2009 00:20:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Edward,

22/03/2009 01:25:19
Yet another anti SNP,anti Salmond Story, this paper is just a Labour mouthpiece
3

Edward,

22/03/2009 01:25:38
Independence cant come quick enough!
4

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 22/03/2009 02:04:57
Still I've heard nothing from Labour about what they believe. I know they're against the SNP but what is their policy on reducing alcohol consumption? Is it the same wait and see policy we currently have from them regarding Council Tax 2 and PPP/PFI?
5

Hamish MacBeth,

NZ 22/03/2009 03:45:53
More Unionist sh!t!
6

,

22/03/2009 06:59:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Walter Ego,

Durness 22/03/2009 07:32:39
Of course the SNP's plans breach Euro law - but they should press on regardless.
8

Myke Wylson,

22/03/2009 08:01:01
This is not an anti-SNP story, the over enthusiastic SNP supporters should stick to complaining about the hundreds that are. Don't dilute the message.

This is actually just the other side of the coin from the Government's position. I back the ISA and the SWA on this one.
9

,

22/03/2009 09:13:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Thisisross,

scotlanc 22/03/2009 09:48:55
Oh for goodness sake.
1) The Scottish Government hasn't even said what the minimum price per unit would be, so how can they claim their vodka would "suffer" a 14% price hike?

2) Minimum prices are illegal if the companies selling the products collude to set one, in order to boost profits. However it is perfectly legal for Governments to use minimum pricing for certain objectives, such as public health.

3) They're concerned about creating a 'trade barrier', but there already are trader barriers. Any form of licensing regime is itself a trade barrier, as it places restrictions on how you can sell alcohol.

4)Is it just a coincidence that it is only the various drinks companies, supermarkets etc - the people who have a vested commercial interest in preserving Scotland's serious alcohol problem - are the ones who keep claiming this is illegal?

The most disappointing things is that these claims are continuously printed, but people like the BMA, the Association of Chief Police Officers, the Chief Medical Officer etc are all ignored. Why? Because "Experts claim Government policy is legal and will reduce alcohol consumption" doesn't sell as many papers.
11

Publius,

Girvan 22/03/2009 10:04:48
#10 Thisisross

"The Scottish Government hasn't even said what the minimum price per unit would be"

If it is 50p per unit (as suggested for England) the minimum price for a 70 cl bottle of whisky at 40 per cent ABV would be 14 pounds. There are some quite good whiskies at 11 or 12 pounds, so it would be a big increase and it would damage the Scotch whisky industry as well as Irish whiskey and vodka.
12

ExpatNL,

glasgow 22/03/2009 10:16:15
#11 Publius

When you say:
"a big increase and it would damage the Scotch whisky industry as well as Irish whiskey and vodka."

Would that be because there would be less whisky and vodka being sold after minimum pricing was introduced?

I thought that was the whole point in bringing in the legislation.
13

Publius,

Girvan 22/03/2009 11:22:00
#12 ExpatNL


Sorry not to reply before. The SonS server is very slow today.

The problem with minimum pricing is that it will have unintended consequences. Cheap vodka (much drunk by women binge drinkers) is usually bottled at 37.5 percent ABV. At 50p per unit a 70 cl bottle would cost 13 pounds 13p. Buckfast (allegedly much drunk by underage drinkers) is bottled at 15 per cent APV. At 50p per unit 70 cl would cost 5 pounds 25p.
Scotch whisky is required by law to be at least 40 percent ABV, so 70 cl would cost a minimum of 14 pounds.
Such a change could damage our own industry but encourage imports.

Scotch whisky is never bottled at less than 40 per cent ABV so it would cost 14 pounds minimum.
14

Number 6,

Germany 22/03/2009 12:30:49
The SNP must stand firm on this most important policy.Why wont the other parties make their positions clear to the Scottish people ?

It seems we should just vote for them ,period. policies
seem to play no part in it.

Take it all the way to the European Courts if required. It's that important. Certainly more important than the Irish drinks industry.
15

Publius,

Girvan 22/03/2009 12:32:30
#15 Wardog™

Interesting post. If anything, you are reinforcing my argument.
I don't think 40 pence per unit will affect the price of alcopops much but it will push up the price of cheaper whiskies to a minimum of 11 pounds 20 pence per bottle.



16

Number 6,

Germany 22/03/2009 12:32:56
13 Wardog. excellent post !.
17

Myke Wylson,

22/03/2009 15:31:44
At least Nigel Griffiths has been on the job http://tinyurl.com/shaggingnigel
18

old copper,

dumfries 22/03/2009 15:35:03
The Irish, and anyone else concerned that an increase in the price of alcohol would result in a reduction in the consumption of that drug, should have no fear.

A substantial number of our citizens are now so addicted to alcohol, or consume it in such vast quantities, they will purchase it no matter what the price. Even moderate drinkers regard alcohol as the focal part of their social lives.

Sadly, it is at the very heart of our culture and is likely to continue to be there for the forseeable future.

So don't fret yourselves over there in the Emerald Isle. The inhabitants of Scotland will always welcome alcohol from any source.


19

Eve,

Scotland 22/03/2009 21:10:28
What does the Irish drinks industry think they are going to make their drinks more expencive than other producers of alcholic beverages?

Though it is an intersting thought, make the Scottish acholic drinks cheaper than the importaned stuff, it appears to work in Spain. But the clear problem here is that Scottish produced drinks aren't the likes of wine so wine would become more expencive than whisky. So that would be that idea gone.
20

watcher,

Edinburgh 23/03/2009 09:21:00
Another case of Salmond trying to rule like the Dictator he is.
21

Arfur,

23/03/2009 13:07:05
Give me a break. Its 40p per unit FGS i.e. £11.20 for a bottle of whisky. How many bottles of whisky sell for £11? S0d all worth drinking. The cheap sh|t is what the jakeys drink and thats what they are trying to out price.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.