Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


You can save a child's sight with just 50 pence

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 December 2007
SCOTLAND ON SUNDAY is today launching a Bring 50p to Work Day to raise thousands of pounds to help prevent blindness in developing countries.
You may download a 'Sightsavers 50 pence Friday' poster and supporting Sightsavers pamphlet here. (You will need Acrobat reader to open the pdf files.)
Companies and organisations, large and small, are being asked to take part in the Day on Friday, December 14, to provide much-needed funds for Sightsavers International.

The central message is that just 50p will help to treat a child suffering from trachoma, the second-biggest cause of preventable blindness in the world. Just £5 will help pay for an operation that reverses the most extreme form of the disease.

Last week, at the start of our Christmas Appeal, we reported from Tanzania, where, in some remote desert villages, up to half the population is affected by trachoma. The conjunctivitis-like infection is spread by flies, unsanitary conditions and a lack of water to wash the bacteria off faces and away from vulnerable eyes.

Yet trachoma can be treated with a tube of antibiotic ointment costing just 50p. If the disease is allowed to develop, the eyelids turn in on themselves and the eyelashes stick to the cornea. It is a painful and distressing condition that leads to total loss of vision.

Even then the condition, known as trichiasis, can be reversed by a 20-minute operation that restores vision, allowing its victims to lead a normal life. Adults who develop trichiasis (it often affects mothers and grandmothers charged with looking after infected children) are unable to carry out their family and village duties.

Jeremy Watson in Tanzania Part 2


< object id="mediaplayer" width="320" height="240" classid="clsid:22d6f312-b0f6-11d0-94ab-0080c74c7e95" style="float: center;">< param name="filename" value="http://multimedia.scotsman.com/enclosures/Sightsavers_videoii384K_Stream.wmv">< param name="showcontrols" value="true">< param name="showstatusbar" value="false">< param name="showdisplay" value="false">< param name="autostart" value="false">< embed type="application/x-mplayer2" src="http://multimedia.scotsman.com/enclosures/Sightsavers_videoii384K_Stream.wmv" name="mediaplayer" width="320" height="240" showcontrols="1" showstatusbar="0" showdisplay="0" autostart="0">< /embed>< /object>

See last week's video clip here

The problem is insufficient funding for the ointment and for training the surgeons required to carry out the operations. Around 20% of blindness in Tanzania is caused by trachoma, yet it can so easily be prevented.

Funds are also short for the health workers who travel to the most remote villages to spread the "wash your face daily" message that can make a huge difference to the spread of the disease. More financial support is also required for basic improvements to water supplies and sanitation - simple measures that will help to eliminate a disease that was largely wiped out in the developed world at the start of the 20th century.

In more accessible areas of Tanzania, where improvements have been made, rates of trachoma have fallen dramatically.

Money has been provided for building wells close to affected villages so that women do not have to make long journeys every day to fetch water for drinking. With water in such short supply, constantly washing children's faces in the dusty, arid conditions of the vast Tanzanian interior is not a priority.

In African countries where major health problems such as Aids suck up the health care budget, treatment of eye conditions - which are distressing but not life-threatening - is generally underfunded. As we report today (opposite), funds are also short for the spectacles that can help children with poor vision to lead normal lives.

With Sightsavers International, which has a fund-raising office for Scotland in Edinburgh, Scotland on Sunday has produced a poster and information sheet that can be downloaded from our website, www.scotlandonsunday.com.

It gives details of how to organise a Bring 50p to Work Day and how to donate any funds raised. Every company or organisation that takes part will be credited for their generosity in subsequent editions of the newspaper.

A number of major companies and organisations have already agreed to take part and we hope that many more will agree to join in before December 14.

The focus is 50p but please give more if you can. Bellshill-based IT company Cisco has already decided to double the amount raised by its employees. Hardeep Singh Kohli, Tom Brown and other Scotland on Sunday columnists are donating their fees this week. The HBOS Foundation, the charitable arm of the Bank of Scotland, has kickstarted the appeal with a £10,000 donation.

Last year, readers raised more than £30,000 for Sightsavers International eye care projects in west Africa, and this year we would like to beat that amount. If you would like to donate, please use the coupon printed on this page.

Next Sunday, we will launch our online auction which last year contributed thousands of pounds to the total. There will be a range of exciting lots to bid for, including having your name being used for a character in a new novel by Christopher Brookmyre, one of Scotland's best-selling fiction writers, a helicopter ride and lunch at a top hotel for four, a day at the Nick Nairn cookery school or a place at a Gordonstoun summer school.

• Read 'Bank's £10,000 gets appeal off to great start' here

Full details will be published next Sunday and the auction will conclude on Sunday, December 23.< hr/>

Scotland on Sunday Christmas Appeal -- Q&A
Wh

at does Sightsavers do?
Si
ghtsavers works with local partners to combat blindness in developing countries, restoring sight through specialist treatment and eye care. We also support people who are irreversibly blind by providing education, counselling and training. We help the people who need it most - those living in poverty in some of the world's poorest countries – by supporting the development of long-term projects.

Where will donations from the appeal go?
Do
nations made to the Scotland on Sunday Christmas Appeal will be spent wherever the need is greatest. Sightsavers works in over 30 developing countries throughout Africa, Asia and the Caribbean.

How much of the money raised by Sightsavers goes towards the projects it supports?
In
2006, 71.1% of expenditure went towards projects, which equated to £17.69m. The remaining money was spent on generating funds to support our work in the future and governance costs. For more information please see our 2006 Annual Review on our website.


What governance does Sightsavers have in place to ensure that monies raised from the appeal actually reach the people they are meant to help?
Si
ghtsavers works with local partner organisations who are as equally passionate about our mission and values as we are. They have strong links into the community and are committed to ensuring that the money is spent in the most effective way to support the poorest in the community.

All our partners are happy to engage in careful financial monitoring, with comprehensive measures in place to track expenditure. Sightsavers partners submit regular reports and accounts and are visited regularly by our country office staff as well as an independent audit team.

How does Sightsavers work to treat Trachoma?
Si
ghtsavers applies the WHO recommended SAFE strategy for combating trachoma - Surgery, Antibiotics, Face washing and Environment changes.

Sightsavers and its partners train community health workers to identify trachoma and also educate villagers on the signs of the infection. The antibiotic ointment, tetracycline, which costs just 50 pence a tube and is taken over a six week period, is effective in curing the disease and preventing the onset of trichiasis.

Where the disease has developed into trichiasis, following repeated infection and scarring of the cornea, surgery can prevent blindness by stopping the eyelashes from rubbing against the eyeball. This surgery is typically done at a community level by a specially trained health worker.

As well as training community health workers to identify trachoma, education amongst villagers plays a key role in prevention. Encouraging face and hand washing can help reduce transmission rates.

Lastly, to beat trachoma in the long term, communities are being encouraged to set up local sanitation committees to build latrines, separate their live stock from areas where people sleep, and ensure rubbish is collected and burnt regularly. This helps reduce the number of flies with which people come into contact with.

Is improving water sanitation for communities, like those featured in the appeal, an area Sightsavers has considered supporting? To date, funds have largely been focused on projects that aim to reduce the prevalence rates of trachoma in communities, and to identify and operate on those suffering from trichiasis before their blindness becomes irreversible.

However Sightsavers is also working in conjunction with partners, such as WaterAid and local governments to support schemes that provide clean water and sanitation for communities, implementing a critical part of the SAFE strategy.

Killa Virkan, a small village in Punjab, Pakistan is one such community where this is taking place. As well as focusing on community education, and intensive training of community health workers, Sightsavers has worked with local partners and local government to improve village infrastructure. Providing clean filtered water, along with building latrines, paving roads etc has improved village sanitation. Due to the success of the changes, in virtually eradicating trachoma, the project is now being rolled out to six other villages in the area over the next few months.

Does Sightsavers accept the donation of used spectacles?
Si
ghtsavers policy is not to collect and send second-hand glasses to developing countries but instead to fund the local production of glasses which are then used as an income generating scheme for our local partners, providing high quality glasses at a small cost. In our experience, using second glasses also incurs costs. The glasses have to be cleaned and measured to find out what strength they are and shipped over to the relevant country.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/12/2007 03:01:12

#1. Chairman Gordon, thing is also, why not fund raise for the prevention, and the cure?
I am sure the Scotsman, had another issue on'
'Sight fundraising' recently, it was about supplying 'glasses! (similar)
I thought, you can get any pair off glasses, for a £1 in any £1 shop!
Why ask for broken old glasses?
Why not ask for a £1 donation and give the less privileged new ones?
Or better still, find out the source, who are making these '£1' glasses, to be sold in the UK and I bet you would get 4pairs for £1.
I am NOT against it! I just dont 'See' it!
And yes, 'Charity starts at Home'
'Boot on the other Foot'?
Forget it! it will, NEVER happen!

2

W Smith,

Middle East 02/12/2007 03:30:18

Gordon Brown spent £167.5 billion on quangos last year and The Scotsman has no issue with that.

Here we are farting about with the pious 'lets save Africa' nonsense.

How about a 'Lets Stop Gordon in his Tracks' campaign and divert some of that money going to quangos and spend the money on hospitals and medicine for Africa.

Problem sorted.

3

Willie Macleod,

Wick 02/12/2007 04:41:50

# Sightsavers are doing great Humanitarian work

4

Stockbridge,

02/12/2007 05:05:35

Would it not be a nice gesture if all the money given illegally to political parties was directed to this instead.

How big a dent in the number of world sufferers would be made by curing 1.5 million of them solely from the money of those who tried to benefit from paying or receiving dodgy backhanders?

5

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 02/12/2007 07:22:47

Fine, bring 50p to work and help perform a miracle for some desperate person.

However, the cure for a disease is at the far end of a crooked system that is not even properly addressed by providing clean water. EU countries fight tooth-and-nail to lock out products from developing countries, and to support their own inefficient and unsustainable agricultural and manufacturing practices. There are vast numbers of smallholdings in France and southern European countries such as Portugal and Greece that would not survive in the face of a free and fair market. European craftsmen are also protected by a barrage of import duties that hobble African craftsmen. Much jewellery and many leather and wooden articles would be made in Africa if markets were free, but they are not. The EU grabs the slightest and most spurious pretext to slap bans on the importation of African products.

Beneath the threadbare camouflage of civilisation humans are as much engaged in the basic struggle for survival as all other creatures. The only difference is that we struggle against each other. The happiness and contentment of small-scale farmers and craftsmen across Europe is paid for by the appalling suffering of Third World peasants.

6

Media 1,

cape town 02/12/2007 08:22:18

Chairman Gordon #1

Absolutely spot on. Why on Earth should any person in Scotland donate money to this cause, or any other cause around the world?

Youre absolutely correct in suggesting that had the money been going to Scottish people suffering from blindness, you would have helped. I agree with you.

Most of the developing nations are in Africa, except the word developing is a PR move to cover up the truth of the matter. They are not developing nations, they are failing nations. Corruption, genocidal governments, dictatorships, coups and a failure to lead responsibly keep these nations where they are, thus the people suffer.

Until Africa and the other "developing" nations take themselves seriously, why should anyone else?

7

buller,

02/12/2007 08:46:49

Sorry don't do this ,the money never goes to people who need and deserve it !! CORRUPT CORRUPT CORRUPT Besides this must breach some sort of human rights legislation ? I mean we can't test Africans coming to OUR country for AIDS!!!!! Besides this Government in its wisdom gave Zimbabwae £900 OOO OOO, and how was that spent ? on the poor ? NOT !!!

8

SandyC,

Asia 02/12/2007 08:51:43

Come on guys- some of the comments above are racist and even lowering themselves into cruelty. Yes its true Africa is corrrupt and some charity money does always go astray but these are poor people who are not part of any corrupt political elite.
Get a grip.
We live in the whole world not just Scotland and if 50p to help some poor illiterate African escape excruciating pain and permanent disability is too much for you then I suggest you have a major problem with your priorities.
I am sure the campiagn will be a major success because the majority of Scottish people are fair minded and compasssionate.

9

Boy Wonder,

02/12/2007 08:58:48

You can also donate your old glasses to almost any Charity Shop if money is tight for you.

10

Media 1,

cape town 02/12/2007 09:08:22

#10 SandyC

I hear you, but I disagree with you..Who asssited our poor ancestors when they were working down coal mines aged 8 for 16 hours per day?

Because of their sacrifice, future generations didnt need to do the same. Perhaps its time that Africa looked ahead and made plans for the future..

Compassion is something we have evolved to understand and employ in situations that tug at our heart strings. But what of African compassion? What about Mugabe having compassion for his people? What about almost every single African leader having compassion for their people?

Africa and some other "developing" nations must grow up and begin helping themselves. After that, we can lend a helping hand, but they need to make the first move.

You use the term racist loosely. Sadly, the actual word "racism" has lost its meaning because people like yourself use it to describe any situation that arises involving a difference in opinions involving different cultures.

The 50p would be better spent in Scotland. And that is the bottom line!

11

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/12/2007 11:19:17

10. SandyC,

"the majority of Scottish people are fair minded and compasssionate"
Yes they are at their own pearl!, I can think of another word that describes us and it ain't in your quote!

12

C.U. Jimmy,

Cynicism Junction 02/12/2007 12:00:43

Having lived in East Africa for nearly 3 years in the Eighties, often meeting the safari-suited Land-Cruiser-driving Mzungu 'aid brigade' poncing around holding meetings and looking self-important, the question I would ask is:

How much of my 50p will be spent on administration and overhead costs?

13

Alice S,

02/12/2007 12:34:29

#10 Where were you and the rest of the PC brigade (which so love to use the race card) when Mugabe was busy kicking white Zimbabwean farmers off their land.
Perhaps it is only racist when white does to black and not vice versa.
I can think of nothing worse than to go blind and my heart goes out to these poor unfortunates but my 50p is not going to buy Mugabie and his ilk any more whisky or champagne to toast themselves with.

14

media4,

Ottawa, Canada 02/12/2007 13:02:15

#15....I assume #10 was right where the rest of us were (and still are), condemning Mugabe for his racist actions, which continue to this day. Racism is racism, no matter what the colour of the skin, and to condemn SandyC without knowing his/her position on Mugabe and white farmers sounds a little defensive to me. The project's run by an NGO, so the money's not funneled through the government...God forbid your 50p should be wasted on a tinpot dictator!

15

Anajinn,

The World 02/12/2007 13:20:56

It's only 50 pence. What's everyone arguing about? Put your hand in your pocket and act like a human being.

16

SandyC,

Asia 02/12/2007 13:31:13

I am not going to get into a bun fight defending my humanitarian instincts.
However - I abhor Mugabe he is probably one of the most evil tin pot dictators in the world right now- the sooner he goes the better.
Second - it is correct in the end Africas problems have to be solved by Africans and to date most African governments have been disgusting in their tolerance of corruption and human rights violations.
But if I sound soft sending 50p( how much does a can of coke cost on Princes Street now) to try and improve the health of a poor African who has virtually no means to improve his lot by his own means then I am happy to live with my conscience.

17

SandyC,

Asia 02/12/2007 13:35:14

I am not going to get into a bun fight defending my humanitarian instincts.
However - I abhor Mugabe he is probably one of the most evil tin pot dictators in the world right now- the sooner he goes the better.
Second - it is correct in the end Africas problems have to be solved by Africans and to date most African governments have been disgusting in their tolerance of corruption and humna rights violations.
But if I sound soft sending 50p( how much does a can of coke cost on Princes Street now) to try and improve the health of a poor African who has virtually no means to improve his lot by his own means then I am happy to live with my conscience.

18

Ralphmaxx,

USA 02/12/2007 14:08:24

Teach them to feed their kids FRUIT!!! Problem solved.
Poor people do not want their kids to eat fruit that grows wild. Instead they feed them food with out proper vitamins.

19

media4,

Ottawa, Canada 02/12/2007 14:11:44

#20, I doubt whether anyone in the UK suffers from trachoma these days, and I'm sure the odd case that crops up is treated quickly. So what's your excuse now? If you wait for ALL the problems in the UK to be cleared up before helping others, then you'll wait forever...or is that the idea?

20

Ecce,

Edinburgh 02/12/2007 16:36:32

I am frankly appalled at the views expressed in many of the above comments from 'Chairman Gordon' et al. 'Charity begins at home' is a useful excuse for charity not to begin at all. Surely charity should begin where it is most needed, and that is certainly not in Scotland. How many of us cannot afford a pair of specs if we need them. I know that what I paid for my present pair could have saved the sight of a large number of children in Africa. This is a question of common humanity, not politics. Yes, Africa has corrupt governments, but this is not a reason to allow the ordinary The UK government has hardly covered itself in glory in the corruption department recently..... African countries will get better governments when their people decide that this is what they want, not when we decide that it is what they need, and perhaps being able to see will help them top make these choices. In the meantime, money going throuhj charities is more likely to be used 'properly' than that which goes via governments. Let's realise how lucky we are and give a bit of help to those who, through no fault of their own, are much less fortunate.

21

Tarchin,

Lothian 02/12/2007 17:43:08

This thread seems to be dominated by a sad bunch of misanthropes, from whom even Ebenezer Scrooge might have learned a few lessons in meaness of spirit. Many of the poorest countries in the world are being badly affected by global warming caused in no small part by actions of the affluent west.
Let "Chairman Gordon" go to Sudan, Turkey or India and see the plight of the poor in these countries and look at the efforts people are making to improve their lot.
What ever happened to Burn's hope that "Man to man the world shall brithers be for a' that"

22

Media 1,

cape town 02/12/2007 18:58:51

#25 Tarchin

I dont think you get it.

Chosing not to give, is in no way distasteful. It is merely a persons right to excercise their unwillingness to offer money for a problem that exists due to the African mindset.

The rest of the world must continue to support Africa whilst her leaders and business people continue to do nothing for their people. Come and live in Africa, experience the African mindset for yourself, and you will quickly learn that Africa suffers because Africa is incapable of progress.

Everything must be shrouded in corruption, nothing works, there is no forethought, no planning. Chaos prevails in almost everything they do. From the running of a the electricity to the mini bus taxi services, everything regresses. You have no idea!

So whilst offering charitable donations for causes that are important to the lives of less fortunate people IS a nice thing to do. It is not necessarily the right thing to do, because the constant giving, giving and giving, keeps them where they are. The toil and sweat will only stop when they are forced to do things for themselves.

23

Tarchin,

Lothian 02/12/2007 20:11:17

#26 Oh I get it. This is not just an African problem but a global one. My family and I lived in Africa, in Sudan, and I have worked in the other two countries. Why pick on Africa? This year we have seen floods, typhoons and mudslides devastate several parts of the globe Bangladesh and The Phillipines to name but two. The upsurge in such natural disasters is most probably attributable to global warming caused by the "Developed World's" colossal overuse of fossil fuels. Are we to leave poor people to die because of our excesses or do we try and help? I am a great believer in helping as fit, healthy people are much more able to help themselves and others.Perhaps we should consider the saying that "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing"

24

Harry Carnie,

British Columbia , Canada 02/12/2007 21:16:00

Maybe if the leaders of these countries spent the MONEY ON THIS.... INSTEAD OF ARMAMENTS>>>>just a thought.

25

C.U. Jimmy,

03/12/2007 10:49:47

Chairman Gordon and Media 1 are the only posters who have got it. The rest of you are well-intentioned but misguided charity fodder, I'm sorry to say.

Live in Africa. Then you'll get it. Free gifts and donations are the enemy of self-sufficiency.

26

Bend Over,

03/12/2007 20:19:00

Charity is harmfull, it simply perpetuates the state of dependance making things only get worse in the future. Africans must learn to stand on thier own two feet, this may sound harsh but its the only way to better things in the long term. Besides that most charities are corrupt with most of the money being syphoned off somewhere along the way. The only people who benefit are the do gooder types whose ego gets a lift thinking they are helping the less fortunate.

27

C.U. Jimmy,

03/12/2007 23:05:48

I'll add Bendover to the list of those who've got it.

Here's another thought for you morally superior folks to ponder. Charity workers depend on poverty remaining in place, to justify their own careers. In some respects they are like trade union leaders. Both thrive on (and nurture) perceived injustices.

28

Bend Over,

04/12/2007 02:22:42

34

"bendover - what a nasty, vindictive, generalising, twisted, selfish, false little effort by you."

Sometimes the truth is hurtfull, but never the less it has to be said. Charity is just like the welfare system in the UK, the more money the Government gives out, the more people rely on it, the more people who depend on the welfare state from cradle to grave. It does no one any favours whatsoever, we only had a welfare state in recent times and no one starved to death before it.

Just do some research into the major charities and see how much the directors get paid.

Marsha Evans of the Red Cross was paid 651,000 dollars in 2003

29

C.U. Jimmy,

04/12/2007 12:02:06

Vincent-W,

When you grow out of the personal insults and concentrate on what those who disagree with your narrow little views have to say, than I'll consider engaging with you.

And do spare us your synthetic agony about the plight of unfortunate folk whose lives it seems would have been transformed if only you had been there to do it (read: been able to bully the likes of me into coughing up for your latest little random pet cause). These pat - sorry, uplifting - stories have all the depth of analysis of the Sunday Post, which was presumably the source of your copy and paste.

You need to get out more. Try living in the third world for a couple of years. Then your opinions may count for something more than hot air.

30

Bend Over,

04/12/2007 14:56:22

37

"Please explain to me how getting drugs to an Aids afflicted parent so they can look after their family for a few more years makes those children a burden on others?"

Its the drugs that kill them, aids drugs are based on AZT which was banned as a cancer cure because it was too toxic. In fact AZT destroys your immune system so no wonder they die of "AIDS"

So you meddlesome do gooders are actually killing people with your misguided intentions.

41

"In the 18/19 centuries the greatest cause of infant death was malnutrition."

Wrong again, the main cause of premature death was due to water supplies polluted with sewage, inadequate sanitation, damp housing, rubbish piled high in the streets and the lack of many of the other things we take for granted in modern day living. There was no welfare or very little before the 1960's , people did not starve in Britain in the 1960's they worked and lived according to their means. The explosion of welfare since then is destroying the country, just as charity is destroying Africa.

31

Bend Over,

04/12/2007 16:36:08

Just do some research youself. Answer this question;

Are HIV tests required to certify someone as having AIDS in Africa ?

The answer is no, in other words they just guess. So someone that may have Malaria or TB is presumed to have AIDS and given deadly drugs which cripple their immune system and means they will almost certainly die. Bill gates isn't stupid you know, his foundation has invested money in the Drug companies that sell the drugs he is pushing in Africa.

32

Bend Over,

05/12/2007 03:04:31

Glad to see you have been doing some reading up on the subject. AZT was banned for use on cancer patients, that just about sums things up really.

"1. Is your view that every instance of charitable giving is wrong because in some cases you are able to present evidence that in some cases it is not properly delivered?"

I would happily say that 99% of people who work for charities are well intentioned, unfortunately its the 1% right at the top who are abusing the good will of the 99%.

33

C.U. Jimmy,

China 05/12/2007 10:44:40

Vincent-W

Sorry I wasn’t able to write yesterday as I was out with my team, teaching a class of sixty (yes, sixty) 13 year-old Chinese schoolchildren about road safety. Their discipline and hunger for knowledge are always awe-inspiring. Their school was built and equipped by my company as part of its corporate social responsibility programme, and we like to offer our services to the local community, pro bono, whenever when we can. Oops, that’s probably ruined your image of me as some kind of spittle-flecked, monocle-wearing retired Colonel from Tunbridge Wells, choking over his toast and marmalade. Never mind: I’m sure your halo is bigger than mine. You certainly polish yours in public more.

Back to your Post #40. Although it’s none of your business, I lived and worked as an expatriate manager for a multinational company in an East African country for two and a half years in the late Eighties. I also served as the Honorary Consul for a certain European country while there. I thus represented that European country on the Aid Donors’ Coordination Committee in the host country, which despite the fancy name was really just a motley collection of misfits, idealists and career diplomats, plus a few bemused Hon. Cons, whose combined efforts did little if anything to alleviate real poverty or suffering. (They certainly kept the local 4x4 dealers and hotel-keepers happy, though.)

I recall committee meetings involving lots of discussion about whose turn it was to host the next visiting VIP (I met Princess Anne there once), which country would be next to celebrate its national day, new diplomatic arrivals and departures, upcoming cocktail receptions, and so on. Lower down the agenda would come discussions about the the ‘projects’, usually involving a sorry catalogue of repeated excuses for failure that would simply not be tolerated in the commercial world. (I am exaggerating a bit. One or two aid projects, such as providing brick-making machines, did wor

34

C.U. Jimmy,

China 05/12/2007 10:48:37

(continued from #49)

So here’s a tip. Next time someone shoves a charity collecting box in your face, ask them the simple question: How much of the money that you raise goes on overhead costs? If they can’t give you a verifiable answer (e.g., by showing you a copy of a page from the charity’s latest published accounts), then their charity doesn’t deserve to be entrusted with your cash. It's as straightforward as that.

Re your #39, well… rhetorical questions are those that don’t need an answer, and leading questions, of the ‘when-did-you-stop-beating-your-wife?’ variety, don’t deserve one.

And lastly, to quote the head of the English department at my old secondary school in Scotland:

“The Sunday Post is Scotland’s biggest-selling newspaper and a disgrace to literacy. It is our national shame.”

I couldn’t have put it better myself. These days, he might also have referred to that newspaper as “the literary equivalent of the deep-fried Mars bar, our culinary shame”.

35

C.U. Jimmy,

China 05/12/2007 13:50:24

I will take your comments in the friendly spirit in which I assume they were intended, though the 'as well' in your last paragraph may be enemy action.

As other posters above have pointed out, many of the third world's problems actually originate in rich countries such as the USA and of course the EU, where powerful lobby groups are able to force elected governments to erect trade and tariff barriers to keep third world crops out of our markets. The most sickening example of the market distortions this creates is in 'Fairtrade' coffee, sugar, and so on, where UK consumers are required to pay once in taxes to subsidise inefficient EU farmers to grow these unnecessary crops, and then to pay a second time via higher 'Fairtrade' prices to the third word producers. Those producers would love to grow and sell their crops to us a lot more cheaply than we could, if only we would let them.

And don't get me started about the junk science that led to the worldwide ban on the use of the insecticide DDT, as a direct result of which millions of people have needlessly died from malaria.

All this guff about 'food miles' is just thinly disguised agricultural protectionism. You don't hear any complaints about other imports, e.g. 'wine miles', 'Play Station 3 miles', 'Lexus miles'.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.