Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


HBOS dream team will be hard to resist for shareholders

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2008
JUST AS time seemed to be running out for HBOS to be snatched from under the nose of Lloyds TSB, two of Scotland's biggest hitters have unexpectedly stepped into the frame.
In what could be billed as a clash of the titans, Sir Peter Burt, former chief executive of Bank of Scotland, and Sir George Mathewson, ex-chairman of Royal Bank of Scotland, have made an intervention that will be impossible to ignore.

Lloyds' ch
ief Eric Daniels, "the quiet American", will have to up the ante if his dream of creating a "superbank" is to come to fruition.

Mathewson and Burt are calling for the scalps of HBOS chief Andy Hornby and chairman Lord Dennis Stevenson and for the bank to remain an independent entity. As part of the grand plan, Burt would step in as chairman and Mathewson as chief executive.

Their opinion is that Lloyds is, in fact, being bailed out by its bigger rival HBOS. This goes against the view put forward by analysts in the past few weeks that the Scottish bank is bust and incapable of standing on its own two feet.

As the move by Mathewson and Burt comes in the wake of investment banking group European American Capital joining the battle for HBOS, what was being seen by many as a done deal could be on the verge of falling apart. Given the respect both Mathewson and Burt have in Scotland, Daniels has a fight on his hands if the Lloyds Banking Group is to be created.

Mathewson and Burt have the influence to lead a shareholder revolt that could leave Daniels' plans in tatters. While Daniels is well respected in the City, until recently he has been a relatively unknown figure north of the border.

His low profile in Scotland is in direct contrast to Mathewson and Burt, who have long-standing relationships with some of the county's biggest institutional shareholders, such as Standard Life. They also have a reputation for success in Scotland that will win grassroots support from small investors.

In his role as chairman of RBS, Mathewson was hailed as the saviour of the bank and a linchpin in creating the global giant it had become in pre-credit crunch days.

Mathewson, known for his Scottish Nationalist sympathies, only stood down from RBS in 2006, after spending 20 years with the bank he had joined as director of strategy when it was a small regional player. In 1992 RBS's profits were £32m. He grew that to £8.3bn by 2005.

Mathewson and Burt are more than comfortable mingling with shareholders and getting them on side – something they will be doing more of than ever before in the coming weeks.

Burt oversaw the merger of Bank of Scotland with Halifax. His reputation as a banker is second to none and his skills as a tough negotiator will be called to the fore.

The dream team of Burt and Mathewson may be hard for shareholders to resist.

Time for tax cuts now

LAST week the Government and Bank of England took the UK by surprise with an unprecedented 1.5% cut in interest rates. The question now is whether Alistair Darling will be able to pull a few rabbits out of hat in the imminent pre-Budget report (PBR).

The Treasury has not yet announced a date for the statement, but it is expected to be some time this month.

Darling's second PBR is being presented in a financial landscape vastly different from his inaugural report delivered last October amid rumours of a snap election.

This time Darling may announce some tax cuts and public spending to help rebuild the economy and business confidence. Any such measures would form part of a global drive to use fiscal policy to stimulate growth. A recession-beating PBR will be needed if Darling is to win over voters.

As Russell Hills, head of tax for KPMG in Scotland, says: "The focus in this year's PBR will be the economic forecast and projections for Government finances. After confirmation that total output fell in the third quarter, the UK is only one quarter away from recession – how long does the Treasury think it will last and how deep will it be?"

Darling will be walking a tightrope between combating the worst effects of the downturn, while reassuring the markets that the public finances will be brought back into order once the economy stabilises.

No doubt Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat voice of reason on the economy, and shadow chancellor George Osborne, will be ready to jump on any weaknesses in Darling's statement. How he must be wishing he could turn the clock back to Brown's boom years.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2008 5:21 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS Business Columnists
 
1

Edwardg,

09/11/2008 00:27:54
Silly article. Mathewson is a good banker but he's not as special as this article makes out. The bulk RBS profit growth under his charge was a result of their purchase of Natwest in 2000, a bank several times their size.

This article makes the whole Lloyds-HBOS saga sound like a popularity contest. Since when did shareholders base their decisions upon which potential CE was the more famous? While Eric Daniels may not be well known outside square mile, it's not like that really matters given that the bulk of HBOS shares are traded on the LSE and are owned by shareholders based either in the city or abroad.

At the end of the day the best deal wins. If Mathewson and Burk can persuade shareholders that they can create more value than a tie up with Lloyds, then the Bank will remain independent. As for the "mystery foreign bidders" that have been spooking HBOS lately, I think it very unlikely that any of them will succeed. Lloyds has pretty much staked its future on the HBOS takeover going through, and were it to collapse now then government would have another headache with further market uncertainty. Its also questionable whether the British taxpayer will be happy to fund another Banco Santander takeover!
2

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 09/11/2008 03:45:19
There is not 1 single legitimate business reason why HBOS cannot recover without being merged with Lloyds.

The only reason that this merger may go forward is a desire by Prime Minister Brown to do as much economic damage to Scotland as possible, to score cheap political points against the SNP.

Not since the suppressed McCrone Report has a sitting UK government worked so actively to deceive in the name of preserving this anachronistic Union..

The great question is are the Scots such cringing slaves that they will allow themselves to be made fools of again?
3

ThePeter,

Edimburg 09/11/2008 18:55:05
Oh come on, both of them must have had a hand in appointing their successors and both must have had a hand in the way HBOS and RBS went to lead to this almighty mess. Bit like Gordon Brown trying to blame Alistair Darling.....

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.