Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Gerald Warner: Is Obama the new JFK? No, he's the new Jimmy Carter

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 July 2008
YES, folks, it's déjà vu all over again. That charismatic American politician Jimmy Carter II, aka Barack Obama, is carrying all before him – at least in Europe – riding a tsunami of media-driven hysteria. When you are possessed of unlimited reserves of rhetoric, boundless ambition, an increasingly undisciplined ego and – er – not a lot else, the soap-box becomes addictive.
Obama's bid to deliver one of his substance-free orations at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin has infuriated Chancellor Merkel, galvanised the media and provoked thoughtful calculations among the McCain camp. Every Republican knows it cannot be long be
fore Icarus soars too close to the sun. The question is: will he crash and burn before or after the presidential election? Next week's European tour is a possible occasion for the gaffe that will turn the election around.

Since the Obama campaign is predicated on imitation (like Dave's painting by numbers to replicate the Blair crusade of 1994-7), this is the candidate's JFK moment: "Ich bin ein Berliner." To resonate with Middle America, he might have done better to pick a more northerly city: "Ich bin ein Hamburger." What makes the Brandenburg Gate a potentially diminishing venue is the memory of a real US statesman, Ronald Reagan, declaiming there on June 12, 1987: "Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall."

The actual déjà vu evoked by Obama is the ill-starred Carter presidency. The parallels are ominous. Carter, the father of the Iranian Revolution, high on an infusion of ethical foreign policy, set about destabilising the Shah, classified in State Department realpolitik as "our bastard" – a foreign policy feature of the time. Carter undermined the Shah, only to see him replaced by the Ayatollah Khomeini and the doctrine that defined the US as "the Great Satan". Nice one, Jimmy.

Khomeini executed more people during his first year in power than the Shah had done in 25 years, including most of the 2,400 Communist prisoners whose alleged ill-treatment had fired up the peanut farmer's indignant intervention. Nothing is more lethal than a deluded liberal. There was an elegant symmetry to the way in which the failed Iranian hostage rescue put the final stamp of abysmal failure on the Carter presidency.

Now Carterpolitik is back. Obama is pledged to sit down unconditionally with Ahmadinejad, Fatty Chavez, Kim Jong-il (and what, pray, is wrong with Osama?) – every looney tune, in Ronald Reagan's phrase, who wants to turn America into an ash-heap. He also proposes to withdraw from Iraq within 16 months. Only Obama could devise a scheme that would demote Dubya's invasion of Iraq to second worst US foreign policy move of the 21st century.

So, the surge continues to succeed, the Iraqi authorities tentatively take over, then the US forces say: "So long, pals, it was great to know you." The calendar on the wall of every al-Qaeda bunker has June 1, 2010, circled in red as the date when the reoccupation of lost territory, the ousting of the fragile Baghdad regime and the mass extermination of the ungodly begin – if President Obama is in the Oval Office.

That would coincide with domestic mayhem. This economic illiterate wants to double capital gains tax, ratchet up social security taxes, return the loathsome death tax to its highest level and ban expansion of oil exploration. Even if the American economy were in good health, such measures would wreck it: in its present ailing condition, Obama's programme is a recipe for a Keynesian Götterdämmerung.

In compensation for material meltdown, however, this would be a moral, a Christian administration. Having sat at the feet of that precious vessel of the Lord, the Rev Jeremiah Wright ("God damn America!"), Obama recently reported: "I'm on my own faith journey and I'm searching." That pilgrim's progress has so far inspired him to oppose the banning of partial-birth abortion and block a bill in the Illinois State Senate to prevent the killing of babies who had accidentally survived abortion.

Yet now comes the really cynical move. On June 17 the US Senate majority leader introduced a bill on behalf of Obama, its sole sponsor: the Preventing Stillbirth and SUID Act of 2008, a measure to combat sudden infant death, designed to put a pro-life patina on Obama's grisly abortion record as he courts the Christian vote.

Beware of charismatic politicians. Blair was just the most recent example of an egomaniac, self-seeking windbag who badly damaged his own and other countries. A few of us warned against him: the media-brainwashed masses would not listen. Now America may be fated to experience the rule of charlatanry on a scale not previously seen. The global consequences would be profound.



The full article contains 801 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 July 2008 8:11 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS News columnists
 
1

Nobama,

essex 20/07/2008 00:38:38
Americans and people who think Obama is the messiah are going to very, very disappointed. Earthquakes,floods,death and war will long continue after Bush is gone.
2

Richardinho,

20/07/2008 01:02:47
What a load of nonsense. Iran was perfectly entitled to hold it's revolution and what the consequences of that were are none of our business.
Iran had an elected leader-until Britain and the US decided to depose him and replace him with the Shah- a ruthless dictator. Warner is one of those right wing loonies who thinks dictatorship is good enough for Iranians, who's to say he wouldn't think it could enough for us?
3

Teemackell the Scribe,

20/07/2008 01:18:48
WARNER, SoS 20 July (today): "Beware of charismatic politicians. Blair was just the most recent example of an egomaniac, self-seeking windbag who badly damaged his own and other countries"

Ian Bell, The Herald,16 July :"My first reading of Mr Obama was that America had just been offered its own Anthony Blair. I see no reason to alter that opinion."

Yours Truly, online, October 2007: "Obama is not the new black; he's the new Blair"

I don't mind those who are actually PAID to write this stuff being 6-9 months behind me in their analysis -and astonishingly disparate a crew we are too. But why oh why cannot SoS get a headline writer to encapsulate the piece below the headline that is rather less than 180 degrees away from the line below?
4

wnaegele,

Albuquerque 20/07/2008 01:39:32
Gerald,

Thanks for the nice piece. I thought all Brits had gone nuts over this silver-tongued empty suit.
5

Mainer1776,

New England 20/07/2008 03:00:34
Obama is NOT all that popular in the United States in spite of what the fawning news media tells you. He isn't that bright. It's simple. He has an oratorical gift, but he's a nitwit.
6

Itchy,

20/07/2008 10:12:15
#2 how about the women executed for adultery? Does Iran have the right to do that?

Typical lefty rubbish.
7

roan dddd,

glasgow 20/07/2008 11:06:15
Re wnaegele and Mainer1776 . I don't believe senator Obama ever made any ambition claims to appeal to the American ultra right so shouldn't you just get back to shooting beer cans off your porch and burning crosses?? Also do us a favour stay clear of Scottish newspapers - fox news is more your style.

On Obama yes he will find competing demands once in office - but anything is better than that chimp in a dinner suit that is the current incumbent
8

EWB,

UK 20/07/2008 13:33:23
So, can Americans look forward to a a one-term Obama presidency (cf Carter) and who is the Republican candidate waiting in the wings as the next Ronald Regan?

Will Obama also launch a misguided mission into Iran?
9

Neil,

Glasgow 20/07/2008 15:03:21
I think more the next Bill Clinton. Charm, talks good & slippery as a snake. I have little doubt Carter was sincere. Ckinton wasn't & I think Obama, whose relationsip & even moreso whose wife's relationsip to the corrupt Chicago machine politics & in particular to the lucrative health health system there is also more driven by ambition than anything.

However Gerald is right that Carter was an economic illiterate & Obama appears to be too. With Bush having already halved the $ & sold much of America to China this is not what the country needs.

On the other hand McCain's X-Prize for a new battery design, while not enough, suggests that he understands both competence & change far better.
10

Tourist Guide,

20/07/2008 16:07:22
Contrary to the views of jaded old political hacks such as Gerald Warner, and sundry other pseudo political pundits, isn't it just possible that Barack Obama is neither the new JFK nor the new Jimmy Carter, nor the "new" anybody else - all that is just sloppy and lazy thinking typical of journos such as Warner, bereft of the capability of any decent analysis.

Love him or loathe him, Obama is Barack Obama.
11

Richardinho,

20/07/2008 17:59:37
#6 how about the women executed for adultery? Does Iran have the right to do that?

Is that any of our business? No, you are an idiot.
12

simian relic,

Dallas, TX 20/07/2008 23:47:45
Gerald Warner.
Dear sir,
Thank you for your serious but entertaining article on Barak Insane Obama. I must totally agree that Obama is more like Carter than JFK(I was alive for both). I must share this with my conservative friends over here. They will enjoy as much as I.
13

truegrit,

Florida 21/07/2008 22:20:53
I am SO glad that people are finally waking up. Americans have been under some sort of spell about Obama that was ludicrous! He is finally being realized as just the smooth-tongued, savvy politician that he truly is, with no substance! It's just too bad that everyone is suddenly coming to that conclusion, after a TRULY good candidate was beat out, Hillary Clinton. She truly had good, well thought out solutions, lots of substance, combined with true compassion for situations and people in need. But the unending blast of misogyny (hatred of women) from the male dominated media (to punish a worthy woman thinking that she could function in a man's post - the nerve!), made her suffer the most humiliating, degrading treatment that we have not seen in a LONG time, and Saint Obama was ignored, and given a free ride because he's black. These days it's OK to put down a woman, but never touch a black because of the tremendous backlash we would get from them (we created a monster). Sad, very, very sad. Now our country has only one intelligent choice, compared to the no-substance Obama. His pretentious postering and ego are now being realized, for what they are, a reflection of his incredible ambition, from long ago, we are realizing. He just wants to be President, not to solve things, like Hillary, but just for the ego of it. But that is not as scary as his and his wife's true connections, both here and overseas, like his cousin King Odinga of Kenya, who contributed one million dollars to Obama's campaign, and for whom Obama actively campaigned for. King Odinga is a renowned Muslim who orders Christian churches burned down, and other terrorist activities. Obama, on his website, accepts donations from people all over the world, and wants you to list for what purpose you are giving to him. They (he and his wife) are close friends with Louis Farrakhan, and many others like him. It's scare what he might do with full access to all of the U.S. weapons, military, and for
14

roan dddd,

glasgow 21/07/2008 22:24:54
See this site has just become a fly paper for gun toting, right wing american assh*les. Still probably a good use for this 3rd rate paper
15

Teofilio Cubillas,

27/07/2008 00:25:05
#13

"But the unending blast of misogyny (hatred of women)"

Yes dear, we know what misogyny means.

"He just wants to be President, not to solve things, like Hillary,"

Woo hoo hoo hoo - what are they putting in your iced tea these days?

16

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 03/08/2008 17:36:52
Sometimes I wonder if a restriction of the franchise is in order. All the halfwits who don't look below the spin and airbrush enhanced surface really don't deserve the vote. Whether it was Bliar or Bliar-Lite, Cameron or Yankie-Bliar, Obama, they're all style and no substance. They sure talk the talk but little else. Obama is a barely reconstructed, self confessed believer in Marxism. I can see why the self-loathing, guilt-ridden political elite in this country can overlook that, but not the normally cannier Americans.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.