Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Gerald Warner: Burke and Hare act that would have Mary turning in her grave



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 October 2008
'THAT Parliament acknowledges the calls by campaigners to return the remains of Mary, Queen of Scots, to the country of her birth; recognises that Mary was an iconic historical figure in Scotland… notes the support that campaigners have had from the Catholic Church in Scotland; further notes that Falkland Palace… was a place of sanctuary for Mary, and nominates this Fife palace as a possible location where her remains could be interred."

So ran the motion tabled at Holyrood last Monday by Christine Grahame, Scottish Nationalist MSP for the South of Scotland. As Alex Salmond's Arc of Prosperity collapsed into an Arc of Poverty, any diversion was welcome to the pole-axed SNP, even a
return to the body-snatching traditions of Burke and Hare. There is an obvious déjà-vu about Mary becoming the object of cynical manipulation by Scottish politicians.

La Grahame is a great one for the attention-seeking parliamentary motions, as in her notorious sour-grapes resolution after England won the Ashes: "That the Parliament notes the recent cricket win by England over Australia and, while congratulating England's players, laments the overwhelming UK-wide coverage of a sport that is of only marginal interest in Scotland"… That ill-informed whine drew down on her the wrath of Scotland's 12,000 active cricketers, participating in a sport played here since 1785.

The proposal to bring the body of Mary, Queen of Scots, back to Scotland and bury it at Falkland Palace is equally ill-considered. The Stone of Destiny this is not. Any comparison is unfounded. The Stone was an intrinsic part of Scotland's heritage, taken by force by an invader. It was stolen property and, as such, required to be restored to its rightful location. The body of the Queen is a different matter.

The motion notes support "from the Catholic Church". James MacMillan, the Catholic composer, has said the return of Mary's body would be a "profoundly religious and spiritual event". How can he believe that? MacMillan, to his great credit, has been vociferous in condemning the travesty of a liturgy that is the legacy of the Second Vatican Catastrophe. Can he not imagine the field day the liturgical animators and sanctuary can-can dancers would have, capering around the royal catafalque, singing banal, happy-clappy rubbish, with a few bars of Simon and Garfunkel thrown in for the more traditionally inclined?

The main objection, however, is that it would diminish Mary. Besides being Queen of Scots, she was also Queen Mary II de jure of England. Elizabeth I was the bastard daughter of Henry VIII and his mistress Anne Boleyn, born out of wedlock, then spuriously legitimised by a bigamous marriage. That was why Mary, throughout her imprisonment in England, was the centre of plots – not to restore her to the Scottish crown, but to install her on the throne of England. She died for that rightful claim and for the Catholic faith.

After her judicial murder, on the ludicrous pretence that the sovereign of Scotland could commit "treason" against England, when her head was hewn off with a butcher's axe previously used on animals, her body lay for a year at Fotheringhay before being removed to Peterborough Cathedral. In 1612 her contemptible son James I and VI, who had not lifted a finger to save her, ordered her re-interment in Westminster Abbey, in order that "honour be done to the body of my dearest mother".

That was as close as she came to recognition of her royal rights in England: burial among the English sovereigns. Mary II rightly occupies her place in the Abbey, surrounded by more than 40 of her descendants. Mary's own wish was to be buried in France, where she had briefly reigned as Queen Consort of Francis II – but, emphatically, not in Scotland.

Before her execution she wrote to Elizabeth, requesting "that I may be buried in holy ground, with my ancestors in France, especially the late Queen my mother, since in Scotland the remains of the Kings my predecessors have been outraged, and the churches torn down and profaned".

As those words show, the Queen was repelled by the prospect of being buried in Scotland, the country that had reviled and overthrown her, with heretical rites amid a desecrated religious heritage. Yet that is precisely what is being wished on her now by "campaigners". The SNP – a republican party – has no understanding of how dynastic inheritance overreaches narrow nationalism. Mary II and I should continue to lie in the Minster of Edward the Confessor, her repose there proclaiming the consummation of the motto embroidered on her cloth of estate: En ma Fin gît mon Commencement. In my end is my beginning.





The full article contains 800 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 October 2008 8:38 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS News columnists
 
1

Richardinho,

19/10/2008 01:20:32
James McMillan was hardly an ardent nationalist last time I checked.
2

Retiarius,

Massilia 19/10/2008 02:08:19
No but he's an ardent self-publicist. Warner is correct. The proposal is preposterous, on all sorts of grounds - not least the fact Mary didn't want to be buried in Scotland anyway.
3

Florestan,

glasgow 19/10/2008 08:12:20
I don't think the SNP have thought this through. This has nothing to do with nationalism/unionism, but all to do with the last wishes of a devout Catholic monarch. If she wanted to be buried in Scotland, bring her home. If not, let her lie. To be honest, I'd be surprised if she waned to come back here, considering the way she was treated by the protestant mobs. And most "patriotic" Scots still hate her anyway because of her Romanism.

Her remains would have to be given over to the Catholic Church in Scotland, and they alone would decide where she was to be placed. It wouldhave nothing to do with the Scottish "government" or the MSPs.

Who's to say that in a few years time Pope Benedict's liturgical reforms won't have spread to this God-forsaken outcrop? MacMillan and the new Gregorian vanguard might even be involved in the liturgical planning.....
4

Florestan,

glasgow 19/10/2008 08:48:14
.....of her second funeral.....
5

Pilrig,

Livingston 19/10/2008 09:39:02
3 - most "patriotic" Scots still hate her for her Romanism"

evidence please ?
6

Pilrig,

Livingston 19/10/2008 09:50:31
GW is a hoot. But have to agree with him on this. Let Mary's remains lie at Westminster Abbey. As GW says, she's surrounded by more than 40 of her descendants, that's as good a reason as any.

Also in that abbey, there is a commemorative plaque in Poets' Corner for T.S. Eliot, who incorporated Mary's motto "In my end is my beginning" into his Four Quartets.
7

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 19/10/2008 10:12:52
A Scottish journalist writing from a an Anglo-Catholic point of view?

As former Scots Secretary Willie Ross once commented, after wiping the floor with yet another Scots Tory chinless wonder over his favourite subject: the life and poetry of Robert Burns:

"It seems that the Scots Conservatives are so confused about their national identity that they actually believe they are English!"
8

Richardinho,

19/10/2008 12:07:43
'The SNP – a republican party – has no understanding of how dynastic inheritance overreaches narrow nationalism.'

Quite priceless from Gerald.Leaders, whether they call themselves 'monarchists' , 'presidents' or 'first ministers', are the servants of the people, not the other way round.
9

Retiarius,

Aquae Sulis 19/10/2008 13:29:34
'The SNP – a republican party – has no understanding of how dynastic inheritance overreaches narrow nationalism.' The Stuart dynasty is long dead. The Saxe Coburg-Gotha dynasty has no relevance in modern Scotland.
One of the more fatuous remarks made in the context of this nonsense was that Mary is "Scotland's best known monarch". That honour belongs, of course, to King Robert I ... without whom there would be no Scotland.
10

Florestan,

glasgow 19/10/2008 14:09:02
#7

What's Anglo-Catholic about Gerald Warner? As far as I am aware he is a real Catholic.
11

ThePeter,

Glasgae 19/10/2008 18:45:39
Mary hated Scotland

Did not want to come here in the 1st place

SNP, stop screwing around
12

Florestan,

glasgow 19/10/2008 18:49:53
#11

No, Mary quite rightly hated the people that had ruined Scotland - Knox and his cultural revolution Taliban fascists.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.